Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In a unilateral rising market, the momentum factor can amplify returns by concentrating on strong-performing stocks, resulting in significant excess returns. When combined with the growth factor, it can capture trends while adding a fundamental safety net to the investment portfolio, making it suitable for medium-risk preference investors. The "growth + momentum" dual-factor investment logic is systematically implemented in the ChiNext Momentum Growth Index and its linked product, the Huaxia ChiNext Growth ETF [1][11]. Summary According to the Directory Product Fund - Huaxia ChiNext Growth ETF (159967) - **Investment Attributes and Returns**: The Huaxia ChiNext Growth ETF closely tracks the ChiNext Momentum Growth Index, serving as a passive investment tool for high-growth and strong-momentum portfolios on the ChiNext board. Since its establishment in June 2019, it has achieved a cumulative return of 113.97%, significantly outperforming broad-based indices such as the CSI 300. In the rising market since May 2025, it has shown outstanding performance with a six-month return of 46.51%, demonstrating its offensive nature in a bull market. However, it has high volatility, with a three-year return of 1.10% significantly trailing the CSI 300's 22.70% [2][11][14]. - **Fund Manager and Fund Company**: The fund is managed by Rong Ying, who manages 21 funds with a total scale of approximately 138.292 billion yuan. As of October 22, 2025, the Huaxia ChiNext Growth ETF has a scale of 30.39 billion yuan. Huaxia Fund, the fund manager, has a total public fund management scale of 2041.571 billion yuan as of October 22, 2025, with 114 ETFs worth 896.351 billion yuan and 13 money market funds worth 774.607 billion yuan, consolidating its leading position in public offering index investment [15][19]. Tracking Index - ChiNext Momentum Growth Index (399296.SZ) - **Index Composition and Calculation**: The index is compiled by Guozheng Index Company, selecting 50 listed company securities with good growth ability and obvious momentum effects from the ChiNext board. It uses a Paasche weighting method with a single stock weight cap of 15% and adjusts samples and weights quarterly. The sample selection involves screening stocks based on liquidity and then using growth and momentum factors to calculate scores and determine the final 50 stocks [20][21][27]. - **Performance and Returns**: Since its release in 2019, the index has achieved a cumulative return of 157.46%, significantly higher than mainstream broad-based indices. In 2020, it had a return of 97.14%, showing high growth elasticity. In the period from May 1 to October 22, 2025, it had a cumulative return of 40.24%, also outperforming major broad-based indices [4][31][35]. - **Weighted Stocks and Industry Distribution**: The top ten component stocks account for 76.63% of the total weight, with high concentration in the technology growth sector. The top four industries (communications, power equipment, electronics, and non-bank finance) account for nearly 80% of the total weight, highlighting the index's focus on the technology growth sector [3][37][52]. - **Valuation and Earnings**: As of October 22, 2025, the index's PE TTM is 40.83 times, slightly lower than the historical median of 44.73 times, indicating a reasonable valuation. From 2019 to 2024, the index's component stocks showed strong growth in revenue and net profit, and it is expected to maintain double-digit growth from 2025 to 2026 [61][64]. - **Sources of High Growth and Excess Returns**: The index's high growth elasticity and excess returns stem from its precise sample screening, factor tilt weighting, high-growth and high-elasticity asset characteristics, and regular dynamic adjustments [71]. Sample Space - ChiNext Composite Index - **Market Value and Industry Structure**: The index shows a pattern where small-cap stocks dominate in number and large-cap stocks dominate in weight. The industry structure has been evolving towards power equipment, electronics, and communications, with the power equipment industry's weight increasing from 13.89% in 2020 to 23.46% in 2025, and the communications industry's weight rising from 2.90% to 9.69% [76][78]. - **Growth and Profitability**: The index has shown strong growth momentum in revenue, with its growth rate consistently higher than that of major market indices from 2020 to 2024. Its average net profit growth rate from 2020 to 2024 was 11.73%, significantly higher than that of mainstream broad-based indices. The average ROE in the past five years was 6.86%, indicating relatively good profitability [79][81][83]. - **Industry Focus and New Productivity Layout**: The index's industry structure focuses on technology growth, with a low financial sector weight and high weights in emerging technology fields such as communications and computers, reflecting the trend of new productivity development and industrial upgrading [88].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: "Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor **Model Construction Idea**: The model is based on the price-volume relationship during intraday and overnight trading sessions. It improves traditional momentum factors by incorporating transaction volume information and separating the trading periods into day and night to explore their respective characteristics and logic[6][7] **Model Construction Process**: 1. The trading period is divided into intraday and overnight sessions 2. The price-volume relationship is analyzed separately for each session to identify distinct features 3. The improved intraday and overnight factors are synthesized into a new momentum factor 4. The factor is tested on the entire A-share market (excluding Beijing Stock Exchange stocks) from February 2014 to October 2025, using a 10-group long-short hedging strategy[7] **Model Evaluation**: The model demonstrates significant stock selection ability, outperforming traditional momentum factors in terms of stability and performance[6][7] Model Backtesting Results - **"Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor**: - Annualized Return: 18.15% - Annualized Volatility: 8.68% - Information Ratio (IR): 2.09 - Monthly Win Rate: 78.01% - Maximum Drawdown: 9.07%[1][7][14] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods - **Factor Name**: "Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor leverages the distinct characteristics of price-volume relationships during intraday and overnight trading sessions to enhance the signal strength of momentum factors[7] **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Separate the trading period into intraday and overnight sessions 2. Analyze the price-volume relationship for each session to identify unique features 3. Combine the improved intraday and overnight factors into a single momentum factor 4. Test the factor on the entire A-share market (excluding Beijing Stock Exchange stocks) from February 2014 to October 2025, using a 10-group long-short hedging strategy[7] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor significantly outperforms traditional momentum factors, with higher stability and better stock selection ability[6][7] Factor Backtesting Results - **"Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor**: - Annualized Return: 18.15% - Annualized Volatility: 8.68% - Information Ratio (IR): 2.09 - Monthly Win Rate: 78.01% - Maximum Drawdown: 9.07%[1][7][14] - **Traditional Momentum Factor**: - Information Ratio (IR): 1.09 - Monthly Win Rate: 62.75% - Maximum Drawdown: 20.35%[6] October 2025 Performance - **"Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor**: - Long Portfolio Return: 0.85% - Short Portfolio Return: -2.35% - Long-Short Hedging Return: 3.20%[1][10]

Report Summary 1. Industry Investment Rating No industry investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints - The proportion of long and short positions in commodities changed little this week. The factor strength of the non - ferrous sector rebounded, while that of the precious metals and agricultural products sectors declined. The non - ferrous sector was relatively strong in the cross - section, while the chemical and precious metals sectors were relatively weak [2]. - Different commodities have different trends in strategy net value and fundamental factors. For example, in the methanol market, the comprehensive signal was long this week; in the float glass market, it was neutral; in the iron ore market, it remained neutral; and in the Shanghai lead market, it remained short [4][7][9]. 3. Summary by Commodity Methanol - **Strategy Net Value**: Last week, the supply factor increased by 0.11%, the demand factor increased by 0.13%, the inventory factor increased by 0.02%, and the synthetic factor strengthened by 0.19%. The comprehensive signal this week is long [3][4]. - **Fundamental Factors**: High import volume of methanol signaled a short on the supply side; increased开工负荷 of acetic acid and MTBE plants signaled a long on the demand side; methanol inventory in East China ports signaled a long on the inventory side; the spot price of inland methanol signaled a short, and the East China basis signaled a long, with the spread side being neutral to short [4]. Float Glass - **Strategy Net Value**: Last week, the inventory factor decreased by 0.06%, the spread factor weakened by 0.07%, the profit factor increased by 0.06%, and the synthetic factor decreased by 0.05%. The comprehensive signal this week is neutral [7]. - **Fundamental Factors**: The capacity utilization rate of float glass remained flat, so the supply side remained neutral; the increase in the number of commercial housing transactions in 30 large - and medium - sized cities signaled a long on the demand side; continuous inventory accumulation of domestic float glass enterprises signaled a short on the inventory side; the continuous slight decline in the spot market and the stable recovery of the futures price made the spread side change from a strong short to neutral [7]. Iron Ore - **Strategy Net Value**: Last week, each factor remained flat compared with the previous week, and the comprehensive signal this week remained neutral [9]. - **Fundamental Factors**: Decreased shipments from FMG and Rio Tinto and reduced arrivals at northern ports strengthened the long feedback on the supply side; decreased daily port clearance volume and steel mill consumption of domestic sintered ore powder maintained the short signal on the demand side; inventory accumulation at major national ports slightly strengthened the short feedback on the inventory side; the increase in the spot price center strengthened the long feedback on the spread side, and both the inventory and spread sides maintained a neutral signal [9]. Shanghai Lead - **Strategy Net Value**: Last week, the supply factor decreased by 0.45%, the demand factor weakened by 0.44%, the spread factor decreased by 0.57%, and the synthetic factor weakened by 0.38%. The comprehensive signal this week remained short [9]. - **Fundamental Factors**: Reduced losses of SMM tax - free recycled lead and a lower ratio of waste battery prices to recycled refined lead prices maintained the short signal on the supply side; inventory reduction in LME and SHFE made the inventory side turn to a long feedback, maintaining a neutral signal; the narrowing of the near - far month discount and the expansion of the spot discount weakened the short feedback on the spread side, and the signal turned to neutral [9]. Sector - Specific Momentum and Structure - **Momentum and Structure Data**: The report provides momentum and structure data for different sectors, including the egg - related, non - ferrous, energy - chemical, agricultural products, equity index, and precious metals sectors. For example, the non - ferrous sector had a momentum sequence value of 0.06, a momentum cross - section value of 0.93, a term structure value of - 2.2, and a position - holding volume value of - 0.64 [5].

Market Overview - Major averages are reaching record highs, indicating strong market momentum and positive sentiment [1][2] - Trade talks and a Federal Reserve meeting are contributing to market optimism, with positive responses to trade news, particularly regarding Asian trade talks [3][4] Earnings Season Insights - Approximately 87% of S&P 500 companies that have reported earnings have exceeded bottom-line estimates, although estimates have been revised down since April [10] - The current earnings season shows that stocks are being rewarded for good news, with a more forgiving market attitude towards companies that miss expectations, as seen with Tesla [11][12] Stock Performance Trends - There is a notable increase in thematic stocks, with significant activity in companies like Beyond Meat, Regetti, and Oaklo [5][6] - Quality stocks, particularly those with strong dividends, are showing latent demand, as evidenced by positive reactions from companies like Coca-Cola and Dr. Pepper to earnings news [6][7] Market Dynamics - A short squeeze has led to a doubling of a basket of the most shorted stocks since the market low in April, with a rally of over 30% since September [5] - The market is currently favoring momentum-driven strategies, although there are considerations for longer-term investments in undervalued stocks [9]

Group 1: Weekly Index Enhanced Portfolio Performance - The CSI 300 index enhanced portfolio achieved an excess return of 0.53% this week and 18.86% year-to-date [1][7] - The CSI 500 index enhanced portfolio recorded an excess return of 0.45% this week and 9.03% year-to-date [1][7] - The CSI 1000 index enhanced portfolio had an excess return of 0.34% this week and 19.00% year-to-date [1][7] - The CSI A500 index enhanced portfolio experienced an excess return of -0.46% this week and 8.18% year-to-date [1][7] Group 2: Stock Selection Factor Performance Tracking - In the CSI 300 component stocks, factors such as quarterly ROA, quarterly ROE, and one-year momentum performed well [1][10] - In the CSI 500 component stocks, factors like SPTTM, executive compensation, and three-month institutional coverage showed strong performance [1][10] - For the CSI 1000 component stocks, factors such as three-month earnings revisions, standardized unexpected revenue, and standardized unexpected earnings performed well [1][10] - In the CSI A500 index component stocks, factors like one-year momentum, quarterly revenue year-on-year growth, and DELTAROA showed good performance [1][10] - Among publicly offered fund heavy stocks, factors like one-year momentum, standardized unexpected revenue, and three-month earnings revisions performed well [1][10] Group 3: Public Fund Index Enhanced Product Performance Tracking - The CSI 300 index enhanced products had a maximum excess return of 2.02%, a minimum of -1.13%, and a median of 0.06% this week [1][23] - The CSI 500 index enhanced products recorded a maximum excess return of 1.24%, a minimum of -1.61%, and a median of 0.19% this week [1][25] - The CSI 1000 index enhanced products achieved a maximum excess return of 1.52%, a minimum of -1.23%, and a median of 0.45% this week [1][29] - The CSI A500 index enhanced products had a maximum excess return of 0.84%, a minimum of -0.53%, and a median of 0.03% this week [1][30]

Core Viewpoint - Momentum stocks that have led the rise in the U.S. stock market this year are experiencing a significant sell-off, indicating a shift in market dynamics and investor sentiment towards quality stocks [1][3]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The market is undergoing a notable rotation, with significant outflows from momentum stock portfolios based on performance over the past 3, 6, and 12 months [3]. - The sell-off is particularly pronounced in speculative sectors, including heavily shorted stocks, quantum computing concepts, and unprofitable tech companies [1][3]. - Historical data suggests that the momentum factor typically underperforms from November to January, indicating that the current downtrend may not be over [5][7]. Group 2: Performance Data - High Beta 12M Winners have a year-to-date return of 60%, while Global Rare Earths have surged by 258% [4]. - Non-profitable tech stocks have seen an 83% increase, but the overall trend indicates a shift towards quality stocks as speculative assets lead the market decline [4][11]. Group 3: Investor Behavior - Investors are moving from chasing high growth to seeking certainty in fundamentals, reflecting a clear change in risk appetite amid rising market uncertainties [4][11]. - Hedge funds maintain a high exposure to momentum stocks, positioned at the 90th and 94th percentiles over the past year and five years, respectively, which could trigger a cascading sell-off if positions are unwound [7][11]. Group 4: Sector Exposure - Current momentum stocks are heavily concentrated in information technology and industrial sectors, while being short on healthcare and consumer sectors, making them vulnerable to market shifts [11][12]. - The correlation between momentum stocks and gold has increased, suggesting that macroeconomic factors influencing both asset classes may be changing [12][14]. Group 5: Market Breadth - The performance of the S&P 500 has outpaced the "X7 index" (excluding seven major tech giants) in 13 out of the last 15 years, with a 6% annualized performance difference since January 2020 [14].

Report Investment Rating - The report gives a "★☆☆" rating to CITIC's five-style stability, indicating a slightly bullish view with limited operability in the market [5]. Core Viewpoints - In the week ending October 17, 2025, Tonglian All A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond, and Nanhua Commodity Index had weekly returns of -3.39%, 0.21%, and -1.14% respectively. In the public fund market, equity long strategies retreated, pure bonds outperformed, neutral strategy products showed mixed performance, and among commodities, precious metal ETFs rose while non-ferrous metal ETFs declined, and energy chemical and soybean meal ETFs continued to weaken [5]. - Among CITIC's five styles, the financial style rose last week while others fell. The style rotation chart shows that the growth and consumption styles weakened marginally in terms of relative strength, and the financial style increased significantly in terms of indicator momentum. In the public fund pool, cyclical style funds had better excess performance in the past week, and other style funds underperformed the index on average. The product's deviation from cyclical and consumption styles increased marginally, and the overall market congestion indicator increased marginally this week, with the cyclical style currently in a historically high congestion range [5]. - In the neutral strategy, the stock index basis showed a marginal recovery trend last week. The IM contract rebounded from below the -2 standard deviation of the three - month average to within one standard deviation, and the premium rates of the corresponding spot index ETFs of IH and IF were in the top 20% quantile range of the past three months [5]. - Among Barra factors, the residual momentum factor had better performance in the past week with a weekly excess return of 2.49%, while the momentum and capital flow factors had excess drawdowns. The win - rates of the profitability and leverage factors improved. The cross - section rotation speed of factors increased significantly this week and is currently in a relatively high quantile range in the past year [5]. - According to the latest scoring results of the style timing model, the consumption and financial styles recovered marginally this week, the cyclical style declined, and the current signal favors the stable style. The return of the style timing strategy last week was 0.52%, with an excess return of 1.45% compared to the benchmark equal - weighted allocation [5]. Summary by Directory Fund Market Review - In the public fund market, equity long strategies had a drawdown in the past week, pure bonds had better returns, neutral strategy products showed mixed performance, precious metal ETFs in commodities had large increases, non - ferrous metal ETFs had a return correction, and energy chemical and soybean meal ETFs' net values continued to weaken [5]. - Among CITIC's five styles, the financial style rose last week while others fell. Cyclical style funds had better excess performance in the public fund pool, and other style funds underperformed the index on average. The product's deviation from cyclical and consumption styles increased marginally, and the overall market congestion indicator increased marginally this week, with the cyclical style in a historically high congestion range [5]. - In the neutral strategy, the stock index basis recovered marginally last week, and the premium rates of the corresponding spot index ETFs of IH and IF were in the top 20% quantile range of the past three months [5]. - Among Barra factors, the residual momentum factor had a weekly excess return of 2.49%, the momentum and capital flow factors had excess drawdowns, and the win - rates of the profitability and leverage factors improved. The factor cross - section rotation speed increased significantly and is in a relatively high quantile range in the past year [5]. - According to the style timing model, the consumption and financial styles recovered marginally this week, the cyclical style declined, and the style timing strategy had a return of 0.52% last week, with an excess return of 1.45% compared to the benchmark [5]. Recent Market Returns - The weekly, monthly, quarterly, and semi - annual returns of Tonglian All A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond (net), and Nanhua Commodity are presented in the report, along with data on the establishment scale of public funds in the past year, the maximum drawdown of major public fund strategy indices in the past three months, and the weekly returns of major public fund strategy indices [7]. CITIC Style Index - The net value trends of CITIC's financial, cyclical, consumption, growth, and stable style indices are shown, as well as the relative rotation chart of these style indices, which reflects the relative strength and momentum of different styles in different time periods [8][9]. - The excess return performance of CITIC style - based fund style indices in different time periods (weekly, monthly, quarterly, semi - annual, annual) is presented, along with the congestion levels of different styles (excluding the stable style due to data limitations) [10][11]. Barra Factors - The preference levels of Barra single - factors (ranging from 0 - 1) are shown, indicating the degree of preference for different factors. The excess return performance of Barra single - factor style strategies in different time periods (weekly, monthly) is also presented, as well as the excess net value trends of Barra single - factor styles since this year [13][14][17].

- Model Name: "Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor; Model Construction Idea: Based on the price-volume relationship during the day and overnight, the intraday factor and overnight factor are improved and then recombined into a new momentum factor[1][7] - Model Construction Process: 1. Split the trading period into day and night sessions[7] 2. Explore the price-volume relationship in each session separately[7] 3. Construct the "Day and Night Convergence" new momentum factor based on the findings[7] - Model Evaluation: The new factor significantly outperforms the traditional momentum factor in terms of stock selection ability[6][7] - Factor Name: "Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor; Factor Construction Idea: Incorporate the information of "trading volume" into the previous "momentum factor segmentation" research to further explore the differences in investor trading behavior[7] - Factor Construction Process: 1. Split the trading period into day and night sessions[7] 2. Explore the price-volume relationship in each session separately[7] 3. Construct the "Day and Night Convergence" new momentum factor based on the findings[7] - Factor Evaluation: The new factor significantly outperforms the traditional momentum factor in terms of stock selection ability[6][7] Model Backtest Results - "Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor, Annualized Return: 17.95%, Annualized Volatility: 8.70%, IR: 2.06, Monthly Win Rate: 77.86%, Maximum Drawdown: 9.07%[1][7][14] Factor Backtest Results - "Day and Night Convergence" New Momentum Factor, Annualized Return: 17.95%, Annualized Volatility: 8.70%, IR: 2.06, Monthly Win Rate: 77.86%, Maximum Drawdown: 9.07%[1][7][14]

Group 1: Southbound Capital - Southbound capital has significantly flowed into the Hong Kong stock market in 2025, with a cumulative net purchase of 979 billion HKD from January to August, surpassing the total of 807.9 billion HKD for the entire year of 2024 [2][24]. - Despite the increasing transaction share of southbound capital, its net purchases have shown little predictive power for the future movements of the Hang Seng Index, with a negative correlation observed between daily net purchases and index fluctuations [2][24]. - The top 10% of stocks by net purchase amount from southbound capital yielded an annualized return of 12.08%, significantly higher than the average of 2.61% and the bottom 10% group which saw a return of -2.94% [3][29]. Group 2: Industry Rotation - The analysis of industry rotation indicates that the southbound net purchase amount has a poor monotonicity across industries, but after adjusting for transaction amounts, the excess returns for bullish positions significantly improve, with the top three industries showing an annualized return of 11.64% [4][32]. - The retail sector, particularly represented by Alibaba, has been the most favored by southbound capital, with a net purchase scale significantly outperforming other sectors [4][32]. - The report highlights the effectiveness of style factors in guiding industry allocation, with growth and long-term momentum factors showing particularly strong performance in the Hong Kong market [6][65]. Group 3: IPO Trends - The Hong Kong stock market has experienced a surge in IPO activity in 2025, with 43 companies listed by June 30, raising a total of 106.71 billion HKD, which is significantly higher than the 88.15 billion HKD raised in 2024 [7][38]. - Notable IPOs include Heng Rui Pharmaceutical and Ningde Times, which raised 11.3 billion HKD and 41 billion HKD respectively, indicating a strong market interest and improved liquidity [7][38]. - The new IPO regulations implemented in August 2025 aim to enhance the attractiveness of the Hong Kong market by reducing public shareholding requirements and shortening the listing review process [7][38]. Group 4: Real Estate Market - The Hong Kong real estate market is showing signs of stabilization following the government's removal of property control measures, which has significantly reduced transaction costs for residential properties [11][12]. - High-frequency data indicates a rebound in private residential price indices since March 2025, suggesting a recovery in market sentiment and price stabilization [12][11]. - The low-interest environment and financial wealth effects are contributing to the improved outlook for the real estate sector, with transaction volumes increasing significantly [11][12].

Core Insights - The momentum factor is driving strength in international equities, particularly benefiting the Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) due to increased defense spending in Europe [1] Defense Spending Trends - The ongoing Russia/Ukraine conflict has catalyzed increased defense spending, with NATO members agreeing to allocate 5% of their GDP for defense over the next decade [2] - Europe has historically relied on the U.S. for defense, but recent geopolitical changes necessitate greater self-reliance among European nations [3] Economic Impact - Increased defense spending in Europe is expected to positively impact economic growth, as highlighted by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen [4] - The IDMO fund, which has attracted $1 billion in assets this year, is positioned to benefit from this trend, with significant allocations to European countries like Germany (15%) and the UK (16.68%) [5] Fund Holdings - IDMO's top holding is Rolls-Royce Holdings, which has a strong presence in the European defense industry and also serves key U.S. defense customers [6][7]