Core Insights - The bond issuance by securities firms has significantly increased this year, with a total of 1.6 trillion yuan raised, marking a year-on-year growth of 62.34% [1][2] Group 1: Bond Issuance Trends - Securities firms are actively issuing bonds to enhance capital strength and market competitiveness, with 73 firms having issued bonds totaling 1.6 trillion yuan as of November 12 [1] - Major firms leading in bond issuance include China Galaxy with 126.9 billion yuan, Huatai Securities with 121.9 billion yuan, and others like Guotai Junan, GF Securities, and CITIC Securities [2] Group 2: Factors Driving Bond Issuance - The increase in bond issuance is driven by multiple factors, including abundant market liquidity, low interest rates, and the need for firms to strengthen capital to support business growth [2] - The launch of the "Technology Board" in the bond market has also contributed to the growth in bond issuance by securities firms [2] Group 3: Use of Raised Funds - The funds raised through bond issuance are primarily used for repaying maturing debts and supplementing operational liquidity, which is crucial for the stable operation and business expansion of securities firms [3] Group 4: Technology Bonds - Since the introduction of the "Technology Board" in May, 45 securities firms have issued 58 technology bonds, raising a total of 78.97 billion yuan, with high investor interest reflected in an average oversubscription rate of 3.8 times [4] - Leading firms in technology bond issuance include China Merchants Securities with 15 billion yuan and Guotai Junan with 13.9 billion yuan [4] Group 5: Market Development and Services - Securities firms are enhancing their roles in the technology bond market by providing liquidity and underwriting services, with 76 firms participating in underwriting, totaling 823.688 billion yuan [4][6] - The complexity of technology bond services is pushing firms to upgrade their core service capabilities, creating competitive advantages in the market [6]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report As of November 7, the durations of general credit bonds and secondary bonds have returned to high levels. The weighted average trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds are at over 90% of their historical highs since 2021. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading durations of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds are at different historical levels, and the durations of other financial bonds have generally shortened, with lease company bonds at a relatively high historical percentile [2][9]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalog 3.1 Full - Variety Maturity Overview - As of November 7, the weighted trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds are 2.20 years and 2.82 years respectively, at over 90% of their historical highs since 2021 [2][9]. - Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading durations of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds are 4.45 years, 3.81 years, and 2.16 years respectively. The general commercial financial bonds are at a relatively low historical level [2][9]. - For other financial bonds, the durations of securities company bonds, securities sub - bonds, insurance company bonds, and lease company bonds are 1.74 years, 2.38 years, 3.31 years, and 1.32 years respectively. The overall duration of other financial bonds has shortened, and lease company bonds are at a relatively high historical percentile [2][9]. - The coupon duration congestion index has slightly increased. After reaching its peak in March 2024 and then declining, it has rebounded this week and is currently at the 35.6% level since March 2021 [11]. 3.2 Variety Microscope Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average trading duration of urban investment bonds hovers around 2.32 years. The duration of Gansu provincial - level urban investment bonds has extended to 3.25 years, while the trading duration of Shanghai district - level urban investment bonds has shortened to around 1.47 years [3][15]. - The historical percentiles of the durations of urban investment bonds in regions such as Chongqing district - level, Henan prefecture - level, and Anhui prefecture - level have exceeded 90%. The durations of Chongqing district - level and Gansu provincial - level urban investment bonds are approaching their highest levels since 2021 [3][15]. Industrial Bonds - The weighted average trading duration of industrial bonds has slightly shortened compared to last week and is generally around 2.27 years. The trading durations of the non - ferrous metals and public utilities industries have extended to 2.48 years and 3.29 years respectively [3][21]. - The trading duration of the real estate industry is at a relatively low historical percentile, while the building materials and commercial retail industries are at relatively high historical percentiles [3][21]. Commercial Bank Bonds - The duration of general commercial financial bonds has extended to 2.16 years, at the 67.6% historical percentile, lower than the level of the same period last year [3][23]. - The duration of secondary capital bonds has shortened to 4.45 years, at the 97.9% historical percentile, higher than the level of the same period last year [3][23]. - The duration of bank perpetual bonds has shortened to 3.81 years, at the 69.7% historical percentile, higher than the level of the same period last year [3][23]. Other Financial Bonds - In terms of the weighted average trading duration, insurance company bonds > securities sub - bonds > securities company bonds > lease company bonds, at the 70%, 63.9%, 63.9%, and 78% historical percentiles respectively. The duration of insurance company bonds has significantly extended compared to last week [3][26].

Group 1: Quantitative Credit Strategy - The urban investment bond duration strategy balances returns and defensiveness well, with cumulative excess returns for perpetual bonds, secondary bonds, and urban investment barbell combinations reaching 18.5bp, 14.7bp, and 5.1bp respectively [2][12] - Most medium to long-term strategies have shown excess returns in the past month, indicating potential profit from recent upward trends, although the likelihood of volatility corrections is higher compared to other strategies [2][12] Group 2: Duration Tracking - As of October 24, 2025, the weighted average transaction durations for urban investment bonds and industrial bonds are 1.98 years and 2.42 years, respectively, returning to over 80% of the high historical percentile since 2021 [3][15] - The weighted average transaction durations for secondary capital bonds, perpetual bonds, and general commercial bank bonds are 4.01 years, 3.46 years, and 1.83 years, with secondary capital bonds showing a relatively high duration percentile [3][15] Group 3: Yield Heatmap - As of October 27, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise industrial bonds and real estate bonds are generally higher than other varieties [4][17] - In the non-financial and non-real estate industrial bonds, yields have generally declined, with the average drop exceeding 6bp for 2-5 year state-owned enterprise private perpetual bonds [4][18] Group 4: Science and Technology Innovation Bonds - The issuance of science and technology innovation bonds reached a year-to-date high, with a total issuance scale of 699.4 billion yuan from October 20 to October 24, 2025, including 421.4 billion yuan from the exchange [5][20] - The subscription enthusiasm for new bonds has increased, with several science and technology bonds being oversubscribed by more than three times, indicating strong institutional demand for quality science and technology bonds [5][20] Group 5: Local Government Bonds - From October 20 to October 24, 2025, local government bonds issued totaled 247.2 billion yuan, including 112.4 billion yuan of new special bonds and 65.1 billion yuan of refinancing special bonds [6][23] - The main investment areas for special bond funds are "special new special bonds" and "ordinary/project income," with 73 billion yuan of special refinancing special bonds issued in October, accounting for 9.3% of the month's local bond issuance [6][23]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - As of October 10, the heavy - position portfolios of medium - to - long - term secondary capital bonds and ultra - long industrial bonds performed better. The average return of the heavy - position portfolio of credit - style secondary capital bonds increased slightly last week, and the bullet - type strategy had an absolute return of around 0.15% with relatively small cumulative drawdown in Q3. The ultra - long bond heavy - position strategy's return rebounded by nearly 25bp, with the industrial ultra - long strategy reaching a relatively high level of 0.2% [2][12]. - The durations of mainstream credit bond varieties continued to shorten. As of October 10, the weighted average trading terms of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were 1.65 years and 1.88 years respectively. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading terms of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds were 3.79 years, 3.36 years, and 1.69 years respectively, with general commercial financial bonds at a relatively low historical level [3][14]. - As of October 13, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise industrial bonds and real estate bonds in the outstanding credit bonds were generally higher than those of other varieties. Compared with last week, the yields of non - financial and non - real - estate industrial bonds generally declined, with an average decline of 6.4BP for varieties within 1 year [4][16]. - From the perspective of yields, the average return level of exchange - traded science and technology innovation bonds remained stable this week. The return of the relatively active 1 - 3 - year varieties increased by 3bp to 1.93%, while the interest rates of 3 - 5 - year varieties decreased, and the spread with non - science and technology general credit bonds of the same term widened to around 40bp [5][20]. - Affected by the National Day holiday, local government bonds worth 10.3 billion yuan were issued from October 9 to 10, all of which were refinancing general bonds. As of October 10, 2025, no special refinancing special bonds were issued in October. The average issuance interest rate of local government bonds declined marginally, and the spread between the 10 - year local government bond issuance rate and the same - term treasury bond rate was stable at around 25bp [6][22]. Summary by Directory Quantified Credit Strategy - As of October 10, the heavy - position portfolios of medium - to - long - term secondary capital bonds and ultra - long industrial bonds performed better. The average return of the heavy - position portfolio of credit - style secondary capital bonds increased slightly last week. The bullet - type strategy, with its previous declines gradually narrowing, had an absolute return of around 0.15% and relatively small cumulative drawdown in Q3, having both defensive and rebound - betting advantages. The secondary bond duration strategy was also strong. The return of the ultra - long bond heavy - position strategy rebounded by nearly 25bp, and the industrial ultra - long strategy reached a relatively high level of 0.2% [2][12]. Variety Duration Tracking - The durations of mainstream credit bond varieties continued to shorten. As of October 10, the weighted average trading terms of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were 1.65 years and 1.88 years respectively. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading terms of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds were 3.79 years, 3.36 years, and 1.69 years respectively, with general commercial financial bonds at a relatively low historical level. Among other financial bonds, the durations of securities company bonds, securities sub - bonds, insurance company bonds, and leasing company bonds were 1.37 years, 1.79 years, 3.22 years, and 1.11 years respectively. The durations of securities sub - bonds and leasing company bonds shortened, and securities company bonds were at a relatively low historical percentile [3][14]. Coupon Asset Heat Map - As of October 13, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise industrial bonds and real estate bonds in the outstanding credit bonds were generally higher than those of other varieties. Compared with last week, the yields of non - financial and non - real - estate industrial bonds generally declined, with an average decline of 6.4BP for varieties within 1 year. The interest rate declines of general commercial financial bonds were basically around 5BP. Among the second - tier perpetual bonds, the 2 - 5 - year varieties performed better, and the yield of 2 - 3 - year state - owned large - bank secondary capital bonds declined by more than 10BP. In addition, the yield of publicly - offered non - perpetual securities company bonds and sub - bonds within 1 year declined by 7.0BP [4][16][18]. Science and Technology Innovation Bond Prism - From the perspective of yields, the average return level of exchange - traded science and technology innovation bonds remained stable this week. The return of the relatively active 1 - 3 - year varieties increased by 3bp to 1.93%, while the interest rates of 3 - 5 - year varieties decreased, and the spread with non - science and technology general credit bonds of the same term widened to around 40bp. After the holiday, the absolute value of the low - valuation deviation of 3 - 5 - year exchange - traded science and technology innovation bonds was also higher than that of science and technology innovation bonds of other terms or general credit bonds of the same term, indicating that investors' preference for science and technology innovation bonds of this term recovered relatively quickly [5][20]. Local Bond Perspective - Affected by the National Day holiday, local government bonds worth 10.3 billion yuan were issued from October 9 to 10, all of which were refinancing general bonds. As of October 10, 2025, no special refinancing special bonds were issued in October. The average issuance interest rate of local government bonds declined marginally, and the spread between the 10 - year local government bond issuance rate and the same - term treasury bond rate was stable at around 25bp [6][22].

Group 1 - The core view of the report indicates that the simulated portfolio returns have generally recovered, with absolute returns of interest rate style portfolios outperforming credit style portfolios overall [2][10][14] - In the interest rate style portfolio, the top weekly returns were from the industrial ultra-long and secondary bond duration strategies, recording returns of 0.17% and 0.16% respectively [2][14] - In the credit style portfolio, the leading strategies were the industrial ultra-long and perpetual bond duration strategies, achieving returns of 0.2% and 0.16% respectively [15][2] Group 2 - The average weekly return of the credit style time deposit heavy portfolio increased by 3.5 basis points to 0.09%, reaching the highest absolute level since mid-August [2][16] - The average weekly return of the city investment heavy portfolio rose to 0.1%, similar to the time deposit strategy, with long-duration city investment bonds showing a recovery in the market [2][16] - The ultra-long bond heavy strategy saw a return increase of nearly 25 basis points, with the industrial ultra-long strategy reaching a high return level of 0.2% [2][16] Group 3 - The report highlights that the secondary perpetual bond duration strategy has significant profit potential, with capital gains contributing substantially this week [3][25] - The annualized coupon rate of the perpetual bond duration strategy is around 2.28%, and the distance from the lowest point this year is over 42 basis points [3][25] - The credit style portfolio's returns were primarily driven by capital gains, with coupon contributions falling within the range of 25% to 50% [3][25] Group 4 - In the past four weeks, the recovery signals for excess returns in secondary bond heavy strategies appeared first in bullet-type and down-sinking combinations [4][30] - The cumulative excess returns for city investment short-end sinking, commercial bank bond bullet-type, and brokerage bond duration strategies reached 11.8 basis points, 11.4 basis points, and 8.2 basis points respectively [4][30] - The report notes that medium to long-duration strategies generally yielded excess returns, with the secondary perpetual bond duration strategy achieving excess returns of 4.8 basis points and 5.3 basis points [33][30]

Group 1 - Chinese brokerage stocks experienced a general rise, with notable increases in shares such as GF Securities (4.05% increase), Guotai Junan (1.93% increase), and China Merchants Securities (1.34% increase) [1] - Since 2025, there has been a significant increase in the enthusiasm for bond financing among brokerages, with 71 brokerages issuing a total of 672 bonds, raising 1.27 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 80.22% [1] - In 2025, 33 brokerages issued bonds exceeding 10 billion yuan, with leading brokerages dominating the issuance scale [1] Group 2 - Zheshang Securities predicts that the profitability of brokerages will continue to grow significantly in Q3 2025, driven by increased market activity, with expected revenue growth of 42.4% and net profit growth of 62.8% year-on-year [2] - The firm anticipates that equity investment returns will be crucial for the overall investment performance of brokerages, benefiting from the rising stock market, with investment business revenue expected to grow by 35% year-on-year in Q3 2025 [2]

Group 1 - Chinese brokerage stocks experienced a general rise, with notable increases in shares such as GF Securities (up 4.05% to HKD 21.08), Guotai Junan (up 1.93% to HKD 6.34), and China Merchants Securities (up 1.34% to HKD 16.59) [1] - Since 2025, there has been a significant increase in the enthusiasm for bond financing among brokerages, with 71 brokerages issuing a total of 672 bonds, raising a total of CNY 1.27 trillion, representing a year-on-year increase of 80.22% [1] - In 2025, 33 brokerages issued bonds exceeding CNY 10 billion, with leading brokerages dominating the issuance scale [1] Group 2 - Zhezhang Securities predicts that the profitability of brokerages will continue to grow significantly in Q3 2025, driven by increased market activity, with expected revenue growth of 42.4% year-on-year and net profit growth of 62.8% [2] - The firm anticipates that equity investment returns will be a key factor in the overall investment performance of brokerages, benefiting from a rising stock market, with investment business income expected to grow by 35% year-on-year in Q3 2025 [2]

Group 1 - The capital market has shown a significant positive trend this year, prompting securities firms to actively supplement capital to seize development opportunities [1][3] - Securities firms are increasingly engaging in private placements, with multiple firms making progress in their fundraising efforts, including Nanjing Securities, which plans to issue up to 1.106 billion shares to raise no more than 5 billion yuan [2][3] - As of October 9, 2023, the total amount raised through bond issuance by securities firms reached 1.27 trillion yuan, marking an 80.22% year-on-year increase [1][3][4] Group 2 - The issuance of bonds has become a crucial method for securities firms to supplement capital, with 71 firms issuing a total of 672 bonds this year [3][4] - Notably, 33 firms have issued bonds exceeding 10 billion yuan, with China Galaxy leading at 107.9 billion yuan, followed by Huatai Securities at 98.1 billion yuan [4] - The current low interest rate environment has made bond financing a primary channel for securities firms to expand their balance sheets, with funds primarily used for debt replacement and operational capital [4]

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content Core Viewpoints - As of September 26, the weighted average trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were 1.89 years and 2.16 years respectively. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading durations of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds were 4.39 years, 3.72 years, and 2.19 years respectively. The duration of bank perpetual bonds was at a relatively low historical level. Among other financial bonds, the durations of securities company bonds, securities subordinated bonds, insurance company bonds, and leasing company bonds were 1.35 years, 1.85 years, 3.10 years, and 1.30 years respectively. The durations of securities company bonds and securities subordinated bonds shortened, and the securities company bonds were at a relatively low historical quantile [1][8]. - The coupon duration congestion index dropped significantly. After reaching its peak in March 2024, the index declined and is currently at the 25.9% level since March 2021 [11]. Summary by Directory 1. Full - variety Duration Overview - The weighted average trading durations of urban investment bonds, industrial bonds, secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, general commercial financial bonds, securities company bonds, securities subordinated bonds, insurance company bonds, and leasing company bonds were 1.89 years, 2.16 years, 4.39 years, 3.72 years, 2.19 years, 1.35 years, 1.85 years, 3.10 years, and 1.30 years respectively. Their corresponding historical quantiles since March 2021 were 78.7%, 75.3%, 97.0%, 65.5%, 71.9%, 8.0%, 23.4%, 60.0%, and 76.5% [10]. 2. Variety Microscope Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average trading duration of urban investment bonds hovered around 1.89 years. The duration of Hebei provincial urban investment bonds extended to 6.37 years, while that of Beijing district - level urban investment bonds shortened to around 1.63 years. The historical quantiles of the durations of urban investment bonds in regions such as Henan prefecture - level cities and Jiangxi prefecture - level cities exceeded 90%, and the duration of Hebei provincial urban investment bonds approached the highest level since 2021 [2][15]. Industrial Bonds - The weighted average trading duration of industrial bonds slightly shortened compared to the previous week, generally staying around 2.16 years. The trading duration of the commercial retail industry extended to 2.09 years, while that of the basic chemical industry shortened to 1.19 years. The trading durations of industries such as food and beverage, coal, real estate, and building decoration were at relatively low historical quantiles, while the building materials industry was at a relatively high historical quantile [2][20]. Commercial Bank Bonds - The duration of general commercial financial bonds extended to 2.19 years, at the 71.9% historical quantile, lower than the same period last year. The duration of secondary capital bonds extended to 4.39 years, at the 97% historical quantile, higher than the same period last year. The duration of bank perpetual bonds shortened to 3.72 years, at the 65.5% historical quantile, higher than the same period last year [2][23]. Other Financial Bonds - In terms of the weighted average trading duration, insurance company bonds > securities subordinated bonds > securities company bonds > leasing company bonds, at the 60%, 23.4%, 8%, and 76.5% historical quantiles respectively. The durations of securities company bonds and securities subordinated bonds slightly shortened compared to the previous week [2][26].

Core Viewpoint - The bond issuance by securities firms has significantly accelerated since July, with a total issuance of 1.14 trillion yuan in 2023, surpassing the previous year's total of 693.7 billion yuan, indicating strong capital replenishment needs in the industry [2][10]. Group 1: Bond Issuance Trends - In September alone, at least four securities firms announced new short-term financing bond issuances, totaling over 8 billion yuan, contributing to a cumulative issuance of over 110 billion yuan in the first half of September [1][9]. - The total bond issuance by securities firms from July 1 to September 17 reached approximately 543.8 billion yuan, accounting for about 47% of the annual total [2]. - As of September 17, 2023, 71 securities firms have issued bonds, with a total issuance of 1.14 trillion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of approximately 64.7% [10]. Group 2: Types of Bonds and Their Purposes - Securities company bonds remain the mainstay, with 415 bonds issued totaling over 750 billion yuan, while short-term financing bonds accounted for nearly 370 billion yuan [11]. - The average coupon rate for the issued bonds is 1.89%, with a general downward trend in interest rates compared to the previous year [13][14]. - The primary purposes of the raised funds include liquidity support and refinancing existing debts, with some firms committing to limit the use of funds for capital-consuming businesses [21][24]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The increase in bond issuance is driven by a recovery in the A-share market, which has led to a rise in margin trading balances from approximately 1.85 trillion yuan at the end of June to about 2.26 trillion yuan at the end of August, marking a 22.2% increase [9]. - The current low-interest-rate environment makes bond financing more attractive compared to equity financing, providing larger funding support while avoiding equity dilution [25]. - If the A-share market remains active, the trend of bond issuance by securities firms is expected to continue in the near future [25].