本次检查网络餐饮门店12家，下达《责令改正通知书》1份，要求相关主体限期整改到位，并将在后续 工作中开展"回头看"，确保问题闭环管理、整改落到实处。 炸鸡、奶茶、炒米粉……您手机里下单的这些"网红"美食，后厨干不干净？食材新不新鲜？为守护群 众"舌尖上的安全"，给网络餐饮紧紧"安全弦"，近日，额敏县市场监督管理局执法人员对辖区内高人气 的网络餐饮店进行了突击检查。 下一步，市场监管局将持续开展"线上+线下"双线监管，加大对网络餐饮的监督检查力度和频次。同 时，依托"互联网+AI监管"智慧监管平台推进后厨阳光化、操作可视化，提升监管效能，保障消费者线 上点得放心、线下吃得安心。（额敏县市场监管局 唐述典） 执法人员直击后厨，对原料采购、加工制作、环境卫生、人员管理等关键环节进行了全面"体检"。在某 炸鸡店，执法人员发现其后堂油污积存、地面黏腻、环境卫生脏乱差、冰柜积霜太厚、生熟食材混放等 问题，当场亮出"红牌"，责令其限期整改。 ...

Core Points - The article discusses the efforts of the Tashkent New City Market Supervision Bureau to regulate online food delivery services and ensure food safety for the community [1][2] Group 1: Source Control - The supervision bureau emphasizes the importance of platform responsibility by conducting regular meetings with regional heads of platforms like Meituan and Ele.me to enforce strict merchant qualification checks [1] - A dual-review mechanism of "platform initial review + regulatory verification" is implemented for new merchants, focusing on the authenticity and validity of business licenses and food operation permits [1] - Over 30 online and 20 offline merchant checks have been conducted to strengthen the entry barriers against unlicensed or fraudulent operations [1] Group 2: Process Management - An innovative "online inspection + offline surprise check" model is adopted for process control, utilizing platform data for real-time monitoring of merchants [1] - More than 80 online targeted inspections and 210 offline inspections have been carried out, focusing on merchants with high order volumes and complaints [1] - Immediate corrective actions were taken for 12 merchants found with operational irregularities and poor hygiene conditions, with follow-up checks to ensure issues are resolved [1] Group 3: Social Co-Governance - The supervision bureau promotes social co-governance by encouraging delivery riders to report hygiene issues during the food pickup process, creating a "pickup as supervision" frontline defense [2] - Activities such as "You Order, I Inspect" and "Random Restaurant Checks" are conducted to combat illegal activities and enhance consumer confidence in food delivery services [2]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has drafted regulations to clarify the responsibilities of third-party platforms and online food service providers regarding food safety, aiming to prevent issues like "ghost takeout" [2][5] Group 1: Responsibilities of Platforms and Providers - The regulations emphasize the need for platforms to conduct on-site inspections of new food service providers and maintain records of these inspections [2] - Platforms must ensure that food service providers implement "Internet + Bright Kitchen" standards before they can engage in online transactions [2] - The regulations also address the issue of false advertising by requiring platforms to label providers that do not offer dine-in services with a "no dine-in" mark [3][5] Group 2: Consumer Behavior and Market Impact - Consumers often rely on the presence of dine-in services to gauge the quality of food providers, as a busy restaurant typically indicates good reputation [4] - The prevalence of false advertising, where providers misrepresent their dine-in status, can mislead consumers and affect their purchasing decisions [4][5] - The new regulations aim to rectify these misleading practices and promote responsible advertising among food service providers [5]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has released a draft regulation aimed at enhancing food safety responsibilities for third-party online food delivery platforms and their partnered restaurants, focusing on clearer labeling and stricter oversight measures. Group 1: Key Highlights of the Draft Regulation - The draft requires platforms to label restaurants that do not offer dine-in services with a "no dine-in" sign, which is expected to improve consumer confidence regarding food safety [1][2] - The regulation emphasizes the implementation of "Internet + Bright Kitchen" video monitoring, allowing consumers to view the cooking process in real-time, thereby increasing transparency and trust [2][3] - A "one certificate, one store" model is proposed to prevent the use of the same business license for multiple online stores, addressing the issue of "ghost restaurants" that lack physical locations [3][5] Group 2: Industry Reactions and Implications - Restaurant operators express that the new regulations will help eliminate unfair competition from non-compliant businesses, allowing compliant operators to compete based on quality and service [3][4] - Experts highlight that the draft addresses critical issues in food safety regulation, such as the need for better scrutiny of online food service providers and the challenges of cross-regional operations [4][5] - The draft is seen as a step towards more refined, standardized, and regulated food safety oversight in the online food delivery sector, with a focus on consumer rights and safety [4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the draft regulations aimed at enhancing food safety supervision in online catering services, focusing on clarifying responsibilities among platforms, service providers, and delivery units [1] Group 1: Regulatory Focus - The regulations address key issues in online food safety, including unclear platform responsibilities, lax management of service providers, and lack of transparency in food safety information [1] - The draft aims to establish systematic rules to prevent issues such as "ghost deliveries" by defining the responsibilities and authority boundaries among platforms, third-party institutions, and service providers [1] Group 2: Implementation Requirements - The regulations propose detailed requirements for platforms regarding the verification of service providers' operational qualifications, routine monitoring, and information disclosure [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the draft regulations aimed at enhancing food safety supervision in online food delivery services, focusing on clarifying responsibilities among platforms, food service providers, and delivery units [1] Group 1: Regulatory Focus - The regulations address key issues in online food service safety, including unclear platform responsibilities, lax management of food service providers, and lack of transparency in food safety information [1] - The draft aims to establish systematic regulations to prevent issues such as "ghost deliveries" by defining the responsibilities and authority boundaries among platforms, third-party institutions, and food service providers [1] Group 2: Implementation Requirements - The proposed regulations detail requirements for platforms regarding the verification of food service providers' operating qualifications, routine monitoring and inspections, and information disclosure [1]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has drafted regulations to clarify the responsibilities and boundaries of third-party platforms and food service providers in ensuring food safety, aiming to prevent issues like "ghost takeout" [1] Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The proposed regulations require platforms to label food service providers that do not offer dine-in services with a "no dine-in" mark on their main page, addressing the issue of misleading promotions [1] - The regulations emphasize the need for platforms to conduct qualification reviews, regular monitoring, and information disclosure regarding food service providers [1] Group 2: Consumer Behavior and Misleading Promotions - Many consumers rely on the presence of dine-in services as an indicator of a restaurant's quality, leading to potential deception when restaurants falsely advertise their popularity [2] - The practice of using misleading images or AI-generated content to create a false impression of dine-in traffic manipulates consumer psychology and can lead to dissatisfaction when the actual service does not meet expectations [2] Group 3: Industry Implications - The increase in restaurants that only offer takeout highlights the need for clear advertising practices to avoid false claims, indicating a shift in the industry towards more stringent regulations [3] - The regulations serve as a reminder to platforms and businesses that they must uphold their responsibilities even without direct consumer interaction [3]

Core Viewpoint - The new draft regulation aims to enhance food safety supervision for online catering services by clarifying the responsibilities of platform providers and food service providers, ensuring compliance with food safety standards and improving consumer protection [1][5]. Group 1: Responsibilities and Monitoring - The draft regulation specifies that platform providers are responsible for monitoring the qualifications, processing, and hygiene of online food service providers, with a minimum of 5% of providers being inspected monthly, aiming for full coverage within two years [1]. - Monitoring and inspection results must be retained for at least two years, and platform providers must verify the qualifications of food service providers against provincial market supervision department records [1]. Group 2: Operational Standards - Online food service providers are required to implement "Internet + Bright Kitchen" practices, ensuring that monitoring covers critical food processing stages and that food packaging is tamper-proof and easily identifiable by consumers [3]. - The regulation prohibits food service providers from outsourcing order preparation to other providers, ensuring accountability and safety in food handling [3]. Group 3: Compliance and Penalties - The draft outlines penalties for non-compliance, with fines ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 yuan for platforms that fail to act on reported violations or do not verify provider qualifications [10]. - Specific fines of 5,000 to 30,000 yuan are set for providers that do not align their food ingredients with those offered at physical locations or fail to implement required monitoring practices [12]. Group 4: Regulatory Clarity - The regulation introduces a "one certificate, one store" model, preventing providers from using the same operating license for multiple online stores on the same platform [9]. - It addresses regulatory blind spots related to "ghost kitchens" and mandates clear public disclosure of provider qualifications on their main pages [5]. Group 5: Jurisdiction and Enforcement - The draft clarifies jurisdictional responsibilities, allowing provincial market supervision departments to penalize platforms for food safety violations occurring within their jurisdiction [14]. - This approach aims to enhance local regulatory engagement and distribute enforcement responsibilities effectively [14].

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has released a draft regulation aimed at enhancing food safety responsibilities for third-party online food delivery platforms and their partnered restaurants, addressing the controversial "ghost kitchen" issue through specific requirements like "Internet + Bright Kitchen" and "One Certificate, One Store" [1] Group 1: Food Safety Regulations - The draft regulation mandates that online food service providers implement "Internet + Bright Kitchen," ensuring that monitoring covers key food processing stages and operates normally [2] - Platforms must review the "Internet + Bright Kitchen" compliance of food service providers and cannot allow transactions for those not meeting this requirement [2] - Video information related to "Internet + Bright Kitchen" must be uploaded and displayed by platforms, with a retention period of at least 14 days [2] Group 2: Legal Responsibilities and Penalties - Food service providers failing to implement "Internet + Bright Kitchen" or manipulate monitoring footage may face fines ranging from 5,000 to 30,000 yuan [2] - Platforms that do not support the technical aspects of "Internet + Bright Kitchen" or fail to display necessary information may incur fines between 5,000 and 50,000 yuan [2] Group 3: Operational Standards - The draft specifies a "One Certificate, One Store" model, requiring food service providers to have a physical store and appropriate licenses, prohibiting multiple online stores under the same license on the same platform [3] - Platforms must prevent food service providers from using the same license to apply for multiple online stores [3] - Non-compliance with the "no dine-in" labeling for delivery-only providers may also result in fines between 5,000 and 50,000 yuan [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the draft regulations by the State Administration for Market Regulation aimed at enhancing food safety responsibilities for third-party platforms and online food service providers in the network catering industry [1]. Group 1: Regulatory Focus - The regulations address key issues in online food service safety, including unclear platform responsibilities, lax management of food service providers, and lack of transparency in food safety information [1]. - The draft aims to clarify the responsibilities and rights of platforms, third-party institutions, food service providers, and delivery units regarding food safety [1]. Group 2: Implementation Requirements - Platforms are required to establish comprehensive food safety work systems and mechanisms, clearly defining food safety responsibilities among all parties involved [3]. - Food service providers must implement the "Internet + Open Kitchen" model to enhance transparency [3]. Group 3: Operational Standards - The regulations stipulate a "one certificate, one store" operating model, prohibiting food service providers from using the same operating credentials to open multiple online stores on the same platform [3]. - Platforms must continuously publicize their operating qualifications, ensuring that the names of online stores match those of their physical counterparts and that the pickup addresses align with the registered business locations [3].