申万宏源研究

Search documents
美国通胀“发令枪”——美国6月CPI点评
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-17 01:17
Overview - The core CPI data for June in the US was slightly weaker than expected, but the inflation effects of tariffs are becoming more evident [3][7][38] - The June CPI year-on-year was 2.7%, slightly above the market expectation of 2.6%, while the core CPI was 2.9%, matching expectations [3][38] - The market reacted to the data with a temporary decline in the 10Y Treasury yield and the US dollar index, which later recovered, indicating a focus on future inflation expectations [11][38] Structure - The main drivers of the CPI rebound include rising oil prices, core goods (excluding new and used cars), and non-rent services [4][39] - The energy CPI for June increased by 0.9% month-on-month, recovering from a previous decline of -1.0%, reflecting global oil price increases [4][39] - Core goods inflation showed signs of warming, with a month-on-month increase of 0.2%, driven by clothing, toys, and audio-visual equipment, indicating the impact of tariffs [20][39] - Rent inflation slightly slowed to 0.2% month-on-month, while core non-rent service inflation rebounded, particularly in medical, transportation, and entertainment services [4][39] Outlook - The second half of the year may see continued upward pressure on inflation, with the third quarter being a critical verification period for tariff inflation effects [5][28][40] - The Federal Reserve is expected to initiate rate cuts in September, with two cuts anticipated within the year, despite potential inflation increases [5][34][40] - The combination of moderate inflation increases and weakening employment may influence the Fed's decision-making [34][40]
国内高频 | 基建开工连续回升(申万宏观·赵伟团队)
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-17 01:17
Group 1: Industrial Production - Industrial production remains relatively stable, with a blast furnace operating rate year-on-year at 0.7% [2][5][8] - Chemical production shows a slight decline, with soda ash and PTA operating rates down by 2.6 percentage points to 6% and 0.9 percentage points to 1.3%, respectively [2][15] - The automotive sector's semi-steel tire operating rate is still below last year's level, up by 2.7 percentage points to -6.3% [2][15] Group 2: Construction Industry - The construction industry shows a mixed performance, with the national grinding operating rate down by 2.4 percentage points to 3.7% [2][27] - Cement shipment rates remain low, with a year-on-year increase of 1.2% to -3% [2][27] - Asphalt operating rates have seen a recovery, up by 0.6 percentage points to 7.4% [2][35] Group 3: Real Estate Transactions - Real estate transactions are at a low point, with the average daily transaction area for new homes down by 19.1% year-on-year, despite a 13.1% increase [2][44] - First-tier cities continue to see a decline in transactions, down by 18.6% to 39.9% [2][44] - Third-tier cities show significant improvement, with a year-on-year increase of 72.4% to 17% [2][44] Group 4: Transportation and Shipping - National railway and highway freight volumes have decreased, with year-on-year declines of 1.3% to 1.2% and 0.9% to 0.8%, respectively [2][54] - Port cargo throughput and container throughput have also shown a decline, down by 9.3% to 6.8% and 4.7% to 0.9%, respectively [2][54] - The overall intensity of human mobility remains high, with a migration scale index down by 2% to 12.6% [2][63] Group 5: Price Trends - Agricultural product prices are mixed, with pork and vegetable prices rising by 0.1% and 0.8%, while egg and fruit prices fell by 2.2% and 0.1% [3][85] - Industrial product prices have generally increased, with the South China industrial price index rising by 1.1% [3][93] - The energy and chemical price index increased by 1.3%, while the metal price index rose by 0.7% [3][93]
【脱水研报】与优秀区域性银行同行—变革深化与长期资金双轮驱动
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-11 07:25
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the supply-side reform of small and medium-sized banks, highlighting the coexistence of risks and opportunities, and emphasizes the importance of regional banks that leverage local advantages to compete with national banks in the evolving financial landscape [1][5]. Summary by Relevant Sections Supply-Side Reform of Small and Medium-Sized Banks - The operational characteristics of small and medium-sized banks are a result of the resonance between regional environments and business strategies. Identifying the survivors and outstanding performers among these banks requires a focus on regional clientele and the strategic arrangement of their assets and liabilities [1][5]. Investment Strategy for the Banking Sector - The banking sector is expected to undergo a long-term revaluation driven by several factors: 1) Continuous allocation of long-term funds by insurance and state-owned entities 2) Dissipation of systemic risk concerns 3) Underestimation of the stability of Return on Equity (ROE) [6][7]. - Current A-share listed banks maintain a dividend yield of over 4%, with a premium of more than 2 percentage points over the ten-year government bond yield, indicating a historical high. As the valuation of the banking sector recovers, although dividend yields may decline, the stability of profit growth ensures predictable and sustainable dividends, making bank stocks a scarce high-dividend asset in a low-interest-rate environment [7][11]. Valuation Metrics - The banking sector's ROE has remained stable at around 10%, significantly higher than the 6.7% of non-financial enterprises in the A-share market. Regulatory perspectives emphasize the necessity of reasonable profit growth to maintain financial system stability, suggesting that ROE is likely to remain in the 9%-10% range [11][12]. Investment Focus - Investment should concentrate on: 1) High-quality regional banks with no burdens and high provisions, which are expected to demonstrate growth and should not trade below book value [13]. 2) Banks with stable profit expectations, strong potential funding drivers, and relatively high index weightings, which are mispriced in terms of valuation and ROE expectations [13]. Historical Performance and Recommendations - The company has been a pioneer in researching and tracking regional banks since 2021, successfully recommending stocks like Suzhou Bank and Chongqing Bank, which have shown significant appreciation in value [14].
6月通胀:三大分化(申万宏观·赵伟团队)
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-10 08:27
Core Viewpoint - The inflation data for June shows a divergence between CPI and PPI, with CPI rising slightly while PPI continues to decline, indicating a mixed economic environment influenced by various commodity prices [2][8][69]. Group 1: Divergence in Commodity Prices - In June, PPI fell by 0.3 percentage points to -3.6% year-on-year, primarily due to declining prices of upstream commodities like coal and steel, while CPI increased by 0.1% year-on-year, supported by rising food prices and platinum [2][9][69]. - The decline in PPI was driven by oversupply in sectors such as steel, cement, and coal, which contributed to a 0.4% month-on-month decrease, while international oil prices provided some support to PPI, contributing positively from oil and copper prices [2][9][69]. Group 2: Core Commodity PPI and CPI Trends - Core commodity PPI remains at historical lows, reflecting the impact of tariffs and low capacity utilization in domestic downstream industries, with a slight recovery of 0.4 percentage points to -1% year-on-year [3][21][70]. - In contrast, core commodity CPI increased by 0.3 percentage points to 0.6% year-on-year, driven by consumer stimulus policies that have bolstered domestic demand, particularly in durable goods and household items [3][27][70]. Group 3: Service CPI Performance - Service CPI remained stable at 0.5% year-on-year, with core service CPI also holding steady at 0.8%, while rental prices showed weakness, with a month-on-month increase of only 0.1% [4][30][61]. - The overall demand for services has remained stable, but the rental component, which is a significant part of the service CPI, has not performed as well compared to previous years [4][30][61]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The combination of policy measures and recovery in domestic demand is expected to alleviate inflationary pressures, but significant downward pressure on commodity prices is anticipated in the second half of the year, with PPI expected to underperform CPI [4][35][70]. - Factors such as tariff disturbances, low global oil inventories, and weakened investment in real estate and manufacturing are likely to constrain commodity prices, while low capacity utilization in downstream sectors will continue to suppress PPI recovery [4][35][70].
汇率双周报 | 弱美元与“去美元化”是两码事!(申万宏观·赵伟团队)
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-10 08:27
关注、加星,第一时间接收推送! 文 | 赵伟、陈达飞、李欣越 联系人 | 李欣越 摘要 4月初关税落地以来,美元汇率不升反降。"去美元化"已成为市场共识,关键问题是:弱美元是周期性的 还是趋势性的,美元再度走强的宏观场景有哪些? 一、近期美元走弱的驱动?更多受降息预期影响,"周期性"因素主导 近期美元再度大幅走弱,引发市场对"去美元化"叙事的密切关注。 截至7月4日,美元指数已跌破97关 口,一度创2022年以来新低;相较5月12日反弹后的阶段性高点,美元贬值幅度高达4.7%。分国别来看, 美元兑发达经济体货币表现更弱,兑新兴市场也多有贬值。 降息预期的快速升温或是近期美元走弱的主要原因。 6月10日以来,联邦基金利率隐含的年内降息次数 由1.8次最高升至2.7次,10Y美债利率随之快速下行23bp,成为美元走弱的主要驱动。降息预期升温是三 方面因素的共振:通胀低于预期、经济弱于预期、联储官员放鸽。 伊以冲突缓和导致"避险"情绪退坡,美元空头回补,进一步加速了美元回落。 1)近期美元走势与油价 高度相关,随着伊以冲突缓和、油价回落,美元也随之走弱;2)市场做空美元力量也在积蓄,截至6月 24日,美元指数非商业 ...
特朗普对等关税进入“数据验证期”
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-08 08:30
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential risks of an unexpected downturn in the US economy, emphasizing the importance of monitoring unemployment rates and the implications of tariffs on trade and economic growth [1][5]. Economic Forecasts - The IMF has revised the global GDP growth forecast for 2025 down to 2.8%, a decrease of 0.5 percentage points from January [2][3]. - The US GDP growth forecast for 2025 has been lowered from 2.7% to 1.8%, reflecting a decline of 0.9 percentage points [2]. Key Economic Indicators - A rise in the unemployment rate to the range of 4.4-4.6% could trigger a "recession trade" in the market [1][5]. - The article highlights the uncertainty in trade, industrial production, and economic growth due to the implementation of Tariff 2.0 [1]. Currency Trends - There is a possibility of further depreciation of the US dollar, which may lead to an appreciation of the Chinese yuan against the dollar, similar to the situation observed in August-September 2024 [1][9]. - The potential for a gradual depreciation of the dollar may continue if the US government pursues fiscal balance and creates more room for interest rate cuts [9]. Economic Scenarios - The article outlines three possible scenarios for the US economy, indicating the risks associated with stagflation and the "triple whammy" of stocks, bonds, and currency [7][6].
【申万宏源策略 | 一周回顾展望】去产能是慢变量,去产量是快变量
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-07 01:27
Core Viewpoint - The current anti-involution policies are expected to strengthen the trend of "reducing capital expenditure," leading to a more certain and sustained supply-demand turning point starting in mid-2026 [1][4]. Group 1: Anti-Involution Policies - The anti-involution policies are reminiscent of the supply-side reforms from 2016-2017, which can be broken down into three core elements: "reducing capacity," "reducing output," and demand-side stimulation [2]. - "Reducing capital expenditure" is an inevitable trend, with the current growth rate of capital expenditure in the midstream manufacturing sector reaching a new low since 2012 [3]. - The impact of "reducing capacity" will manifest in three ways: delayed effects from reduced capital expenditure, abandonment of existing projects, and guiding the survival of the fittest among existing enterprises [3][4]. Group 2: Supply-Demand Dynamics - The most significant impact of the current anti-involution is that by mid-2026, the growth rate of fixed asset formation in midstream manufacturing will be lower than the nominal GDP growth rate, enhancing the visibility of the supply-demand turning point [4]. - The current low capacity utilization and weak internal investment willingness among enterprises suggest further room for decline in capital expenditure growth [4]. Group 3: Market Outlook - The improvement in the supply-demand dynamics in midstream manufacturing and the easing of the anti-involution narrative are seen as crucial components for a bull market expected in 2026-2027 [8]. - The recent breakthrough of the Shanghai Composite Index has become an investment narrative, enhancing risk appetite, although the current fundamental expectations and profit accumulation are not yet at bull market levels [8][9]. - The focus on high-dividend stocks, including bank shares, is deemed a long-term correct strategy, but short-term dynamics indicate that this trend may not be sustainable [10]. Group 4: Sector Performance - The sectors currently showing significant profit expansion include banking, steel, and electricity equipment, while sectors like defense and non-ferrous metals are experiencing contraction [14]. - The short-term market focus is on sectors such as steel, building materials, and electrical equipment, with expectations of improved profitability in various manufacturing sub-sectors by Q4 2025 [11]. Group 5: Investment Strategy - The investment strategy should consider the anticipated structural changes in the market, with a focus on sectors that will benefit from the anti-involution policies and the expected recovery in profitability [11][14]. - The Hong Kong stock market is expected to perform well in the potential bull market, driven by factors such as concentrated IPOs and early dividends [11].
【申万宏源策略】周度研究成果(6.30-7.6)
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-07 01:27
Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of "capacity reduction," which is reflected in the decline of capital expenditure, the abandonment of existing projects, and the guidance for the survival of the fittest among existing enterprises. This capacity reduction is a slow variable that will elevate the long-term profitability capability [3] - The current strong performance of the A-share market suggests a growing focus on long-term positive factors, although the current fundamental expectations and profit-making effects are not yet at bull market levels. The company's market outlook remains unchanged, predicting that 2026-27 will be the core period of the bull market, with signs of index improvement starting in Q4 2025 [3] - The article notes that the capital expenditure of internet platforms may improve, serving as a driving force for stock prices in the domestic AI computing power industry chain. In the short term, the market is highly focused on sectors such as electric equipment, steel, and building materials [3] Group 2 - Service consumption is recovering, with a notable expansion in the price decline of white liquor and pork. Year-on-year growth rates have been continuously rising since the beginning of the year [6]
李总理在会上提的“好房子”是什么?
申万宏源研究· 2025-07-03 07:12
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article suggests that the new model of real estate development may include concepts such as "good houses," human-land-money relationships, lifecycle management of properties, and a system of selling completed houses, with the intention of shifting the real estate industry from a financial focus back to manufacturing [1][4]. Group 2 - "Good houses" are driven by policy direction, with a current supply shortage of high-quality residential properties, where only 24% of urban residential stock is estimated to be of high quality, while the demand for improved housing is projected to account for 44% from 2022 to 2025 [2][4]. - The definition of "good houses" is evolving from a focus on physical structures to include functional living spaces and emotional significance, indicating a broader market demand [4][6]. - Drawing from the U.S. experience post-real estate crisis, the industry underwent supply reform, and companies with strong product capabilities and inventory management were able to navigate through economic cycles successfully [7][9]. Group 3 - The article anticipates that companies capable of producing "good houses" will thrive in the future, characterized by strong product capabilities (higher profit margins) and effective inventory management (higher turnover rates) [9].
美元稳定币:科技精英与传统秩序之间的一次博弈
申万宏源研究· 2025-06-30 01:22
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the restructuring of the global financial and monetary order, emphasizing the challenges faced by the US dollar and the implications for asset allocation strategies in the coming years [1]. Group 1: Dollar and Monetary Policy - The article highlights the "Triffin Dilemma" faced by the US dollar, exacerbated by fluctuating tariff policies under Trump, indicating a mid-term rebalancing pressure on dollar assets [1]. - The introduction of dollar stablecoins represents a dual effort by the US government to both centralize emerging cryptocurrencies and tacitly accept the decentralization of traditional dollars [3][5]. - Despite the emergence of dollar stablecoins, the article warns that they may not provide the expected stability, suggesting a continued strategic outlook on decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin and diversified stablecoins [6]. Group 2: Renminbi Internationalization - The article identifies key areas for the internationalization of the Renminbi, including trade settlement, currency swap liquidity, offshore bond financing, and the development of offshore financial markets, particularly in Hong Kong [8]. - It notes that Hong Kong's position as the largest offshore Renminbi market is crucial for providing high-quality Renminbi-denominated assets, enhancing its strategic importance [8]. - The current level of Renminbi internationalization is deemed to have significant room for improvement, especially when compared to China's GDP and trade volume on a global scale [9]. Group 3: Asset Allocation Strategy - The article recommends focusing on non-dollar assets, gold, and Bitcoin as alternative asset revaluation opportunities, particularly during periods of dollar depreciation [10]. - For tactical asset allocation over the next 3-6 months, it suggests a standard allocation to equities, underweighting oil and US Treasuries, while overweighting gold; and for the next 6-12 months, it anticipates potential trend opportunities in global equities and risk assets like copper [10]. - It also points out that the allocation of funds in Chinese, Japanese, and European stock markets remains low, indicating significant potential for growth, while US stock market allocations are at high levels and may decrease [10].