先聊个和今天市场没啥关系的事儿哈，上周五，总局印发了《商业银行代销管理办法》，为什么要聊这个呢，我一说可能大家就记起来了。 去年6月初的时候，市场一则关于 银行不得再继续代销私募基金 的传言发酵，对市场的冲击非常大，当天小盘股大跌2%以上，我当时也聊了，说这个传 闻"不可能发生，更不应该发生"，原文我删了，大家也不用回头找了，但草稿箱里还有，开头这么说的，下图。 你可以理解为，当时的这个传闻，就是借着，这回这个办法的征求意见稿的名头，传播的。 很多人问，能不能解读一下这个办法，我觉得简单来说，核心就是4件事。 1、 银行可以继续卖私募 ，方法沿用现在的，通过TOF或者私募管理人担任投顾的模式； 2、银行代销出现的风险事件太多了，爆出来的很多，没爆出来的更多，在这个办法中，相比过往的文件， 不再有银行不承担代销产品的风险管理责任的 说法 ，换句话说，以后银行不能轻飘飘地说，自己只是代销的，风险都是管理人造成的了——这导致银行对代销的准入、退出等全生命周期，会变得更 加谨慎。 3、私募管理人，做银行准入的最低门槛，是 规模不低于3亿、成立不少于3年、且3年内没有接受过惩罚 ，这意味着，过去那种明星公募基金经理，出 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article reviews the performance of the dividend style in 2024, analyzes the timing effects of the dividend style in a low interest rate environment from an overseas perspective, introduces dividend stock selection strategies and event effects, and provides an outlook on the future performance of the dividend style in the current low interest rate environment [1][10]. Group 1: Dividend Performance in 2024 - The dividend style showed strong performance in 2024, with excess returns relative to the CSI All Share Index from 2021 to 2024, indicating a stable return profile [3]. - Since the end of May 2024, there has been a degree of internal differentiation within the dividend style, with financial and utility sectors maintaining stability while cyclical sectors experienced some pullback [3]. - Insurance funds have increased their allocation to dividend assets, as evidenced by the top holders of dividend ETFs [3]. Group 2: Timing of Dividend Style - The analysis draws on experiences from the US, UK, Germany, and Japan to assess how dividend and growth styles perform in low interest rate environments [4][14]. - Both dividend and growth styles performed well in low interest rate environments, with annualized returns of 21%, 11%, 8%, and 10% in the US, UK, Germany, and Japan respectively [4][15]. - Growth style is more sensitive to interest rate changes, with dividend style potentially having an advantage during periods of rising low interest rates [4][17]. Group 3: Dividend Stock Selection Strategy - A constrained dividend selection strategy, limiting industry and market capitalization deviations to within 5% of the CSI Dividend Index, achieved a stable excess return of 4.74% in 2024 and an annualized excess return of 7.65% since 2010 [6][33]. - Companies announcing high dividend plans typically achieve excess returns around the announcement date, with a notable effect observed in the period leading up to the ex-dividend date [6][38]. Group 4: Outlook for Dividend Style - The overall outlook for the dividend style in a low interest rate environment is positive, with expectations of absolute returns driven by interest rate trends and the influx of medium to long-term capital [7][37]. - The anticipated decline in interest rates in 2025 may favor growth style, but the expansion of medium to long-term capital inflows could further boost the dividend style [7][36].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The Japanese stock market experienced significant valuation increases during three notable periods post the 1990s bubble burst, with PE ratios reaching as high as 159 times [2][4] - The analysis of the 1990s low-interest environment reveals a clear distinction between periods driven by fundamentals and those driven by valuation changes, particularly in the consumer sector [5][20] - The food and beverage sector showed relative stability despite a slight revenue decline, indicating a shift in consumer behavior towards essential goods [8][25] Summary by Sections Historical Context - The report outlines the four phases of Japan's declining interest rates from the early 1990s to the late 1990s, highlighting the impact on various consumer sectors [6][7] - The initial phase saw a 40% drop in the market, while subsequent phases experienced varying degrees of recovery and decline across sectors [7][14] Sector Performance - In the 1994-1995 recovery period, all sub-sectors showed improvement, with retail profits soaring by 180% and significant revenue increases across various industries [13][17] - The food and beverage sector's revenue grew by 4% during the 1996-2000 period, but profits declined by 13%, reflecting a challenging environment [15][17] - The electrical equipment sector outperformed others, with a revenue increase of 5% and profit growth of 7% during the same period [17] Valuation Dynamics - The report emphasizes the shift from fundamental-driven performance in 1994-1995 to valuation-driven performance in 1996-2000, with significant declines in PE ratios across most consumer sectors [20][21] - Essential goods like food and beverages maintained stable valuations, contrasting sharply with the volatility seen in discretionary sectors [25] Consumer Behavior Trends - The report notes that during the economic recovery, discretionary spending surged, particularly in the wholesale and retail sectors, with substantial increases in both revenue and profit [24] - Essential sectors demonstrated resilience, with minimal fluctuations in valuations compared to more volatile discretionary sectors [25]