2026年1月底，因为路透社的消息显示，我国石油企业中石油已经要求暂停购买或者交易委内瑞拉原 油。显然，中国出手的对象不是委内瑞拉，而是把油能不能进中国市场，当作战略筹码的美国算计。 起因要追溯到美国试图接管委内瑞拉石油出口许可的那套"卖油换规则"的操作。 他们想玩"资源代理人"的老把戏，一边施压委内瑞拉听从指挥，一边想拉中国背书新价格体系。目标很 清楚，用委原油填补市场，同时借机坐上话语权主位。 不好意思，中国根本不陪这场戏。 阅读须知：本文内容所有信息和数据，均为作者查阅官方信息和网络已知数据整合解析，旨 在让读者更清晰了解相应信息，如有数据错误或观点有误，请文明评论，作者积极改正！ （创作不易，一篇文章需要作者查阅多方资料，整合分析、总结，望大家理解。） 这不是一场石油买卖那么简单，这是一次对全球资源话语权的正面较量。 而中国这次，没有闪躲，没有妥协，干脆利落地打出一记"禁令牌"。 船不靠岸，合同不推进，资金不流转。看到这一步，特朗普的脸变了，话风也猛地一拐。 这到底发生了什么？ 中国拒绝为"单方面设定、没有共识的价格和契约体系"站台，更不会在美方主导的清算体系里当角色球 员。 结果，画虎不成反类犬。美 ...

Core Insights - In 2025, central enterprises registered an average of over one new energy storage company daily, totaling 392 companies with a registered capital exceeding 50 billion [1] - The collective action of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) reflects a strategic move not just to meet carbon neutrality goals but to assert control over the future energy system [1][2] Group 1: Strategic Moves by Central Enterprises - The establishment of a joint venture between China National Petroleum Corporation and CATL to produce energy storage systems signifies a deeper logic: the competition is for discourse power in the energy transition era, not merely market share [2] - Traditional energy companies face an identity crisis as power generation shifts from traditional plants to distributed energy sources, making control over energy storage crucial for maintaining operational authority [2] - The formation of 54 subsidiaries by the State Grid in the energy storage sector is a strategic move to reinforce its core position amid the trend of grid intelligence [2][3] Group 2: Investment Strategies and Market Dynamics - Two contrasting capital strategies are evident among central enterprises: significant investments in core strategic areas and smaller, exploratory investments in emerging markets [3] - Major investments, such as the 1 billion yuan registered capital of China Yajiang Group's new energy company, signal a shift of energy storage from a trial business to a core strategic focus [3] - Conversely, smaller subsidiaries with registered capital as low as 100,000 yuan are being established to test the waters in regions like Xinjiang and Gansu, reflecting a cautious approach to market entry [3] Group 3: Challenges and Market Structure - Despite the rapid expansion of energy storage projects led by central enterprises, there are underlying profitability challenges, as many projects rely on bundled development rather than independent market operations [5][6] - The geographical concentration of these projects, particularly in Hebei, Xinjiang, and Shandong, indicates a strategic alignment with local resource endowments and policy support [5] - The current focus on electrochemical storage technologies raises concerns about the lack of diversification in technological pathways, which could hinder the long-term health of the energy storage industry [6] Group 4: Future Implications - The competitive landscape is shifting, with central enterprises reshaping the power structure of the energy storage industry, compelling private companies to reconsider their roles [6] - The success or failure of the 392 newly registered companies will significantly influence the future power dynamics of China's energy system [6] - The transition from traditional energy systems to new power systems is critical, and the ongoing competition in energy storage represents a pivotal battle in this transformation [6]

Core Insights - The reports highlight that the global oil and gas industry is entering a period of profound transformation by 2025, characterized by intensified turmoil, system restructuring, and a reconfiguration of the landscape due to geopolitical conflicts, economic restructuring, and energy transition [1][2] Group 1: Global Oil and Gas Industry Trends - The global oil and gas sector is facing a complex "new situation" with increasing volatility and a reshaped framework, driven by intertwined geopolitical conflicts and economic changes [1] - By 2026, the global economy is expected to exhibit "low growth, high differentiation, and increased turmoil," posing severe challenges to global energy security and market stability [1] - The oil market is anticipated to shift from a tight balance to a state of oversupply, with Brent crude prices projected to range from $60 to $65 per barrel under normal conditions, and potentially rise to $70 to $75 per barrel amid geopolitical tensions [3] Group 2: China's Oil and Gas Industry Developments - China's oil and gas industry is demonstrating strategic confidence and resilience, aiming for progress while maintaining stability, with a focus on achieving the goals set for the 14th Five-Year Plan [1][4] - By 2025, China's energy self-sufficiency is projected to reach 84.4%, with non-fossil energy consumption accounting for 21.8% of total energy use, and this is expected to rise to over 23% by 2026 [4] - Oil and gas production in China is set to reach a historical high of 420 million tons of oil equivalent by 2025, with crude oil production expected to stabilize at 200 million tons in 2026 [4][5] Group 3: Energy Security and Policy Implications - The global energy security landscape is becoming increasingly complex, with the report indicating that while fossil energy remains relatively secure, the risks associated with electricity supply are rising [6] - The report calls for a more inclusive and cooperative approach to energy security, emphasizing the need for multilateralism and practical collaboration across various sectors, including energy investment and climate governance [6] - China's energy security situation is improving, marking a new phase in its journey towards becoming an energy powerhouse [6]

Core Viewpoint - Venezuela has assured China that its oil pricing will remain independent of U.S. influence, emphasizing the security of Chinese investments in the country [2][5]. Oil Pricing and U.S. Influence - Venezuelan ambassador to China, Remigio Ceballos, stated that Venezuela will not adhere to U.S. arrangements regarding oil pricing, asserting the right to make independent decisions based on international market prices [3][4]. - Reports indicated that the U.S. was considering exerting control over Venezuela's state-run oil company, PDVSA, potentially lowering prices to $50 per barrel [2][3]. China-Venezuela Relations - China has condemned the U.S. military actions against Venezuela and reaffirmed its commitment to the partnership with Venezuela, which is based on mutual trust [4][5]. - Ceballos emphasized that Chinese investments in Venezuela, including those in the petroleum sector, will continue unaffected by external pressures [5][6]. Chinese Investments in Venezuela - China National Petroleum Corporation has joint ventures with PDVSA, and China Concord Resources Corp. plans to invest over $1 billion in a Venezuelan oil project, aiming for a production target of 60,000 barrels per day by the end of 2026 [6]. - Despite Venezuela's significant oil reserves, its crude output has been hindered by mismanagement and U.S. sanctions [6]. U.S. Actions and Responses - The Trump administration has promoted U.S.-led reforms to boost oil production and attract foreign investment in Venezuela, which is seen as beneficial for both the country and American consumers [7]. - The U.S. has returned $500 million from an initial oil sale to Venezuela and is reportedly moving to ease sanctions to revive the energy sector [8]. Diplomatic Developments - Following the military operation against Maduro, the U.S. reportedly urged Venezuela to sever economic ties with China and other nations, although Trump later indicated that Chinese investment would be welcomed [9]. - Chinese President Xi Jinping expressed a commitment to working with Latin American countries, emphasizing the importance of sovereignty and development goals [10].

Core Viewpoint - The chemical industry ETF managed by E Fund has shown positive performance, with significant inflows and growth in both scale and shares, reflecting strong investor interest in the sector [1][2]. Group 1: Index Performance - As of February 4, 2026, the China Petroleum Industry Index (H11057) increased by 0.41%, with key stocks like Sinopec rising by 3.17% and Wanhua Chemical by 3.09% [1]. - Over the past two weeks, the E Fund chemical industry ETF has accumulated a rise of 0.55%, ranking in the top half among comparable funds [1]. Group 2: Liquidity and Trading Volume - The E Fund chemical industry ETF had a turnover rate of 3.05% during the trading session, with a transaction volume of 48.77 million yuan [1]. - The average daily trading volume over the past week reached 160 million yuan [1]. Group 3: Fund Size and Shares - The latest size of the E Fund chemical industry ETF reached 1.595 billion yuan, marking a one-year high [1]. - The total shares of the ETF have also reached 1.466 billion, which is a one-year high [1]. Group 4: Net Inflows - The E Fund chemical industry ETF has seen continuous net inflows for 13 days, with the highest single-day net inflow reaching 391 million yuan, totaling 1.371 billion yuan in net inflows [1]. - The average daily net inflow stands at 105 million yuan [1]. Group 5: Top Holdings - As of January 30, 2026, the top ten weighted stocks in the China Petroleum Industry Index account for 55.71% of the index, including companies like Wanhua Chemical and Sinopec [2].

港股石油股午后走高，中国石油化工股份(00386.HK)、中国海洋石油(00883.HK)、中国石油股份 (00857.HK)均涨超2%。 本文源自：金融界AI电报 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the performance of the Oil ETF (561360), which opened with a gain of 1.42% at 1.431 yuan on February 4 [1] - Major holdings of the Oil ETF include China National Petroleum Corporation, which rose by 2.01%, China National Offshore Oil Corporation by 1.98%, and Sinopec by 0.79% [1] - The Oil ETF's performance benchmark is the CSI Oil and Gas Industry Index return, managed by Guotai Fund Management Co., Ltd., with a return of 41.01% since its establishment on October 23, 2023, and a return of 14.47% over the past month [1] Group 2 - The article lists other notable stocks within the Oil ETF, including Jereh Group (up 0.98%), China Merchants Energy Shipping (up 1.56%), Guanghui Energy (up 1.30%), COSCO Shipping Energy (up 0.82%), Hengli Petrochemical (up 1.82%), Rongsheng Petrochemical (up 0.79%), and Intercontinental Oil and Gas (up 2.24%) [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the incentive compensation for executives of major state-owned enterprises in the energy sector in China for the 2022-2024 term, highlighting the amounts allocated to various leaders within these companies [1][3][4]. Group 1: Central Enterprises and Their Incentive Compensation - The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) has released the incentive compensation details for executives of central enterprises, which include companies like China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec), and State Grid Corporation of China [1][3]. - The incentive compensation consists of annual salary and term incentive income, with the latter being distributed every three years [1]. Group 2: Individual Executive Compensation - For CNPC, the chairman Dai Houliang is set to receive an incentive income of 86.21 million RMB for the 2022-2024 term [3]. - In Sinopec, chairman Ma Yongsheng's incentive income is 84.81 million RMB, while other executives like Zhao Dong and Zhang Shaofeng have amounts of 83.23 million RMB and 75.35 million RMB respectively [4]. - China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) chairman Wang Dongjin will receive 86.06 million RMB, with other executives like Zhou Xinhai and Huojian receiving 49.43 million RMB and 76.86 million RMB respectively [5]. Group 3: Summary of Other Major Enterprises - State Grid Corporation of China chairman Zhang Wei will receive 78.17 million RMB, while other executives like He Zhongwen and Jiang Changliang will receive 48.54 million RMB and 70.14 million RMB respectively [7]. - China Southern Power Grid's chairman Meng Zhenping is set to receive 83.54 million RMB, with other executives like Qian Chaoyang receiving 26.35 million RMB [10]. - China Huaneng Group's chairman Wenshu Gang will receive 63.47 million RMB, while other executives like Zhang Wenfeng and Dong Jianling will receive 39.02 million RMB and 67.79 million RMB respectively [11]. Group 4: Additional Notable Executives - In China Datang Corporation, chairman Zou Lei will receive 80.02 million RMB, while Liu Mingsheng and Zhang Chuanjiang will receive 44.23 million RMB and 17.78 million RMB respectively [12]. - China Huadian Corporation's chairman Jiang Yi will receive 63.24 million RMB, with other executives like Ye Xiangdong receiving 84.32 million RMB [14]. - National Energy Investment Group's former chairman Wang Xiangshi received 16.46 million RMB for his term, while other executives like Feng Laifa and Xu Xinfeng will receive 60.97 million RMB and 39.94 million RMB respectively [18].

Core Viewpoint - The demand for asphalt in China remains strong due to ongoing economic development and infrastructure construction, but the industry is entering a new phase characterized by supply surplus and limited capacity growth [2]. Group 1: Industry Overview - The asphalt industry in China has seen a steady increase in production capacity, reaching 79 million tons in 2023, with an annual increase of 8 million tons, representing a growth of 11.27% year-on-year [2]. - The average operating rate of refineries has remained low at around 50%, indicating a persistent supply surplus in the domestic asphalt market [2]. - The production profit for asphalt is expected to drop to its lowest point in recent years in 2024, which will further inhibit refineries from increasing production capacity [2]. Group 2: Demand and Supply Factors - The overall demand for asphalt is projected to decline due to local fiscal pressures and stricter approvals for infrastructure projects [2]. - Potential implementation of a consumption tax policy could significantly increase production costs, further weakening the willingness of refineries to expand production [2]. Group 3: Industry Development History - The asphalt industry in China began to develop significantly in the 1980s with the construction of high-grade highways, leading to increased demand for asphalt [7]. - The "Twelfth Five-Year Plan" period saw rapid development in various transportation modes, which further stimulated the asphalt industry [7]. - The "Thirteenth Five-Year Plan" period is characterized by a focus on supporting major national strategies, indicating a broad market potential for the asphalt industry [7]. Group 4: Industry Chain - The upstream of the asphalt industry chain includes raw materials such as coal, emulsifiers, modifiers, and petrochemicals [9]. - The midstream involves the production and manufacturing of asphalt, while the downstream applications include highways, waterproof building materials, municipal road construction, and airport construction [9]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The asphalt industry is expected to face stagnation in capacity growth due to multiple factors, including declining demand and rising production costs [2]. - The continuous expansion of the highway network and periodic maintenance needs will provide stable and sustained market demand for the asphalt industry in the future [14].

Group 1 - The oil and gas ETF Huatai-PB (561570) opened with a gain of 1.22%, priced at 1.331 yuan [1] - Major holdings in the ETF saw positive movements: CNOOC rose by 1.98%, PetroChina by 2.01%, Sinopec by 0.79%, and others like Jereh, COSCO Shipping, and Guanghui Energy also experienced gains [1] - The ETF's performance benchmark is the CSI Oil and Gas Industry Index, managed by Huatai-PB Fund Management Co., with a return of 31.70% since its inception on October 9, 2024, and a monthly return of 14.01% [1]