Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the document Core Viewpoints - In April, the market rebounded from the bottom. Wind All - A closed down 3.15% monthly, with different performance among various indices. The US tariff war, though temporarily halted, may recur due to its underlying financial issues. Attention should be paid to the growth indicators in the A - share annual and quarterly reports, and the long - term trend of A - shares is mainly affected by the de - leveraging process of various sectors under the debt cycle. Also, capital expenditure and profitability of domestic and foreign demand - related sectors need to be monitored [3][6]. - The equity risk premium is at a relatively high historical level. Short - term funds support the stock market, but market sentiment has cooled significantly, and the momentum of both fund inflows and market sentiment has weakened weekly [3][9][18]. - Sectors with high overseas revenue are more sensitive to tariff policies as most of them are in the development stage with high capital expenditure and low ROE, adopting a thin - profit - high - turnover model [3][20]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Market Overview - **Index Performance**: In April, Wind All - A closed down 3.15% monthly. Specifically, CSI 1000 fell 4.61%, CSI 500 fell 3.94%, SSE 50 fell 0.63%, and SSE 300 fell 2.58%. Weekly, small - cap indices rebounded more strongly, with CSI 1000 rising 1.85% and SSE 50 falling 0.33% [3][6]. - **Tariff Policy**: The US tariff war, which started on April 2nd, has temporarily ended. However, due to the US's insufficient financial account financing ability and the need to balance the current account deficit, tariff policies may change again in the future [3][6]. - **Financial Reports**: At the end of April, A - shares will fully disclose the 2024 annual reports and 2025 first - quarter reports. The market is more concerned about nominal growth data, and the year - on - year revenue growth rate in the financial reports can provide indirect verification. In the first three quarters of 2024, the cumulative year - on - year revenue growth rate of A - shares in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets, excluding the financial sector, was - 1.7% ( - 0.6% in the semi - annual report) [3][6]. 2. Market Indicators - **Interest Rate and Valuation**: At the end of April, the yield of the 10 - year active treasury bond was 1.67%. The dynamic P/E ratio of Wind All - A was 18.22 times, and the equity risk premium was still at a relatively high historical level. The PE_ttm of CSI 1000 was 37.23, and that of SSE 300 was 12.26, with both valuation levels slightly lower than last month [9]. - **Fund Flow**: From April 1st to April 24th, the net subscription of the four major broad - based index ETFs reached 193.6 billion yuan, with a single - day net subscription of 100.3 billion yuan on April 7th, a record high. However, the margin trading balance decreased by 110.5 billion yuan during the same period, indicating a significant cooling of market sentiment. Weekly, both showed weakening momentum [18]. 3. Overseas Revenue Sectors - **Industry Concentration**: Sectors with high overseas revenue are mainly concentrated in three industrial chains: high - end technology manufacturing, new energy vehicle industry chain, and energy and chemical products [20]. - **Sensitivity to Tariffs**: Most sectors with high overseas revenue are in the development and expansion stage, with high capital expenditure ratios (8% - 18% of revenue). Their ROE is lower than the A - share average (around 7.8%), adopting a thin - profit - high - turnover model, making them more sensitive to tariff policies [20]. 4. Policy and Data - **Domestic Policies**: Multiple policies have been introduced, including a 12 - trillion - yuan debt - resolution plan, a mention of "moderately loose monetary policy", a 2025 GDP growth target of 5%, a fiscal deficit rate of 4%, and a fertility reward policy in Hohhot [21]. - **US Tariff Policy**: The US "reciprocal tariff" plan was implemented on April 3rd. As of April 12, 2025, the US tariff rate on Chinese imports increased by 125%. The US also issued a tariff exemption list and a tariff suspension policy for some countries, while China issued a white paper on Sino - US economic and trade relations [21]. - **Economic Data**: In March, China's exports increased by 12.4% year - on - year (in US dollars), and imports decreased by 4.3% year - on - year (in US dollars). In the first quarter of 2025, China's GDP increased by 5.4% year - on - year, and the year - on - year growth rate of social retail sales in March was 5.9%, exceeding the average level of the demand side [21]. 5. Index and Option Performance - **Index Performance**: CSI 1000 fell 4.15% monthly, CSI 500 rose 3.94% monthly, SSE 300 fell 2.58% monthly, and SSE 50 fell 0.63% monthly, with the basis discount annualization showing a widening divergence for all [29][33][36][38]. - **Option Indicators**: Charts of historical volatility, volatility cones,持仓PCR, and 交易PCR for CSI 1000, SSE 300, and SSE 50 options are provided, but no specific analysis of these indicators is given in the text [42][51][58]. - **Trading Slippage**: Charts of IM long - and short - position trading slippage are provided, but no specific analysis is given [66]. 6. Corporate Profitability - **Low - level Profitability**: The profitability of listed companies remains at a relatively low level. In the third quarter of 2024, the revenue and net profit growth rates of the entire market, excluding the financial sector, showed different degrees of decline [77]. - **Financial Indicators of Indices**: The 2024 semi - annual report shows various financial indicators of different indices, including ROE, operating net profit margin, asset turnover, etc., with differences in growth and profitability among different indices [79].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of having a "margin of safety" in investments, particularly in the context of fixed income, as articulated by Liu Wanfeng, the director of fixed income investment at China Merchants Fund [2][67][71]. Group 1: Investment Philosophy - Liu Wanfeng's investment philosophy is heavily influenced by Seth Klarman's book "Margin of Safety," which stresses the necessity of risk management and maintaining a margin of safety to survive extreme market conditions [2][67]. - The concept of long-term compounding is highlighted, indicating that short-term decisions can jeopardize long-term gains, thus discipline in trading is crucial [3][68]. - Liu emphasizes the need for patience and long-term commitment in fixed income products, prioritizing steady returns over short-term gains [7][68]. Group 2: Team Structure and Decision-Making - The fixed income team at China Merchants Fund operates under a collective decision-making mechanism, ensuring thorough discussions and research support for investment decisions [4][5][6]. - The team consists of nearly 40 professionals, including 22 fund managers with an average experience of over 11 years, organized into specialized groups to enhance collaborative efforts [6][41]. - This structured approach has allowed the team to navigate market volatility effectively, as demonstrated in 2016 and post-2020 adjustments in the real estate bond market [5][40]. Group 3: Performance Metrics - As of the end of 2024, Liu manages eight funds with a total scale of approximately 35 billion, with a notable performance record of achieving positive returns for the flagship fund over ten consecutive years [7][8]. - The flagship product, "Zhaoshang Shuangzhai LOF," has maintained a maximum drawdown of no more than 2% in each complete year from 2016 to 2024, showcasing its stability [7][8]. - Liu's strategy involves adjusting the portfolio based on macroeconomic cycles, ensuring that the right types of bonds are held at the appropriate times [7][8]. Group 4: Market Outlook and Strategy - Liu forecasts a challenging bond investment environment characterized by low yields and high volatility, necessitating a more refined approach to investment strategies [11][56]. - The current macroeconomic landscape is described as a new phase where policy and investor behavior significantly influence the bond market, with a focus on maintaining stability amid low yields [20][21][22]. - Liu suggests that in the current market, attention should be directed towards the balance of policies and investor behavior, as these will dictate bond market fluctuations [21][22]. Group 5: Risk Management and Future Considerations - Liu advocates for a cautious approach to investment, emphasizing the importance of risk control and the need to avoid overexposure to market speculation [9][11][49]. - The article discusses the potential for passive investment strategies to gain traction in the current market, as they offer lower costs and clearer risk profiles compared to active management [51][53]. - Liu expresses the belief that the bond market will require a rational perspective moving forward, particularly in light of recent market adjustments and the need for careful analysis of macroeconomic indicators [62][56].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of monitoring the evolving global economic landscape, particularly in light of intensified US-China trade tensions and their impact on market dynamics. It suggests a cautious approach to investment, focusing on undervalued assets and maintaining a diversified portfolio strategy to mitigate risks associated with market volatility [2][4]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The Hong Kong stock market has shown signs of short-term exhaustion after six consecutive weeks of gains, indicating a need for caution and a focus on low volatility, dividend, value, and quality factors [2]. - The recent surge in the Hang Seng Index basis, which exceeded 200 points, is a rare occurrence, having only happened 13 times since 2013. Historical data suggests that the performance of the Hong Kong market is closely tied to corporate earnings, with PPI (Producer Price Index) being a key indicator to track [2][8]. - The article notes that the Chinese government has taken significant measures to support the capital market amid escalating trade tensions, which positively influenced market performance [2]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - The article outlines a three-pronged approach for identifying optimal investment opportunities during periods of market volatility: (1) observing signs of easing trade tensions, (2) identifying undervalued assets, and (3) recognizing liquidity issues that may lead to temporary market dislocations [3]. - A long-term strategy is recommended, focusing on a "global barbell strategy" that balances risk and return across various asset classes, particularly in the context of rising tariffs and the implications of a shifting global order [4]. - The article suggests maintaining a defensive asset allocation strategy, emphasizing the importance of tracking US dollar liquidity as a leading indicator for market movements [3]. Group 3: Asset Allocation - The article provides a detailed asset allocation model under the "All Weather Strategy," which includes varying proportions for different risk preferences, highlighting the importance of adjusting allocations based on market conditions [6]. - The model suggests a significant allocation to Chinese government bonds and convertible bonds, reflecting a preference for lower-risk assets in uncertain market conditions [6]. - The allocation percentages for various assets are tailored to different risk appetites, with specific adjustments made for volatility and correlation among asset classes [6].

戴康 CFA 广发证券发展研究中心 董事总经理（MD）、首席资产研究官 邮箱：daikang@gf.com.cn 报告摘要 ● 引言：我们在 25.2.28《牛市二阶段，事缓则圆》 提示，港股周线6连阳后，短期行情有所透支，事缓则圆。从历史经验看6连阳后不建议追涨，反而应关注落后的低 波、股息、价值、质量因子。 我们在 25.4.8《"事缓则圆"后，当前如何应对》 提示中期投资者需要深刻解读世界秩序重塑的方向和权衡各类资产的性价比。 ● 中美贸易摩擦加剧中，中国政府采取了有力的维护资本市场的举措，对周二的市场产生了较好的提振作用。 而从美国与各国磋商贸易条件进展看，不排除特朗普延期 关税的可能。 ● 中国资产的风险偏好冲击在本周一达到了较为极端的水平。 恒指基差突破200点是历史罕见现象，2013年至今只出现过13次，本轮对等关税冲击下，恒指基差突破近 210点。复盘历史13次的经验，极端贴水（现货价格远高于期货）后港股市场的表现由企业盈利决定（PPI同比是较好的跟踪指标）：PPI回升—>港股反弹；PPI回落—> 港股回落。PPI与中美贸易条件的演变息息相关，需要继续跟踪关税问题的进展。 ● 全球资本市场目前 ...

Core Viewpoint - The world is on the brink of a profound transformation, driven by structural fractures in monetary, political, and geopolitical orders, with the current debt bubble posing significant risks to the global economy [1][2]. Group 1: Monetary/Economic Order Breakdown - The root cause of the crisis lies in unsustainable debt levels, with excessive debt accumulation and uncontrolled growth of new debt leading to a dangerous debt bubble that supports the capital markets and economies [3][6]. - The current state of de-globalization has resulted in absurd trade deficits and capital imbalances, where major economies are caught in a "technological cold war," undermining supply chain security and trust [4][5]. - The existing monetary and economic order, characterized by low-cost manufacturing in countries like China and high debt levels in the U.S., is unsustainable and must change to address these imbalances [6][12]. Group 2: Domestic Political Order Breakdown - The U.S. faces a political crisis fueled by educational gaps, opportunity disparities, productivity stagnation, wealth polarization, and a fragmented value system, leading to a rise in populism and extreme political polarization [7]. - The erosion of the compromise spirit and rule of law threatens the survival of democratic institutions, with economic and political crises creating a vicious cycle [7][11]. Group 3: International Geopolitical Order Reconstruction - The unipolar world order led by the U.S. has ended, with a shift towards unilateralism and "America First" policies, resulting in trade wars, technological blockades, and geopolitical tensions [8][12]. - This transition is marked by the emergence of a new order that challenges previous multilateral frameworks and introduces new forms of conflict [8][12]. Group 4: Natural Disaster Impact - The increasing destructiveness of natural disasters, such as droughts and pandemics, acts as a catalyst for global system disruptions, contributing to the overall instability [9]. Group 5: Technological Revolution - Disruptive technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, are reshaping monetary debt systems, political power structures, and international interactions, while also altering the cost of responding to natural disasters [10][12]. Group 6: Interconnected Forces - The interplay of these five forces is crucial for understanding the systemic changes underway, as failing to recognize these underlying dynamics can lead to significant misjudgments about current events and their implications [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - April is a critical observation period for fundamental and policy changes, with key focuses on potential risks of fundamental fluctuations, the marginal easing of central bank attitudes, and the further developments following the implementation of tariffs by the Trump administration [1] Macro: Economic Cycle Position and State - The current Chinese economy exhibits three significant characteristics: 1. The phase of maximum downward pressure has likely passed, with the inventory cycle indicating that 2022-2023 was the most challenging period, and the low point of this cycle is expected to be at the end of 2023 to early 2024 [2] 2. Moving away from the peak of downward pressure does not imply a rapid rebound, as recent cycles indicate that the economy remains in a state of fluctuation [2] 3. Short-term economic recovery faces obstacles due to external trade pressures and slow recovery in real estate investment and consumption [2] Policy: Important Observation Window for Central Bank Attitude - April serves as a crucial observation window for the central bank's stance, focusing on liquidity management and potential hawkish signals, especially in light of significant bond issuance pressure [3] - The speed and proportion of government bond issuance in April will be vital for determining economic conditions in the second quarter [3] Overseas: Subtle Changes in Sentiment - The overall performance of the U.S. economy shows marginal changes, with a slight increase in unemployment and resilient labor market conditions, while retail sales have improved from negative growth [4] - Investor sentiment is changing rapidly, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s policies [4] Major Asset Strategy Judgments - A-shares are experiencing a style switch, driven by clearer fundamental outlines and cyclical changes in market sentiment, leading to a shift in market style [5] - Bond market rates are expected to remain volatile, with the central bank's liquidity stance influencing bond yields [6] - Commodity prices, particularly copper and gold, are shifting focus back to fundamentals as tariff expectations have been priced in [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on global assets and the shift from a "great moderation" to a "great volatility" in the global economy, emphasizing the need for investors to adapt their strategies accordingly [3][4]. Short-term Outlook - Investors are advised to focus on safe-haven assets such as U.S. Treasuries, Chinese bonds, Swiss francs, gold, and dividend stocks before the implementation of tariffs on April 9 [4]. - Current market indicators suggest a decline in risk appetite, and liquidity metrics should be closely monitored for potential trading opportunities [4]. - Specific asset class assessments indicate that global equities and commodities remain under pressure, while U.S. equities are weak and U.S. Treasuries are strong, reflecting a preference for safety over inflation concerns [4]. Medium to Long-term Outlook - The tariffs reinforce three underlying logics of a new investment paradigm: the intensification of de-globalization, misalignment of debt cycles, and trends in the AI industry [5]. - The article suggests maintaining a balanced allocation of safe-haven assets to manage risk and return effectively, as the global economic landscape continues to evolve [5]. Asset Allocation Strategy - The "All Weather Strategy" outlines different asset allocation percentages based on risk preferences, with a notable emphasis on Chinese government bonds and gold across varying risk profiles [7]. - For low-risk preference, the allocation includes 34.18% in Chinese government bonds and 8.51% in COMEX gold, while for high-risk preference, it suggests 14.16% in Chinese government bonds and 11.75% in gold [7].

戴康 CFA 广发证券发展研究中心 董事总经理（MD）、首席资产研究官 邮箱：daikang@gf.com.cn 报告摘要 ● 引言： 我们在25.2.28 《牛市二阶段，事缓则圆》 提示，港股周线6连阳后，短期行情有所透支，事缓则圆。 从历史经验看6连阳后不建议追涨，反而应关注落后的低波、股息、价值、质量因子。 ● 部分投资者仍然对"新投资范式"认识不足，对特朗普关税的底层逻辑存在误解。 疫情以来，全球从"大缓和"走 向"大波动"，G2在生产贸易（中国生产国VS美国消费国）、债务（中国私人高VS美国政府高）失衡突出，特朗 普政府企图通过非常规手段化解全球供给与需求失衡，世界秩序重塑不可逆。 ● 特朗普关税对全球资产的影响？ 关税一阶段定价征税国家的"通胀效应"+被征税国家的"需求收缩效应"、二阶 段定价被征税国家的应对措施（货币财政）。 ● 短期而言：在4.9（对等关税生效日期）前，以避险资产（美债&中债、瑞郎、黄金、红利等）为宜。 当前关键 问题除了关注各国之间的贸易谈判，在金融市场上还要关注基本面的问题是否会转换成流动性的问题。当前， （VIX、AAII熊牛价差、BNP全球风险溢价等指标显示）风险偏好下 ...

戴康 CFA 广发证券发展研究中心 董事总经理（MD）、首席资产研究官 邮箱：daikang@gf.com.cn 完整内容详见25年4月2日发布的《 【广发资产研究】资产配置如何应对"东升西落"叙事？ 》（点击标题查看原文） | | | | 全天候配置策略(The All Weather Strategy) | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 低风险偏好 | | 中等风险偏好 | | 高等风险偏好 | | | 波动率 | | 调整系数 配置比例 | 调整系数 配置比例 | | 调整系数 | 配置比例 | | 中国国债指数 | 0.08% | 430 | 34.18% | 258 | 24.00% | 129 | 14.16% | | COMEX黄金 | 0.93% | 107 | 8.51% | 107 | 9.96% | 107 | 11.75% | | 中国可转债 | 0.44% | 226 | 17.99% | 226 | 21.05% | 226 | 24.83% | | 印度SENSEX30 | 0. ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses asset allocation strategies in response to the narrative of "East Rising, West Falling," emphasizing the importance of adapting investment strategies to changing global dynamics [2]. Group 1: Asset Allocation Strategies - The All Weather Strategy outlines different asset allocation percentages based on risk preferences, with Chinese government bonds, gold, and convertible bonds being key components [2]. - For low-risk preference, the allocation includes 34.18% in Chinese government bonds and 17.99% in Chinese convertible bonds [2]. - For medium-risk preference, the allocation shifts to 24.00% in Chinese government bonds and 21.05% in Chinese convertible bonds [2]. - High-risk preference sees allocations of 14.16% in Chinese government bonds and 24.83% in Chinese convertible bonds [2]. Group 2: Market Trends and Indicators - The correlation among S&P 500 component stocks is at a historical low, suggesting a potential for mean reversion in 2025 [3]. - The current equity risk premium (ERP) for the "Seven Sisters" of U.S. stocks is not favorable, indicating a less attractive valuation environment [4]. - The overall market excluding the "Seven Sisters" also shows a low ERP, reinforcing the notion of high valuations in the U.S. market [5]. Group 3: Historical Performance Analysis - The Hang Seng Index has experienced over six weeks of consecutive gains, which historically leads to varied performance in Chinese stocks [6][7]. - Historical data indicates that after similar performance patterns, sectors such as low volatility, dividend yield, and value factors tend to underperform in the following months [8]. - The article suggests focusing on lagging sectors with high dividend yields and value characteristics rather than chasing leading sectors after significant market rallies [8].