Group 1 - The article emphasizes the systemic and practical aspects of the current economic landscape, highlighting the shift in global trade dynamics due to the weakening of direct economic ties between China and the U.S. and the strengthening of China's relationships with emerging markets [1][2] - China's trade connections with emerging markets are becoming increasingly robust, while its trade ties with major U.S. allies have declined, indicating a strategic pivot in China's economic diplomacy [2] - The article suggests that the current "strategic stalemate" between China and the U.S. is a foundational expectation, with an optimistic outlook for China's strategic opportunities beginning to take root among investors [2] Group 2 - The A-share market is seen as having the potential to develop into a bull market due to increasing household asset allocation towards equities, driven by a decline in risk-free interest rates and an upcoming peak in deposit reallocations in 2025 [3][4] - Improvements in corporate governance and shareholder returns are expected to elevate the return baseline for A-shares, while the encouragement of mergers and acquisitions aligns with a turning point in the primary market [4][5] - A significant supply clearing cycle is anticipated, which could lead to a long-term increase in profitability for Chinese enterprises, particularly in high-value sectors [5][6] Group 3 - The current market conditions are not yet signaling the start of a bull market, with various factors influencing demand and supply dynamics, including uncertainties in domestic fiscal policies and real estate [6][7] - The technology sector is undergoing a mid-term adjustment, with breakthroughs in foundational technologies necessary for significant advancements in AI applications [7] - New consumption trends are emerging as a separate industrial trend, but the broader economic transition towards consumption-driven growth is expected to be gradual [7][8] Group 4 - A forecast for A-share profitability in 2025 indicates a likely decline in demand in the latter half of the year, with a projected net profit growth rate of 4.6% for the entire A-share market [8] - The asset management industry is not yet prepared for a bull market, as the accumulation of a profitable effect is necessary for public funds to re-enter the market [9][10] - The potential bull market is expected to be driven by structural trends in new economic industries, with significant catalysts needed for a broader market rally [10][12] Group 5 - The article discusses the conditions necessary for a bull market to emerge, emphasizing the importance of breaking out of the current trading range and the historical context of market behavior following bear markets [11][12] - The potential for a "Chinese-style slow bull" market is highlighted, with expectations for a longer duration of market optimism despite weaker elasticity in fundamental improvements [12][13] - Key sectors such as AI, embodied intelligence, and defense are identified as having the potential to drive structural bull trends, with a focus on high-value opportunities in the technology space [13][14] Group 6 - The Hong Kong stock market is positioned to lead the market rally, serving as a critical link in China's financial external circulation and benefiting from the convergence of domestic and foreign capital [15]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transformation of industries and the necessity for policy innovation in response to economic changes since 2022, highlighting the divergence in economic indicators and the impact of external factors on domestic industries [1][6]. Group 1: Industry Transformation and New Challenges - Since 2022, the economic transformation has entered a "new stage," characterized by a downward trend in the contribution of traditional sectors like real estate, with growth rates for real estate-related industries dropping below 2% [7][24]. - The pressure in this new stage is increasingly focused on terminal demand, leading to a decline in PPI while CPI remains weak, indicating a shift of excess capacity to downstream sectors [13][24]. - The transformation has resulted in a significant decline in the growth rate of traditional industries, similar to trends observed from 2011 to 2015, which ultimately stabilized the economy [7][13]. Group 2: Policy Innovation - The effectiveness of traditional policy frameworks has diminished, necessitating comprehensive policy innovation to address the new economic landscape [1][35]. - By the end of 2024, a comprehensive optimization of the policy framework was initiated, focusing on supply-side structural reforms and enhancing the targeting of structural policies [35][42]. - The new policy framework emphasizes high-quality development, high-level openness, and sustainable growth, with a shift from investment-driven to people-centered approaches [3][121]. Group 3: External Shocks as Accelerators - External shocks, particularly during the tariff phases, have accelerated domestic industrial upgrades, with significant shifts in trade structures observed [64][65]. - The first phase of tariffs led to a notable increase in high-value-added industries, while the second phase primarily impacted low-value-added consumer goods, which were already experiencing significant internal competition [64][101]. - The export structure has improved, with a decrease in the proportion of exports to the U.S. and an increase in exports to non-U.S. economies, particularly in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative [83][90]. Group 4: Focus on "Anti-Internal Competition" and Service Sector - The new policy framework is expected to focus on "anti-internal competition" and the service sector, which can absorb structural employment pressures during the transformation process [4][121]. - The service sector has become the largest employment absorption area, yet it faces significant supply shortages, indicating a need for increased support and demand stimulation [4][121]. - By the second half of 2025, the main macroeconomic indicators may experience a "strong-weak conversion," with potential downward pressure on manufacturing and positive improvements in service sector investments and consumption [4][121].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a significant shift in global asset allocation, with a notable inflow into European equities and bonds, while Chinese equities are experiencing outflows, indicating a "seesaw" effect in the market dynamics [1][3][41]. Market Review - The successful outcome of the China-US-Switzerland talks on May 12 has significantly boosted global risk appetite, leading to an increase in global stock indices [10][41]. - The 20-year US Treasury auction on May 22 was poorly received, with the final yield surpassing 5%, raising concerns about US fiscal pressure [1][10]. Global Asset Performance - In May, equity assets generally rose, while US Treasury yields increased and the dollar weakened. The 10-year US Treasury yield rose by 24 basis points [2][13]. - Gold prices increased by 2.1%, and Brent crude oil rose by 1.7% during the same period [2][13]. Global Fund Flows - In May, there was a significant inflow of $215 billion into global money market funds, with developed market equities receiving $305 billion, while emerging market equities saw an outflow of $83 billion [3][20]. - Developed European fixed income and equity funds attracted inflows of $190 billion and $247 billion, respectively, indicating stronger performance compared to the US [3][20]. China Market Dynamics - By the end of May, global equity funds experienced an outflow of $88.5 billion from China, a reversal from the inflow of $198.3 billion in April [4][41]. - The outflow was primarily driven by passive ETFs, which saw a withdrawal of $82.5 billion in May compared to an inflow of $203.9 billion in April [4][41]. - In terms of sector performance, there was a significant inflow into technology, real estate, and materials, while telecommunications, consumer staples, and healthcare saw outflows [4][41]. Country Allocation - Global market funds reduced their allocation to US equities by 1.0 percentage points in April, while increasing allocations to European equities [5][41]. - The allocation to China remains stable at 26.4%, indicating potential for further growth [5][41]. Emerging Markets - Emerging market funds saw a decrease in allocation to Chinese equities, with a drop of 1.6 percentage points compared to March, while the allocation to Indian equities also decreased [5][41]. - In May, emerging market equity funds experienced a net outflow of $45 billion, with China being the primary contributor to this outflow [43][46].

Core Insights - The article discusses the potential opportunities in the market due to expected lower supply chains, particularly in the context of the U.S. economic slowdown and its implications for various industries [2]. Group 1: Market Trends - The article highlights that the current market conditions may allow for adjustments and opportunities, especially with the anticipated lower supply chains [2]. - It notes that the consumer spending has shown a significant impact, often being a key indicator for market adjustments [2]. Group 2: Industry Analysis - The article mentions that the technology sector is expected to experience significant growth, driven by trends in the industry [2]. - It also discusses the performance metrics, indicating a notable increase in certain sectors, with a focus on the implications of these trends for future investments [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the A-share market is likely to remain in a consolidation phase until Q2-Q3 of 2025, with a need to wait for favorable conditions to initiate a larger market rally [1][2]. Market Review and Conditions for Breakthrough - Historically, after a bear market ends, the market often enters a consolidation phase before confirming a bull market. Significant upward breakthroughs from this phase typically signal the start of a major bull market [2]. - The article outlines previous consolidation periods in the A-share market, noting that the end of bear markets in 2005 and 2009 led directly to bull markets, while subsequent bear market endings resulted in prolonged consolidation phases [2]. - The conditions for a breakthrough include sustained inflow of incremental capital into A-shares, cyclical and structural improvements in the fundamentals, and optimistic expectations for a bull market [2]. Current Market Dynamics - The current environment shows that the asset management industry is returning to incremental competition, but further accumulation of profit effects is needed [2]. - The cyclical improvement in fundamentals is expected to be confirmed by 2026, while the structural bull market in technology requires breakthroughs at the foundational level to drive application layers [2]. - The optimistic expectations for China's strategic opportunity period are developing but need to resonate with other factors to reflect in asset prices [2]. Short-term Market Trends - The short-term rebound in the A-share market is supported by a "隔离墙" (isolation wall) against macroeconomic disturbances, which reduces major downside risks [5][6]. - The market is currently experiencing a positive attempt at structural breakthroughs, driven by the expansion of profit effects in new consumption and a rebound in technology growth [5][6]. - However, the overall profit effect is nearing a high point, suggesting potential for increased volatility in the short term [5][6]. New Consumption Trends - Core targets within new consumption sectors (such as jewelry, trendy toys, new snacks, and beauty products) are maintaining their respective growth trends, with high valuation frameworks still sustainable [7]. - The article expresses caution regarding the expansion of profit effects in new consumption, indicating that significant profit effect expansions often signal short-term adjustments [7]. - The A-share market's mid-term return to a structural bull market relies on breakthroughs in technology industry trends, with short-term rebounds in technology not yet escaping adjustment phases [8]. Quantitative Indicators - The article includes various quantitative indicators tracking market sentiment and profit effect diffusion across sectors, indicating ongoing expansions in several industries, including healthcare, environmental protection, and transportation [10].

青春飞扬，爱拼敢赢 申万宏源研究总经理 王胜 此外，近期的外部不确定性，反而可能最终导致中国的国际影响力不断上升， 中国商品可能将逐步成为品质和实力的象征，这对于反内卷、提升要素回报，特别 是劳动力要素回报，并最终提振内需意义重大。中国资本市场也可能进入ROE回报 提升、 龙头 品 牌 影 响 力 日 益 突 出的 时代 ，也 将 证明 GDP 增 速 哪 怕 回 落 到 中 高 速 增 长，也能迎来长牛。 最后，除了助力发挥类"平准基金"作用的中央汇金、以及全国社保、各类保险 公司等耐心资本，我们认为"居民存款搬家"可能也会最终发生，成为资本市场生力 军，而不少国家和地区的外资最终也将加入人民币资产重估的大潮。 在这浩如烟海的中国经济史、证券史中，我的职业生涯虽微不足道，但最令自 己骄傲的或许就是能与申万宏源研究同行的十六载。作为"土生土长"的申万宏源研 究人，从20 09年毕业入职作为建筑行业分析师的萌新，到现今即将奔赴总经理（所 内称"所长"更多）的新岗位，借机整理并分享近期的思考和感悟。 乱云飞渡仍从容 风云际会，"百年未有之大变局"徐徐展开，世界秩序重构过程中或许有"惊涛 骇浪"，"特里芬两难"已经 ...

5 月 30 日，申万宏源召开干部任职宣布会，周海晨同志不再兼任申万宏源研究总经理，王胜 同志接任总经理一职，全面负责经营管理工作。申万宏源证券执行委员会委员周海晨同志分管研 究业务和机构业务，兼任申万宏源研究党委书记、董事长。 王胜同志在会上则表示，研究所将在公司党委的领导下，积极服务国家发展大局，强化数据 优势，开拓智能研究，擦亮研究"金字招牌"，以"金融报国"的情怀和政治担当，持续优化"投研 +产研+政研"体系建设，为公司"一流投资银行和投资机构"建设而努力。 申万宏源党委书记、证券公司董事长刘健同志在干部任职宣布会上，肯定了王胜同志的专业 能力、敬业精神和客户意识，并提出研究所要持续深化高质量党建对研究工作的引领作用，以 "金融报国、金融为民" 的使命担当，为公司高质量发展注入强劲动能；要聚焦主责主业提升研究 质效，锚定金融 "五篇大文章" 精准发力，在服务国家战略中彰显研究价值；夯实可持续发展根 基，传承和发扬好团队历史底蕴与专业精神。 周海晨同志肯定了王胜同志近些年在服务国家战略、专业领域、团队管理的成绩。希望王胜 同志继续夯实团队可持续发展根基，赓续 "百年团队" 精神，在创新中开拓新局，聚焦宏 ...

Core Viewpoints - The article discusses the current concerns of investors regarding macro interest rates, credit, and convertible bonds, and provides insights on these topics [2][12]. Group 1: Bond Market Dynamics - Bond interest rates are positively correlated with domestic demand and negatively correlated with external demand, indicating that despite unexpected tariff changes, the core contradiction in the bond market remains focused on domestic demand [3][14]. - The liquidity environment is improving gradually, with funding rates decreasing from around 1.8% to a range of 1.4%-1.6%, suggesting that negative carry is becoming a thing of the past [4][19]. - The long-end interest rates, particularly the 10-year government bond, require a decline in deposit rates to facilitate further downward movement [20][21]. Group 2: Macro-Prudential Support - The People's Bank of China is focusing on macro-prudential measures to support the healthy development of the bond market, which includes monitoring risks and enhancing regulatory coordination [5][24]. - The current credit environment shows weak growth in broad credit, with local government bonds expanding, indicating that investors may face more interest rate risks [25]. Group 3: Credit Bond Market - The credit bond market is expected to see a shift towards stronger credit performance and weaker interest rates, driven by a decrease in deposit rates and increased allocation towards credit bonds by wealth management products [7][28]. - The performance of credit strategies is likely to favor short to medium-term bonds, particularly those with a maturity of 2-3 years, with a ranking of value from city investment bonds to industry bonds [8][30]. Group 4: Investment Opportunities - The recent surge in sci-tech bonds presents unique investment opportunities, especially with new issuers and private sector participation, although investors should remain cautious of potential credit risks [10][32]. - The recommendation for a near-term convertible bond strategy is based on the increasing market focus on bonds with shorter maturities, particularly those with a strong repayment capability [11][34].

以下文章来源于申万宏源策略 ，作者全球资产配置团队 申万宏源策略 . 我们强调体系性、实战性 长端日债利率上行归因与套息交易后续展望 ——全球资产配置热点聚焦系列之二十九 金倩婧/冯晓宇/林遵东/涂锦文/王胜 本期投资提示： 事件：2025年5月20日，日本财务省发行的1万亿日元20年期国债拍卖中，投标倍数跌至2.5倍 （2012年以来最低），尾差（中标价与最低接受价差距）飙升至1.14（1987年以来最高），随 后30年日债利率大幅上升至2.74%，带动30Y-10Y日债利差大幅上行至126BP（目前处于2000年 以来的99.3%分位数），日本国债的期限结构显著陡峭化。 日本长期国债利率大幅上行的核心原因来自：1）2023年以来日本就业市场持续回暖，薪资增速 快速上升带动通胀上行，日央行加息周期中全期限日债利率处于上行通道。 2021年以来日本经 济中就业市场逐步回暖，其中日本失业率快速下行，而劳动参与率趋势性提高，导致2023年以 来日本劳动组织总联合会春斗的工资涨幅大幅上升，另外疫情之后日本服务业PMI持续维持在 繁荣区间，所以日本通胀趋势性上行，连续两年超过日央行的通胀目标区间（2%）。为了应对 通 ...

Core Viewpoint - April's profit growth is primarily driven by short-term improvements in costs and expenses, but attention is needed on potential profit decline pressures in the third quarter due to tariff disturbances [3][76]. Group 1: Profit and Revenue Analysis - In April, industrial profits increased by 0.4 percentage points year-on-year to 2.9%, mainly due to improved cost and expense pressures [3][9]. - The contribution of costs and expenses to overall profit improved, with costs contributing +2.7 percentage points and expenses +0.5 percentage points, while other losses contributed negatively [3][9]. - Actual operating revenue showed resilience, with a year-on-year decline of 1.6 percentage points to 5.5%, contributing 4.9% to overall profit growth [3][9]. Group 2: Cost Structure and Industry Performance - The overall cost rate for industrial enterprises was 86%, with a year-on-year marginal decline of 12.6 basis points [3][17]. - Downstream consumer manufacturing industries saw a cost rate increase of 59.7 basis points to 84.3%, which was significantly lower than seasonal trends [3][17]. - In contrast, the petrochemical and metallurgy chains experienced weaker cost performance, with respective cost rates rising to 86.5% and declining to 87% [3][17]. Group 3: Revenue Support from Infrastructure and Exports - Benefiting from infrastructure investment and export boosts, the coal and metallurgy chains, along with downstream consumer industries, provided significant revenue support [4][27]. - The actual revenue growth rate fell by 1.6 percentage points to 5.5%, with the petrochemical industry experiencing a notable decline of 3 percentage points to 2.1% [4][27]. - The consumer manufacturing chain maintained a relatively high revenue growth rate of 7.8%, supported by short-term export boosts [4][27]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Uncertainties - Future profit recovery remains uncertain due to potential lagging effects of tariffs and low capacity utilization in mid and downstream sectors [4][33]. - Historical data indicates that profit margins have a greater impact on profits than revenue, with current low capacity utilization keeping consumer manufacturing cost rates high [4][33]. - Previous experiences suggest that post-tariff implementation may lead to declines in asset turnover and rising fixed costs, resulting in profit growth rates declining more than revenue [4][33]. Group 5: Regular Tracking of Industrial Performance - Industrial enterprise profits showed a year-on-year increase of 0.4 percentage points, primarily due to improved profit margins [5][36]. - Revenue growth for industrial enterprises remained stable, with significant increases in the food and beverage sectors [5][50]. - Inventory growth slightly declined, indicating that terminal demand still requires further recovery [5][61].