这充分体现了中欧双方的对话精神和磋商成果。中欧双方有能力、有意愿，在世贸组织规则框架下，通过对话 磋商妥善化解分歧，维护中欧及全球汽车产业链供应链稳定。这不仅有利于中欧经贸关系健康发展，也有利于 维护以规则为基础的国际贸易秩序。 未 经 授 权 禁 止 转 载 ， 否 则 将 追 究 相 应 法 律 责 任 。 来源：商务部网站 责编：汪云鹏 校对： 陶谦 原标题：商务部关于中欧电动汽车案磋商进展的通报 百万用户都在看 "降息大门关闭！"美联储，预期突变！美国重磅数据出炉！ 美国公民，立即撤离委内瑞拉！特朗普宣布进入国家紧急状态！马杜罗发声：在监狱"一切都好" 利好突现！A50，异动！ 大动作！"国家队"，重磅出手！ 中共中央政治局常务委员会召开会议 刚刚，暴涨超90%！人工智能，重磅来袭！ 为落实中欧领导人会晤共识，妥善解决欧盟对华电动汽车案，中欧双方本着相互尊重的态度，进行了多轮磋 商。双方一致认为，有必要向对欧盟出口纯电动汽车的中国出口商，提供关于价格承诺的通用指导，以便中国 出口商可通过更加实用、有针对性且符合世贸组织规则的方式，解决相关关注。 违法和不良信息举报电话：0755-83514034 邮箱 ...

为落实中欧领导人会晤共识，妥善解决欧盟对华电动汽车案，中欧双方本着相互尊重的态度，进行了多轮磋商。 双方一致认为，有必 要向对欧盟出口纯电动汽车的中国出口商，提供关于价格承诺的通用指导 ，以便中国出口商可通过更加实用、有针对性且符合世贸组 织规则的方式，解决相关关注。 为此， 欧方将发布《关于提交价格承诺申请的指导文件》 ，并在文件中确认， 欧方将秉持非歧视原则 ，根据世贸组织规则有关规 定，对每一项价格承诺申请，适用相同法律标准，并以客观和公正的方式进行评估。 这充分体现了中欧双方的对话精神和磋商成果。中欧双方有能力、有意愿，在世贸组织规则框架下，通过对话磋商妥善化解分歧，维护 中欧及全球汽车产业链供应链稳定。这不仅有利于中欧经贸关系健康发展，也有利于维护以规则为基础的国际贸易秩序。 附件： 1月12日，商务部网站发布《关于中欧电动汽车案磋商进展的通报》。 商务部关于中欧电动汽车案磋商进展的通报 来源：商务部网站 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c ne ne rgy） 编辑丨赵方婷 ...

为落实中欧领导人会晤共识，妥善解决欧盟对华电动汽车案，中欧双方本着相互尊重的态度，进行了多 轮磋商。双方一致认为，有必要向对欧盟出口纯电动汽车的中国出口商，提供关于价格承诺的通用指 导，以便中国出口商可通过更加实用、有针对性且符合世贸组织规则的方式，解决相关关注。 （文章来源：商务部网站） 为此，欧方将发布《关于提交价格承诺申请的指导文件》，并在文件中确认，欧方将秉持非歧视原则， 根据世贸组织规则有关规定，对每一项价格承诺申请，适用相同法律标准，并以客观和公正的方式进行 评估。 这充分体现了中欧双方的对话精神和磋商成果。中欧双方有能力、有意愿，在世贸组织规则框架下，通 过对话磋商妥善化解分歧，维护中欧及全球汽车产业链供应链稳定。这不仅有利于中欧经贸关系健康发 展，也有利于维护以规则为基础的国际贸易秩序。 ...

Group 1: China's Anti-Subsidy Investigation on EU Dairy Products - China has officially launched an anti-subsidy investigation into certain dairy products imported from the EU, including milk and cheese, due to complaints from domestic dairy associations about unfair pricing caused by EU subsidies [3][5] - The investigation process involves collecting data on EU subsidy policies and assessing the impact on local dairy producers, revealing that the influx of imported dairy products has negatively affected local production and farmer incomes [3][5] - A preliminary ruling confirmed that EU subsidies exist and have harmed China's domestic industry, leading to the implementation of temporary measures requiring importers to pay a deposit on affected dairy products [5][7] Group 2: Brazil-EU Free Trade Agreement Negotiations - Negotiations for a free trade agreement between Brazil and the EU, which began in 1999, have faced delays primarily due to disagreements over agricultural market access, particularly concerning Brazilian beef and sugar exports [9][11] - In December 2024, progress was made with technical work completed, but France and Italy raised stricter environmental protection demands, causing further delays in signing the agreement originally planned for December 2025 [11][13] - Brazilian President Lula expressed frustration over the prolonged negotiations, indicating that Brazil would not continue to wait indefinitely for the EU's decision and has established closer ties with other markets [11][13]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful resolution of a cross-border commercial dispute involving a Senegalese businessman and a local automotive trading company in Liangshan, showcasing the effectiveness of professional mediation in overcoming language barriers and facilitating communication in international trade [1][6]. Group 1: Dispute Background - A Senegalese businessman, Mr. Manina, purchased six trucks from a local automotive company, but a dispute arose over the delivery of two remaining trucks due to communication issues [2][3]. - The automotive company had delivered four trucks but refused to cover the export costs for the remaining two, leading to a disagreement over the contractual obligations and costs involved [3][4]. Group 2: Mediation Process - Initial mediation attempts faced challenges due to language barriers, with the mediator using online tools for communication, which proved insufficient for clarifying key facts [2][5]. - A face-to-face meeting was arranged, allowing the mediator to translate contract terms and clarify the dispute's details effectively [2][6]. Group 3: Resolution Achieved - After thorough investigation and discussions, the mediator identified discrepancies in the understanding of export costs and responsibilities, particularly regarding the "FOB" trade term [6][7]. - The mediation culminated in an agreement where the automotive company refunded an additional 35,000 yuan to Mr. Manina, on top of the previously refunded 5,000 yuan, demonstrating a successful resolution of the dispute [7].

Core Viewpoint - International trade is increasingly vital for Chinese enterprises to expand markets and acquire resources, but it also brings challenges related to the application of international rules and legal risks [1] Group 1: Understanding and Application of International Trade Rules - The understanding of international trade rules by Professor Shen Kehua goes beyond mere textual interpretation, focusing on practical application and risk identification [12] - International trade rules serve as a foundational framework for cross-border business, with dynamic and region-specific applicability [12] - Key tools for enterprises include frameworks like Incoterms and UCP600, which help in delineating responsibilities, controlling risks, and safeguarding property rights [12] Group 2: Training Curriculum Overview - The training curriculum designed by Professor Shen covers critical aspects of international trade, emphasizing practical operations and risk prevention [13] - The first module focuses on the latest revisions of Incoterms®2020, addressing common misconceptions and the implications of term selection on costs and liability [13] - The second module analyzes the impact of geopolitical events on logistics, providing strategies for risk control and dispute resolution [14] - The third module delves into the operational and risk aspects of mainstream settlement methods like TT and L/C, highlighting the importance of due diligence [15] - The fourth module discusses insurance claims processes, particularly in unique transportation scenarios [16] - The fifth module offers interactive Q&A sessions to address typical disputes and emphasizes a comprehensive risk management approach [17] Group 3: Localization and Advantages of Shanghai International Trade Training - The training courses have distinct "Shanghai characteristics" and local advantages, addressing the urgent need for internationalized and specialized training among Shanghai enterprises [18] - The curriculum utilizes real case studies from Chinese enterprises to enhance relevance and engagement [18] - Timely policy interpretations help enterprises comply with changing regulations in import/export controls and foreign exchange [18] - The training is conducted primarily in Chinese, minimizing misunderstandings due to translation or cultural differences [18] Group 4: Importance of Legal Risk Prevention in International Trade - Legal risks in international trade can lead to severe consequences, including financial losses and reputational damage [20] - A systematic legal risk prevention mechanism is essential for enterprises to navigate the complexities of the international environment [20] - The training aims to help enterprises establish a comprehensive risk management system that includes risk anticipation, identification, control, and resolution [20] Conclusion - Professor Shen Kehua is recognized as an authority in the field of international trade training, providing essential knowledge and practical guidance for Chinese enterprises to thrive in global competition [20]

Core Points - The U.S. has resolved an eight-month deadlock with the WTO by paying approximately $25.7 million in overdue fees, despite previous criticisms of the organization by the Trump administration [1][3] - The payment ensures that the U.S. is no longer subject to administrative measures for overdue fees, which could have included various penalties [3][6] - The U.S. is still not restoring the WTO's appellate body, which has been paralyzed since 2019 due to the U.S. blocking the appointment of new judges [3][5] Financial Obligations - The U.S. is required to pay 11% of the WTO's annual budget, which is approximately 205 million Swiss Francs (around $25.7 million) for 2024 [3] - The overdue fees had significant implications for the WTO's operations, leading to budget constraints and a reduction in technical assistance to developing countries [6][7] U.S. Participation in WTO - Despite the payment, the U.S. continues to undermine the WTO's dispute resolution capabilities by blocking the selection of appellate body members [4][5] - The U.S. is engaging in WTO technical work at an administrative level, indicating a selective approach to participation rather than a fundamental strategy shift [6][7] - Experts suggest that the U.S. payment is more about maintaining control over the WTO rather than a genuine commitment to reforming the organization [6][7]

Group 1 - German Foreign Minister Baerbock's planned visit to China has been postponed due to insufficient meetings arranged in China, which highlights the importance of China in trade and international affairs [1] - The visit was originally scheduled to start on the 26th and was intended to address export control issues related to rare earths and semiconductors, emphasizing the need for stable and reliable global trade relations [1] - Baerbock expressed that Germany aims to maintain close economic ties with China, stating that "decoupling" is not the correct strategy [1] Group 2 - Baerbock reiterated Germany's commitment to the One China policy while emphasizing that Germany will decide its policy implementation independently and does not support the use of force to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait [2] - China's Foreign Ministry responded by stating that the greatest threat to peace in the Taiwan Strait is "Taiwan independence" and external forces supporting it, urging Germany to uphold the One China principle [2] - A commentary from German media suggested that Baerbock should adopt a more curious and learning-oriented approach towards China, rather than a punitive one, which could benefit Germany's export sector [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the U.S. approach of imposing high tariffs and trade restrictions on China is not the correct way to handle bilateral relations, and it calls for a rational and pragmatic dialogue to maintain global supply chain stability [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: U.S.-China Trade Relations - The U.S. has implemented multiple trade restrictions against China, including adding Chinese entities to export control lists and expanding the scope of these controls, which negatively impacts thousands of Chinese companies [1][2]. - The U.S. actions are seen as damaging to the atmosphere of trade talks and disrupting international trade rules, leading to adverse effects on bilateral economic relations [1][2]. Group 2: China's Export Control Measures - China's export control measures on rare earths and related items are framed as a responsible action to maintain national and international security, especially given their importance in military applications [2]. - The number of items on China's export control list is approximately 900, while the U.S. has over 3,000 items, highlighting a disparity in the application of export controls [2]. Group 3: Call for Dialogue and Cooperation - China maintains a clear stance of being open to dialogue while also prepared to respond firmly to any actions that harm its interests, emphasizing the need for mutual respect and cooperation [3][4]. - A recent survey indicates that a majority of American respondents view U.S. protectionist policies as a significant barrier, suggesting a public desire for reduced tariffs and increased trade facilitation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Recent actions by China regarding rare earth exports and technology controls have sparked global attention, indicating a significant shift in international trade rules and geopolitical dynamics [1][3] Group 1: China's Position in Rare Earth Market - China is the largest producer of rare earth elements, controlling approximately 90% of high-purity rare earth production capacity, which underscores its substantial influence in the market [1] - The recent export control measures by China encompass raw materials, technology, and equipment across multiple segments of the industry, even affecting products processed in third countries, leading to a comprehensive "blockade" strategy [1] Group 2: Netherlands' Actions and Implications - The Dutch government has taken measures against China's Wingtech Technology, freezing assets of its subsidiary, ASML, in 30 global entities, signaling a provocative stance against China and a violation of international trade norms [3] - The actions taken by the Netherlands are seen as a response to the broader U.S.-EU strategy to curb China's technological advancements, indicating a shift in how commercial issues are being politicized [3][5] Group 3: Impact on International Investment Environment - The intertwining of commercial and political issues is reshaping the international investment landscape, potentially leading to increased "political risks" for Chinese companies' overseas assets [5] - The current global economic recovery phase makes the protection of Chinese assets abroad a pressing concern for both political and business leaders, especially in high-tech sectors [5] Group 4: China's Strategic Response - China is expected to utilize legal, diplomatic, and public opinion strategies to defend its rights, challenging arbitrary actions taken under the guise of "national security" [7] - Emphasizing technological independence and internal development of the supply chain is crucial for China to counter Western technological blockades [7] - China should actively participate in reshaping international rules to ensure fair and equitable development for all nations, moving away from historically unfavorable multilateral trade rules [7]