Core Viewpoint - Volatility is not risk itself; the true risk is "permanent loss." However, volatility manifests as risk, triggering investor fear and behavioral biases, turning risk into reality and providing opportunities for counterparties to profit [4][38]. Group 1: Perspectives on Volatility - Three views on volatility have emerged: 1. Risk-averse investors see volatility as risk that needs to be avoided [5]. 2. Risk-seeking investors view volatility as a source of returns that should be embraced [6]. 3. Value investors consider volatility to be neutral, with investment risk stemming solely from operational risks leading to permanent losses [7][39]. Group 2: Academic Perspective - The Sharpe Ratio, a key metric for assessing fund performance, emphasizes that returns should be evaluated against the risks taken to achieve them [17]. - Traditional financial theories, such as Markowitz's Modern Portfolio Theory, define risk as the uncertainty of future returns, represented by price volatility [18]. - Historical price fluctuations can create a false sense of security, as investors may not recognize the potential for future losses during periods of volatility [19][20]. Group 3: Practical Perspective - Warren Buffett has explicitly rejected the notion that volatility equates to risk, emphasizing that the most significant risk is the permanent loss of capital [24][26]. - Buffett's investment philosophy focuses on the intrinsic value of companies, viewing short-term volatility as mere "noise" that does not pose a substantial threat unless forced to sell at a loss [27]. Group 4: Trading Perspective - The view that "volatility equals returns" stems from the fact that many investors dislike uncertainty and volatility, particularly large funds [29]. - High volatility assets often trade at a discount, reflecting the risk aversion of investors, while the actual risk remains objectively present [30][31]. - Volatility can be treated as a tradable commodity, with strategies like options trading reflecting the relationship between volatility and risk [32][33]. Group 5: Nature of Volatility - Volatility is an inherent aspect of the financial world, reminding investors of the constant changes and the need to distinguish between what can and cannot be controlled [42].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the relationship between volatility and risk, emphasizing that while volatility is often equated with risk, it can also represent potential returns depending on the investor's perspective [6][34]. Group 1: Academic Perspective on Volatility - Volatility is defined as risk in traditional finance, where it represents the uncertainty of future returns [7][9]. - The Sharpe Ratio is highlighted as a key metric for evaluating fund performance, taking into account the risk taken to achieve returns [8][10]. - Historical volatility is used to quantify risk, with higher volatility indicating greater risk and necessitating higher expected returns [11][12]. Group 2: Practical Perspective on Volatility - Warren Buffett and other value investors argue against equating volatility with risk, focusing instead on the risk of permanent capital loss [15][18]. - The article presents a dichotomy where risk-averse investors view volatility as something to avoid, while risk-seeking investors see it as an opportunity for profit [23][34]. - Different investment strategies are discussed, including those that embrace volatility for potential gains, such as grid trading and trend trading [31][32]. Group 3: Trading Perspective on Volatility - Volatility can be viewed as a tradable commodity, with options pricing reflecting historical volatility [26][27]. - The article explains that risk is a commodity that can be bought and sold, with different strategies catering to varying attitudes towards volatility [25][28]. - The concept of "volatility = returns" is explored, indicating that higher volatility can lead to greater profit opportunities for certain investors [22][24]. Group 4: Conclusion on Volatility - The article concludes that volatility is an inherent aspect of the financial world, influencing investor behavior and creating opportunities for profit [39][40]. - It emphasizes the importance of understanding what can be controlled and what cannot in the context of volatility and investment strategies [38][39].

Group 1 - The article discusses the importance of understanding volatility in investment, emphasizing that it is a significant risk factor that can impact investor returns [3][4][11] - It contrasts two funds: Fund A with a 15% annualized return but high volatility, and Fund B with a 10% return and low volatility, suggesting that investors in Fund B may achieve better average returns due to lower drawdowns [10][11] - The article highlights that while volatility is often viewed as a risk, some investment experts, like Warren Buffett, argue that it should not be equated with risk, focusing instead on the risk of permanent capital loss [12][14] Group 2 - The article explains that volatility can be seen as a source of potential returns, particularly in trading strategies that embrace market fluctuations [15][20] - It outlines different investor attitudes towards volatility: risk-averse investors view it as a risk to avoid, while risk-seeking investors see it as an opportunity for profit [23][24] - The discussion includes various trading strategies that leverage volatility, such as grid trading and trend trading, which require different approaches to managing risk and returns [20][22]

Core Viewpoint - The AI Fund, Invesco Great Wall Growth Opportunity Mixed A, reported a profit of 396,500 yuan for the first half of 2025, with a net asset value growth rate of 2.03% [3] Fund Performance - As of September 3, the fund's unit net value was 1.297 yuan, with a three-month net value growth rate of 24.72%, ranking 187 out of 615 comparable funds [5] - The fund's six-month net value growth rate was 20.46%, ranking 244 out of 615, and the one-year growth rate was 29.55%, ranking 440 out of 601 [5] Fund Holdings and Valuation - As of June 30, 2025, the fund's weighted average price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was approximately 24.9 times, slightly below the industry average of 25.34 times [11] - The weighted average price-to-book (P/B) ratio was about 2.67 times, compared to the industry average of 2.34 times, and the weighted average price-to-sales (P/S) ratio was approximately 1.73 times, lower than the industry average of 2.09 times [11] Growth Metrics - For the first half of 2025, the weighted revenue growth rate of the fund's stock holdings was 0.08%, and the weighted net profit growth rate was 0.12% [18] Fund Management and Strategy - The fund manager indicated a focus on high-quality companies capable of integrating into the global supply chain, with limited exposure to U.S. business operations despite tariff impacts [3] Fund Size and Shareholder Information - As of June 30, 2025, the fund's total size was 16.1349 million yuan, with 185 holders owning a total of 15.1762 million shares [33][36] - The fund's maximum drawdown since inception was 12.19%, with the largest quarterly drawdown occurring in Q2 2025 at 10.37% [29] Top Holdings - The top ten holdings of the fund included companies such as Yipinhong, Midea Group, and Baofeng Energy [41]

Group 1 - The article introduces key investment terms to help beginners understand fund investment better [4][5][7][10][11][15][16][18]. - "Left-side trading" refers to buying undervalued assets before a price increase occurs [4][5]. - "Right-side trading" involves waiting for a clear upward trend before making a purchase, acknowledging potential hidden risks [7]. - "Maximum drawdown" measures the largest decline from a peak to a trough during a specific period, indicating the worst-case scenario for investors [8]. - "Sharpe ratio" assesses the risk-adjusted return of a fund, with a higher ratio indicating better performance relative to risk [10][11][12]. - "Bullish/Bearish" sentiment is influenced by new policies or technological breakthroughs, leading to increased buying or selling pressure [15][16]. - "Valuation percentile" helps determine whether a fund's current price is high or low compared to its historical valuation [18].

Core Viewpoint - True wealth creation must be viewed over decades or even an entire company lifecycle to be realized [2] Group 1: Investment Philosophy - James Anderson, a prominent figure in global growth stock investment, emphasizes long-termism and imagination in identifying great companies [4][6] - The market is not a mean-reverting world but is driven by a power law, where a few winners generate most of the returns [8][22] - The real challenge in investing is not finding these great companies but enduring the inevitable significant drawdowns they experience [9][34] Group 2: Market Dynamics - Since 1926, 57% of U.S. companies have underperformed government bonds over their lifetimes, indicating that holding stocks does not guarantee systematic returns [24][25] - From 1990, one-third of excess returns in the U.S. stock market came from just 10 companies, highlighting the concentration of market performance [20][21] - Globally, only 1% of companies have generated all excess returns since 1990, reinforcing the idea of a few companies driving market value [22] Group 3: Investment Strategy - Investors should focus on identifying and supporting a small number of truly great companies, even if it means buying at unreasonable prices [46][48] - The investment approach should prioritize long-term value creation over short-term gains, moving away from the prevalent short-termism in the industry [38][66] - Companies that are ambitious and willing to challenge boundaries are essential for long-term investment success [94] Group 4: Future Outlook - The investment landscape is becoming increasingly inefficient, and the diversity of investment thinking is diminishing [38][56] - There is a need to shift focus back to genuinely creating value rather than merely trading and financial engineering [64] - The potential for significant advancements in sectors like healthcare and renewable energy suggests that the next wave of investment opportunities may arise from companies addressing fundamental issues [78][80]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance evaluation of private equity funds, emphasizing the importance of the Sharpe ratio as a measure of risk-adjusted return, alongside absolute and excess returns [2]. Summary by Sections Sharpe Ratio Overview - The Sharpe ratio is a key indicator for assessing risk-adjusted returns, calculated as (expected return - risk-free rate) / standard deviation of returns [2]. - A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-return efficiency, with a ratio above 1 suggesting returns exceed the volatility risk [2]. Performance of Private Equity Products - As of July 2025, there are 2,796 private equity products with a median Sharpe ratio of approximately 0.58 over the past three years, with only 538 products (about 19.24%) having a Sharpe ratio greater than 1 [4]. - Among the product strategies, stock strategy products are the most numerous (1,814), but have the lowest proportion of products with a Sharpe ratio above 1, attributed to high market volatility [3][4]. Product Strategy Breakdown - **Stock Strategy**: 1,814 products, median Sharpe ratio of 0.54, with only 203 (11.19%) having a Sharpe ratio greater than 1 [4]. - **Futures and Derivatives**: 380 products, median Sharpe ratio of 0.64, with 118 (31.05%) above 1 [4]. - **Multi-Asset**: 352 products, median Sharpe ratio of 0.69, with 104 (29.55%) above 1 [4]. - **Bond Strategy**: 192 products, median Sharpe ratio of 1.13, with 104 (54.17%) above 1 [4]. - **Combination Funds**: 58 products, median Sharpe ratio of 0.52, with 9 (15.52%) above 1 [4]. Top Performing Products - The article lists top-performing products with a Sharpe ratio greater than 1 across various strategies, including quantitative long, subjective long, market-neutral, multi-asset, subjective CTA, and quantitative CTA [5][7][10][12][15][18]. - Notable products include "积露11号" from 积露资产 and "君之健翱翔信泰" from 君之健投资, both showing significant returns and high Sharpe ratios [6][9][20]. Conclusion - The analysis highlights the varying performance of private equity products based on strategy, with bond strategies showing the highest risk-adjusted returns, while stock strategies lag behind due to market volatility [3][4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexity of timing in investment strategies, particularly in diversified asset portfolios, and emphasizes the importance of understanding both asset characteristics and investor capabilities before making timing decisions [2][3]. Group 1: Asset Characteristics - The article categorizes assets into two types: "electric saw" assets (high volatility, strong cycles) such as individual stocks and sector funds, which require careful timing to avoid significant losses, and "leveling tool" assets (low volatility, stable returns) like high-grade bonds and money market funds, which do not benefit from frequent timing attempts [4]. - It highlights that the need for timing varies significantly between a portfolio focused on equities and one that emphasizes fixed income [4]. Group 2: Investor Capabilities - Investors are encouraged to assess their own skills by answering three critical questions: their proficiency in timing, the availability of time for market analysis, and their psychological resilience to market fluctuations [5]. - If the answers to these questions are uncertain, the article suggests that a better investment framework may be more beneficial than improving timing skills [6]. Group 3: Investment Framework - The article introduces the "core-satellite" strategy, likening it to a "main dish and side dish" approach, where the core (70%-90% of the portfolio) consists of stable assets that provide a solid foundation, while the satellite (10%-30%) allows for exploration and experimentation with higher-risk investments [8][9][10]. - The core assets should be managed passively to capture long-term market growth, while the satellite portion can be used for more aggressive strategies, allowing for mistakes without jeopardizing the overall portfolio [10]. Group 4: Tactical Considerations - The article provides three guiding principles for timing decisions: evaluating the cost-benefit of timing actions based on potential losses and historical performance, focusing on familiar areas of expertise, and looking for opportunities during extreme market pessimism [12][13][14]. - It emphasizes that understanding the historical maximum drawdown of a diversified portfolio can signal potential entry points, as significant downturns may indicate a favorable risk-reward scenario [14]. Group 5: Conclusion - For most investors, the optimal strategy is to focus on building a solid core portfolio and trust in its long-term growth potential rather than attempting to time the market [15]. - For those with the capability and desire to explore, the core-satellite framework offers a balanced approach to risk and opportunity [16]. - Investors needing immediate liquidity should approach timing with caution, prioritizing safety above all [17].

Core Insights - The bond market is currently in a low-yield, high-volatility state, contrasting with the previous year's high-yield, high-volatility environment. This shift suggests frequent "mispricing" opportunities, prompting investors to adopt a "low position + high win rate" strategy for defensive counterattacks and to capitalize on oversold rebound opportunities [1][10][21]. Group 1: Market Conditions - Since the beginning of 2025, the 10-year government bond yield has shown significant volatility, rising from approximately 1.60% at the start of the year to around 1.78% by August 20, with a peak close to 1.90%. The rolling standard deviation indicates that the yield's volatility has increased, with a median of about 0.03%, higher than the median of 0.028% from 2021 to 2024 [10][11]. - The performance of bond funds has declined in 2025, with the median annualized return for medium to long-term pure bond funds at 0.83%, significantly lower than the 3.98%, 2.36%, 3.47%, and 4.58% returns from 2021 to 2024. Short-term pure bond funds also reflect a similar trend, with a median return of 1.41% [11][12]. Group 2: Fund Evaluation - The Calmar ratio is deemed more reflective of true risk compared to the Sharpe ratio, although both should be used in conjunction. The Sharpe ratio is more suitable for short and pure bond funds with lower volatility and drawdown, while the Calmar ratio is better for long bond funds and secondary bond funds that exhibit higher volatility and deeper drawdowns [2][16]. - In 2025, investors are advised to prioritize the Calmar ratio alongside the Sharpe ratio to better select bond funds, as the low-yield, high-volatility environment increases the demand for fund managers' ability to control drawdowns [19][20]. Group 3: Investment Strategy Adjustments - The bond market is still in a headwind phase, with the trend for bullish positions delayed. Despite rising interest rates and a steepening curve reducing bullish sentiment, the high volatility presents frequent "mispricing" opportunities. Investors are encouraged to maintain a "high-grade, short-duration, high-liquidity" base to better control drawdowns while selectively participating in long and ultra-long bonds after significant declines [3][21][22]. - The strategy should focus on quick trades and timely profit-taking, as the current market conditions do not favor long-term bullish positions. Historical data indicates that after significant declines, the 10-year government bond typically experiences a short-term rebound [22][24].

Group 1 - The Hong Kong stock market is expected to present structural opportunities in 2025, particularly in growth sectors like renewable energy and biotechnology, attracting global capital attention [1] - Companies with core patents, such as those involved in solid-state battery technology, have seen their stock prices increase by over 30% this year, outperforming the industry average [1] - Fixed income investments, including local government special bonds and offshore RMB government bonds, maintain yields in the range of 4.2%-5.8%, providing a hedge against equity asset volatility [1] Group 2 - A suggested asset allocation strategy is to maintain a portfolio consisting of 40% equities, 35% fixed income, and 25% alternative investments, focusing on specific Hong Kong Stock Connect stocks and cross-border bond varieties [2] - Smart investment advisory products can dynamically adjust portfolio allocations based on real-time data, enhancing the Sharpe ratio by 0.3-0.5 [2] - REITs are highlighted as providing an average annual dividend return of 6.2%, appealing to investors seeking stable income [2] Group 3 - Digital gold certificates launched by the Shanghai Gold Exchange utilize blockchain technology for T+0 settlement, with average daily trading volume exceeding 80 tons this year [1] - Investing in gold ETFs allows ordinary investors to avoid physical storage costs while benefiting from price fluctuations [1]