关注公众号，点击公众号主页右上角" ··· "，设置星标 "⭐" ，关注 鑫椤锂电 资讯~ 本文来源：企业官微 三大创新领袖强强联手 共同推动固态电池技术路测 当三家全球创新先锋携手合作，将带来怎样的行业变革？这一答案，正在慕尼黑的城市道路上逐步揭晓。 近日，宝马集团正式启动配备大尺寸固态电池（Solid-State Battery）的BMW i7实车道路测试。该电池电芯由Solid Power公司开发，并搭载了优美科专有的 正极活性材料 （CAM）。该材料基于优美科与Solid Power此前签署的联合 开发协议，由双方共同研发完成。 以合作驱动创新 固态电池以 固态电解质 替代传统液态电解质，在 安全性 、 效率 和 能量密度 方面具备显著优势。作为 固态电池正 极材料 研发的前沿企业，优美科正积极推动该技术从实验室阶段迈向商业化应用。 为了将先进的正极材料应用于下一代电池电芯，优美科与行业领先的全固态电池技术开发商Solid Power建立合作，共 同推进 全固态电池（ASSB）电芯 的研发。此次用于宝马i7测试车辆的电池电芯，正是这一合作成果的重要体现。 慕尼黑实路测试启动关键验证 宝马集团在该技术的 ...

曾经是市场竞争对手的两大车企巨头，竟然私下在悄悄谈判启动合作。 近日，据德国《Manager Magazin》报道，奔驰和宝马正在就发动机合作进行深入谈判。如果合作达成，奔驰将从2027年起在部分车型中使用宝马的 四缸汽油发动机。目前双方已进入"高层规划阶段"，预计近几个月敲定最终方案，2025年底前或将官宣。 在环保方面，随着全球环保意识的提升，汽车排放标准愈发严苛，Euro 7排放标准便是摆在众多车企面前的一道难题。奔驰与宝马作为欧洲豪华汽车 的代表，自然无法置身事外。研发一款全新的四缸发动机以满足Euro 7排放标准，需要投入巨额资金，据估算，这一数字高达数十亿欧元。对于任何一家 车企而言，如此巨大的研发成本都是沉重的负担。 目前，宝马的B48发动机已形成了成熟的技术体系，年产量超过200万台，凭借着规模效应，其边际成本优势显著。通过共享宝马的发动机，奔驰可 以节省超过30%的研发支出。对于宝马而言，这一合作也能盘活奥地利施泰尔工厂25%的闲置产能，实现典型的"规模效应"，达成双赢局面。 当地舆论认为，产品布局的战略互补，也是奔驰与宝马合作的重要原因。从理论上看，奔驰在紧凑型车市场，如CLA、GLA等车 ...

其中，全新BMW X3长轴距版曜夜套装给外观换上新"皮肤"，售价不变。全系车型还增加新车身 漆"个性化定制磨砂纯灰"，冷冽色泽散发锋芒。全新BMW X3长轴距版设计语言着眼于未来家族，原石 切割般的车身带来无可比拟的气势。其轴距达2,975毫米，媲美BMW X5标准轴距。车身每一曲线和棱 角，都经过严格的风洞测试，风阻系数较上代降低7%，驾驶更高效。 颜值换新之外，BMW X家族还将更智能。未来几周内，BMW X1、X3长轴距版搭载的BMW智能 个人助理将接入DeepSeek功能，扩展车机能力边界。同时，第9代BMW操作系统车机生态不断解锁"新 技能"，即将带来常用、好用的新应用和新功能，让数字化体验始终在线。驾驶过程中，车道级导航覆 盖城市主干道；3D视图的车载地图直观呈现精准路况；一线城市更可实现精确到车位的地下停车场导 航。(中国经济网记者 郭跃) "X"是BMW体系中最具进取精神的代表。此次BMW X家族主力成员全面引入"曜夜套装"，为BMW X1、X3长轴距版、X5车身覆上亮黑高光，遍布车身的高亮修饰恰到好处，个性化、运动风双buff叠 满，更具张力的视觉表达呼应客户积极进取、追求豪华品质与时尚格调 ...

凤凰网科技讯 8月22日，宝马官方发文谈到自家汽车标志性的"鼻子"前脸设计。 宝马认为，双肾格栅不仅是宝马设计的图腾，更是在每个时代与发动机技术、散热需求密切相关的功能 性表达。 宝马对于自己的"鼻子"为何如此执着? 官方称，双肾是三维雕塑化、浑然一体设计的品牌宣言--更立 体、更有力、更未来，没有突破，就没有下一个经典。BMW始终让设计服务于功能，但不止于功能。 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Mercedes-Benz and BMW are in high-level negotiations to collaborate on engine technology, specifically for BMW to supply its four-cylinder gasoline engines for multiple Mercedes models, marking a historic cross-brand technology sharing initiative [1][3]. - The collaboration aims to reduce R&D costs and adapt to industry changes, with the potential to enhance the market sustainability of fuel vehicles and accelerate the deployment of plug-in hybrid models for Mercedes [1][3]. - The specific models that may utilize BMW's engines include CLA, GLA, GLB, C-Class, E-Class, GLC, and a planned small SUV, which indicates a broad application of the partnership [3]. Group 2 - The BMW B48 series 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine is expected to be produced in Austria and offers layout flexibility for both compact and mid-size vehicles, which could benefit Mercedes' vehicle lineup [3][4]. - The partnership may extend beyond engine sharing to include technology collaboration in areas such as transmissions, although no official confirmation of the details has been made yet [4]. - The outcome of the negotiations is anticipated to be announced by the end of the year, indicating a timeline for potential developments in this collaboration [4].

Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between Mercedes-Benz and BMW reflects a strategic balance between traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) operations and the transition to electric vehicles (EVs), showcasing a dual approach to meet market demands and regulatory pressures [1][2]. Group 1: Engine Collaboration - Mercedes-Benz is in advanced negotiations with BMW to supply its 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine (B48 series) for multiple Mercedes models, which aligns with the upcoming Euro 7 emission standards [1]. - This engine can be utilized across various platforms, including models such as CLA, GLA, GLB, C-Class, E-Class, GLC, and the planned "small G" series, potentially produced in Austria or the U.S. to avoid tariffs [1][2]. - The partnership allows Mercedes to reduce R&D costs for ICEs while maintaining competitiveness in the plug-in hybrid and range-extended vehicle markets [1]. Group 2: Charging Network Collaboration - Mercedes and BMW have established a joint venture, Beijing Yianqi New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., to build and operate a high-power charging network in China, with plans to construct at least 1,000 charging stations and approximately 7,000 charging piles by the end of 2026 [1][2]. - The charging stations will feature a rated power of 600 kW and a maximum current of 800 A, supporting a voltage range of 200V to 1000V, and will offer functionalities like plug-and-charge and online reservations [2]. - This collaboration addresses the growing demand for high-end charging experiences and reflects the necessity for infrastructure investment as a competitive differentiator in the luxury automotive market [2]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The dual strategy of maintaining ICE and hybrid models while enhancing EV charging infrastructure illustrates the challenges luxury automakers face amid slow EV sales growth and limited profit contributions from electric vehicles [2]. - The partnership between Mercedes and BMW signifies a pragmatic approach to resource sharing and cost distribution, highlighting the flexible stance of luxury car manufacturers in navigating competition and collaboration during the transition period [2]. - If the engine collaboration is finalized, consumers may see Mercedes vehicles equipped with BMW engines, alongside access to the jointly developed high-power charging network in China, representing a compromise in the face of industry uncertainties [2].

在反对欧洲2035年全面禁售燃油车的态度上，BBA出奇一致。 近日，梅赛德斯-奔驰从宝马、奥迪手中接过接力棒，其首席执行官康林松同样借接受媒体采访之机，表达了对上述政策的不满。相较于前者，康林松的 发言更加大胆也更具威胁。他将燃油车与欧洲汽车产业相绑定，直言没有燃油车，欧洲汽车产业将面临"崩溃"。 反对者异口同声，支持者同样旗帜鲜明。去年9月，沃尔沃汽车公司与数十家工业制造商力挺欧盟，敦促2023年禁售内燃机汽车政策的落实。 他们的证词同样正气凛然，沃尔沃首席执行官Jim Rowan称："2035 年的目标对于协调所有利益相关者并确保欧洲的竞争力至关重要。" 夹在支持者与反对派之间，欧盟的态度摇摆不定。一方面，欧盟为政策落实做着各种努力，目前政策仍未取消；另一方面，在反对派的游说之中，欧盟屡 屡让步，不仅给予合成燃料以豁免权，还在3月延后了减排不达标的罚款。 欧盟一再的食言与摇摆不定的态度下，反映出的是欧洲电动车进展的不顺与暗藏的危机。 从欧洲当下局势来看，其电动车普及率依然在低位徘徊，民众对电车的态度也不温不火。车企的处境尤其尴尬，一众厂商的电动化转型与预期相去甚远， 从半年报数据来看，在销量和关税的内外部 ...

关注 「电动车公社」 和我们一起重新思考汽车 "如果没有燃油车，欧洲汽车产业将彻底完蛋！" 这并不是危言耸听，而是奔驰 CEO 康林松的肺腑之言。 前不久，几大欧洲车企纷纷拿出了 利润大幅缩水的上半年财报： 在一次媒体采访中，康林松直白地表示： 如果欧盟坚持要在 2035 年全面实行"禁燃令"，整个欧洲汽车业要迎接的，就是集体"全速撞墙"的现实。 奔驰净利润下降 56% 、宝马集团净利润下降 29% 、大众营业利润同 样下 降 32.8%...... Stellantis 集团 更惨， 2023 年狂砍 180 亿净利润、荣膺欧洲最赚钱汽车制造商的盛景，仿佛犹在眼前 。但 今年上半年直接扭盈为亏， 净亏损竟高达 22.56 亿 欧元！ 事实上，随着电气化转型的日程表逐渐推进，欧洲汽车产业的日子是一年不如一年。 | | | | H1 2025 VS. | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | € million, except as otherwise stated | H1 2025 | H1 2024 | H1 2024 | | Combined Shipments(1) (000 uni ...

Group 1 - The Chinese imported automobile market is experiencing a continuous decline, with total imports expected to be only 220,000 units in the first half of 2025, a year-on-year decrease of 32% [1] - Since reaching a peak of 1.43 million imports in 2014, the market has been on a downward trend, with a 12% year-on-year decline in 2024, bringing imports down to 700,000 units [1] - The decline is attributed to the rise of the domestic automotive industry and the wave of electrification [1] Group 2 - Traditional luxury car brands, particularly the German trio (BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Audi), are facing significant challenges, with BMW deliveries down 15.5% to 317,900 units, Mercedes-Benz down 19% to 293,200 units, and Audi down 10.2% to 287,600 units [3] - In contrast, domestic new energy luxury vehicles are rising sharply, with Li Auto delivering 204,000 units and NIO delivering 74,000 units in the same period [3] - In the 300,000-400,000 yuan market, new energy vehicles achieved a market share of 52.5% in July, surpassing traditional fuel vehicles for the first time [3] Group 3 - Despite the challenges, traditional luxury brands still maintain a loyal customer base, with a market share of 58.7% in July, down from 60.2% in March [4] - The slow pace of electrification among traditional luxury brands is evident, with imported new energy passenger vehicles accounting for only 2% of the market in the first half of 2025, an 80% year-on-year decline [4] - Policy changes, such as the adjustment of luxury car tax thresholds, have led to a significant drop in sales for some models, with declines exceeding 20% [4] Group 4 - The future of the Chinese imported automobile market will be characterized by both challenges and opportunities, with the competition between traditional luxury and domestic luxury brands unlikely to end soon [5] - Domestic brands are leading in electrification, making it difficult for traditional ultra-luxury brands to catch up [5] - The market feedback indicates that high-end positioning now relies on technological strength and ecosystem development rather than solely on brand prestige [5]

Core Viewpoint - The global automotive industry is experiencing a significant decline in profits across major multinational companies, attributed to various external and internal factors, including new U.S. tariff policies and the transition to electric vehicles [1][2][4]. Group 1: Financial Performance - Major automotive companies reported either revenue growth without profit increase or declines in both revenue and profit, with substantial profit drops noted [1]. - German automakers saw drastic profit reductions: Volkswagen Group's operating profit fell by 33%, Mercedes-Benz's net profit dropped by 56%, and BMW's net profit decreased by 29% [1]. - U.S. automakers also faced challenges, with General Motors' net profit down 21%, Ford's net profit shrinking from $3.2 billion to $400 million, and Stellantis reporting a net loss of €2.256 billion [1]. - Japanese automakers like Toyota and Honda reported net profit declines of 37% and 50%, respectively, while Nissan continued to incur losses [1]. Group 2: Impact of Tariff Policies - The new U.S. tariff policies have significantly impacted all automotive companies, leading to increased costs and reduced profit margins [2]. - Toyota reported a loss of ¥450 billion due to tariffs in Q2, with an estimated total loss of ¥1.4 trillion for the fiscal year [2]. - Hyundai indicated a loss of ₩828 billion in Q2 due to tariffs, with expectations of greater impacts in Q3 [2]. - Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz also cited tariff impacts on their profit declines, with Volkswagen reporting a loss of €1.3 billion due to tariffs [2]. Group 3: Strategic Adjustments - Many automotive companies are adjusting their strategies in response to tariff pressures, including shifting production to the U.S. to mitigate costs, although this may lead to increased production expenses [3]. - The transition to electric vehicles presents structural challenges, as current electric vehicle sales do not yet match the profitability of traditional fuel vehicles, necessitating high R&D expenditures [3]. - Volkswagen's electric vehicle sales grew by 47% in H1, but profitability remains lower than that of fuel vehicles, impacting overall profit levels [3]. - Companies like Stellantis and Nissan are undergoing leadership changes and implementing cost-cutting measures, including workforce reductions and factory closures, to address financial pressures [4]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The collective profit pressure on global automotive companies results from a combination of external factors like tariffs and internal challenges such as market positioning and strategic adjustments [4]. - The industry faces the critical task of balancing profitability from traditional vehicles while investing in electric vehicle development amidst changing global trade environments and geopolitical factors [4].