关注今日美伊日内瓦谈判结果 行情综述： 油：原油依旧呈现地缘与基本面的分化态势，且短期逻辑完全聚 焦伊朗问题。短期地缘情绪继续推升原油上行，假期期间美伊两轮谈 判未有大幅进展，同时中东美军继续增大部署，美军中东军事力量已 达 03 年伊拉克以来最大规模，已完成中等规模空中打击行动的前置 准备，市场继续提前定价地缘冲突。但目前海外 polymarket 平台上 的 2 月底前打击伊朗概率依然不高，开战的高成本与高风险和协议达 成对中期选举的利好权衡依然在影响特朗普决策，对特朗普来说达成 协议依然是最能"赢"的选项，美军中东军事集结既是军事选项的前 置准备也是特朗普极限施压的一环。市场提前进行地缘溢价计价后原 油盘面短期走势将完全由伊朗地缘解决路径决定。协议解决与冲突发 生将形成急跌修复与急涨两种路径。目前谈判主动权在美，留给伊朗 的谈判筹码不多，关键仍在伊朗能否接受特朗普要价。抛开局势失控 的极端情景仍以等待降温高空机会为主。 数据来源：天富期货研询部、文华财经 图 1.2：原油 2604 小时图 数据来源：天富期货研询部、文华财经 受地缘情绪从原油传导至丁二烯带来成本端向上驱动，短期需关注伊 朗问题发展路径。 ...

热点栏目 自选股 数据中心 行情中心 资金流向 模拟交易 客户端 国泰君安期货市场分析师 张驰宁 Z0020302 随着春节长假的结束，我们即将迎来农历新年的首个交易周。在咱们休市的这十天里，海外市场并没有 停下脚步，反而积蓄了不少变数。作为分析师，我认为有必要在开盘前为大家梳理一下假期间外围市场 的核心变化。我们不谈枯燥的数据，主要聊聊这些宏观波动，可能会给国内期货市场带来怎样的开局指 引，助大家开年投资的第一仗，打得更有底气。 l 热点事件 【1、美最高法院驳回关税政策】 假期最大的扰动依然来自贸易端。美国关税政策出现戏剧性反复：最高法院裁定部分关税无效，但特朗 普政府随即宣布了10%的全球临时关税作为"补丁"，并紧接着在第二天，把临时关税提到了上限15%。 【3、美总统访华行程】 假期期间，市场有消息称美总统可能于三月末访华，但中方尚未正式回应。这一消息可能引发市场 的"预期博弈"：访华前夕，美方为增加谈判筹码，不排除在贸易等领域继续施压，特别是在关税裁决受 挫后，其展示政策干预能力的动机较强；但为确保访问顺利，双方也可能保持一定克制。 对交易者而言，需紧盯未来一个多月美方在贸易、科技等领域的动向，任何 ...

Group 1: Report's Investment Rating - No information about the industry investment rating is provided in the report. Group 2: Core Viewpoints - Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair has triggered a significant game between macro - policy expectation reconstruction and industrial fundamentals in the domestic energy - chemical commodity futures market. Warsh's "tight liquidity + low - interest - rate" policy combination has broken the traditional impact logic of monetary policy on commodities, leading to an "upstream pressured, downstream differentiated" market structure [4][5][40]. - In the short term, the market will focus on Warsh's policy implementation rhythm, the trend of the US dollar index, and geopolitical dynamics, with intensified volatility. In the long - term, energy - chemical prices will return to industrial fundamentals, and domestic demand recovery, industrial structure upgrading, and cost advantages will be the core factors determining the trends of each sector [5][40]. Group 3: Summaries of Each Chapter Chapter 1: Domestic Energy - Chemical Sector Experiences a Collective Decline - On February 2, 2026, affected by the cooling of Middle - East geopolitical risks and the nomination of Kevin Warsh, the domestic energy - chemical sector declined collectively. The crude oil futures 2603 contract dropped 7.02% to 449 yuan/barrel, the fuel oil futures 2605 contract fell 6.51% to 2669 yuan/ton, the asphalt futures 2603 contract decreased 4.87% to 3299 yuan/ton, and the methanol futures 2605 contract declined 3.92% to 2252 yuan/ton. The rubber futures sector generally fell 3.5% - 5%, the polyester industry chain sector averaged a 5% decline, and the polyolefin sector averaged a 2.5% decline [10]. Chapter 2: Kevin Warsh's Policy Proposals and Transmission Mechanisms - Warsh's policy stance is a mix of "hawkish and dovish". He advocates active balance - sheet reduction to shrink excess liquidity and supports Trump's call for interest - rate cuts, creating a "tight financial liquidity + loose real - economy financing environment" combination. This makes the traditional "interest - rate cut = easing" logic ineffective, and the commodity market faces a dual game of "US - dollar strengthening suppression" and "economic recovery support" [23]. - The impact of Warsh's nomination on domestic energy - chemical futures is transmitted through three paths: the US - dollar exchange - rate channel (the expected balance - sheet reduction pushes up the US - dollar index, pressuring the prices of international crude oil and other basic energy sources), the capital - flow channel (tightening financial - market liquidity leads to speculative - capital withdrawal and concentrated closing of high - leverage positions), and the demand - expectation channel (the expected economic recovery from interest - rate cuts and the global demand suppression from balance - sheet reduction offset each other) [25]. Chapter 3: Oil - Chemical Futures Sector: Full - Chain Pressure under Crude Oil Dominance - The oil - chemical sector is directly affected by international crude oil price fluctuations. Under the dual impact of the strengthening of the US dollar and the cooling of geopolitical risks, it shows a "full - chain pressured" weak market. The crude oil and fuel oil futures hit the daily limit down, while the asphalt futures are relatively resistant to decline [26]. - The expected balance - sheet reduction by Warsh pushes up the US - dollar index, increasing the procurement cost for non - US - currency buyers of crude oil and suppressing global demand. The cooling of geopolitical risks leads to a rapid return of the previously accumulated geopolitical premium. The global crude oil market has a loose supply - demand fundamental, with an expected daily surplus of 385,000 barrels in 2026 and a 0.3 - percentage - point reduction in the global crude oil demand growth rate forecast [26]. - The fuel oil futures are closely linked to crude oil. The sharp decline in crude oil prices leads to a collapse in the cost side, and the weak demand in the shipping market further suppresses prices. The asphalt futures are relatively resistant due to infrastructure demand support, but the overall demand is expected to decline year - on - year, and the industry is experiencing capacity reduction and increasing concentration [27][29]. Chapter 4: Coal - Chemical Futures Sector: Game Balance between Policy Impact and Cost Advantage - The coal - chemical sector is less directly affected by Warsh's policy. The prices of domestic coal - chemical products are mainly determined by policy regulation and the supply - demand fundamental of coal, and the demand for products like methanol and urea is relatively rigid. The coal - to - olefin route has a significant cost advantage when the international oil price is above 60 US dollars/barrel [30]. - It is expected that the stable coal cost and domestic rigid demand will support the prices of the coal - chemical sector. The methanol futures will maintain a range - bound trend, the urea futures may stabilize and rebound with the start of spring - plowing demand, and the price fluctuations of coal - based ethylene glycol will be limited [30]. Chapter 5: Rubber Futures Sector: Double Pressure from Import Dependence and Weak Overseas Demand - The rubber sector, which is import - dependent and sensitive to overseas demand, shows a "domestic - overseas resonance decline" under Warsh's policy impact. The strengthening of the US dollar increases import costs, and the continuous shrinkage of overseas terminal demand reduces the rubber procurement demand of domestic tire enterprises [31]. - In the short term, the double pressure of the strengthening US dollar and weak overseas demand will suppress rubber prices. In the long term, the incremental demand from the domestic new - energy vehicle industry and the supply contraction in Southeast Asia's main producing areas may support rubber prices [33]. Chapter 6: Polyester Futures Sector: Game Balance between Blocked Cost Transmission and Domestic Demand - The polyester sector shows characteristics of "pressured cost side, differentiated demand side". The decline in crude oil prices drags down raw - material costs, but the cost reduction is not fully transmitted to terminal products, and the profit margins of polyester enterprises improve marginally. The recovery of domestic consumption offsets the pressure from overseas demand [34]. - The polyester futures sector may present a pattern of "weak cost - side fluctuations, demand - side dominance" in the future. In the short term, the prices of PTA and ethylene glycol are under limited cost pressure, and the demand for polyester filament is expected to remain high. In the long term, the recovery of the global economy and domestic textile exports need to be monitored [35]. Chapter 7: Polyolefin Futures Sector: Resonant Decline due to Loose Supply - Demand and Policy Impact - The polyolefin sector is affected by both the loose supply - demand pattern and policy impact. On the supply side, the release of domestic production capacity and the pressure of imports intensify the supply - demand imbalance. On the demand side, the weak recovery of industrial demand fails to support price increases, and the pricing logic has shifted from "cost - side dominated" to "supply - demand - side dominated" [36][38]. - In the short term, the polyolefin sector will be suppressed by the loose supply - demand and policy uncertainties. In the long term, the supply - demand pattern may improve marginally, and the demand growth from emerging fields will be the core driving force for structural opportunities [39]. Chapter 8: Summary - The domestic energy - chemical commodity futures market situation triggered by Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh is the result of the game between macro - policy expectation reconstruction and industrial fundamentals. The "tight liquidity + low - interest - rate" policy combination leads to a market structure of "upstream pressured, downstream differentiated" [40]. - Investors should focus on the supply - demand fundamentals and policy transmission logic of each sector, seize structural opportunities, and do a good job in risk prevention [40].

Core Viewpoint - Baofeng Energy's financial report for the first half of 2025 indicates strong performance in the production and sales of polyethylene and polypropylene, with a significant gross margin in its coal-to-olefins segment [1][7]. Group 1: Financial Performance - The company sold a total of 2.2708 million tons of polyethylene and polypropylene products, generating revenue of 14.94 billion yuan [1][7]. - The average selling price of olefin products is approximately 6,579.18 yuan per ton [1][7]. - The gross margin for the coal-to-olefins segment reached 42.84%, suggesting a production cost of about 3,760.66 yuan per ton [1][10]. Group 2: Cost Analysis - Some analysts believe that considering hydrogen subsidies and carbon tax exemptions, the actual production cost could be "just over three thousand," significantly lower than traditional industry perceptions [10][11]. - The cost of producing ethylene via traditional naphtha cracking is around 550 USD per ton, equivalent to approximately 3,894.99 yuan, indicating that Baofeng could earn nearly 3,000 yuan per ton when market prices are at 6,700 yuan [5][10]. Group 3: Industry Comparison - The coal chemical industry, exemplified by Baofeng Energy, excels in producing cost-sensitive bulk chemicals through integrated and large-scale production, creating a competitive cost advantage [12]. - In contrast, the oil chemical industry offers a wider range of products, including high-end materials, and often views olefin production as a byproduct of its refining processes [12].