Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the perception that individuals should not prioritize personal preferences when choosing a vehicle, particularly in the context of the Li Auto brand, and argues that owning a Li Auto vehicle can indeed be enjoyable for individuals [1]. Group 1: Reasons for Perception - Many believe that Li Auto vehicles are not designed for individual use due to the brand's focus on family-oriented marketing and product definitions, which often emphasize larger groups [2]. - Cultural factors in China promote the idea of self-sacrifice for family, leading to a perception that vehicles should cater to family needs rather than individual preferences [2]. Group 2: Product Features and User Experience - The Li Auto L789 model, which has been popular in 2023, emphasizes comfort over driving control, aligning with the notion of sacrificing personal preferences for family needs [3]. - Feedback from users has led to improvements in driving control in the 2024 L789 model and the 2025 L9 model, indicating responsiveness to consumer preferences [3]. - Li Auto's marketing predominantly targets family scenarios, with little emphasis on individual use, reflecting the company's belief that the family market is substantial [3]. Group 3: Advantages of Individual Use - Using a Li Auto vehicle as an individual can provide more convenience, such as the ability to keep more personal items on hand that may not be feasible in a multi-user scenario [4]. - The design of the MEGA model allows for a flat single bed setup, which is more advantageous for individual users compared to the L89 model, which has limitations in this regard [5]. - The placement of cup holders and other features in the MEGA model enhances the experience for individual users, allowing for better organization and accessibility [6][7]. Group 4: Overall Comfort and Utility - For individuals, the ability to prioritize personal needs when packing for trips can lead to a more enjoyable experience, as they can choose items that suit their preferences without compromise [8]. - The comfort level of Li Auto vehicles is highlighted as a significant advantage for individual drivers, making them less fatigued during use compared to competitors [8].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the progress of the company's supercharging station construction, with a current total of 2860 stations built, moving towards a target of over 4000 stations by the end of 2025 [1] - The progress for new stations this year is at 49.85%, indicating a steady increase towards the annual goal [1] - With 176 days remaining in the year, the company needs to build an average of 6.48 new stations daily to meet the year-end target [1] Group 2 - A new supercharging station has been established in Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, featuring specifications of 4C × 6 [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the progress of the company's supercharging station construction, with a current total of 2859 stations and a target of over 4000 by the end of 2025 [1] - The completion rate for new supercharging stations this year has increased from 49.71% to 49.80%, indicating steady progress towards the annual goal [1] - There are 177 days remaining in the year, and the company needs to build an average of 6.45 new stations daily to meet the year-end target [1] Group 2 - Two new supercharging stations have been completed in Xiamen, Fujian Province, both located at the Dongfu Service Area on the Shenhai Expressway, with specifications of 2C × 3 and 5C × 1 [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company emphasizes the importance of understanding what it wants, what it is willing to give up, and the responsibilities it must bear in order to build a solid and value-driven enterprise [1][2][3]. Group 1: Understanding Goals and Responsibilities - The company believes that knowing what it wants is crucial, especially when financial resources are limited, and this understanding helps in making informed decisions [1]. - It is essential to recognize what sacrifices are necessary for long-term success, rather than seeking quick financial gains or superficial recognition [1][2]. - The company stresses the importance of accountability and consistency in actions and words, which builds trust and credibility over time [1][3]. Group 2: Addressing Anxiety and Pain - The company identifies a lack of wisdom training as a core reason for anxiety and pain, suggesting that understanding one's goals and responsibilities can alleviate these feelings [4]. - It promotes a culture where individuals support each other in identifying their desires and analyzing what can be sacrificed, fostering a strong organizational framework [3][4]. - The company acknowledges that anxiety will always exist due to new challenges, but it can be managed through the development of skills and wisdom [4].

Core Insights - The article discusses the progress of the company's supercharging station construction, highlighting the current number of stations and the targets for the future [1]. Group 1: Supercharging Station Development - The total number of supercharging stations has increased from 2855 to 2857, with a target of over 4000 stations by the end of 2025 [1]. - The progress towards this year's target is at 49.71%, with 178 days remaining in the year [1]. - To meet the year-end goal, the company needs to build an average of 6.42 stations per day [1]. Group 2: New Stations Added - Two new supercharging stations have been completed: one in Chongqing at the Shuanglong Service Area and another in Quanzhou, Fujian at the Donghaiwanmen Phase II [1]. - The specifications for the new stations include a 2C × 4 configuration for the Chongqing station and a 4C × 6 configuration for the Quanzhou station [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the different design philosophies between electric vehicles (EVs) and traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, emphasizing that there is no absolute right or wrong in these choices, but they lead to different commercial outcomes in the short, medium, and long term [1]. Group 1: Design Philosophy - The design of Xiaomi's SU7 and YU7 has received positive feedback for its aesthetics, which closely resemble those of traditional ICE vehicles [2]. - Xiaomi prioritizes aesthetics in its design philosophy, aiming for mainstream consumers to find the vehicles visually appealing at first glance [1][2]. - The criticism of Li Auto's MEGA design led to adjustments in the appearance of its i8 and i6 models, indicating a shift towards more conventional aesthetics [1]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Xiaomi has shown strong financial performance over the past 15 months, while Li Auto's financial results have not met earlier expectations, leading to dissatisfaction regarding its design choices [2]. - Public sentiment towards a company's design and decisions often correlates with its financial performance; positive results lead to praise, while negative results lead to criticism [2]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - Tesla's first-generation EV design has set a standard in the industry for the past decade, focusing on low drag, good handling, low energy consumption, and long range [2][3]. - Li Auto has built upon Tesla's design principles, potentially leading the industry for the next 5-10 years due to the significant user value of its design approach [3]. Group 4: Technical Aspects - Li Auto has not surpassed Tesla in low drag, handling, energy efficiency, or range, as these aspects are largely dictated by physical laws and design choices [4]. - Xiaomi's SU7 MAX is designed to match Tesla's Model 3 Performance in handling, indicating its capability to achieve similar performance levels [5]. - Li Auto's approach to charging infrastructure and design after removing the engine is seen as a competitive advantage, focusing on user experience with fast charging capabilities [5][6]. Group 5: User Value Considerations - Li Auto prioritizes internal space over front trunk space, believing that maximizing internal space will provide greater user value, especially with the future of autonomous driving [6]. - The design choices made by Li Auto reflect a belief that internal space will be more valuable than aesthetic considerations derived from traditional vehicle designs [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company aims to create groundbreaking products in the artificial intelligence hardware terminal field, similar to the impact of the 2007 iPhone [1][26] Group 1: Company Vision and Strategy - The company defines itself as a space robotics enterprise, focusing on creating exceptional user experiences in smart electric vehicles [7][26] - The CEO believes that the next 2-3 years will see a pivotal moment in the physical world akin to ChatGPT, emphasizing the importance of technical fundamentals behind products [2][21] - The company prioritizes safety and functionality over aesthetics in resource allocation, viewing design as a reflection of corporate values [4][18] Group 2: Team Dynamics and Management - The CEO emphasizes the need for a unique training and growth system to adapt to the younger generation's expectations, which differ from traditional management styles [3][21] - A 63-1 time allocation strategy is employed, with 60% dedicated to organizational work, 30% to product development, and 10% to learning [2][9] - The CEO encourages open discussions and debates within the team to foster a more comprehensive decision-making process [5][9] Group 3: Recruitment and Talent Management - The company prioritizes technical skills, communication abilities, and shared values when recruiting core team members, with any misalignment in values being a deal-breaker [15][21] - The CEO believes that differing perspectives among team members stem from varying viewpoints rather than differences in capability [16][21] Group 4: Innovation and Market Positioning - The company has faced challenges in financing due to its unique approach, such as choosing to develop range-extended electric vehicles despite investor pressure to follow market trends [19][20] - The CEO asserts that the company is focused on solving real-world problems using new technologies and artificial intelligence, rather than merely following market trends [21][22] Group 5: Future Aspirations - The CEO envisions launching innovative AI products that will revolutionize the industry, positioning the company as more than just a traditional automotive manufacturer [26][27]

Core Viewpoint - The company is making progress towards its goal of establishing over 4000 supercharging stations by the end of 2025, with current construction numbers indicating a steady increase in capacity [1]. Group 1: Supercharging Station Development - The total number of supercharging stations has increased from 2852 to 2855, with a recent addition of 3 new stations [1]. - The current progress towards the 2025 target stands at 49.63%, with 179 days remaining in the year [1]. - To meet the end-of-year target, the company needs to construct an average of 6.40 new stations per day [1]. Group 2: New Station Details - New supercharging stations have been established in three locations: - Dongying, Shandong Province: Dongying Blue Ocean Yuhua Hot Spring Hotel, a city 4C station with specifications of 4C × 4 [1]. - Dongguan, Guangdong Province: Dongguan Dongcheng Wanda Plaza, a city 4C station with specifications of 4C × 6 [1]. - Jiangmen, Guangdong Province: Jiangmen Licun Jinyu Plaza, a city 4C station with specifications of 4C × 6 [1].

以下文章来源于具身进化 ，作者一起学习 具身进化 . 智启形随，进化无界。 一、 自动驾驶的技术范式演进 自动驾驶技术正从简单的感知-控制，向更高级的认知智能演进，最新的自动驾驶模型可以分为三大范式： ●端到端自动驾驶 (End-to-End AD): 将传感器输入直接映射到驾驶动作。此模式高效但缺乏可解释性，难以处理需要高级推理的"长尾"场景。 ●用于自动驾驶的视觉语言模型 (VLMs for AD): 引入视觉语言模型来理解和解释复杂的交通场景，显著提升了系统的可解释性。但其输出的 语言与车辆的实际控制脱节，存在"行动鸿沟"。 ●用于自动驾驶的视觉-语言-行动模型 (VLA for AD): 当前最新的范式。它在一个统一模型中整合视觉感知、语言理解和动作执行，实现了感 知、推理和行动的闭环。车辆遵循自然语言指令直接输出动作或者轨迹。 二、 VLA自动驾驶模型的核心架构 一个典型的VLA模型由输入、处理、输出三部分构成，旨在无缝整合环境感知、高级指令理解与最终的车辆控制。 1.多模态输入 (Inputs)： ○视觉与传感器数据：视觉是系统的核心输入，技术已从早期的单前视摄像头发展到如今的多摄像头环视系统。为 ...

最后，根据实际情况重新进行顶层设计，即利益分配机制&权责利机制。 申明：转发这个内容不意味着TOP2认为其说的非常对，只意味着TOP2认为是其是一个值得参考的思考线 索。 原作者：微博用户钱海见闻 原文链接： https://weibo.com/1764841984/PzvpdxiSI 再叨叨一次，学华为渠道管理到底怎么学？ 第一步绝对不是把华为渠道管理套路搬过来，空降华为高管，华为在流程环节削足适履学 IBM≠你 所有模块削足适履学华为。 首先，是认清楚自己，了解自己过去为什么能做的好，取得成功？华为到底做对了那些事才实现了 赶超？ 其次，和利益相关方充分沟通，看华为的哪些我们能学，怎么学，怎么用？ ovm 三家学华为我都很清楚，都走了不同的弯路。 1.O和理想一样的错法，急功近利，直接空降华为高管，最后乌烟瘴气一地鸡毛，而且不仅空降高 管，中国区核心骨干中层也都换了一圈，企业文化都遭到了稀释和侵蚀，导致调整周期最长。 2.v学华为，没走大规模空降华为高管的弯路，但是没有认清楚自己过去成功的经验或者说抛弃了过 去成功的经验【极致分销&保姆式服务】，忽视中小渠道基本盘，想一步到位搞定 KA。还好中国区企业文 ...