Group 1 - The current index level is not as critical as the underlying quality of the market, with structural opportunities still present despite short-term fears in the technology sector [1] - The overall growth is entering a recovery phase, with improvements in net profit margins across various sectors, particularly in emerging technologies and cyclical industries [2] - The market is expected to experience a period of consolidation, with a potential shift in investment styles as the year-end approaches [4] Group 2 - The focus is shifting towards internal structural optimization following the completion of the third-quarter reports, with an emphasis on sectors like AI and export-related industries [6] - The technology sector remains a key investment theme, although short-term volatility may increase due to adjustments in fund allocations [8] - The outlook for the market remains optimistic in the medium to long term, supported by stable policies and a recovering economic environment [9]

Group 1: AIA Group (友邦保险) - AIA Group achieved new business value of USD 4.31 billion in the first three quarters of 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 18% (fixed exchange rate) and 19.3% (actual exchange rate) [5] - The new business value for Q3 2025 alone saw a significant year-on-year growth of 27.1% [5] - Annualized new premiums reached USD 7.49 billion, up 10.9% year-on-year, with Q3 2025 showing a 15.3% increase [5] - Total weighted premium income was USD 35.85 billion, reflecting a 14.2% year-on-year growth, with Q3 2025 also showing a 15.6% increase [5] Group 2: Keda Manufacturing (科达制造) - Keda Manufacturing reported revenue of CNY 12.61 billion and net profit attributable to shareholders of CNY 1.15 billion for the first nine months of 2025, marking increases of 47.2% and 63.5% year-on-year, respectively [6] - In Q3 2025, the company achieved revenue of CNY 4.42 billion, with net profit attributable to shareholders reaching CNY 400 million, reflecting year-on-year growth of 43.9% and 62.6% [6] Group 3: SANY Heavy Industry (三一重工) - SANY Heavy Industry reported revenue of CNY 65.74 billion for the first three quarters of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 13.6%, with net profit attributable to shareholders growing by 46.6% to CNY 7.14 billion [7] - The company's gross margin improved to 27.6%, up 0.7 percentage points year-on-year, while the net margin increased to 11.0%, up 2.4 percentage points [7] Group 4: BYD Electronics (比亚迪电子) - BYD Electronics reported Q3 2025 revenue of CNY 42.68 billion, a year-on-year decrease of 2.0%, with gross profit declining by 20.0% to CNY 2.946 billion, resulting in a gross margin of 6.9% [10] - The decline in revenue and gross profit was attributed to changes in product mix, particularly delays in the delivery of high-margin products for North American clients [10] - Net profit for Q3 2025 decreased by 9.0% to CNY 1.407 billion [10] Group 5: TAL Education Group (好未来) - TAL Education Group reported revenue of USD 861 million for FY26 Q2, representing a year-on-year increase of 39.1%, with net profit attributable to shareholders rising by 116.1% to USD 124 million [11] - The company's Non-GAAP net profit reached USD 136 million, up 82.7% year-on-year, indicating strong growth in both learning services and learning equipment revenue [11] Group 6: Wuliangye Yibin (五粮液) - Wuliangye Yibin's total revenue for the first three quarters of 2025 was CNY 60.945 billion, down 10.26% year-on-year, with net profit attributable to shareholders declining by 13.72% to CNY 21.511 billion [12] - In Q3 2025, total revenue fell sharply by 52.66% to CNY 8.174 billion, with net profit down 65.62% to CNY 2.019 billion [12] Group 7: BGI Genomics (华大智造) - BGI Genomics reported revenue of CNY 1.869 billion for the first three quarters of 2025, a slight decrease of 0.01%, while net loss attributable to shareholders improved by 74.20% to CNY 120 million [13] - In Q3 2025, revenue increased by 14.45% to CNY 755 million, with a significant reduction in net loss by 90.31% to CNY 16 million [13]

Group 1 - The article discusses various investment styles, particularly focusing on "deep growth" stocks, which are less common in funds but prevalent in new stocks on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board and the ChiNext Board [4] - "Growth" style stocks are characterized by high revenue and profit growth, often trading at significantly higher valuations than the market average, with typical price-to-earnings ratios ranging from 40 to 50 times [6][7] - "Growth value" style stocks are in a mature phase with slowing revenue growth but can maintain profitability through cost control, often represented by high ROE stocks in sectors like consumer goods, pharmaceuticals, and technology [8][10] Group 2 - "Deep value" style stocks show stable dividends and high dividend yields, with performance expected to be strong from 2022 to 2024, reflecting a trend of style rotation in the A-share market [11][12] - The article highlights a historical performance pattern where growth styles dominated from 2019 to 2021, while value styles are expected to be strong from 2022 to 2024, with a potential shift back to growth styles in 2025 [12][13] - Understanding the characteristics of different styles allows for strategic adjustments in portfolio allocation based on valuation opportunities [12]

Core Viewpoint - The "National Team," including Central Huijin Investment and its asset management plans, has maintained a stable position in broad-based ETFs while making minor adjustments in sector-specific ETFs, reflecting a strategic approach to stabilize the A-share market [1][2][3]. Group 1: ETF Holdings and Performance - The "National Team" has kept its holdings in broad-based ETFs largely unchanged, with significant performance in the third quarter, where the average increase of ETFs held exceeded 20%, resulting in a scale increase of over 200 billion yuan [2][6]. - As of mid-2025, the "National Team" holds over 40% of the total A-share ETF market, indicating a strong influence on market stability [3]. - The total scale of ETFs held by Central Huijin Investment and its asset management plans reached 1.55 trillion yuan by the end of the third quarter, marking an increase of over 200 billion yuan from the previous quarter [7]. Group 2: Specific ETF Adjustments - Central Huijin Asset Management's two specialized asset management plans have shown more frequent trading activity, including a reduction in holdings of specific ETFs, which should not be interpreted as a broader "National Team" strategy [4][5]. - Notably, the specialized plans reduced their holdings in the Guotai Zhongzheng 800 Automotive and Parts ETF by 800,000 shares in July, and completely divested from the Huaxia Hang Seng China Mainland Enterprises High Dividend ETF [4]. Group 3: Market Conditions and Influences - The significant rebound in the A-share market during the third quarter was a primary driver of the "National Team's" unrealized gains, supported by favorable domestic liquidity conditions and expectations of U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate cuts [8]. - Factors such as policy support, active trading, and capital inflows contributed to the overall positive market performance, with a notable increase in risk appetite among investors [8].

Group 1 - The public fund market in China has shown growth in both the number and scale of funds, with a total of 12,900 public funds existing as of Q3 2025, an increase of 541 funds since the beginning of the year, and a total scale of 33.72 trillion yuan, up 1.42 trillion yuan from the end of 2024 [14][15] - The ETF market has significantly outperformed public funds, with Q3 2025 seeing the issuance of 117 new ETFs, totaling 119.657 billion units, representing a quarterly growth rate of 31.46% and 209.62%, far exceeding the growth rates of public funds [17][18] Group 2 - In Q3 2025, stock funds, bond funds, and mixed funds generally exhibited an increase in stock positions and a decrease in bond positions, with equity mixed funds, flexible allocation funds, and ordinary stock funds showing a continuous increase in their positions in Hong Kong stocks over four consecutive quarters [4][23] - The allocation of public funds has shifted from the main board and Hong Kong stocks to the ChiNext and Sci-Tech Innovation Board, with the ChiNext seeing the largest increase in allocation, rising by 3.52% to 16.63% [36][37] Group 3 - The active adjustment ratio has increased significantly in the electronics, communications, and retail sectors, while the banking, automotive, and home appliance sectors have seen a notable decrease in active adjustment [5][46] - The top three stocks with the most significant active increases in Q3 2025 were Industrial Fulian, Alibaba-W, and Zhongji Xuchuang, while the top three stocks with the most significant active decreases were Shenghong Technology, Midea Group, and Xiaomi Group-W [5][54] Group 4 - The FOF fund market has seen a reversal in trend, with total FOF fund scale increasing by 27.817 billion yuan in Q3 2025, after a decline from 2022 to 2024 [7][19] - The top five heavy-weight funds in the Q3 2025 FOF report were all ETFs, with most heavy-weight funds being bond funds [7][19] Group 5 - The allocation of public funds to Hong Kong stocks has seen a gradual increase, with 2,104 funds having exposure to Hong Kong stocks by the end of Q3 2025, an increase of 87 funds from the previous quarter [29][31] - The number of funds with exposure to Hong Kong stocks among the four major fund categories has also increased, with the equity mixed fund category having the highest allocation at 62.10% [29][31]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the resurgence of active equity funds, highlighting their recent outperformance compared to the CSI 300 index, particularly in a structural market environment that favors growth opportunities [1][2]. Group 1: Active Equity Fund Performance - Over the past three years, active equity funds have underperformed the CSI 300 index, leading to skepticism about their ability to generate excess returns [1]. - As of October 24, the Wind偏股基金指数 recorded a return of 32.39%, significantly outperforming the CSI 300 index's 14.68% during the same period [1]. - Historically, active equity funds have outperformed the CSI 300 index during growth structural opportunities in years such as 2010, 2015, and 2019 to 2021 [1]. Group 2: Recommended Balanced Funds - The article identifies three balanced fund products from Southern Fund that are suitable for investors lacking specific sector or style selection capabilities: 1. 南方智信混合 (managed by Zhang Yanmin) 2. 南方智弘混合 (managed by Jin Lanfeng) 3. 南方港股通优势企业 (managed by Luo Shuai) [2][3]. - These funds are characterized by their ability to control drawdowns in bear markets while capturing gains in bull markets, making them ideal for investors who prefer a hands-off approach [2]. Group 3: Fund Manager Insights - Zhang Yanmin's 南方智信混合 achieved a return of 54.80%, outperforming its benchmark by 30.87% since inception [5]. - Jin Lanfeng's 南方智弘混合 recorded a return of 48.25%, surpassing its benchmark by 20.29% within its first year [12]. - Luo Shuai's 南方港股通优势企业 achieved a total return of 28.87%, outperforming its benchmark by 18 percentage points over more than four years [20]. Group 4: Investment Strategies - Zhang Yanmin emphasizes a diversified investment approach, focusing on both the probability of success and the price at which assets are acquired, adapting to market style rotations [7][9]. - Jin Lanfeng employs a cyclical investment framework, making tactical adjustments based on market conditions and focusing on less crowded investment opportunities [15][16]. - Luo Shuai's strategy involves maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality companies, adapting to market conditions while seeking growth opportunities in the Hong Kong market [22][23]. Group 5: Conclusion on Balanced Products - The three identified balanced funds are suitable for ordinary investors seeking stable returns, with a focus on minimizing maximum drawdowns and enhancing adaptability in various market environments [27].

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Views of the Report - Value style outperforms growth style and the overall market in the long - run, with better risk - return ratios [2][6]. - Value - style funds are scarce in the market, and fund managers need strong conviction and support to adhere to this style [14][16]. - Lan Xiaokang of China Europe Fund is a value - investment adherent. His China Europe Dividend Optimal has achieved excellent performance [2][17]. Summary by Directory 1. Value Style Fund Product Investment Value Overview 1.1 Value Style Performance: Better Risk - Return Ratio in the Long Run - Since 2012 (as of 2025/10/24), the Guozheng Value R has significantly outperformed the Guozheng Growth R and the Wind All - A, indicating the long - term superiority of the value style [6]. - The investment return of the value style is more stable, with a higher win - rate. From 2017 to 2025/10/24, the one - year rolling return win - rate of Guozheng Value R is 70.77%, compared to 56.50% for Guozheng Growth R [8]. - In terms of risk indicators such as yield, volatility, and maximum drawdown, the Guozheng Value R outperforms the Guozheng Growth R in different time periods, showing a better risk - return ratio [11]. 1.2 Scarcity of Value - Style Fund Products in the Market - Only 11 out of over 1700 active equity fund managers manage value - style funds that meet the defined criteria, and 4 of them are financial real - estate funds [14]. - Reasons for the scarcity include fund managers' subjective wavering, scale pressure, and inappropriate fund company assessment systems [15][16]. 2. Lan Xiaokang of China Europe Fund - A Value - Investment Adherent Seeking Maximum Investment Efficiency in Certain Returns 2.1 Background: Years of Research and Management Experience, Historical Performance Outperforming the CSI 300 - Lan Xiaokang has about 8.5 years of investment management experience, currently manages 4 funds with a total scale of 24.809 billion yuan [17]. - His fund manager index has outperformed the CSI 300, especially since 2021 [17]. 2.2 Investment Framework: Seeking Maximum Investment Efficiency under the Premise of Safety - Lan Xiaokang builds a systematic investment framework through top - down and bottom - up research, focusing on macro trends and individual stock fundamentals [19]. - He uses multiple investment strategies, including long - term, dividend, stable - return, hedging, and trend - reversal strategies, to seek differentiated excess returns [19]. 2.3 Representative Product: China Europe Dividend Optimal - Lan Xiaokang's China Europe Dividend Optimal has achieved a return of 169.82% since he took over in 2018/4/20, significantly outperforming its benchmark [20][22]. 3. Analysis of the Characteristics of China Europe Dividend Optimal 3.1 Performance: Leading in Return and Risk - Return Ratio - Since Lan Xiaokang took over, as of 2025/10/24, the cumulative return of China Europe Dividend Optimal is 169.82%, significantly outperforming the benchmark [24]. - From 2019 to 2025/10/24, the quarterly win - rate of positive returns is 74.1%. The quarterly win - rate of relative returns compared to the benchmark and Guozheng Value R is 77.8% and 74.1% respectively, with average quarterly excess returns of 3.82% and 2.58% [25]. - Since 2019, the annualized return of China Europe Dividend Optimal is 19.88%, ranking in the top 12% among similar products. The annualized volatility is 19.98%, ranking in the bottom 25%. The annualized Sharpe ratio and Calmar ratio are in the top 5% and 1.5% respectively [30]. 3.2 Industry Distribution: Timely Rotation with Good Results - The fund mainly invests in value - style sectors such as household appliances, non - bank finance, and real estate, and rotates among these sectors in a timely manner [34]. - Industry rotation operations have brought significant excess returns. For example, in 2024, the increase in bank holdings and the reduction in coal holdings contributed positive excess returns [38][42]. 3.3 Holding Characteristics: Moderate Concentration of Individual Stocks and Timely Allocation of Hong Kong Stocks - The top ten holdings of the fund account for 40% - 60%, and the top thirty holdings account for over 90%, with a moderate concentration of individual stocks [43]. - The fund has a low turnover rate, with a short - term increase in 2020 - 2021, presumably due to adjustments in response to market changes [43]. - The fund mainly focuses on large - and medium - cap stocks, and has gradually increased its allocation to Hong Kong stocks since 2023, with nearly 50% of stock positions in Hong Kong stocks as of the 2025 semi - annual report [45]. 3.4 Return Breakdown: Significant Contribution from Stock Selection - Stock selection is the main source of excess returns for the fund, and trading also contributes a small amount of excess returns [48]. - The absolute return of the fund comes from multiple sectors, with significant contributions from the cyclical sector. In terms of relative returns, the cyclical and financial real - estate sectors have made significant contributions [53]. 3.5 Product Feature Summary - The fund focuses on value - style sectors and achieves good results through timely industry rotation [58]. - It has an outstanding risk - return ratio, with leading returns and low volatility [58]. - Stock selection is the main source of excess returns, mainly from cyclical and financial real - estate innovation sectors [58]. 4. Fund Manager's Ability Circle: Outstanding Hidden Trading and Industry Rotation Abilities - Lan Xiaokang has a moderately diversified industry allocation and a moderately concentrated individual - stock allocation [59]. - His stock - selection ability is strong, ranking in the top 20% among similar products since 2020 [59]. - His hidden trading ability is excellent, ranking in the top 10% among similar products [59]. - His industry rotation ability is stable, ranking in the top 15% among similar products [60]. - His ability to invest in both upward and downward markets is good, being able to seize opportunities in upward markets and defend well in downward markets [60].

Core Insights - The performance of Wang Mingxu's funds has significantly declined, with a year-to-date return of -12.69%, ranking last among 1522 fund managers [1][10] - A systemic issue is evident as six out of seven equity products managed by Wang have consistently underperformed, with declines mostly in double digits [2][4] - The concentrated investment strategy, heavily weighted in traditional value stocks, has led to increased risk and poor performance, especially as market styles shift [3][6] Performance Analysis - Wang's funds were primarily established during market peaks in 2020-2021, leading to a disadvantage as market preferences shifted towards growth and technology sectors [3] - The contrasting performance of the Guangfa Shengjin Mixed Fund, which achieved an 18.29% positive return, highlights the importance of a diversified investment approach [3] - The management scale of Wang has decreased from over 300 billion to around 100 billion, indicating a loss of market confidence [6] Market Sentiment - Investor dissatisfaction is growing due to the significant gap between expectations and actual performance, exacerbated by long-term underperformance [4][8] - The second quarter saw Wang reduce holdings in real estate and brokerage sectors while increasing positions in banks and consumer electronics, which did not align with market trends [4] - The upcoming quarterly report will be crucial in determining whether there will be substantial adjustments in fund positions and risk management strategies [8] Fund Performance Metrics - Specific funds managed by Wang have shown substantial losses, with the Guangfa Value Advantage Mixed Fund down 17.40% and the Guangfa Value Preferred Mixed Fund down 15.36% year-to-date [9] - The performance of these funds is significantly lagging behind the benchmark index, the CSI 300, which has gained 17.06% [9][10] Strategic Recommendations - The need for timely adjustments and clear communication from the fund management is critical to restore investor trust and improve performance [8][10] - Enhancing portfolio diversity and risk management execution will be essential for future recovery, as the market may not remain forgiving [10]

- **Barra style factors**: The report tracks several style factors including Beta, Market Cap, Momentum, Volatility, Non-linear Market Cap, Valuation, Liquidity, Profitability, Growth, and Leverage. These factors are constructed using historical data and financial metrics such as turnover rates, earnings growth rates, and market leverage ratios. For example, the Beta factor represents historical beta, while the Valuation factor is calculated as the inverse of the price-to-book ratio. The formulas for constructing these factors include weighted combinations of metrics like turnover rates and earnings ratios [14][15][16] - **Factor performance tracking**: The report evaluates the recent performance of style factors across the market. Beta, Liquidity, and Momentum factors showed strong long positions, while Market Cap, Non-linear Market Cap, and Valuation factors performed better in short positions. The tracking methodology involves selecting stocks from the Wind All A pool, excluding ST stocks, suspended stocks, and newly listed stocks under 120 days. Long positions are taken in the top 10% of stocks with the highest factor values, and short positions in the bottom 10%, with equal weight allocation [16][19][20] - **Factor backtesting results**: The report provides detailed backtesting results for style factors. For example, Beta achieved a weekly return of 4.58%, while Market Cap showed a negative weekly return of -3.55%. Other factors like Momentum and Liquidity also demonstrated varied performance across different time horizons, such as one week, one month, and year-to-date. The report highlights the annualized returns for three-year and five-year periods for each factor [17][18][19] - **GRU factor performance**: GRU factors showed weaker performance overall, with only the barra1d model achieving positive returns. Other GRU models experienced drawdowns in their long-short portfolios. This indicates potential challenges in the effectiveness of GRU factors under current market conditions [20][25][29] - **Technical factors**: Technical factors such as 20-day Momentum, 60-day Momentum, and various volatility measures (e.g., 120-day Volatility) were tracked. These factors generally showed positive returns in long positions, particularly in high-volatility and high-momentum stocks. For example, 120-day Volatility achieved a weekly return of 5.92% in the CSI 300 stock pool [24][27][31] - **Fundamental factors**: Fundamental factors like ROA growth, ROC growth, and Net Profit growth were analyzed. In the CSI 300 stock pool, Net Profit growth achieved a weekly return of 2.51%, while ROA growth showed a return of 1.19%. These factors generally favored stocks with stable and strong growth metrics [23][25][30] - **Multi-factor portfolio performance**: The report evaluates the performance of multi-factor portfolios. The barra5d model outperformed the CSI 1000 index by 0.27% this week and achieved a year-to-date excess return of 5.91%. Other models showed mixed results, with some experiencing slight drawdowns. The multi-factor portfolio achieved a weekly excess return of 0.04% relative to the CSI 1000 index [8][33][34]

Core Viewpoint - The growth style continues to rise, with the Guozheng Growth 100 Index increasing by 2.6% as of 14:15, attracting significant capital attention to related products [1] Group 1: Index Performance - The Guozheng Growth 100 Index focuses on A-share stocks with prominent growth characteristics, selecting 100 securities based on criteria such as quarterly net profit year-on-year changes and expected net profit growth rates [1] - The latest expected net profit growth rate for the index's constituent stocks in 2025 exceeds 100%, significantly outperforming other similar indices [1] - Since the base date at the end of 2012, the index has achieved an annualized return of over 20%, with a return of approximately 105% since the beginning of 2024 and nearly 50% year-to-date, outperforming similar style indices [1] Group 2: Investment Products - The Growth ETF (159259) is the only ETF product tracking the Guozheng Growth 100 Index, providing a convenient option for investors favoring growth stocks to invest in high-quality growth companies [1]