Group 1 - The core impact of the tariffs is evident, with a significant decline in U.S. imports from Europe, dropping from $56.6 billion in May to $45.2 billion in June, marking the lowest level since February 2024 [2] - The automotive sector is the hardest hit, with a year-on-year decline of 36% in European exports to the U.S. in June due to a 25% additional tariff [3][6] - Other sectors also experienced declines, with transportation equipment and chemicals seeing year-on-year drops of 30% and 19% respectively, while some sectors like base metals and agricultural products remained resilient due to tariff exemptions [7] Group 2 - The report warns that the observed decline is still mild compared to the potential overall losses predicted by models, indicating that more severe impacts are yet to come [4][9] - Starting August 1, the average tariff rate on European exports to the U.S. increased from 12% in June to 16%, with the current 15% rate being more damaging than the previous 10% during the tariff suspension period [11] - The negative impacts of tariffs may have a lagging effect, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector, where a significant drop in exports is anticipated as inventory is consumed and tariffs potentially rise further [11]

美国对欧洲商品加征关税的影响正在显现。 据追风交易台消息，德意志银行最新发布的报告显示，6月美国从欧洲的进口出现首次明显下滑，从5月份的566亿美元降至452亿美元，创2024年2月以来 最低水平。 其中，汽车行业遭受最严重冲击。受25%额外关税影响，欧洲对美汽车出口在6月份同比暴跌36%。 德银在报告中警告称，目前观察到的下降幅度相比模型预测仍然温和，更严重的冲击尚未到来。随着8月7日"对等关税"正式生效，以及"抢出口"效应的消 退，欧洲对美出口的下降趋势预计将加速。 汽车业首当其冲 报告数据显示，6月欧洲对美汽车出口同比锐减36%，成为关税冲击下受创最深的行业。 除了汽车业，其他多个领域也感受到了寒意。其他运输设备和化学品出口分别录得30%和19%的同比降幅。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 以上精彩内容来自追风交易台。 更详细的解读，包括实时解读、一线研究等内容，请加入【追风交易台▪年度会员】 一些表面上保持韧性的行业，如基础金属和农产品，其稳健表现主要得益于大部分产品被豁免关税。报告指出，在这些行业中，被纳入"对等关税"的商 品，其对美出口量在同期也出现了7%至18%的"显著下滑"。 ...

关税冲击进入数据"验证期"，如何监测其经济影响？ (一)中美关税缓和，但美进口平均税率仍处历史高位。5月12日发布的《中美日内瓦经贸会谈联合 明》，中美双方关税政策调整呈现"短期缓和、长期博弈"特征。中美达成协议后，美国平均关税税率由 27%降至16%，但仍处于历史高位。1930年霍利斯穆特关税落地后，美国关税税率从14%上升至20%， 斜率更平缓。4月11日中美关税加码后，美国平均关税税率从2024年的2.4%升至27%。5月12日，中美关 税降级后，美国平均关税税率下降至16%，考虑豁免产品后，进一步降至14%。双边关税降级后，美国 平均关税税率依然处于近50年来高位。 根据5月12日版本关税，美国国内生产总值（GDP）或下跌0.65个百分点，通胀抬升1.7个百分点。耶鲁 大学预算实验室（The Budget Lab）评估了截至2025年5月12日美国所有关税及外国报复性措施的影响， 包括对华关税下调、美英贸易协定和近期宣布的汽车关税退税政策。其中，美国个人消费支出物价指数 （PCE）可能抬升1.7个百分点，2025年实际GDP可能下降0.65个点，中长期GDP可能下跌0.36个百分 点。分季度看，202 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the monitoring framework for assessing the economic impact of tariff shocks in the U.S., focusing on trade, prices, and risk preferences [3][27] - As of mid-May, the average tariff rate on U.S. imports has decreased to around 16%, but it remains at a historical high, with potential GDP decline of 0.65% and inflation increase of 1.7% due to tariffs [4][13][10] - The article emphasizes that the current economic condition is characterized by "stagflation," which is the baseline assumption for the short term [18][19] Group 2 - In the short term, key economic indicators to monitor include imports, inventory levels, and inflation pressures, with a notable increase in imports and stable inventory turnover ratios [4][39] - The article highlights that the inflation effects of tariffs may be delayed but are expected to manifest, impacting consumer demand [4][58] - The U.S. economy is likely to follow a dynamic path from "stagflation" to "slowdown" or "recession," depending on how tariff conflicts evolve [5][105] Group 3 - The article notes that the U.S. has experienced a significant "import rush" in the first quarter, with a stable inventory-to-sales ratio, indicating robust domestic demand despite tariff impacts [4][39] - Tariffs have led to a shift in U.S. import patterns, with increased imports from countries with lower tariff rates, such as Canada and Mexico, while imports from China have decreased significantly [36][30] - The article suggests that certain U.S. export sectors, particularly oil, coal, and basic metals, may face significant challenges due to retaliatory tariffs [47][5] Group 4 - The inflation effects of tariffs are becoming evident, with U.S. retail prices starting to reflect the impact of tariffs on imported goods [58][61] - The article indicates that the inflationary pressures may suppress consumer spending, as observed in the correlation between inflation and consumer behavior [69][61] - The financial market's volatility and increased financial pressure could further suppress investment and consumer sentiment in the U.S. economy [75][88]