Core Viewpoint - The bond financing by securities firms remains robust entering 2026, with significant growth observed in 2025, driven by policy guidance and declining interest rates, making bond financing a key method for firms to supplement operating funds and refinance debts [1][3]. Group 1: Bond Financing Scale and Growth - In 2025, 77 securities firms issued a total of 1,004 domestic bonds, amounting to 1.89 trillion yuan, representing a year-on-year increase of nearly 40% [3]. - Major players in bond issuance included China Galaxy Securities, Guotai Junan, Huatai Securities, CITIC Securities, and others, with each issuing over 100 billion yuan [3]. - The increase in bond financing is attributed to the need for refinancing existing debts and supplementing operating funds amid a favorable policy and market environment [3]. Group 2: Types of Bonds and Financing Costs - In 2025, the issuance of short-term financing bonds totaled 326, amounting to 574.17 billion yuan, while regular corporate bonds accounted for 678 issues totaling 1.32 trillion yuan [4]. - The average coupon rate for outstanding securities company bonds was 1.97%, with some high-rated firms achieving rates as low as 1.54% [4]. - The average financing cost for short-term bonds was 1.76%, with a minimum of 1.52% and a maximum of 2.25% [4]. Group 3: Emerging Trends in Bond Issuance - The demand for perpetual subordinated bonds continued to grow, with 14 securities firms issuing a total of 66.8 billion yuan in 2025, marking an increase of over 40% from 2024 [7]. - The issuance of sci-tech bonds also saw rapid growth, totaling 83.44 billion yuan in 2025, reflecting a rising share of overall bond issuance [7]. - The average spread for bonds issued by securities firms was 43.27 basis points, while sci-tech bonds had a lower spread of 35.18 basis points, indicating a potential advantage for these types of bonds [7]. Group 4: International Financing Activities - In 2025, seven securities firms issued 30 offshore bonds, raising 4.703 billion USD, with growth exceeding 30% compared to 2024 [8]. - Notable examples include Tianfeng Securities planning to issue up to 960 million USD in offshore bonds to refinance existing debts [8]. - The trend of increasing offshore bond issuance is expected to continue as Chinese securities firms expand their international business [9].

Core Viewpoint - The bond financing activity of securities firms remains strong as they enter 2026, with significant growth in issuance and diversification in financing channels [1][2]. Group 1: Bond Financing Scale and Growth - In 2025, the total bond issuance by 77 securities firms reached 1.89 trillion yuan, marking a nearly 40% increase compared to 2024, with an additional 529.36 billion yuan [3]. - Major players in bond issuance include China Galaxy Securities, Guotai Junan, Huatai Securities, CITIC Securities, and others, with each issuing over 100 billion yuan, collectively accounting for a significant portion of the market [3]. - The primary purposes of the raised funds are to repay short-term debts and supplement operational capital, with short-term financing bonds mainly used for operational funding [3][4]. Group 2: Types of Bonds and Financing Costs - In 2025, 326 short-term financing bonds were issued, totaling 574.17 billion yuan, while 678 corporate bonds accounted for 1.32 trillion yuan [4]. - The average coupon rate for outstanding securities company bonds is 1.97%, with some high-rated firms achieving rates as low as 1.54% [4]. - The average financing cost for short-term bonds is 1.76%, with a minimum of 1.52% and a maximum of 2.25% [4]. Group 3: Emergence of New Bond Types and International Financing - The issuance of perpetual subordinated bonds saw a significant increase, with 14 firms issuing a total of 66.8 billion yuan, reflecting a growth of over 40% from 2024 [5][6]. - The issuance of Sci-tech bonds also rose, totaling 83.44 billion yuan, indicating a growing share in the overall bond issuance by securities firms [6]. - International financing activities have increased, with seven firms issuing 30 offshore bonds worth 4.703 billion USD, representing a growth of over 30% from 2024 [6][7].

普信债久期明显缩短： 截至 12 月 31 日，城投债、产业债成交期限分别加权于 1.58 年、2.19 年，商业银行债中，二级资本债、银行永续债 以及一般商金债加权平均成交期限分别为 4.01 年、3.31 年、1.73 年，其中一般商金债处于较低历史水平，二级资本 债处于较高历史水平；从其余金融债来看，证券公司债、证券次级债、保险公司债、租赁公司债久期分别为 1.41 年、 1.43 年、3.06 年、1.35 年，久期较上周均有缩短，证券公司债、证券次级债位于较低历史分位。 品种显微镜： 城投债：城投债加权平均成交期限徘徊在 1.65 年附近。其中，陕西省级城投债久期拉长至 4.88 年，河北省级城投债 成交久期缩短至 0.61 年附近。同时，福建区县级、甘肃省级城投债久期历史分位数已逾 90%，甘肃省级城投债久期逼 近 2021 年以来最高。 产业债：产业债加权平均成交期限较上周有所缩短，总体处于 1.84 年附近，基础化工行业成交久期拉长至 2.33 年， 食品饮料行业成交久期缩短至 0.80 年。此外，房地产行业成交久期处于较低历史分位，医药生物行业位于较高历史 分位。 商业银行债：一般商金债久期 ...

近期，已有多家券商获批发行百亿元级别大额债券。例如，12月11日晚间，招商证券发布公告称，收到 中国证监会批复，同意公司向专业投资者公开发行面值总额不超过400亿元公司债。 本报记者 于宏 当前，资本实力已成为影响券商经营与发展的关键因素之一。今年以来，为把握资本市场向好带来的发 展机遇，券商积极通过发行债券等多种方式补充资本金，以优化公司业务结构、提升盈利能力及市场竞 争力。 多因素驱动券商发债升温 整体来看，今年以来，券商发债"热情"较去年显著提升。Wind资讯数据显示，截至12月12日，年内券 商合计在境内发行了925只债券，发行规模合计达1.8万亿元，较去年同期增长44.79%。具体来看，年内 券商合计发行证券公司债502只，发行规模达1.08万亿元；发行证券公司短期融资券311只，发行规模为 5408.7亿元；发行证券公司次级债112只，发行规模为1812.89亿元。 对此，巨丰投资首席投资顾问张翠霞在接受《证券日报》记者采访时表示："年内券商发债规模同比显 著增长，受到多重因素的驱动。首先，在市场交投活跃背景下，券商扩张业务规模的意愿和资金需求更 加旺盛，通过发行债券进行融资，可以快速有效地补充运 ...

Report Summary Investment Rating No investment rating for the industry is provided in the report. Core Viewpoints - The duration of secondary capital bonds has been continuously rising, while the durations of other credit bonds have generally shortened. As of December 5, the weighted average trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were 1.90 years and 2.27 years respectively. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading durations of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds were 4.31 years, 3.78 years, and 1.94 years respectively. General commercial financial bonds were at a relatively low historical level, and secondary capital bonds were at a relatively high historical level. For other financial bonds, the durations of securities company bonds, securities subordinated bonds, insurance company bonds, and leasing company bonds were 1.53 years, 1.83 years, 3.33 years, and 1.19 years respectively. The duration of securities subordinated bonds has significantly shortened compared to last week, and the durations of securities company bonds and securities subordinated bonds were at relatively low historical levels [2][9]. - The coupon duration crowding index has slightly increased. After reaching its highest value in March 2024, the coupon duration crowding index declined. This week, it increased compared to last week and is currently at the 20.8% level since March 2021 [11]. Summary by Directory 1. All - Variety Duration Overview - Urban investment bonds: The weighted average trading duration hovered around 1.90 years. The duration of Hebei provincial urban investment bonds lengthened to 5.50 years, and the trading duration of Guangxi provincial urban investment bonds shortened to around 1.22 years. The historical quantiles of the durations of urban investment bonds in regions such as Zhejiang prefecture - level cities, Henan prefecture - level cities, and Hunan province have exceeded 90%, and the duration of Hunan provincial urban investment bonds is approaching the highest level since 2021 [3][15]. - Industrial bonds: The weighted average trading duration of industrial bonds shortened compared to last week and was generally around 2.27 years. The trading duration of the transportation industry lengthened to 2.02 years, and the trading duration of the food and beverage industry shortened to 0.55 years. The trading duration of the real estate industry was at a relatively low historical level, while those of the non - ferrous metals and pharmaceutical and biological industries were at relatively high historical levels [3][21]. - Commercial bank bonds: The duration of general commercial financial bonds shortened to 1.94 years, at the 35.9% historical quantile, lower than the level of the same period last year. The duration of secondary capital bonds lengthened to 4.31 years, at the 95.1% historical quantile, higher than the level of the same period last year. The duration of bank perpetual bonds shortened to 3.78 years, at the 67.7% historical quantile, higher than the level of the same period last year [3][23]. - Other financial bonds: In terms of the weighted average trading duration, insurance company bonds > securities subordinated bonds > securities company bonds > leasing company bonds, at historical quantiles of 71.4%, 22%, 31.8%, and 61.2% respectively. The overall duration of other financial bonds has shortened compared to last week [3][26]. 2. Variety Microscope - Coupon duration crowding index: After reaching its peak in March 2024, the coupon duration crowding index decreased and then increased slightly this week. It is currently at the 20.8% level since March 2021 [11]. - Regional analysis of urban investment bonds: The report provides the durations and historical quantiles of urban investment bonds in different provinces and administrative levels, such as the duration of Hebei provincial urban investment bonds lengthening to 5.50 years and Guangxi provincial urban investment bonds shortening to 1.22 years [15][20]. - Industry analysis of industrial bonds: Different industries within industrial bonds showed different duration changes. For example, the transportation industry's duration lengthened, and the food and beverage industry's duration shortened [21].

Core Insights - The bond issuance by securities firms has significantly increased this year, with a total of 1.6 trillion yuan raised, marking a year-on-year growth of 62.34% [1][2] Group 1: Bond Issuance Trends - Securities firms are actively issuing bonds to enhance capital strength and market competitiveness, with 73 firms having issued bonds totaling 1.6 trillion yuan as of November 12 [1] - Major firms leading in bond issuance include China Galaxy with 126.9 billion yuan, Huatai Securities with 121.9 billion yuan, and others like Guotai Junan, GF Securities, and CITIC Securities [2] Group 2: Factors Driving Bond Issuance - The increase in bond issuance is driven by multiple factors, including abundant market liquidity, low interest rates, and the need for firms to strengthen capital to support business growth [2] - The launch of the "Technology Board" in the bond market has also contributed to the growth in bond issuance by securities firms [2] Group 3: Use of Raised Funds - The funds raised through bond issuance are primarily used for repaying maturing debts and supplementing operational liquidity, which is crucial for the stable operation and business expansion of securities firms [3] Group 4: Technology Bonds - Since the introduction of the "Technology Board" in May, 45 securities firms have issued 58 technology bonds, raising a total of 78.97 billion yuan, with high investor interest reflected in an average oversubscription rate of 3.8 times [4] - Leading firms in technology bond issuance include China Merchants Securities with 15 billion yuan and Guotai Junan with 13.9 billion yuan [4] Group 5: Market Development and Services - Securities firms are enhancing their roles in the technology bond market by providing liquidity and underwriting services, with 76 firms participating in underwriting, totaling 823.688 billion yuan [4][6] - The complexity of technology bond services is pushing firms to upgrade their core service capabilities, creating competitive advantages in the market [6]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report As of November 7, the durations of general credit bonds and secondary bonds have returned to high levels. The weighted average trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds are at over 90% of their historical highs since 2021. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading durations of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds are at different historical levels, and the durations of other financial bonds have generally shortened, with lease company bonds at a relatively high historical percentile [2][9]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalog 3.1 Full - Variety Maturity Overview - As of November 7, the weighted trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds are 2.20 years and 2.82 years respectively, at over 90% of their historical highs since 2021 [2][9]. - Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading durations of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds are 4.45 years, 3.81 years, and 2.16 years respectively. The general commercial financial bonds are at a relatively low historical level [2][9]. - For other financial bonds, the durations of securities company bonds, securities sub - bonds, insurance company bonds, and lease company bonds are 1.74 years, 2.38 years, 3.31 years, and 1.32 years respectively. The overall duration of other financial bonds has shortened, and lease company bonds are at a relatively high historical percentile [2][9]. - The coupon duration congestion index has slightly increased. After reaching its peak in March 2024 and then declining, it has rebounded this week and is currently at the 35.6% level since March 2021 [11]. 3.2 Variety Microscope Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average trading duration of urban investment bonds hovers around 2.32 years. The duration of Gansu provincial - level urban investment bonds has extended to 3.25 years, while the trading duration of Shanghai district - level urban investment bonds has shortened to around 1.47 years [3][15]. - The historical percentiles of the durations of urban investment bonds in regions such as Chongqing district - level, Henan prefecture - level, and Anhui prefecture - level have exceeded 90%. The durations of Chongqing district - level and Gansu provincial - level urban investment bonds are approaching their highest levels since 2021 [3][15]. Industrial Bonds - The weighted average trading duration of industrial bonds has slightly shortened compared to last week and is generally around 2.27 years. The trading durations of the non - ferrous metals and public utilities industries have extended to 2.48 years and 3.29 years respectively [3][21]. - The trading duration of the real estate industry is at a relatively low historical percentile, while the building materials and commercial retail industries are at relatively high historical percentiles [3][21]. Commercial Bank Bonds - The duration of general commercial financial bonds has extended to 2.16 years, at the 67.6% historical percentile, lower than the level of the same period last year [3][23]. - The duration of secondary capital bonds has shortened to 4.45 years, at the 97.9% historical percentile, higher than the level of the same period last year [3][23]. - The duration of bank perpetual bonds has shortened to 3.81 years, at the 69.7% historical percentile, higher than the level of the same period last year [3][23]. Other Financial Bonds - In terms of the weighted average trading duration, insurance company bonds > securities sub - bonds > securities company bonds > lease company bonds, at the 70%, 63.9%, 63.9%, and 78% historical percentiles respectively. The duration of insurance company bonds has significantly extended compared to last week [3][26].

Group 1: Quantitative Credit Strategy - The urban investment bond duration strategy balances returns and defensiveness well, with cumulative excess returns for perpetual bonds, secondary bonds, and urban investment barbell combinations reaching 18.5bp, 14.7bp, and 5.1bp respectively [2][12] - Most medium to long-term strategies have shown excess returns in the past month, indicating potential profit from recent upward trends, although the likelihood of volatility corrections is higher compared to other strategies [2][12] Group 2: Duration Tracking - As of October 24, 2025, the weighted average transaction durations for urban investment bonds and industrial bonds are 1.98 years and 2.42 years, respectively, returning to over 80% of the high historical percentile since 2021 [3][15] - The weighted average transaction durations for secondary capital bonds, perpetual bonds, and general commercial bank bonds are 4.01 years, 3.46 years, and 1.83 years, with secondary capital bonds showing a relatively high duration percentile [3][15] Group 3: Yield Heatmap - As of October 27, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise industrial bonds and real estate bonds are generally higher than other varieties [4][17] - In the non-financial and non-real estate industrial bonds, yields have generally declined, with the average drop exceeding 6bp for 2-5 year state-owned enterprise private perpetual bonds [4][18] Group 4: Science and Technology Innovation Bonds - The issuance of science and technology innovation bonds reached a year-to-date high, with a total issuance scale of 699.4 billion yuan from October 20 to October 24, 2025, including 421.4 billion yuan from the exchange [5][20] - The subscription enthusiasm for new bonds has increased, with several science and technology bonds being oversubscribed by more than three times, indicating strong institutional demand for quality science and technology bonds [5][20] Group 5: Local Government Bonds - From October 20 to October 24, 2025, local government bonds issued totaled 247.2 billion yuan, including 112.4 billion yuan of new special bonds and 65.1 billion yuan of refinancing special bonds [6][23] - The main investment areas for special bond funds are "special new special bonds" and "ordinary/project income," with 73 billion yuan of special refinancing special bonds issued in October, accounting for 9.3% of the month's local bond issuance [6][23]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - As of October 10, the heavy - position portfolios of medium - to - long - term secondary capital bonds and ultra - long industrial bonds performed better. The average return of the heavy - position portfolio of credit - style secondary capital bonds increased slightly last week, and the bullet - type strategy had an absolute return of around 0.15% with relatively small cumulative drawdown in Q3. The ultra - long bond heavy - position strategy's return rebounded by nearly 25bp, with the industrial ultra - long strategy reaching a relatively high level of 0.2% [2][12]. - The durations of mainstream credit bond varieties continued to shorten. As of October 10, the weighted average trading terms of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were 1.65 years and 1.88 years respectively. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading terms of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds were 3.79 years, 3.36 years, and 1.69 years respectively, with general commercial financial bonds at a relatively low historical level [3][14]. - As of October 13, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise industrial bonds and real estate bonds in the outstanding credit bonds were generally higher than those of other varieties. Compared with last week, the yields of non - financial and non - real - estate industrial bonds generally declined, with an average decline of 6.4BP for varieties within 1 year [4][16]. - From the perspective of yields, the average return level of exchange - traded science and technology innovation bonds remained stable this week. The return of the relatively active 1 - 3 - year varieties increased by 3bp to 1.93%, while the interest rates of 3 - 5 - year varieties decreased, and the spread with non - science and technology general credit bonds of the same term widened to around 40bp [5][20]. - Affected by the National Day holiday, local government bonds worth 10.3 billion yuan were issued from October 9 to 10, all of which were refinancing general bonds. As of October 10, 2025, no special refinancing special bonds were issued in October. The average issuance interest rate of local government bonds declined marginally, and the spread between the 10 - year local government bond issuance rate and the same - term treasury bond rate was stable at around 25bp [6][22]. Summary by Directory Quantified Credit Strategy - As of October 10, the heavy - position portfolios of medium - to - long - term secondary capital bonds and ultra - long industrial bonds performed better. The average return of the heavy - position portfolio of credit - style secondary capital bonds increased slightly last week. The bullet - type strategy, with its previous declines gradually narrowing, had an absolute return of around 0.15% and relatively small cumulative drawdown in Q3, having both defensive and rebound - betting advantages. The secondary bond duration strategy was also strong. The return of the ultra - long bond heavy - position strategy rebounded by nearly 25bp, and the industrial ultra - long strategy reached a relatively high level of 0.2% [2][12]. Variety Duration Tracking - The durations of mainstream credit bond varieties continued to shorten. As of October 10, the weighted average trading terms of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were 1.65 years and 1.88 years respectively. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading terms of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds were 3.79 years, 3.36 years, and 1.69 years respectively, with general commercial financial bonds at a relatively low historical level. Among other financial bonds, the durations of securities company bonds, securities sub - bonds, insurance company bonds, and leasing company bonds were 1.37 years, 1.79 years, 3.22 years, and 1.11 years respectively. The durations of securities sub - bonds and leasing company bonds shortened, and securities company bonds were at a relatively low historical percentile [3][14]. Coupon Asset Heat Map - As of October 13, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise industrial bonds and real estate bonds in the outstanding credit bonds were generally higher than those of other varieties. Compared with last week, the yields of non - financial and non - real - estate industrial bonds generally declined, with an average decline of 6.4BP for varieties within 1 year. The interest rate declines of general commercial financial bonds were basically around 5BP. Among the second - tier perpetual bonds, the 2 - 5 - year varieties performed better, and the yield of 2 - 3 - year state - owned large - bank secondary capital bonds declined by more than 10BP. In addition, the yield of publicly - offered non - perpetual securities company bonds and sub - bonds within 1 year declined by 7.0BP [4][16][18]. Science and Technology Innovation Bond Prism - From the perspective of yields, the average return level of exchange - traded science and technology innovation bonds remained stable this week. The return of the relatively active 1 - 3 - year varieties increased by 3bp to 1.93%, while the interest rates of 3 - 5 - year varieties decreased, and the spread with non - science and technology general credit bonds of the same term widened to around 40bp. After the holiday, the absolute value of the low - valuation deviation of 3 - 5 - year exchange - traded science and technology innovation bonds was also higher than that of science and technology innovation bonds of other terms or general credit bonds of the same term, indicating that investors' preference for science and technology innovation bonds of this term recovered relatively quickly [5][20]. Local Bond Perspective - Affected by the National Day holiday, local government bonds worth 10.3 billion yuan were issued from October 9 to 10, all of which were refinancing general bonds. As of October 10, 2025, no special refinancing special bonds were issued in October. The average issuance interest rate of local government bonds declined marginally, and the spread between the 10 - year local government bond issuance rate and the same - term treasury bond rate was stable at around 25bp [6][22].

Group 1 - The core view of the report indicates that the simulated portfolio returns have generally recovered, with absolute returns of interest rate style portfolios outperforming credit style portfolios overall [2][10][14] - In the interest rate style portfolio, the top weekly returns were from the industrial ultra-long and secondary bond duration strategies, recording returns of 0.17% and 0.16% respectively [2][14] - In the credit style portfolio, the leading strategies were the industrial ultra-long and perpetual bond duration strategies, achieving returns of 0.2% and 0.16% respectively [15][2] Group 2 - The average weekly return of the credit style time deposit heavy portfolio increased by 3.5 basis points to 0.09%, reaching the highest absolute level since mid-August [2][16] - The average weekly return of the city investment heavy portfolio rose to 0.1%, similar to the time deposit strategy, with long-duration city investment bonds showing a recovery in the market [2][16] - The ultra-long bond heavy strategy saw a return increase of nearly 25 basis points, with the industrial ultra-long strategy reaching a high return level of 0.2% [2][16] Group 3 - The report highlights that the secondary perpetual bond duration strategy has significant profit potential, with capital gains contributing substantially this week [3][25] - The annualized coupon rate of the perpetual bond duration strategy is around 2.28%, and the distance from the lowest point this year is over 42 basis points [3][25] - The credit style portfolio's returns were primarily driven by capital gains, with coupon contributions falling within the range of 25% to 50% [3][25] Group 4 - In the past four weeks, the recovery signals for excess returns in secondary bond heavy strategies appeared first in bullet-type and down-sinking combinations [4][30] - The cumulative excess returns for city investment short-end sinking, commercial bank bond bullet-type, and brokerage bond duration strategies reached 11.8 basis points, 11.4 basis points, and 8.2 basis points respectively [4][30] - The report notes that medium to long-duration strategies generally yielded excess returns, with the secondary perpetual bond duration strategy achieving excess returns of 4.8 basis points and 5.3 basis points [33][30]