Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the pitfalls of relying solely on Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratios for investment decisions, particularly in industry indices, and emphasizes the importance of combining PE with Price-to-Book (PB) ratios for more reliable investment timing and efficiency [5][6][29]. Group 1: PE Ratio Analysis - PE ratios can be misleading, especially in industry indices where profits are highly synchronized, leading to exaggerated fluctuations in PE during economic cycles [8][9]. - In broad indices, PE has more reference value due to smoother profit distributions, while in industry indices, profit volatility can distort the perceived value [8][9]. - The consumption electronics sector exemplifies the "profit decline, valuation distortion, profit recovery" cycle, illustrating how PE can mislead investors [10][23]. Group 2: Stages of PE Fluctuation - The first stage is the decline phase, where prices drop and PE decreases, creating an illusion of value, often leading to premature investments [13][15]. - The second stage is the bottoming phase, characterized by price stabilization and rising PE, which may deter investors despite being a potential entry point [19]. - The third stage is the reversal phase, where prices rise and PE stabilizes or decreases, indicating a "cheaper as it rises" scenario, as seen in the consumption electronics sector in 2024 [21][23]. Group 3: Importance of PB Ratio - PB ratio serves as a more stable indicator compared to PE, as it reflects the company's net asset value rather than fluctuating profits, making it a useful tool for assessing value during volatile periods [25][27]. - The combination of PE and PB ratios creates a "valuation temperature" that provides a more accurate assessment of an index's value, especially in cyclical industries [27]. - The methodology adjusts the weight of PE and PB based on the industry cycle, enhancing the reliability of the valuation approach [27]. Group 4: Conclusion - Investors should be cautious of relying solely on PE ratios, as they can create illusions of value during profit fluctuations. A multi-faceted approach using both PE and PB is recommended for a clearer understanding of true market value [29].

↑点击上面图片 加雪球核心交流群 ↑ 今天是国庆小长假前倒数第二个交易日，A股一改前两周震荡的态势，在券商板块的带领下发起新一轮攻势。截止收盘，沪指 涨0.90% ， 深成指 涨2.05% ， 创业板指 涨2.74%， 沪深两市成交额2.16万亿，较上一个交易日放量146亿。 盘面上 ， 市场热点快速轮动 ，早盘固态电池、储能板块领涨，贵金属板块持续拉升，午后"牛市旗手"证券板块集体拉升，千亿中信证券一度冲 击涨停。 01 此外，本周一、周二是国庆前的最后两个交易日。 开源证券指出 ，临近国庆假期前的避险情绪上升，不排除高位科技板块延续本周回撤的可能。 但从中长期来看，政策基调未出现根本性偏离，长线资金与外资仍有配置倾向，散户情绪较为理性， 再加上券商、金融板块尚处于较低估值区 间，建议"持股过节"。 4500亿中信证券一度冲击涨停 今天证券板块午后大幅走强，中信证券一度冲击涨停，收涨5.88%，华泰证券、国盛金控、广发证券盘中涨停，东方证券、湘财股份、东吴证券 涨幅居前。 消息面上，日前中国人民银行货币政策委员会召开2025年第三季度例会。会议指出，有效落实好各类结构性货币政策工具，扎实做好金融"五篇大 文 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the cyclical nature of market fluctuations and emphasizes that despite the unique triggers for each crisis, the underlying principles of investing remain consistent. It highlights the importance of maintaining a long-term perspective and sticking to a well-defined investment plan rather than reacting to market noise [5][10]. Group 1: Market Behavior and Investor Psychology - Historical market crises, such as the 1973-1974 stock market crash and the 2020 pandemic, illustrate that investors often perceive each crisis as unprecedented, leading to panic and irrational behavior [5][10]. - The author, Nick Murray, argues that the most significant factor affecting investor returns is not economic conditions or market trends, but rather the behavior of the investors themselves [8][9]. - A key insight is that human nature often leads investors to act against their best interests, particularly in the context of price movements and perceived value [9][10]. Group 2: Investment Planning and Strategy - Establishing a clear financial plan is crucial for investors, which includes understanding core financial goals and creating a pathway to achieve them [8][12]. - The article stresses the importance of constructing an investment portfolio aimed at long-term returns, ensuring that it aligns with the established financial plan [8][12]. - Investors should focus on executing their plans consistently, rather than being swayed by market fluctuations or current events [11][12]. Group 3: Role of Investment Advisors - Investment advisors should guide clients to resist the urge to react to market volatility and instead concentrate on long-term goals and strategies [11][12]. - The article suggests that a significant portion of an advisor's role is to help clients overcome behavioral biases that can hinder their investment success [9][13]. - Advisors are encouraged to minimize discussions about current market events, as these can distract from the core investment strategy and lead to unnecessary anxiety [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that younger investors should avoid competing in the same investment arena as older investors, particularly in traditional sectors, and instead focus on emerging industries that older investors may not understand [2][3][9]. Group 1: Investment Strategies - Older investors, referred to as "老登," have benefited from previous market trends, particularly in sectors like liquor and consumer goods, but may miss out on new technology trends [2][3]. - Younger investors should seek opportunities in industries that are not yet recognized by older investors, as this could provide a chance for significant returns [3][9]. Group 2: Case Study of Kweichow Moutai - Kweichow Moutai's stock price increased from approximately 4 yuan at its IPO in 2001 to a peak of around 2342 yuan in 2021, representing a growth of over 580 times [4]. - The company's revenue grew from 1.618 billion yuan in 2001 to 109.5 billion yuan in 2021, an increase of about 68 times [6][7]. - To replicate its past success, Kweichow Moutai would need to achieve a revenue of approximately 11.8 trillion yuan in 20 years, which is nearly 15 times the current size of the entire liquor industry [8]. Group 3: Investment Considerations - Investing in traditional industry leaders like Kweichow Moutai may only be suitable for those with substantial capital, as the potential for high returns diminishes for smaller investors [8][9]. - The article suggests that younger investors would be better off focusing on their careers rather than spending time in the stock market, as the opportunity cost may be higher [9].

↑点击上面图片 加雪球核心交流群 ↑ 周末的市场休息，本来还是很平淡，但这周末，特朗普又带来了王炸消息！ 01 辟谣！摩尔线程上市！ 先看一下周五大家比较关注的科技板块的一个小作文，周五科技板块，半导体，芯片，算力出现了调整，冲高回落，而且收盘时跌幅也是比较大 的。 在周五盘中传出了一则小作文的消息：25号摩尔线程在交易所的状态为"暂缓审核"，上市被卡。也是周五芯片半导体板块下跌的一个原因。 但在昨天，就被马上辟谣，上海证券交易所上市委审议通过了摩尔线程智能科技（北京）股份有限公司的首发申请。从6月30日上市申请获受理到 成功过会，摩尔线程仅用时88天，创下科创板审核周期的最快纪录。 此次IPO， 摩尔线程计划募资80亿元人民币，是年内A股过会项目中募资规模最大的项目，同时也是年内半导体领域最大规模的IPO。 02 又要开战？ 再来看看这个周末的重磅消息，周末市场休息，但是特朗普不休。来看一下周末这两天关于特朗普的消息。 据美煤日报道，4名消息人士透露， 美国军方官员正在制定针对委内瑞拉境内"贩毒分子"的行动方案，并可能在几周内开始对该国境内目标的打 击。 值得一提的是， 委内瑞拉 是世界重要石油生产与出口国 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a diversified, long-term investment strategy, particularly through a "permanent investment strategy" that balances various asset classes to achieve stable returns while minimizing risk [4][5][12]. Group 1: Investment Strategy - The author advocates for a global multi-asset allocation approach, suggesting that investors should not overly concentrate on high-valuation sectors [4][5]. - A sample permanent investment portfolio is proposed, consisting of 12.5% in Nasdaq 100, 12.5% in S&P 500, 25% in gold, 25% in Chinese bonds, and 25% in U.S. bonds [6][12]. - Historical backtesting of this strategy shows a three-year return of 70.74%, outperforming the CSI 300's 18.41% and slightly lagging behind the S&P 500's 83.51% [9][12]. Group 2: Risk and Performance Metrics - The maximum drawdown for the permanent strategy is reported at 9.19%, significantly lower than the CSI 300's 24.8% and the S&P 500's 18.62% [9][12]. - The Sharpe ratio for the permanent strategy is calculated at 0.12, compared to 0.02 for the CSI 300 and 0.08 for the S&P 500, indicating better risk-adjusted returns [9][12]. - The strategy's positive return days are at 55.14%, slightly higher than the CSI 300's 49%, suggesting that while the strategy does not yield daily profits, it benefits from lower volatility [9][12]. Group 3: Long-term Performance - Over five years, the permanent strategy achieved a return of 79.1%, while the CSI 300 only returned 0.07% and the S&P 500 returned 115.36% [13]. - The article notes that rebalancing the portfolio over five years resulted in a decrease in performance from 76.3% to 66.6%, attributed to the strong upward trends in U.S. stocks and gold [17]. - The author argues that long-term rebalancing can enhance returns during market downturns by locking in profits and allowing for reinvestment at lower prices [17]. Group 4: Asset Correlation - The correlation between S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 is very high at 0.97, indicating limited diversification benefits between these two assets [20]. - In contrast, the correlation between S&P 500 and gold is only 0.01, and between S&P 500 and U.S. bonds is 0.09, highlighting the importance of including low-correlation assets in a diversified portfolio [20]. - The article suggests that the current market is heavily concentrated in large-cap tech stocks, which may pose risks if the broader economy weakens [21].

Group 1: US Tariff Policy Changes - The latest US tariff measures on pharmaceuticals will not apply to countries that have trade agreements with the US, such as the EU and Japan, which will continue to adhere to the agreed 15% tariff cap [2][5] - The UK, however, will face a 100% tariff on pharmaceutical exports to the US, as negotiations on drug-related tax rates are still ongoing [5] Group 2: Market Reactions and Economic Data - Following the announcement of the tariff changes, the Asia-Pacific pharmaceutical stocks experienced declines, with companies like BeiGene down 4% and Sumitomo Pharma down over 3% [2] - On September 26, US stock indices saw gains, with the Dow Jones up 0.65% and the S&P 500 up 0.59%, driven by inflation data that raised expectations for interest rate cuts [6][12] - The Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index for September was reported at 55.1, slightly lower than the preliminary value, while the core PCE price index showed a year-on-year increase of 2.9%, aligning with market expectations [13] Group 3: Precious Metals Market - The precious metals market experienced a significant rally, with COMEX gold futures rising 0.5% to $3789.8 per ounce and silver futures up 2.77% to $46.365 per ounce, marking a 14-year high for silver [15][16] - Over the past six months, silver has seen a cumulative increase of over 30%, outperforming most commodities, with a year-to-date rise of 59%, compared to gold's 43% [17] - The current gold-silver ratio indicates that silver is undervalued relative to historical averages, suggesting potential for price correction [18]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant shift in market trends since early July, highlighting the underperformance of bank stocks compared to technology sectors like communications and semiconductors, which have seen substantial gains [3]. Group 1: Market Performance - Before July, bank stocks had the highest gains among all sectors, with a peak increase of over 22%, but have since dropped to a 6.8% increase [3]. - The author reflects on the missed opportunity of reallocating investments from bank stocks to technology stocks during this period, which could have resulted in higher returns [5][6]. Group 2: Investment Philosophy - The article emphasizes the importance of a dividend and equity mindset, suggesting that during bear markets, dividend stocks serve as a safer investment, experiencing smaller declines compared to growth stocks [8][10]. - It advocates for a long-term investment strategy that includes buying undervalued companies with high dividends, ensuring a safety margin and consistent income [12][14]. Group 3: Investment Strategies - The author contrasts two investment approaches: dividend stock investment, which prioritizes safety and stable returns, and technology stock investment, which seeks high returns but comes with higher risks [17][18]. - The article suggests that investors should consider their understanding of technology stocks and their long-term profitability before making investment decisions, using Warren Buffett's approach as a guiding principle [20].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the strong performance of the ChiNext index, which has reached a three-year high, driven by significant movements in specific stocks and sectors, particularly in the gaming, AI applications, and solid-state battery industries. Group 1: Company Highlights - The stock of Upwind New Materials surged by 20%, reaching 132.1 CNY per share, with a total market capitalization of 53.3 billion CNY, marking it as the top performer in the A-share market this year with an astonishing annual increase of 1892% [3][6]. - Upwind New Materials underwent a significant ownership change, with Zhiyuan Robotics acquiring a 29.99% stake, making it the new controlling shareholder, and plans to further acquire 37% of the shares at a price of 7.78 CNY per share, requiring up to 1.16 billion CNY [6][7][8]. - The acquisition is seen as a strategic move to integrate the supply chain, focusing on the application of composite materials in lightweight robotic structures, rather than a shell listing [9]. Group 2: Industry Trends - The solid-state battery sector is gaining momentum, with companies like Ningde Times reaching a market cap of 1.79 trillion CNY, driven by advancements in solid-state battery technology and a recent conference discussing its future [10][13]. - The copper industry saw a rise in stock prices due to a fatal landslide at Freeport McMoRan's Grasberg mine, which accounts for about 3% of global copper supply, leading to concerns over supply disruptions and supporting copper prices [15][18]. - The gaming sector is experiencing a resurgence, with several stocks hitting new highs following the approval of 145 domestic games and 11 imported games by the National Press and Publication Administration, reflecting a 25% year-on-year increase in game approvals [19][22].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant market differentiation observed in 2023, highlighting the contrasting performances of the food and beverage sector, which has seen a decline of 0.87%, versus the technology sector, which has experienced gains exceeding 40% in indices like the Shenwan Communications and Shenwan Electronics [5][6]. Group 1: Thematic Investing - The concept of "thematic investing" involves selecting a specific investment theme and identifying companies that support this theme, ultimately constructing an investment portfolio around these companies [8]. - While many investors believe that choosing the right theme guarantees profits, the reality is that missteps can lead to substantial losses, as evidenced by the contrasting fortunes of "old" and "new" asset classes in previous market cycles [9][10]. - Historical data shows that many investors in thematic funds have not recouped their investments, particularly those who entered at market peaks [10]. Group 2: Conditions for Successful Thematic Investment - To profit from thematic funds, three conditions must be met: identifying long-term winning themes, selecting funds that can capitalize on these themes, and entering the market at undervalued times [19][24]. - A reliable investment theme should be supported by solid logic, such as industry policy support or technological breakthroughs, rather than mere speculation [20]. - The timing of investment is crucial; entering a popular theme after it has already gained traction can lead to missed opportunities and potential losses [25]. Group 3: Role of Thematic Funds in Portfolios - For most ordinary investors, thematic funds are not essential for achieving steady profits, as they do not significantly diversify risk compared to other asset classes [27]. - The correlation between thematic funds and major market indices has remained high, suggesting that adding thematic funds to a portfolio with index funds may not provide substantial risk diversification [28]. - Thematic funds are better suited as "satellite holdings" rather than "core allocations" within an investment portfolio, and their proportion should be strictly controlled to mitigate potential losses during market fluctuations [30][33].