Group 1 - Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a 25% tariff on Chinese steel, aiming to protect the domestic steel industry amid rising U.S. tariffs [1][3] - Carney's decision is seen as a move to appease the domestic steel industry while risking the agricultural sector, which heavily relies on China for exports [3][4] - The Canadian steel industry is significantly dependent on the U.S. market, with 90% of its exports going there, while the agricultural sector relies on China for 70% of canola seed exports [3][5] Group 2 - The tariff policy exhibits a double standard, as Canada grants exemptions to U.S. and Mexican imports while imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods [5][6] - Canadian steel companies express concerns that the tariffs will not significantly impact Chinese imports, as they only account for 8% of total imports, potentially leading to higher prices for consumers [6][8] - The Canadian government’s $1 billion fund for the steel industry is viewed as insufficient compared to the estimated $4.5 billion loss in the agricultural sector due to retaliatory tariffs from China [8][9] Group 3 - Chinese companies are adapting by utilizing transshipment routes to circumvent tariffs, significantly reducing their costs [6][7] - The Canadian construction industry is already feeling the impact of rising steel prices, with costs increasing by 15% following the tariff announcement [6][9] - The overall economic strategy of Canada under Carney is criticized for being overly reliant on a single market, leading to vulnerabilities in both the steel and agricultural sectors [8][10] Group 4 - The global trade environment is increasingly characterized by protectionism, which is detrimental to consumers and businesses alike, as evidenced by rising prices and lost market share [10][11] - The Canadian government's approach is seen as short-sighted, potentially leading to long-term economic harm while failing to diversify trade relationships [10][11] - The situation highlights the risks of aligning too closely with U.S. policies, as Canada may find itself marginalized in the global market [11]

Group 1 - Canada has announced an expansion of steel import tariffs, effective from August 1, to address U.S. steel tariffs and global overcapacity, while excluding the U.S. from these tariffs [1][3] - The new tariffs include a 25% additional tax on steel products containing Chinese melted and cast steel, indicating Canada's alignment with U.S. trade policies against China [3][5] - Canada's actions are seen as an attempt to appease the U.S. and support the return of American manufacturing, despite the negative impact on its own steel industry [3][5] Group 2 - The recent tariff measures raise questions about Canada's commitment to constructive dialogue with China, as expressed by Canadian Foreign Minister Anand at the ASEAN meeting [6] - China has significant trade relations with Canada, particularly in canola, with annual trade worth approximately $2 billion, and Canada has been a major supplier of canola to China [8] - The potential shift of canola trade to Australia, following recent agreements, could negatively impact Canada's agricultural exports to China [8][11]

Group 1 - As of July 22, 2025, the dividend progress of constituent stocks in major indices shows that 40 companies in the SSE 50 Index have distributed dividends, while 3 companies have not [1] - In the CSI 300 Index, 221 companies have distributed dividends, and 26 companies have not [1] - The CSI 500 Index has 370 companies that have distributed dividends, with 77 companies not distributing [1] - The CSI 1000 Index has 735 companies that have distributed dividends, while 210 companies have not [1] Group 2 - The current dividend yield statistics indicate that the coal, banking, and steel industries rank the highest in terms of dividend yield [4] - The realized dividend yields as of July 22, 2025, are 2.04% for the SSE 50 Index, 1.56% for the CSI 300 Index, 1.09% for the CSI 500 Index, and 0.86% for the CSI 1000 Index [6][49] - The remaining dividend yields are 0.17% for the SSE 50 Index, 0.27% for the CSI 300 Index, 0.15% for the CSI 500 Index, and 0.07% for the CSI 1000 Index [6] Group 3 - The annualized premium for the IH main contract is 3.30%, while the IF main contract has a premium of 2.68%. The IC main contract shows a discount of 5.68%, and the IM main contract has a discount of 9.94% as of July 22, 2025 [1] - The tracking of index futures premium and discount levels is essential for understanding market sentiment and risk preferences among institutional investors [2] Group 4 - The methodology for estimating dividend points in index futures is crucial for accurately assessing the premium and discount levels of futures contracts [28] - The report emphasizes the importance of considering the impact of constituent stock dividends on index point levels when calculating futures premiums [2][28]

Domestic Policy News - The State Council held a meeting on July 16 to discuss strengthening the domestic circulation, emphasizing the need for optimized policy design and collaboration among departments to promote economic stability and growth [9][10][11] - The National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference convened a meeting on July 18 to analyze the macroeconomic situation for the first half of 2025, highlighting the importance of maintaining employment, enterprises, and market stability amid a complex international environment [11][12] Overseas Policy News - On July 17, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "Genius Act," establishing a regulatory framework for digital stablecoins, marking a significant legislative reform in cryptocurrency regulation [2][14] - Data from the U.S. Treasury revealed that in May 2025, Japan and the UK increased their holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds, while China continued to reduce its holdings for the third consecutive month [16][20] Equity Market Analysis - A-shares experienced a slight increase in mid-July, driven by better-than-expected economic growth in the first half and policies encouraging long-term capital inflow [22][23] - The MSCI China A-share index rose by 1.2% in the third week of July, while the Southbound capital maintained a net inflow of nearly 20 billion yuan [22][23] Fixed Income Market Analysis - The People's Bank of China indicated a commitment to increasing monetary easing, with a net injection of 9.749 billion yuan into the market through open market operations [3][21] - The central bank's policies have shown a positive impact on supporting the real economy, with a notable increase in the effectiveness of monetary policy [3][21] Commodity Market Analysis - The prices of non-ferrous metals showed a slight rebound, while crude oil prices experienced a minor decline [3][21] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced the implementation of a work plan to stabilize growth in ten key industries, including steel and non-ferrous metals [3][21] Foreign Exchange Market Analysis - The U.S. dollar index strengthened slightly, closing at 98.46 on July 18, while the renminbi faced depreciation pressure, trading at 7.18 [4][20] - A joint announcement from seven departments encouraged foreign investment in domestic reinvestment, aiming to enhance the investment environment [4][20] Major Asset Rotation Outlook - The report anticipates further fiscal expansion and moderate monetary easing in the second half of the year, with a focus on structural adjustments to address uncertainties from U.S. trade policies and geopolitical risks [4][20]

Group 1 - Canada announced a 25% tariff on steel and related products from China to protect its domestic industry from an influx of foreign steel following U.S. tariffs [1][3] - The Canadian government is responding to U.S. trade policies, particularly those imposed by the Trump administration, which have included tariffs ranging from 35% to 50% on various Canadian products [3][5] - The decision to target China is seen as a strategic move to demonstrate a tough stance externally while attempting to appease domestic dissatisfaction and signal cooperation to the U.S. [5][7] Group 2 - China is the largest steel producer globally and a significant source of steel imports for Canada, accounting for over 10% of Canada's steel imports last year, which could lead to increased costs for Canadian industries [5][7] - China's potential retaliatory measures include imposing punitive tariffs on Canadian agricultural products, which could severely impact Canada's agricultural sector that relies heavily on the Chinese market [7][9] - The evolving trade dynamics indicate a broader trend of countries aligning against China, with Canada’s actions reflecting this shift in international trade relations [7][9]

Group 1 - Canada imposes a 25% tariff on all steel products containing "Chinese smelting and casting," while exempting U.S. steel imports, claiming to protect domestic steel manufacturers [1][3] - The Canadian government faces backlash from farmers as China retaliates by canceling a CAD 4.9 billion (approximately RMB 26 billion) canola order, leading to a significant drop in canola futures prices [1][5] - Canadian steel imports are projected to be CAD 16 billion in 2024, with only 10% coming from China, contradicting claims of "Chinese dumping" [3][5] Group 2 - The new regulations are perceived as a "protection fee" to the U.S., as Canada responds to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum by targeting China [5][9] - Canadian farmers are struggling with unsold canola, with reports of warehouses overflowing and significant financial losses due to the sudden policy shift [7][12] - Australia quickly capitalizes on the situation by signing agreements to supply canola to China, benefiting from the void left by Canada [7][12] Group 3 - Canadian provincial leaders and farmers express frustration over the government's handling of trade relations, with calls for action to support the agricultural sector [9][11] - The Canadian government faces criticism for prioritizing political relations with the U.S. over the economic well-being of its farmers [9][12] - The International Monetary Fund warns that the trade tensions could lead to a 0.8% contraction in Canada's GDP [12]

Group 1 - The U.S. is set to increase import tariffs on August 1, with specific rates of 25% on Japan and 50% on Brazil, reflecting President Trump's dissatisfaction with Brazil's trade practices [1][2] - Since April 9, most U.S. trading partners have faced a 10% tariff, while Canada and Mexico have been subjected to a 25% tariff, although certain goods under the USMCA are exempt [2] - The Trump administration has implemented sector-specific tariffs, including a 50% import tax on steel and aluminum, and a 25% tariff on automobiles and most auto parts, with plans to extend tariffs to other industries such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals [2] Group 2 - Treasury Secretary Mnuchin emphasized the importance of achieving a high-quality trade agreement over adhering to the August 1 deadline, suggesting that negotiations could continue post-deadline [1] - Commerce Secretary Lutnick described August 1 as a hard deadline for countries to start paying tariffs, indicating that negotiations could still occur after this date [1] - Following the announcement, U.S. stock markets saw a slight increase, with the Nasdaq and S&P 500 indices reaching new historical highs [1]

Group 1 - The Canadian government's recent decision to impose a 25% tariff on Chinese steel products in response to U.S. tariffs has led to significant repercussions for Canadian farmers, particularly in the canola sector [1][5] - Canada’s tariff policy is seen as inconsistent, with different standards applied based on trade agreements, effectively exempting the U.S. while targeting countries like China [3][8] - The immediate impact of the tariff has resulted in China redirecting a 150,000-ton canola order to Australia, which poses a severe threat to Canadian canola farmers who heavily rely on the Chinese market [5][7] Group 2 - The canola trade between Canada and China has been fraught with issues, including a previous anti-dumping investigation by China that led to a 100% tariff on Canadian canola earlier this year [7][11] - The recent actions by the Canadian government have drawn criticism domestically, with political leaders highlighting the detrimental effects on farmers and questioning the government's diplomatic strategy [8][14] - Analysts predict that if Canada loses the Chinese market, the canola industry could face annual losses of up to 3.8 billion Canadian dollars, threatening the viability of many farms [14]

Group 1 - The article discusses Canada's strategic missteps in international trade, particularly its decision to impose tariffs on Chinese steel in an attempt to appease the United States, which ultimately backfired [1][9][51] - Canada's steel industry has been severely impacted by a 50% tariff imposed by the U.S., leading to significant job losses and pressure on the government to respond [5][7][51] - The Canadian government's decision to target Chinese steel with a 25% tariff and strict quotas was intended to demonstrate alignment with U.S. trade policies, but it has raised questions about the protection of domestic industries [9][12][14] Group 2 - China's response to Canada's tariffs was swift, launching an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian canola and planning to resume imports of Australian canola, which Canada has historically dominated [20][24][29] - The timing of China's countermeasures was strategic, indicating that it had anticipated Canada's actions and was prepared to respond effectively [22][24] - The shift in canola imports from Canada to Australia represents a significant loss for Canada, which relies heavily on China for its canola exports, with 64% of its canola exports going to China [24][51][56] Group 3 - Australia's successful re-entry into the Chinese market for canola is attributed to its pragmatic approach and efforts to meet Chinese import standards, contrasting sharply with Canada's political maneuvering [36][41][46] - The article emphasizes that Australia's shift from a confrontational stance to one of cooperation has allowed it to regain market access, while Canada faces the risk of losing its market position permanently [41][58] - The overall narrative suggests that middle powers like Canada must adopt independent and pragmatic foreign policies rather than relying on opportunistic strategies to navigate the complexities of international relations [65][67]

Report Industry Investment Ratings There is no information about the report industry investment ratings in the provided content. Core Views of the Report - The short - term gold price is in a volatile state, and the dollar index is expected to weaken in the short term. The stock market needs to observe the Politburo meeting's positioning of the domestic economy and forward - looking policies. The CBOT soybeans rose due to private sales and the Indonesia - US agreement, and the market is concerned about US tariff policies. Various commodities have different price trends and influencing factors, such as steel prices oscillating weakly, coal prices remaining seasonally strong, and copper prices potentially under short - term pressure [11][15][18][25]. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 1. Financial News and Reviews 1.1 Macro Strategy (Gold) - US June PPI annual rate was 2.3%, the lowest since September 2024, and the monthly rate was 0%. Gold fluctuated sharply due to the news of Trump potentially firing Powell. The fundamentals lack positive factors for gold, and the short - term gold price is in a volatile range. Investment advice is that the short - term gold price will oscillate with increased volatility [10][11][12]. 1.2 Macro Strategy (Foreign Exchange Futures - Dollar Index) - Fed officials believe the current restrictive monetary policy is appropriate. The Fed's Beige Book shows a slight economic uptick with high uncertainty. Trump denied firing Powell, but the dollar index is expected to weaken in the short term [13][15][16]. 1.3 Macro Strategy (Stock Index Futures) - The State Council executive meeting studied policies to strengthen the domestic cycle. On July 17, the stock market was flat at a high level with low trading volume. The market needs to observe the Politburo meeting's stance. Investment advice is to allocate stock indices evenly [18][19]. 1.4 Macro Strategy (US Stock Index Futures) - US banks' performance grew steadily, but the investment banking business was under short - term pressure. The Fed's Beige Book showed a slight economic increase. The market's risk appetite is supported, but risks from Trump's policies exist. The stock index is expected to oscillate, and investors should control their positions carefully [20][22][23]. 2. Commodity News and Reviews 2.1 Agricultural Products (Soybean Meal) - Private exporters sold 120,000 tons of soybeans, and Indonesia will buy $4.5 billion of US agricultural products, causing CBOT soybeans to rise. The market is concerned about US tariff policies. The domestic and foreign futures prices are oscillating, and the market should monitor US soybean production area weather and tariff policies [24][25][26]. 2.2 Ferrous Metals (Rebar/Hot - Rolled Coil) - The steel price is oscillating weakly. The probability of over - expected policy stimulus is low. The steel price is expected to oscillate in the short term. Investment advice is to use a rebound hedging strategy for the spot market [27][28][29]. 2.3 Ferrous Metals (Steam Coal) - High - temperature weather supports coal consumption, and the coal price is expected to remain seasonally strong [30]. 2.4 Ferrous Metals (Iron Ore) - The iron ore price is oscillating at a high level. The supply is not expected to increase significantly this year, and the demand is under pressure. The price is difficult to break through the $100 resistance level [31][32]. 2.5 Non - Ferrous Metals (Lead) - The Middle East will impose tariffs on Chinese lead - acid battery enterprises. The lead price is falling, but the price center of Shanghai lead is expected to rise. Investment advice includes looking for short - term buying opportunities and considering internal - external inverse arbitrage [33][34][35]. 2.6 Non - Ferrous Metals (Zinc) - Vedanta's zinc concentrate production increased in Q2 2025. The zinc price oscillated widely. The zinc market is under pressure, and investment advice includes short - term short - selling, positive arbitrage in the long - term month spread, and internal - external positive arbitrage [36][38]. 2.7 Non - Ferrous Metals (Lithium Carbonate) - Zimbabwe plans to build a lithium ore processing plant. The supply side of lithium carbonate has uncertainties. The price is expected to be strongly oscillating in the short term. Investment advice is to look for short - term long - buying and positive arbitrage opportunities [39][40]. 2.8 Non - Ferrous Metals (Copper) - Kazakhstan will restrict non - ferrous metal exports and resume gallium production. The copper price may be under short - term pressure. Investment advice is to take a bearish approach for single - side trading and wait and see for arbitrage [41][45]. 2.9 Non - Ferrous Metals (Nickel) - Indonesia will shorten the mining quota period from 2026. The nickel price is expected to oscillate at a low level in the short term and decline in the medium term. Investment advice is to look for short - selling opportunities [46][47]. 2.10 Energy and Chemicals (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) - The PDH unit of Guoheng stopped due to a malfunction. US C3 inventory increased, and the domestic market is weakly oscillating with insufficient upward momentum [48][49][50]. 2.11 Energy and Chemicals (Crude Oil) - EIA commercial crude oil inventory decreased, but gasoline and refined oil inventories increased. The oil price fell slightly. The short - term oil price is expected to oscillate [51][52][53]. 2.12 Energy and Chemicals (Caustic Soda) - The price of caustic soda in Shandong remained stable. The supply increased, and the demand was good. It is difficult for the price to continue rising [54][55]. 2.13 Energy and Chemicals (Pulp) - The price of imported wood pulp is weakening. The upward space of the pulp price is limited [56]. 2.14 Energy and Chemicals (PVC) - The price of PVC powder decreased. The PVC market followed the rebound but has limited upward potential due to inventory changes [57][58]. 2.15 Energy and Chemicals (Bottle Chips) - Bottle chip factories are implementing production cuts. The supply pressure will be relieved, and investors can look for opportunities to expand processing fees [59][60]. 2.16 Energy and Chemicals (Soda Ash) - The soda ash market is weakly stable. The supply is high, and the demand is average. Investment advice is to short - sell at high prices in the medium term [61]. 2.17 Energy and Chemicals (Float Glass) - The price of float glass decreased slightly. The glass market is weak, and investment advice includes considering cross - variety arbitrage [62][63]. 2.18 Shipping Index (Container Freight Rates) - The Port of Long Beach will expand. The freight rate of the European line's 10 - contract retreated after rising. The 08 - contract's oscillation range moved up, but there are potential negative factors [64][65].