米粉们终于赢了一次。在经过一整天的评论区喊话、脱粉抵制以及热搜施压之后，小米新任公关负责人徐洁云昨日（1 月 5 日）晚 9 时 35 分公开对外致 歉，表示将立即终止与相关 KOL "可能进行的任何形式的合作"，"且以后也不会合作。" 01 事件起因并不复杂。前几日，社交媒体上盛传小米正在接洽投放一位数码博主，但该博主被米粉认为是"米黑"的代表人物，米粉们认为其多次发表涉及小 米的争议言论且长期贬低米粉群体，比如广为流传的"负资产"言论。 在得知小米即将与该博主合作之后，米粉们或许感受到了一丝背叛。部分米粉们开始组织起来在雷军及公关负责人徐洁云微博评论区表达不满，"这种米 黑博主你们也投放，请他们来黑小米用户吗？" 昨日晚 9 时 35 分，徐洁云终于对外公开回应，承认公司此前曾与相关 KOL 接触，"经大家提醒，经过查证，我们立即终止可能进行的任何形式的合作， 且以后也不会合作。"他同时强调，用户及米粉朋友们感受是小米最在乎的事情。 徐洁云致歉微博 过去一年，对于那些深爱着小米的米粉们来说或许并不算轻松。 从年初的辅助驾驶高速事故、SU7 Ultra 的碳纤维双风道前舱盖争议，到年底持续至今的小字营销风波 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Xiaomi and the blogger "万能的大熊" (Zong Ning) has sparked significant backlash from the Xiaomi community, leading to a public apology from Xiaomi's PR head and the termination of any potential collaboration with the blogger [1][10][11]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The controversy began when the blogger openly stated in a group chat that Xiaomi had invested in him, which angered many Xiaomi fans who viewed him as a critic of the brand [2]. - The blogger has a history of disparaging Xiaomi products and referring to Xiaomi users as "negative assets," which intensified the backlash when his connection to Xiaomi was revealed [4]. - Prominent Xiaomi influencers reacted strongly, with one publicly denouncing the collaboration and expressing disgust, leading to a broader call for boycotts against Xiaomi products [6]. Group 2: Community Reaction - The topic "大熊 小米" quickly trended on social media, with Xiaomi's executives facing a flood of negative comments on their Weibo posts [7]. - Many Xiaomi fans expressed feelings of betrayal, stating that if Xiaomi were to sign with the blogger, they would cease supporting the brand altogether [9]. - The community consensus was that Xiaomi should allocate marketing funds to support loyal customers rather than those who criticize the brand [9]. Group 3: Company Response - In response to the escalating public outcry, Xiaomi's PR head issued a statement confirming prior contact with the blogger and announced the immediate termination of any potential collaboration [10][11]. - The statement emphasized the importance of user sentiment and aimed to restore trust among Xiaomi's customer base [11]. - The incident has been characterized as one of the largest trust crises in Xiaomi's history, highlighting a potential failure in corporate culture and values [13].

Core Insights - On January 6, 2026, Alibaba-W (09988), SMIC (00981), and Tencent Holdings (00700) were the top three stocks by trading volume in the Southbound Stock Connect, with trading amounts of 5.049 billion, 4.427 billion, and 4.110 billion respectively [1] - In the Southbound Stock Connect for the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, Alibaba-W (09988), Tencent Holdings (00700), and SMIC (00981) also ranked as the top three, with trading amounts of 4.374 billion, 2.876 billion, and 2.096 billion respectively [1] Southbound Stock Connect Trading Activity - **Top Active Companies in Southbound Stock Connect (Shanghai-Hong Kong)** - Alibaba-W (09988): Trading amount of 5.049 billion, net buying of +2.061 billion [2] - SMIC (00981): Trading amount of 4.427 billion, net selling of -0.240 billion [2] - Tencent Holdings (00700): Trading amount of 4.110 billion, net buying of +11.255 million [2] - Xiaomi Group-W (01810): Trading amount of 2.244 billion, net buying of +0.485 billion [2] - China Ping An (02318): Trading amount of 1.693 billion, net buying of +0.760 billion [2] - **Top Active Companies in Southbound Stock Connect (Shenzhen-Hong Kong)** - Alibaba-W (09988): Trading amount of 4.374 billion, net selling of -0.442 billion [2] - Tencent Holdings (00700): Trading amount of 2.876 billion, net selling of -0.815 billion [2] - SMIC (00981): Trading amount of 2.096 billion, net buying of +0.262 billion [2] - Xiaomi Group-W (01810): Trading amount of 1.644 billion, net buying of +11.316 million [2] - China Ping An (02318): Trading amount of 1.586 billion, net buying of +1.081 billion [2]

Core Viewpoint - The live stream hosted by Lei Jun aimed to counter various rumors and criticisms surrounding Xiaomi's automotive division, particularly focusing on safety concerns and misinformation spread by online "black water armies" [1][2]. Group 1: Response to Safety Concerns - The live stream featured a detailed disassembly of the Xiaomi Yu7 standard version, emphasizing the vehicle's safety features, including a 3.2mm thick high-strength aluminum alloy anti-collision beam and a detachable honeycomb aluminum energy-absorbing box [2][4]. - Lei Jun highlighted the design of the Yu7, which includes a long front end for aesthetic appeal and enhanced safety through a longer collision buffer zone [4]. Group 2: Addressing Misinformation - The term "Green Belt Warrior" was labeled as a malicious edit, with claims that it was a deliberate attempt to mislead the public about Xiaomi vehicles following a series of traffic accidents [5]. - Xiaomi's public relations team is actively working to support affected car owners in gathering evidence against online harassment and misinformation campaigns [5]. Group 3: Clarification of Misunderstandings - The claim that the Yu7 could travel 1300 kilometers on a single charge was described as taken out of context; Lei Jun clarified that this was based on a specific test conducted under controlled conditions [6]. - The phrase "200 kilometers instant stop" was also misinterpreted, with comparisons made to casual expressions that do not accurately reflect the technical specifications of vehicle braking [7]. Group 4: Legal and Public Relations Strategy - The rumor of Xiaomi having a 7000-member legal team was dismissed as false, with the company expressing intentions to strengthen its legal team to combat defamation and misinformation [9]. - The decision to close comment sections during product launches was explained as a measure to protect the experience of genuine users from coordinated attacks by online trolls [6]. Group 5: Marketing Practices - The controversy surrounding "small print marketing" was defended as a compliant practice rather than deceptive marketing, with the company emphasizing transparency in its promotional materials [10].

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd. has obtained a patent for a method and device for configuration information transmission, with the patent number CN116234049B, applied for on April 2020 [1] - Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd. was established in 2012 and is primarily engaged in software and information technology services, with a registered capital of 148.8 million RMB [1] - The company has made investments in 4 enterprises, participated in 149 bidding projects, and holds 5000 patent records, along with 123 administrative licenses [1]

营销之王又直播营销啦！（营销之王是宣传目标）。 1月3号雷总的直播，除了拿来一辆YU7进行拆车讲解之外，更是预留了一段时间专门对近期的一些节奏和谣言进 行解释。雷总在直播完的第二天还特地发了个微博说： 知道大家不爱看拆车，冲着什么来的我能不懂吗？上菜！ 老话说的好：要断章取义——节选自《不要断章取义》。"1300公里只充一次电"和"1300公里中间只充了一次 电"，完全不一样的意义。 首先最受关注的，就是被网友调侃的"绿化带战神"标签。现在有不少车都有自己的外号，什么"毛胚房"、"浴皇大 帝"、"公路闪电"等等。雷总请来公关部总经理的徐洁云在直播里直接表示这是恶意剪辑的结果，以及有黑水军操 纵账号带节奏。 有个朋友首批提了YU7,前几天被大货车蹭了侧面（大货车全责）。结果车载录像一发到他的抖音上，直接就火了 挑几个评论你们自己看。 然后是"小字营销"。"逆光之王"是吧？我懂的，我最爱吃"海参炒面"了！这点雷总解释说，用小字更多是为了满 足广告法的合规要求，但实际上确实影响了用户体验，接下来会优化宣传物料设计，尽量更直接，让信息更透 明。 除此之外，有一些离谱的传言我听了都觉得好笑，比如"小米不让农民卖小米"。 ...

小米集团-W(01810)发布公告，于2026年1月6日，该公司斥资约1.5亿港元回购385万股股份，每股回购 价格为38.86-38.9港元；就根据股份计划授予参与人(发行人的董事除外)的股份奖励或期权而发行36.1万 股。 ...

智通财经APP讯，小米集团-W(01810)发布公告，于2026年1月6日，该公司斥资约1.5亿港元回购385万 股股份，每股回购价格为38.86-38.9港元；就根据股份计划授予参与人(发行人的董事除外)的股份奖励或 期权而发行36.1万股。 ...

FF305 第 1 頁 共 9 頁 v 1.3.0 翌日披露報表 (股份發行人 ── 已發行股份或庫存股份變動、股份購回及/或在場内出售庫存股份) 表格類別： 股票 狀態： 新提交 公司名稱： 小米集团 (於開曼群島註冊成立以不同投票權控制的有限公司) 呈交日期： 2026年1月6日 如上市發行人的已發行股份或庫存股份出現變動而須根據《香港聯合交易所有限公司（「香港聯交所」）證券上市規則》(「《主板上市規則》」)第13.25A條 / 《香港聯合交易所有限公司GEM證券 上市規則》(「《GEM上市規則》」)第17.27A條作出披露，必須填妥第一章節 。 | 第一章節 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. 股份分類 | 不同投票權架構公司普通股 | | 股份類別 B | | 於香港聯交所上市 | 是 | | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 01810 | | 說明 | | | | | | 多櫃檯證券代號 | 81810 | RMB | 說明 | | | | | | A. 已發行股份或庫存股份變動 | | | | ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the evolution of autonomous driving technology in 2025, marking a transition from research to practical implementation, with significant advancements in various technical areas [2][3]. Group 1: Industry Trends - The year 2025 is characterized as a turning point for autonomous driving, with technologies like BEV perception, multi-sensor fusion, and trajectory prediction reaching maturity [2]. - The competition in the smart electric vehicle sector is intensifying, with companies like Horizon, Xiaomi, and Li Auto making notable advancements [4][22]. Group 2: Company Highlights - Horizon has made significant strides with its HSD technology, showcasing high potential in end-to-end solutions and innovative approaches like GoalFlow and ResAD [9]. - Xiaomi's autonomous driving development has rapidly progressed, with a team exceeding 1000 members and a series of iterative improvements leading to the release of HAD enhanced version [10][11]. - Li Auto has established itself in the domestic autonomous driving tier, although it faces challenges in transitioning from range-extended to pure electric vehicles [13]. - Xiaopeng Motors experienced a rebound in sales, doubling its volume to nearly 430,000 units in 2025, driven by the successful launch of VLA 2.0 technology [14]. - Bosch is actively investing in both research and production lines, focusing on end-to-end solutions and enhancing its engineering capabilities [16]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The competition in the smart electric vehicle market is expected to become more fierce in 2026, with a shift towards L3 and L4 autonomous driving technologies gaining traction [22][23].