1月12日，第一财经记者了解到，自变量机器人宣布已完成10亿元A++轮融资。本轮融资由字节跳动、 红杉中国、北京信息产业发展基金、深创投、南山战新投、锡创投等顶级投资机构及多元地方平台联合 投资。据了解，这也是深创投AI基金成立以来的第一笔投资。值得关注的是，除字节外，自变量在此 前的融资中也先后获得了美团、阿里的投资，是国内唯一同时被这三家互联网大厂投资的具身智能企 业。（第一财经） ...

值得关注的是，除字节外，自变量在此前的融资中也先后获得了美团、阿里的投资，是国内唯一同时被 这三家互联网大厂投资的具身智能企业。 （文章来源：第一财经） 1月12日，第一财经记者了解到，自变量机器人宣布已完成10亿元A++轮融资。本轮融资由字节跳动、 红杉中国、北京信息产业发展基金、深创投、南山战新投、锡创投等顶级投资机构及多元地方平台联合 投资。据了解，这也是深创投AI基金成立以来的第一笔投资。 ...

Group 1 - Anta Sports-R (82020), Tencent Holdings-R (80700), and Geely Automobile-R (80175) have the highest short-selling ratios at 100.00%, 90.92%, and 80.03% respectively [1][2] - Meituan-W (03690), Alibaba-W (09988), and Tencent Holdings (00700) lead in short-selling amounts, with 1.554 billion, 1.440 billion, and 1.253 billion respectively [1][2] - Tencent Holdings-R (80700), China Wangwang (00151), and Country Garden (02007) have the highest deviation values at 45.18%, 36.17%, and 33.66% respectively [1][2] Group 2 - The top short-selling amounts are led by Meituan-W (03690) at 1.554 billion, followed by Alibaba-W (09988) at 1.440 billion, and Tencent Holdings (00700) at 1.253 billion [2] - The top short-selling ratios include Anta Sports-R (82020) at 100.00%, Tencent Holdings-R (80700) at 90.92%, and Geely Automobile-R (80175) at 80.03% [2] - The highest short-selling deviation values are observed in Tencent Holdings-R (80700) at 45.18%, China Wangwang (00151) at 36.17%, and Country Garden (02007) at 33.66% [2][3]

Group 1 - Tencent Holdings (00700) had a net inflow of 1.953 billion, representing a 14.71% increase in net inflow [1][2] - Xiaomi Group-W (01810) saw a net inflow of 1.634 billion, with a net inflow ratio of 22.31% [1][2] - The top three stocks with the highest net outflow were China Mobile (00941) at -1.137 billion, SMIC (00981) at -1.079 billion, and Kuaishou-W (01024) at -286 million [1][2] Group 2 - The highest net inflow ratios were recorded by Sichuan Chengyu Expressway (00107) at 72.73%, Shanghai Industrial Holdings (00363) at 56.73%, and Qingdao Port (06198) at 50.96% [1][3] - The stocks with the largest net outflow ratios included China National Building Material (03323) at -61.83%, Stone Pharmaceutical Group (02005) at -61.03%, and CITIC International Telecommunications (01883) at -54.38% [1][3]

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities in China are taking action against the chaotic competition in the food delivery industry, initiating an investigation into the market competition status of food delivery platforms [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The State Administration for Market Regulation announced that the Office of the State Council Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee will investigate and assess the competitive conditions in the food delivery platform service industry [1][3]. - The investigation aims to address issues such as excessive subsidies, price wars, and traffic control that have been detrimental to the real economy and have intensified "involution" competition within the industry [3]. Group 2: Industry Response - Major food delivery platforms, including Meituan, Taobao Shanguo, and JD, have expressed their support for the investigation and committed to cooperating fully with the regulatory authorities [4]. - Meituan stated that it will use this investigation as an opportunity to work with other platforms to fulfill market responsibilities and promote healthy development in the food delivery service industry [4]. Group 3: Historical Context - This is not the first time regulatory authorities have intervened in the food delivery industry; previous actions included discussions with major platforms in response to the intense competition and subsidy wars that escalated in 2025 [5][6]. - In 2025, significant subsidy investments were made by platforms, including a joint investment of 50 billion yuan by Taobao and Ele.me, and 10 billion yuan by JD [5]. Group 4: Financial Impact - The ongoing price wars have negatively impacted the profitability of major players; for instance, JD's operating profit margin fell to -0.2% in Q2 2025, down from 3.6% in the same period of 2024 [6]. - Meituan reported a net profit of 1.49 billion yuan in Q2, a staggering 89% decrease year-on-year, attributed to industry competition [6].

Core Viewpoint - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee has initiated an investigation into the competitive landscape of the food delivery platform service industry, highlighting issues of excessive subsidies, price wars, and traffic control that have led to "involution" in competition [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Competition - The food delivery industry has seen intense competition, initially sparked by JD.com, followed by fierce battles between Alibaba's Taobao and Meituan, escalating further amid multi-format e-commerce conflicts [1]. - Regulatory scrutiny has been ongoing, with the government previously engaging with major platforms like JD.com, Meituan, and Alibaba to ensure fair competition [1]. - The ongoing price wars have resulted in significant financial burdens for platforms, which have not translated into sustainable business improvements [1]. Group 2: Impact on Stakeholders - Many small and medium-sized businesses are experiencing a situation where increased order volume does not equate to increased revenue, reflecting a broader issue of financial strain across the industry [2]. - Delivery riders are also facing challenges, as the influx of orders does not lead to proportional income, indicating a disconnect between consumer subsidies and worker compensation [2]. - Consumers may benefit from low prices in the short term, but this comes with hidden risks, such as the potential for lower quality and service standards [2]. Group 3: Regulatory and Market Implications - The government has emphasized the need to address "involution" in competition, particularly in e-commerce, where low prices and low quality dominate, leading to inefficiencies and resource wastage [2][3]. - Healthy competition is essential for industry growth, and the current state of "involution" hinders innovation and value creation, necessitating a shift towards differentiated, high-quality competition [3]. - The regulatory intervention signals a commitment to fostering fair competition and improving overall market health, moving from mere market share battles to enhancing supply chain efficiency and innovation [3].

Group 1 - The establishment of Jiaxing Lexian Technology Co., Ltd. has been officially registered with a capital of 5 million yuan [1] - The company's business scope includes network technology services, Internet of Things technology services, ticketing agency services, and information system integration services [1] - Jiaxing Lexian Technology Co., Ltd. is wholly owned by Meituan's Zhejiang Lexian Technology Co., Ltd. [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the urgent need to address the "involution" in the food delivery industry, as highlighted by the central government's focus on expanding domestic demand, promoting innovation, and combating involution in the economy [5][6]. Group 1: Market Saturation and Competition - The food delivery market in China is nearing saturation, with online food delivery users reaching 592 million by the end of 2024, accounting for 53.4% of the total internet users [8][10]. - The competition in the food delivery sector has shifted to a zero-sum game, where growth is no longer driven by increased demand but rather by existing market share [8][11]. Group 2: Impact on Stakeholders - The ongoing price wars have not benefited any stakeholders in the food delivery ecosystem. Merchants have seen a rise in order volume but a decline in actual revenue, with a reported average decrease of 4% in daily revenue despite a 7% increase in total orders since July 2025 [12][15]. - Delivery riders are also facing increased workloads without corresponding income growth, leading to a significant drop in average monthly earnings [13][15]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The government has initiated investigations into the chaotic competition in the food delivery market, indicating a serious approach to curbing involution and ensuring fair competition [6][20]. - Previous attempts to regulate the market through discussions with major platforms like Meituan and JD have had limited success, necessitating a more robust regulatory framework [16][18]. Group 4: Long-term Implications - The article argues that the current trajectory of excessive marketing expenditures over long-term capital investments could undermine the long-term value of Chinese internet companies [21][27]. - The call for a shift from price wars to differentiated services and technological innovation is seen as essential for sustainable growth in the industry [27][25]. Group 5: Conclusion - The initiation of market investigations is viewed as a critical step towards meaningful reform in the food delivery sector, signaling the end of unsustainable competition driven by short-term gains [22][27]. - The article concludes that the future of the food delivery industry will depend on platforms' ability to adapt their strategies towards building a healthier ecosystem and enhancing core competitiveness [27][28].

Core Viewpoint - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee has initiated an investigation into the competitive landscape of the food delivery platform industry, highlighting issues of excessive subsidies, price wars, and traffic control that have led to "involution" and negatively impacted the real economy [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Competition - The food delivery industry has seen intense competition, initially sparked by JD.com, followed by fierce battles between Alibaba's Taobao and Meituan, escalating amidst a multi-format e-commerce environment [1]. - Regulatory scrutiny has been ongoing, with the government previously engaging with major platforms like JD, Meituan, and Alibaba to ensure fair competition [1]. - The current competition is characterized by a focus on market share acquisition through heavy spending, which has not translated into sustainable business improvements, resulting in significant financial burdens for the platforms [1]. Group 2: Impact on Stakeholders - Many small and medium-sized businesses are experiencing a situation where increased order volume does not equate to increased revenue, leading to a cycle of burdens without corresponding financial benefits [2]. - Delivery riders are also facing challenges, as the influx of orders does not lead to proportional earnings, and consumer subsidies are not effectively reaching the labor force [2]. - Consumers may benefit from low prices in the short term, but this comes with hidden risks, such as the potential for lower quality products and services due to aggressive pricing strategies [2]. Group 3: Regulatory Response and Future Directions - The government has emphasized the need to address "involution" in competition, particularly in the e-commerce sector, which is marked by low prices and low quality, lacking innovation [2]. - A healthy industry requires new entrants and should focus on creating value rather than engaging in destructive competition that leads to resource waste and declining profits [3]. - The regulatory intervention signals a push towards fostering fair and orderly competition, aiming to shift from mere market share battles to enhancing supply chain efficiency and promoting high-quality, differentiated competition [3].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The coffee industry remains highly prosperous with brands actively opening new stores, although there is a caution regarding short-term data volatility due to the seasonal downturn [3] - The tea beverage sector is under slight pressure as it enters the off-season, with a trend of subsidy reductions expected despite the government's investigation into delivery platforms [3] - The e-commerce sector continues to face challenges, showing lackluster performance due to the domestic consumption environment [3] - Music streaming platforms are highlighted as valuable internet assets driven by domestic demand, with a recommendation to focus on music subscription platforms [3] - The virtual asset and trading platform market is experiencing limited catalysts, with cryptocurrency prices remaining volatile [3] - The automotive service sector is seeing expansion, with new 4S stores being opened by Zhongsheng Group in various cities [3] - The internet healthcare sector is gaining attention with OpenAI's launch of "ChatGPT Health," suggesting a focus on this area [3] - The AI and cloud sectors are viewed positively, with recommendations to monitor leading tech companies with strong cash flows [3] - The media sector is showing signs of recovery, with new games performing well and user growth in the gaming segment [3] Summary by Sections 1.1 Consumer & Internet - The Hang Seng non-essential consumer index decreased by 0.98%, underperforming the Hang Seng index by 0.57 percentage points [8] - Notable stock performances include: Gu Ming (+8.72%), Ba Wang Tea (+6.99%), and Luckin Coffee (-6.47%) [8][10] 1.2 Platform & Technology 1.2.1 Streaming Platforms - The Hang Seng media index increased by 3.22%, outperforming both the Hang Seng index and the technology index [15] - Key stock performances include: iQIYI (+0.99%) and Tencent Music (-2.86%) [15] 1.2.2 Virtual Assets & Internet Brokers - As of January 9, the global cryptocurrency market cap reached $319.54 billion, up 3.40% [22] - Bitcoin and Ethereum prices were $90,505 and $3,083.14, reflecting changes of +0.6% and -1.2% respectively [22] 1.2.3 Automotive Services - The Hang Seng composite index rose by 0.38%, with notable stock performances including Advance Auto Parts (+12.73%) [31] 1.2.4 O2O - The Hang Seng internet technology index decreased by 0.27%, with key stock performances such as JD Health (+13.31%) and Didi Global (-7.19%) [37] 1.2.5 AI & Cloud - The Nasdaq internet index increased by 1.59%, with Amazon (+9.22%) and Google (+4.26%) showing strong performances [39] 1.3 Media - The Shenwan一级传媒 index increased by 13.14%, with the advertising and marketing sector showing the largest gains [46] - Key stock performances include: Xindong Company (+18.50%) and Tencent Holdings (-1.93%) [46]