Core Insights - The article emphasizes three investment themes to focus on during the third quarter earnings reports, highlighting the relatively subdued internal growth expectations and increased external uncertainties due to the escalation of US-China tariffs [1] Group 1: Earnings Highlights - Key areas to watch in the third quarter earnings include sectors such as gold, TMT (Technology, Media, and Telecommunications) benefiting from high AI demand, and non-bank financials [1] - Investors are encouraged to identify structural highlights through the earnings reports, particularly in sectors with low correlation to economic cycles and external risks [1] Group 2: High-Growth Opportunities - High-growth opportunities include the AI industry chain and sectors with significant overseas capacity layout that cater to non-US economic trade, such as white goods, construction machinery, and power grid equipment [1] - The article suggests focusing on industries that have achieved supply-side clearing in a moderately recovering environment, including industrial metals, lithium batteries, innovative pharmaceuticals, commercial vehicles, and rail and road equipment [1]

点击注册小程序 查看完整报告 特别申明： 本订阅号中所涉及的证券研究信息由光大证券研究所编写，仅面向光大证券专业投资者客户，用作新媒体形势下研究 信息和研究观点的沟通交流。非光大证券专业投资者客户，请勿订阅、接收或使用本订阅号中的任何信息。本订阅号 难以设置访问权限，若给您造成不便，敬请谅解。光大证券研究所不会因关注、收到或阅读本订阅号推送内容而视相 关人员为光大证券的客户。 报告摘要 量化市场跟踪 大类因子表现： 因子行业内表现： 本周，基本面因子在各行业表现分化，净资产增长率因子、净利润增长率因子、每股净资产因子、每股经 营利润TTM因子在非银金融行业正收益较为一致。估值类因子中， BP因子和EP因子在家用电器、综合、 非银金融行业正收益较为一致。残差波动率因子和流动性因子在煤炭行业正收益明显。市值风格上，本周 食品饮料、美容护理、银行行业大市值风格显著。 PB-ROE-50组合跟踪： 本周全市场股票池中，动量因子获取正收益0.43%，市场表现为动量效应；Beta因子、市值因子、非线性 市值因子分别获取负收益-1.50%、-0.91%、-0.54%；市场表现为小市值风格；其余风格因子表现一般。 单因子表现 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the tendency for non-mainstream sectors to lead in bull markets, particularly during the latter stages of market uptrends, influenced by capital inflows and valuation considerations [1][13]. Group 1: Historical Context - In the 2005-2007 financial cycle bull market, small-cap growth stocks outperformed in the latter half of the bull market, with sectors like textiles, environmental protection, and pharmaceuticals leading the gains [2][3]. - The 2013-2015 TMT bull market saw a significant style shift in late 2014, where large-cap value stocks, particularly in non-bank financials, construction, and steel, outperformed while the TMT sector lagged [8][9]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The shift in market style during bull markets often occurs when incremental capital flows accelerate, leading to a focus on undervalued sectors with high safety margins, rather than performance-driven sectors [1][13]. - Non-mainstream sectors may experience a temporary surge in performance due to factors such as low valuations and the presence of catalysts like mergers and acquisitions [3][13]. Group 3: Current Market Outlook - The current market is expected to continue its upward trend, driven by policy expectations and potential increases in retail investor participation, particularly in low-valuation sectors [15][18]. - Financial sectors, including banks and non-bank financials, are anticipated to benefit from style shifts and may see increased performance in the fourth quarter [17][18].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the current structural fundamental clue in A-shares is the outbound expansion of Chinese enterprises, influenced by the ongoing US-China tensions, which may affect market pricing for outbound investments [2] - The new focus is on China's long-term strategy to ensure resource security, industrial chain safety, and leading technology security, indicating a shift in investment themes post-dividend rotation [2] - The adjustment in the leading industries, such as optical modules, PCB, and innovative pharmaceuticals, is expected to continue, with potential for new highs as the third-quarter reports approach [3][4] Group 2 - The market is currently in a bull market consolidation phase characterized by high-low fund rotation and index stagnation, with the expectation that the bull market logic remains intact [6] - The market's recent adjustments are attributed to high valuations and uncertainties in US-China relations, but historical patterns suggest that such corrections are common in bull markets [7] - The upcoming policy expectations and the focus on the "15th Five-Year Plan" are likely to provide new investment opportunities, particularly in sectors with strong performance certainty [8][10] Group 3 - The recent market adjustments are seen as the beginning of a structural shift, with a focus on domestic industries that are experiencing a recovery in demand [9] - The investment strategy should prioritize sectors with strong growth potential, such as new consumption, military industry, and advanced manufacturing, while also considering defensive sectors [11] - The fourth quarter is anticipated to see continued upward movement in indices, driven by policy catalysts and stable earnings expectations [14]

Group 1 - The report emphasizes the establishment of a thematic investment database aimed at identifying high-potential opportunities and monitoring peak trends in popular themes, particularly focusing on quantitative screening of four types of patterns and trading heat indicators [2][9]. - The report identifies a total of 13 thematic indices showing a bottoming pattern, primarily in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, while 17 indices have broken out, mainly in non-bank financials, utilities, food and beverage, and defense industries [12][9]. - The report highlights a decline in trading heat for humanoid robots and Deepseek themes, with humanoid robots' trading heat dropping to 61% and Deepseek's to 42%, indicating a potential cooling in market interest [3][16]. Group 2 - The report outlines the monitoring of leading stocks corresponding to popular themes, noting that the closing price of Changsheng Bearing is 12.8% below its 60-day moving average, while Daily Interaction is 10.8% below its 60-day moving average [16][20]. - The report indicates that there are currently no thematic indices in an accelerated upward trend, with only three indices showing a main rising pattern, primarily in coal and textile sectors [12][9]. - The report suggests that the thematic investment data system will be updated regularly to provide investors with objective references for capturing market trends [2][9].

- The report highlights the performance of the index enhancement portfolios, where the CSI 500 enhancement portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 1.19% this week, while the CSI 300 enhancement portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 0.52% [2][46][52] - The CSI 500 enhancement portfolio has achieved a cumulative excess return of 53.08% relative to the CSI 500 index since 2020, with a maximum drawdown of -5.73% [46] - The CSI 300 enhancement portfolio has achieved a cumulative excess return of 37.09% relative to the CSI 300 index since 2020, with a maximum drawdown of -5.86% [52] - The report identifies momentum factor as the dominant style factor this week, delivering high excess returns, while beta factor showed significant negative excess returns. High-leverage stocks performed well, whereas residual volatility and non-linear size factors underperformed [2][57][56] - The report mentions the construction of the A-share sentiment index, which is based on market volatility and trading volume changes. The sentiment index includes bottom warning and top warning signals. Currently, the bottom signal indicates bearish sentiment, and the top signal also points to bearish sentiment [32][37][35] - The A-share prosperity index was constructed using the YoY growth of net profit attributable to the parent company of the Shanghai Composite Index as the Nowcasting target. As of October 17, 2025, the index stands at 21.71, up 16.28 compared to the end of 2023, indicating an upward cycle [29][30][31]

Report Summary 1. Investment Rating - No investment rating for the industry is provided in the report. 2. Core View - This week, overseas ETF funds showed an overall outflow trend, with significant net outflows after large - scale positive inflows in September. External investors are cautious, possibly due to renewed Sino - US frictions. Short - term attention should be paid to Sino - US negotiation progress and domestic policy support [12]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Wide - based ETFs - **Average Weekly Returns**: The data shows various average weekly returns for different wide - based ETFs, such as some with positive returns like 6.43% and 1.09%, and others with negative returns like - 0.52% and - 2.84% [4]. - **Fund Inflows/Outflows**: There are detailed records of fund inflows and outflows for the top ten wide - based ETFs. For example, the Huatai - PineBridge CSI 300 ETF had an inflow of 27.54 billion yuan in one record and an outflow of 22.41 billion yuan in another, while the ChinaAMC SSE STAR Market 50 ETF had an inflow of 27.23 billion yuan and an outflow of 26.82 billion yuan [4]. 3.2 Industry - themed, Smart Beta, and Hong Kong Stock Connect ETFs - **Industry - themed ETFs**: The average weekly return was 3.52%, and there were corresponding fund inflows/outflows, with the largest inflow reaching 109.18 billion yuan [6][8]. - **Smart Beta ETFs**: The average weekly returns ranged from - 2.30% to 2.23%, and the fund inflows/outflows varied from - 1.64 billion yuan to 0.00 billion yuan [9]. - **Hong Kong Stock Connect ETFs**: The average weekly returns were between - 3.56% and 2.0%, and the fund inflows/outflows were from - 5.0 billion yuan to 25 billion yuan [9]. 3.3 Overseas ETFs - **Overall Fund Flow**: This week, overseas ETFs had a net outflow of 10.85 billion yuan. In terms of style indices, the CSI 300 and CSI A500 experienced significant outflows, while only the CSI 1000 and CSI 500 had slight inflows. At the industry level, the banking sector had concentrated outflows, and sectors like non - bank finance and food and beverage also had net outflows. Among individual stocks, Kweichow Moutai was the most heavily sold, followed by Contemporary Amperex Technology and Ping An Insurance [12]. - **Top 10 Industry Index Outflows**: The top 10 industry index outflows included sectors such as banking, non - bank finance, and food and beverage, with the banking sector having the largest outflow of 1.82 billion yuan [15]. - **Top 10 Individual Stock Outflows**: The top 10 individual stock outflows included Kweichow Moutai, Contemporary Amperex Technology, and Ping An Insurance, with Kweichow Moutai having a relatively large outflow [19].

【股指期货周报20251019】风险偏好下降，股指本周继续震荡 【逻辑跟踪】 1. 国际形势是复杂的,中美摩擦再起,影响风险偏好。 【风险提示】 浙商期货有限公司 报告撰写人:周志超 从业资格号: F03087618 策略综述及建议 策略综术 【指数判断】 中国第一次对外实行"长臂管辖",超美国预期,特朗普反制加征关税。中美摩擦加深，短期影响股指走势，尤其是高估值科技股。股指预计迎来调整。但回调 幅度或弱于四月份,不必过分悲观;中长期来看,国内市场为流动性叙事,增量资金源源不断,仍有上行动能。 投资咨询号: Z0019474 全球指数收盘价 一、市场表现 全球指数涨跌幅 周涨跌幅/年初至今涨跌幅 申万一级行业涨跌幅 货币投放 MLF投放 二、流动性 狭义流动性 逆回购利率/DR007 M2/社会融资规模 广义流动性 股指周报目录 成交额/换手率/涨跌家数比 三、交易数据及情绪 基金份额/融资融券/开户数 北向资金/南向资金 国内主要指数PE/PE分位数 四、指数估值 四大期指股债性价比/股债性价比分位数 申万一级行业PE/PE分位数 五、指数行业权重 四大期指行业权重分布 请务必阅读正文之后的免责条款和声明 ...

证券研究报告·固定收益·固收点评 固收点评 20251018 绿色债券周度数据跟踪 （20251013-20251017） [Table_Tag] [Table_Summary] 观点 ◼ 一级市场发行情况： 本周（20251013-20251017）银行间市场及交易所市场共新发行绿色债券 18 只，合计发行规模约 122.82 亿元，较上周减少 29.68 亿元。发行年限 多为 3 年；发行人性质为地方国有企业、央企子公司、大型民企、其他 企业；主体评级多为 AAA、AA+级；发行人地域为广东省、北京市、贵 州省、江苏省、河南省、山东省、上海市、浙江省；发行债券种类为中 期票据、私募公司债、企业 ABS、交易商协会 ABN、超短期融资券。 ◼ 二级市场成交情况： 本周（20251013-20251017）绿色债券周成交额合计 613 亿元，较上周增 加 195 亿元。分债券种类来看，成交量前三为非金公司信用债、金融机 构债和利率债，分别为 306 亿元、226 亿元和 63 亿元；分发行期限来 看，3Y 以下绿色债券成交量最高，占比约 79.45%，市场热度持续；分 发行主体行业来看，成交量前三的行业为金融 ...

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods Factor Performance Tracking Single Factor Performance - Factors with the best performance in the CSI 300 stock pool this week include the standard deviation of 5-day trading volume (2.12%), the proportion of downside volatility (1.78%), and the 5-day exponential moving average of trading volume (1.35%) [1][12] - Factors with the worst performance in the CSI 300 stock pool this week include the 5-day reversal (-3.60%), single-quarter total asset gross profit margin (-3.43%), and single-quarter ROA (-3.38%) [1][12] - Factors with the best performance in the CSI 500 stock pool this week include the inverse of the P/E ratio TTM (3.99%), the proportion of downside volatility (3.80%), and the P/E ratio factor (3.17%) [14] - Factors with the worst performance in the CSI 500 stock pool this week include the 5-day reversal (-1.95%), 5-day average turnover rate (-1.17%), and the 5-day exponential moving average of trading volume (-1.15%) [14] - Factors with the best performance in the liquidity 1500 stock pool this week include the correlation between intraday volatility and trading volume (2.27%), the proportion of downside volatility (1.80%), and the P/B ratio factor (1.51%) [16] - Factors with the worst performance in the liquidity 1500 stock pool this week include single-quarter EPS (-1.36%), standardized unexpected income (-1.29%), and the 5-day reversal (-1.25%) [16] Major Factor Performance - In the overall market stock pool this week, the momentum factor achieved a positive return of 0.43%, indicating a momentum effect in the market [18] - The Beta factor, market capitalization factor, and non-linear market capitalization factor achieved negative returns of -1.50%, -0.91%, and -0.54%, respectively, indicating a small-cap style in the market [18] Industry Factor Performance - This week, fundamental factors showed varied performance across industries. The net asset growth rate factor, net profit growth rate factor, net asset per share factor, and operating profit per share TTM factor consistently achieved positive returns in the non-bank financial industry [22] - Among valuation factors, the BP factor and EP factor consistently achieved positive returns in the home appliances, comprehensive, and non-bank financial industries [22] - The residual volatility factor and liquidity factor showed significant positive returns in the coal industry [22] - In terms of market capitalization style, the food and beverage, beauty care, and banking industries showed a significant large-cap style this week [22] Factor Backtesting Results CSI 300 Stock Pool - Standard deviation of 5-day trading volume: 2.12% (1 week), 3.52% (1 month), 8.21% (1 year), 19.07% (10 years) [13] - Proportion of downside volatility: 1.78% (1 week), 0.41% (1 month), -5.44% (1 year), 25.57% (10 years) [13] - 5-day exponential moving average of trading volume: 1.35% (1 week), 1.19% (1 month), 3.70% (1 year), 5.13% (10 years) [13] CSI 500 Stock Pool - Inverse of P/E ratio TTM: 3.99% (1 week), 4.80% (1 month), -5.74% (1 year), 48.40% (10 years) [15] - Proportion of downside volatility: 3.80% (1 week), 1.56% (1 month), -3.09% (1 year), 107.51% (10 years) [15] - P/E ratio factor: 3.17% (1 week), 2.58% (1 month), -4.94% (1 year), 26.11% (10 years) [15] Liquidity 1500 Stock Pool - Correlation between intraday volatility and trading volume: 2.27% (1 week), 3.18% (1 month), 2.59% (1 year), 152.82% (10 years) [17] - Proportion of downside volatility: 1.80% (1 week), 2.97% (1 month), 5.48% (1 year), 114.63% (10 years) [17] - P/B ratio factor: 1.51% (1 week), 3.69% (1 month), -5.28% (1 year), 74.59% (10 years) [17] Portfolio Tracking PB-ROE-50 Portfolio Performance - This week, the PB-ROE-50 portfolio achieved positive excess returns in the CSI 500 stock pool: 0.15% [24] - In the CSI 800 stock pool, the PB-ROE-50 portfolio achieved excess returns of -1.50% [24] - In the overall market stock pool, the PB-ROE-50 portfolio achieved excess returns of -2.52% [24] Institutional Research Portfolio Tracking - This week, the public fund research stock selection strategy and private fund research tracking strategy achieved negative excess returns relative to the CSI 800: -0.94% and -4.83%, respectively [26] Block Trade Portfolio Tracking - This week, the block trade portfolio achieved positive excess returns relative to the CSI All Share Index: 1.56% [30] Private Placement Portfolio Tracking - This week, the private placement portfolio achieved positive excess returns relative to the CSI All Share Index: 1.86% [36]