量化信用策略 截至 9 月 30 日，久期策略表现持续低迷。近四周，城投久期策略持续跑输基准，重仓 10 年 AA+城投债的哑铃型组合 累计超额收益降至-34bp 左右，节前一周基金对 5 年以上普信债卖盘收窄，但行情难言改善。二永债久期策略波动较 大，尽管 9 月逐次下跌后修复幅度大于普信债品种，其累计超额收益依旧收于-18bp、-30bp 的低位。相比之下，城投 短端下沉、商金债子弹型等策略组合超额收益相对靠前。 品种久期跟踪 主流品种久期防御特征明显。截至 9 月 30 日，城投债、产业债成交期限分别加权于 1.76 年、2.22 年，处于 2021 年 以来 65%-80%的分位区间，商业银行债中，二级资本债、银行永续债以及一般商金债加权平均成交期限分别为 3.67 年、 3.70 年、1.92 年，所处分位水平出现明显回落；从其余金融债来看，证券公司债、证券次级债、保险公司债、租赁公 司债久期分别为 1.51 年、1.73 年、4.11 年、1.23 年，除保险公司债之外，其余品种久期同样位于较低历史分位。 票息资产热度图谱 截至 2025 年 9 月 29 日，与前一周相比，非金融非地产类产业债收 ...

Group 1 - The second batch of Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs will be listed on September 24, with 14 public funds participating in the issuance, following the first batch launched on July 17 [1] - The total issuance scale of the second batch of 14 Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs reaches 40.786 billion yuan, with 13 of them exceeding 2.9 billion yuan each [1] - The total scale of Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs has surpassed 170 billion yuan, while the overall scale of bond ETFs has exceeded 600 billion yuan for the first time [1] Group 2 - The largest bond ETFs include Convertible Bond ETF at 59.218 billion yuan, Short-term Bond ETF at 58.516 billion yuan, and Policy Financial Bond ETF at 45.615 billion yuan [3] - Other notable bond ETFs include 30-Year Treasury Bond ETF at 30.895 billion yuan and City Investment Bond ETF at 24.767 billion yuan [3] - The newly launched Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs are expected to enhance the liquidity and market presence of bond ETFs [8] Group 3 - According to Guotai Junan Securities, the ticket interest strategy will dominate from 2025 onwards, with Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs showing resilience during market adjustments [7] - The performance of actively managed pure bond funds indicates that short-term bonds outperform medium to long-term bonds, and credit bonds are favored over interest rate bonds [7] - The liquidity of bond ETFs is expected to improve as the current market environment gradually stabilizes [7] Group 4 - The new sales fee regulations by the China Securities Regulatory Commission are anticipated to create greater development opportunities for bond ETFs [8] - The proposed changes in redemption fees may lead to a shift in institutional investment from interest rate bond funds to bond ETFs, enhancing their attractiveness [8]

Core Viewpoint - The second batch of Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs is set to be issued, with rapid expansion in scale enhancing liquidity and pricing efficiency in the market [1][2]. Group 1: Market Expansion and Product Details - As of September 8, 2025, the total scale of the first batch of 10 Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs has exceeded 120 billion yuan, representing a growth of over 300% from the initial fundraising amount [1]. - The second batch consists of 14 Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs, which received approval on September 8, 2025, and will be launched on September 12, 2025 [1]. - The introduction of new products is expected to further enrich investor choices and enhance market liquidity and pricing efficiency, thereby increasing the activity level of the Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETF market [1]. Group 2: Competitive Landscape and Management Strength - The second batch of Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs will face heightened competition, necessitating stronger capabilities in fixed income management, company empowerment, and ETF operation from the issuers [2]. - Huatai-PineBridge Fund stands out among the issuers, leading in the aforementioned areas. As of the end of Q2 2025, Huatai-PineBridge's assets under management exceeded 1 trillion yuan, with bond fund assets surpassing 260 billion yuan [2]. - The firm has also achieved an ETF management scale exceeding 100 billion yuan, ranking it among the top issuers in this category [2]. Group 3: Fund Management and Performance - The performance of actively managed pure bond funds in 2025 has shown that short-term bonds outperform medium to long-term bonds, and credit bonds outperform interest rate bonds [12]. - During the recent market adjustment, the decline in the value of Sci-Tech Innovation Bond ETFs was less severe compared to other interest rate bond ETFs, indicating better market resilience [12]. - The liquidity of bond ETFs is expected to continue improving as the current market environment stabilizes [12]. Group 4: Regulatory Changes and Future Opportunities - New sales fee regulations issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission on September 5, 2025, are anticipated to create greater development opportunities for bond ETFs [17]. - The proposed changes in redemption fees may lead to a shift in institutional investment from interest rate bond funds to bond ETFs, enhancing the latter's growth prospects [17].

Group 1 - The second batch of 14 science and technology innovation bond ETFs will begin fundraising, with 9 products available for one day and 4 for three trading days, while 1 product will have a five-day fundraising period [1] - The first batch of 10 science and technology innovation bond ETFs has exceeded a total scale of 120 billion yuan, growing over 300% from the initial fundraising amount [2] - The introduction of the new batch of products is expected to further accelerate the expansion of the bond ETF market, with science and technology innovation bond ETFs becoming the highest market capitalization subcategory [2] Group 2 - According to Guotai Junan Securities, the interest rate strategy has been dominant since 2025, with science and technology innovation bond ETFs showing certain resilience during adjustment periods [3] - The bond market has experienced significant volatility since 2025, with the value of duration strategies declining, while credit bond interest rate strategies have shown advantages [3] - The recent regulatory changes regarding fund sales fees are expected to create greater development opportunities for bond ETFs, as higher redemption fee thresholds may redirect investments from other bond funds to bond ETFs [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strategic considerations for investing in credit bonds and sci-tech bonds ETFs, focusing on cash retention versus bond allocation, seeking flexibility versus static returns, duration versus credit quality for yield, and the term structure of bond holdings [1][2]. Group 1: Investment Strategy Considerations - The decision to retain cash is often a short-term phenomenon during periods of weak market conditions, with low likelihood of cash retention in a weak credit bond ETF environment [1]. - In the current low interest rate and low spread environment, actively seeking static returns from credit bond ETFs is less cost-effective, with a tendency to extend duration for flexibility when interest rates stabilize or decline [1]. - Most ETF products tend to quickly increase duration after launch, with limited instances of duration shortening, influenced by market conditions [1]. - Credit ratings are dynamically adjusted based on market conditions, with high-rated bonds dominating during both strong and weak phases of the bond market [1]. - The overall term structure of holdings tends to favor a barbell strategy, balancing liquidity and yield, with a shift towards longer-duration bonds during recovery periods [1]. Group 2: Sci-Tech Bond ETF Preferences - The configuration preference for sci-tech bond ETFs is expected to align with credit bond ETFs during correction periods, focusing on high flexibility and high-rated bonds, while maintaining a barbell strategy [2]. - Following the recent correction, the attractiveness of coupon rates for sci-tech bonds has not significantly increased, making the maintenance of flexibility crucial [2]. - The current duration of sci-tech bond ETFs is relatively long, suggesting a preference for stabilizing duration in the near term [2]. Group 3: Selection Strategy Under Expansion Expectations - The selection strategy for sci-tech bonds is influenced by the narrowing spread between component and non-component bonds during market adjustments, with a recorded spread of -10.0 basis points as of August 29 [3]. - There is an anticipated increase in demand for perpetual (non-subordinated) sci-tech bonds due to expansion expectations, with three out of the first ten sci-tech bond ETFs including such bonds [3]. - The issuance of new sci-tech bonds has increased, with an average weekly issuance of 427 billion yuan since July, indicating a growing space for new issuances during market adjustments [3].

Report Summary 1. Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content. 2. Core Viewpoints - As of August 8, the duration strategy was neutral, with medium - long - term duration portfolios performing slightly better than dumbbell - shaped ones. Long - term allocation sentiment was low, as the excess returns of ultra - long - term strategies were generally negative, and the willingness to extend duration was not strong [2][12]. - The trading duration of mainstream varieties was marginally shortened. As of August 10, the weighted trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds decreased, and some financial bonds were at low historical levels [3][16]. - As of August 11, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise industrial bonds and real - estate bonds were generally higher than other varieties. Most non - financial and non - real - estate industrial bond yields declined compared to the previous week, and more than half of financial bond yields decreased [4][20]. - The number of ultra - long - term credit bond transactions significantly declined. From August 4 - 8, 2025, the combined number of transactions of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds with a term of 7 years and above dropped from 515 to 389. The yields of some bonds were changing, with the yield spread between the most active 7 - 10 - year industrial bonds and 20 - 30 - year treasury bonds narrowing [5][24]. - The increase of local government bond indices was less than that of treasury bonds of the same term. Last week, the 7 - 10 - year and over - 10 - year local government bond indices rose 0.09% and 0.01% respectively, underperforming treasury bonds of the same term but outperforming ultra - long - term credit bonds [6][27]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Quantified Credit Strategy - As of August 8, the duration strategy was neutral. Medium - long - term duration portfolios had better performance, with return deviations from the benchmark within 4bp. The short - end sinking strategy of urban investment bonds had a negative deviation of over 5bp, and the excess returns of urban investment duration and dumbbell - shaped strategies were only 1.2bp and 0.2bp respectively. Ultra - long - term strategies had negative excess returns, especially for industrial and secondary ultra - long - term combinations, with readings below - 10bp [2][12]. 3.2 Variety Duration Tracking - As of August 10, the weighted trading durations of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were 2.00 years and 2.60 years respectively. Among commercial bank bonds, the weighted average trading durations of secondary capital bonds, bank perpetual bonds, and general commercial financial bonds were 4.20 years, 3.48 years, and 3.13 years respectively, with bank perpetual bonds at a low historical level. Among other financial bonds, the durations of securities company bonds, securities sub - bonds, insurance company bonds, and leasing company bonds were 1.54 years, 2.17 years, 2.71 years, and 1.37 years respectively, with some at low historical quantiles and leasing company bonds at a high historical quantile [3][16]. 3.3 Coupon Asset Heat Map - As of August 11, 2025, private enterprise industrial bonds and real - estate bonds had higher valuation yields and spreads. Non - financial and non - real - estate industrial bond yields mostly declined compared to the previous week. Among financial bonds, leasing company bonds, urban and rural commercial bank capital replenishment tools, and securities sub - bonds had higher valuation yields and spreads. More than half of financial bond yields decreased. The interest rates of general commercial financial bonds fluctuated within a narrow range (no more than 1.5BP), and the yields of some 1 - year - within urban and rural commercial bank perpetual bonds decreased significantly, with the yield of 1 - year - within urban commercial bank perpetual bonds dropping by more than 5BP [4][20]. 3.4 Ultra - long - term Credit Bond Micro - tracking - Since July, the lack of floating profits in ultra - long - term credit bonds and the difficulty in controlling drawdowns led to a significant decrease in trading demand. From August 4 - 8, 2025, the combined number of transactions of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds with a term of 7 years and above decreased from 515 to 389. The average trading yield of the most active 7 - 10 - year industrial bonds was marginally repaired, and the spread with 20 - 30 - year treasury bonds narrowed to 22bp, but the yields of over - 10 - year general credit bonds were still rising [5][24]. 3.5 Local Government Bond Supply and Trading Tracking - Last week, the 7 - 10 - year and over - 10 - year local government bond indices rose 0.09% and 0.01% respectively, less than the increase of treasury bonds of the same term but better than the overall decline of ultra - long - term credit bonds [6][27].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The bond market witnessed a key policy adjustment from August 4 - 8, 2025. The new tax policy resumed the collection of VAT on the interest income of government bonds and financial bonds issued after August 8, leading to an expectation of an expanded spread between new and old bonds. Fundamental data such as flat CPI, a 3.6% decline in PPI, and a drop in PMI in July, along with the cooling of anti - involution market sentiment, support the bullish logic of the bond market. The yield of 10 - year treasury bonds is expected to fall to around 1.65%, and the yield of 5 - year secondary capital bonds of national and joint - stock banks may decline to 1.9%. Although the new tax policy exerts some pressure on new bonds, it forms a downward yield logic for old bonds, especially creating a strong incentive for institutions such as bank self - operations to scramble for old bonds. Credit bonds not affected by the new policy will also be indirectly benefited. Therefore, the current bond market bullish trend is considered the path of least resistance. In terms of credit strategies, it is recommended to increase the allocation of old financial bonds in mid - to - late August and actively capture capital gains opportunities brought about by the decline in credit bond yields [2][6]. - The tax - exemption advantage of non - financial credit bonds may lower the credit spread center. After the Ministry of Finance resumed the collection of VAT on the interest income of interest - rate bonds, the after - tax yield of non - financial credit bonds became more attractive due to their tax - exemption status, directly lowering the credit spread center. However, considering the sharing game of tax costs between issuers and investors, the decline in the spread may be less than the theoretical value. It is estimated that the yield of credit bonds may decline by 2 - 5bp, and in the long run, the allocation value of credit bonds will increase, but investors need to be vigilant about the phased disturbance of the new issuance interest rate of interest - rate bonds on the comparison advantage of credit bonds [2][7]. - The duration strategy adheres to the "neutral as the anchor". The fluctuation of market risk preference limits the stretching space of duration, and a 3 - 4 - year neutral duration is the optimal solution that combines offense and defense. Medium - duration credit bonds are less sensitive to capital interest rates and can avoid the repeated disturbances of the capital market in August. At the same time, medium - duration bonds have sufficient repair space and combine odds and liquidity. Long - duration varieties are restricted by the upward shift of the risk premium center after adjustment, supply pressure, and the cautious attitude of institutions, and it may be difficult to replicate the trend - like market of last year. It is recommended to appropriately control positions [8]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs Yield and Spread Overview - Yield and Changes of Each Term - The report presents the yields, weekly changes, and historical quantiles of various bond types (including treasury bonds, national development bonds, local government bonds, etc.) at different terms (0.5Y, 1Y, 2Y, 3Y, 5Y). For example, the 0.5 - year treasury bond yield is 1.34%, showing a - 3.4bp change compared to last week, with a historical quantile of 5.6% [15]. Yield and Spread Overview - Spread and Changes of Each Term - It shows the credit spreads, weekly changes, and historical quantiles of various bond types at different terms. For instance, the 0.5 - year credit spread of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 16bp, with a - 5.7bp change compared to last week and a historical quantile of 1.1% [17]. Credit Bond Yield and Spread by Category (Hermite Algorithm) - Urban Investment Bond Yield and Spread by Region Yield and Changes of Each Term - Displays the yields, weekly changes, and historical quantiles of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in each province at different terms. For example, the 0.5 - year yield of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in Anhui is 1.70%, with a - 6.4bp change compared to last week and a historical quantile of 0.0% [20]. Spread and Changes of Each Term - Presents the credit spreads, weekly changes, and historical quantiles of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in each province at different terms. For example, the 0.5 - year credit spread of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in Anhui is 23.66bp, with a - 6.4bp change compared to last week and a historical quantile of 0.0% [23]. Yield and Changes of Each Implicit Rating - Shows the yields, weekly changes, and historical quantiles of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in each province at different implicit ratings. For example, the AAA - rated 0.5 - year yield of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in Anhui is 1.73%, with a - 2.6bp change compared to last week and a historical quantile of 1.0% [28]. Spread and Changes of Each Implicit Rating - Displays the credit spreads, weekly changes, and historical quantiles of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in each province at different implicit ratings. For example, the AAA - rated 0.5 - year credit spread of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in Anhui is 23.10bp, with a - 2.5bp change compared to last week and a historical quantile of 21.5% [33]. Yield and Changes of Each Administrative Level - Presents the yields, weekly changes, and historical quantiles of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds at different administrative levels in each province. For example, the provincial - level 0.5 - year yield of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in Anhui is 1.72%, with a - 2.1bp change compared to last week and a historical quantile of 1.0% [38].

Market Overview - The A-share market showed mixed performance with the Shanghai Composite Index up by 0.12%, while the Shenzhen Component and ChiNext indices fell by 0.13% and 0.52% respectively, and the North China 50 Index rose by 0.43% [1] - The total trading volume in the Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing markets reached 1.2062 trillion yuan, an increase of 132.7 billion yuan compared to the previous day [1] Bond Market Dynamics - The central bank conducted a 7-day reverse repurchase operation of 160.7 billion yuan at a stable interest rate of 1.40% [1] - The yields on major bonds showed slight fluctuations, with the 10-year government bond yield decreasing by 0.5 basis points to 1.699%, while the 10-year policy bank bond yield increased by 0.1 basis points to 1.796% [1] - The bond market has experienced significant volatility, with the 10-year government bond yield rising from a low of 1.64% in early July to a peak of 1.75% at the end of July before retreating [1] Market Sentiment and Predictions - Analysts suggest that despite a hot equity market, the underlying economic fundamentals remain weak, leading to a cautious outlook for the bond market, which is expected to fluctuate within a range of 1.6% to 1.8% for the 10-year government bond yield [2] - The sentiment in the market is more stable compared to the redemption environment of 2022, with institutional views leaning towards a bullish stance [2] - Huaxi Securities indicates that opportunities for a bond bull market are emerging, recommending extending duration positions [3] Strategic Insights - Analysts recommend maintaining a neutral to slightly high duration strategy in the bond market, as recent policy expectations have cooled and economic indicators suggest a weak reality [4] - The current market risk appetite has increased, limiting the potential for significant interest rate declines, while also constraining the upward movement of rates due to the unstable economic fundamentals [4] - The 30-year government bond ETF, launched in March 2024, is highlighted as a significant investment vehicle, tracking the performance of the 30-year government bond index [5]

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The bond bull market is not over yet as the economic recovery pace is slowing down, inflation has limited upward elasticity, and the growth of social financing is weakening in the second half of 2025 [1][15]. - In the context of a long - term low - interest - rate environment and low credit spreads in China, the duration strategy becomes crucial in bond investment, and 10 - year treasury bonds are a relatively balanced choice [2]. - It is advisable to invest in long - duration treasury bond ETFs. Bond - type passive products are in the fast lane of development, and the 10 - year treasury bond ETF is a powerful tool for investors [3]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Observing the Situation: Economic Recovery Pace Slows Down, Bond Bull Market Continues - **2025 H1 Bond Market Performance**: The bond market first declined and then rose, with the turning point in March. From the beginning of the year to mid - March, it adjusted significantly due to exchange - rate stabilization and tight funds. In late March, it recovered due to tariff frictions. In April and May, it was affected by the central bank's double cuts and the Geneva talks, showing an overall oscillatory upward trend. In June, it oscillated downward and strengthened slightly with the central bank's signal of liquidity support [1][12][13]. - **2025 H2 Economic Outlook**: The economic recovery slope is likely to slow down, mainly because the "export rush" in H1 may lead to an overdraft effect on H2 exports, consumption may lose policy support, and the real - estate investment has not shown significant improvement. Prices are at the bottom with limited upward elasticity, and the social financing stock growth rate is likely to decline in Q3 and Q4 [15][21][22]. 2. Trend: Low - Interest - Rate Environment, Duration is King - **Long - Term Low - Interest - Rate Environment**: China's economic transformation and demographic changes are likely to lead to a long - term low - interest - rate environment. The decline in the traditional economic driving forces and the imbalance between capital supply and demand caused by population aging are the main reasons [28]. - **Importance of Duration Strategy**: In a low - interest - rate environment, adding long - duration bonds is the core to obtain term premiums. Compared with short - term and ultra - long - term treasury bonds, 10 - year treasury bonds have relatively balanced performance in terms of return and risk. Among different bond types, treasury bonds have advantages in terms of tax and liquidity [2][31][40]. 3. Seizing the Opportunity: Allocating Long - Duration Treasury Bond ETFs - **Development of Bond ETFs**: The performance gap between active and passive bond products is narrowing, and the bond - type passive products are in a golden development period. The scale of bond ETFs has reached new highs this year. Compared with overseas markets, domestic bond ETFs have broad development space [3][44][45]. - **Advantages of Bond ETFs**: Bond ETFs have lower fees, higher transparency, and more flexible trading mechanisms. They support T + 0 trading, can be leveraged through pledge, and have lower management and custody fees [3][50]. - **10 - Year Treasury Bond ETF**: It is the only 10 - year treasury bond ETF in the domestic market, providing a powerful tool for investors to invest in 10 - year treasury bonds. Managed by Wang Yu and Wang Zhenyang, it has excellent historical performance and good liquidity [3][57][60]. - **Cathay Fund**: As an ETF pioneer, Cathay Fund has a rich variety of ETF products, covering different asset classes. As of July 18, 2025, it has 69 ETFs with a total scale of 186.626 billion yuan, providing investors with a wide range of choices [66].

Overview - The performance of interest rate bond funds has been notably superior in Q2 2025, with significant contributions from financial-style bond funds and some standout credit bond funds [1][14][19] - The bond market in Q2 2025 exhibited characteristics of "low interest rates and rapid fluctuations," with government bonds outperforming other types of bonds [14][19] Fund Shares - The total share of bond funds in the market saw a marginal increase in Q2 2025 compared to Q1, with over half of the top-performing medium to long-term bond funds also experiencing slight growth [2][26] - Notable increases in shares were observed in funds such as Penghua Fengxiang, Dongfang Zhenbao Pure Bond A, and Tianhong Qixiang A, each expanding by over 3 billion shares in a single quarter [2][26] Net Value - The net value growth of top-performing bond funds in Q2 2025 significantly outperformed that of Q1 2025, with nearly 70% of the growth in Q2 attributed to changes in April [3][30][33] - The sample of top-performing bond funds showed a clear recovery in net value, contrasting with the negative growth rates seen in Q1 [30][33] Bond Type Allocation - By the end of Q2 2025, top-performing bond funds reduced their holdings in interest rate and credit bonds while slightly increasing their positions in certificates of deposit [4][36] - Within credit bonds, there was a notable increase in holdings of financial and corporate bonds, while holdings of medium-term notes and short-term financing bonds were reduced [4][36] Investment Strategy - The investment strategy for Q2 2025 focused on extending duration, reducing leverage, and making moderate downward adjustments [5][58] - The average duration of the bond fund portfolios increased, with top-performing funds maintaining a duration above the market average [5][48][52] - The average leverage ratio for top-performing bond funds slightly decreased to 122.43% in Q2 2025 [58] Summary and Outlook - Looking ahead, the bond market is expected to maintain a volatile upward trend in Q3, with a focus on the flexibility of duration management in September [6][65] - The strategy of extending duration remains favorable, particularly if the positive conditions persist, with key targets for 10Y and 30Y government bonds set at 1.7% and 1.9% respectively [6][65] - For credit bonds, strategies include focusing on short-duration assets and high liquidity long bonds to enhance returns [6][65]