Workflow
交运设备
icon
Search documents
光模块概念板块走强,19位基金经理发生任职变动
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-26 08:53
11月26日A股三大指数涨跌不一,截至收盘,沪指跌0.15%报3864.18点,深成指涨1.02%报12907.83点,创业板指涨2.14%报3044.69点。从板块行情上来看, 今日表现较好的是F5G概念、光通信模块和算力概念,而航母概念、军民融合和有机硅等板块下跌。 新基金经理上任方面,大成基金苏秉毅现任基金资产总规模为22.54亿元,管理过的基金多为债券型和混合型基金,任职期间回报最高的产品是大成景恒混 合A(090019),为混合型基金,在任职的7年又155天时间内获得252.52%的回报,至今仍在管理该基金。新上任大成元瑞诚利债券A、大成元瑞诚利债券C 这两只基金产品的基金经理。 | | 票个数排行 | 近一个月基 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 调研股票家数 | 基金公司调研行】 | | | 印度是高度高速量限公司 | 195 | 医疗器械 | 545 | | 博时真金管理有限公司 | 115 | 半导体 | 501 | | 平安基金管理有限公司 | 106 | 通用设备 | 415 | | 华夏基金管理有限公司 | 106 | 化学制品 | 404 | | 嘉 ...
AI应用全线爆发,58位基金经理发生任职变动
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-24 08:47
11月24日A股三大指数集体收涨,截至收盘,沪指涨0.05%报3836.77点,深成指涨0.37%报12585.08点,创业板指涨0.31%报 2929.04点。从板块行情上来看,今日表现较好的是AI智能体、远程办公和Web3.0,而新型工业化、苹果概念和锂矿概念等 板块下跌。 近一个月(10月25日-11月24日),创金合信基金参与公司调研的数量最多,共调研214家上市公司,然后调研较为活跃的 还有博时基金、华夏基金和平安基金,分别调研117家、113家、112家上市公司;从调研行业上来看,基金公司对医疗器械 行业的上市公司调研次数最多,共有639次,其次是化学制品行业,基金公司调研了502次。 基金经理是一只基金产品最核心的成员,能决定一只基金的投资方向、投资策略以及投资风格,基金经理出色的择时选股 能力和调研预测能力是基金业绩的有力保证,所以基金经理是投资者在选择基金产品时的重要依据;基金经理的变动很大 程度上会影响到基金产品未来的表现,是一个需要特别关注的信息。 根据巨灵统计的数据显示,近30天(10.25-11.24)共有644只基金产品的基金经理发生离职变动。其中今天(11.24)有72只 基金产 ...
中金11月数说资产
中金· 2025-11-16 15:36
中金 11 月数说资产 20251114 10 月份的经济数据表现如何?有哪些主要变化? 10 月份的经济数据整体放缓,主要由于技术提升、季末效应消退以及需求依然 疲软。具体来看,工业增加值和服务业生产指数分别从上个月的 6.5%和 5.6% 下降至 4.9%和 4.6%。消费方面,社会消费品零售总额增速从 3.0%回落至 2.9%,其中以旧换新的相关品类零售增速降至负 2.2%。固定资产投资 1-10 月累计同比从上个月的负 0.5%进一步回落至负 1.7%,单月环比也从负 0.9% 回落到负 1.6%。 分行业来看,各行业表现如何? 分行业来看,除了公用事业、汽车、交运设备等少数行业同比增速有所回升外, 大部分行业增速均有回落。工业方面,出口交货值同比转负,同时内需偏弱, 能源金属方面,10 月原油加工量维持高位,石油表观消费同比增长 4%-5%,支撑油价,预计四季度布伦特油价中枢约 65 美元/桶。基础金 属下游需求走弱,对黑色金属价格持谨慎态度,长期看好 2026 年铜铝 价格中枢。 轻工零售美妆行业内销板块业绩偏弱,需政策刺激,但赛道间分化明显, 看好潮玩、美妆等基本面坚实且具成长性的赛道,以及 A ...
A股三大指数走弱,沪指跌0.63%再度回落至4000点下方;创业板指跌超1%!培育钻石、电池、光伏设备逆市走强,近2600股下跌
Ge Long Hui· 2025-11-11 03:15
Core Points - A-shares major indices weakened, with the Shanghai Composite Index falling 0.63% to below 4000 points, while the ChiNext Index dropped over 1% after briefly rising nearly 1% in the morning [1] - The Shenzhen Component Index decreased by 0.77%, and nearly 2600 stocks in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets declined [1] Index Performance - Shanghai Composite Index: 3993.28, down 25.32 points, or -0.63% [2] - ChiNext Index: 3149.40, down 29.42 points, or -0.93% [2] - Shenzhen Component Index: 13324.21, down 103.40 points, or -0.77% [2] - Sci-Tech Innovation 50 Index: 1394.48, down 13.08 points, or -0.93% [2] - North Star 50 Index: 1507.74, down 4.78 points, or -0.32% [2] - CSI 300 Index: 4650.72, down 44.33 points, or -0.94% [2] - FJE 50 Index: 3025.57, down 28.28 points, or -0.93% [2] Sector Performance - Weaker sectors included coal, Hainan, insurance, diversified finance, and satellite internet [1] - Stronger sectors included cultivated diamonds, batteries, photovoltaic equipment, cement and building materials, and transportation equipment [1]
必得科技现3笔大宗交易 均为溢价成交
Core Viewpoint - Bid Technology experienced significant trading activity on November 4, with a total transaction volume of 293,800 shares and a transaction value of 13.45 million yuan, reflecting a premium of 11.14% over the closing price of the day [2] Trading Activity Summary - Total transaction volume on November 4 was 293,800 shares, with a total transaction value of 13.45 million yuan [2] - The transaction price was 45.79 yuan, which is 11.14% higher than the closing price of 41.20 yuan [2] - The stock closed down by 1.03% on the same day, with a turnover rate of 1.02% and a total trading volume of 77.15 million yuan [2] - Net outflow of main funds was 4.22 million yuan, with a cumulative decline of 8.46% over the past five days and a total net outflow of 10.35 million yuan [2] Company Background - Jiangsu Bid Technology Co., Ltd. was established on September 26, 2002, with a registered capital of 187.85 million yuan [2]
比肩工业革命?核聚变板块再受资金青睐——道达涨停复盘
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-10-27 08:44
Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 1.18% and the Shenzhen Component Index increased by 1.51%, while the median individual stock change was an increase of 0.44% [1] - A total of 50 stocks hit the daily limit up, a decrease of 7 from the previous day, and 5 stocks hit the limit down, a decrease of 2 from the previous day [3] Sector Performance - The sectors with the most limit-up stocks included specialized equipment, semiconductors, and transportation equipment [3][4] - The specialized equipment sector saw 3 limit-up stocks, driven by equipment renewal policies and manufacturing recovery [4] - The semiconductor sector also had 3 limit-up stocks, supported by policy backing and accelerated domestic substitution [4] - The transportation equipment sector had 2 limit-up stocks, benefiting from infrastructure investment and export growth [4] Conceptual Trends - The most represented concepts among limit-up stocks were Fujian Free Trade/Haixi concept, nuclear fusion, and domestic chip concepts [5] - The nuclear fusion concept had 5 limit-up stocks, driven by expectations of an energy revolution and policy support [5] - The Fujian Free Trade/Haixi concept also had 5 limit-up stocks, supported by favorable policies and regional economic vitality [5] Notable Stocks - Six stocks reached historical highs, including兆易创新 (Zhaoyi Innovation), 生益科技 (Shengyi Technology), and 东方钽业 (Oriental Tantalum) [8] - Eighteen stocks reached new highs in the past year, including 时空科技 (Shikong Technology) and 大为股份 (Dawen Shares) [8] Capital Flow - The top five stocks with the highest net inflow of main funds included 恒宝股份 (Hengbao Shares) and 厦门钨业 (Xiamen Tungsten) [10] - The stocks with the highest proportion of net inflow relative to market capitalization included 恒宝股份 (Hengbao Shares) and 郑州煤电 (Zhengzhou Coal Electricity) [10] Limit-Up Stock List - The limit-up stock list includes stocks from various sectors, such as 时空科技 (Shikong Technology) in decoration and 大为股份 (Dawen Shares) in semiconductors [7][11] - 盈新发展 (Yingxin Development) led with 6 consecutive limit-ups, followed by 世龙实业 (Shilong Industry) with 5 [11]
我国贸易多元化发展,有助于提高出口韧性
Core Viewpoint - China's exports and imports in September 2023 exceeded expectations, with exports growing by 8.3% year-on-year and imports by 7.4%, supported by strong performance in semiconductor, automotive, and shipping industries [1][2] Group 1: Export Performance - Exports to the EU, ASEAN, and Latin America showed double-digit year-on-year growth, effectively countering the impact of US tariff policies [1][2] - In the first three quarters of 2023, China's exports to the EU increased by 8.2%, with notable growth to Germany (10.5%), France (7.5%), and Italy (8.9%) [2] - Emerging markets such as ASEAN, Latin America, and Africa contributed significantly to export resilience, with respective growth rates of 14.7%, 6.9%, and 28.3% [2] Group 2: Import Dynamics - The manufacturing PMI showed seasonal recovery in September, indicating slight improvement in economic conditions compared to August, which supported import growth [1] - Major commodities such as iron ore, crude oil, and copper saw year-on-year increases in import volumes, while integrated circuit imports grew by 8.9% in quantity and 9.8% in value [1] Group 3: Trade Structure and Trends - The share of emerging markets in China's export portfolio is increasing, with ASEAN and Latin America accounting for approximately 17% and 8% of total exports, respectively [3] - China's export structure is optimizing, with a growing share of high-end manufacturing products, driven by strong competitiveness in sectors like semiconductors and transportation equipment [3] - The share of textiles and miscellaneous products in total exports has been declining, while the share of high-end manufacturing goods has been rising, indicating a shift towards more competitive export offerings [3] Group 4: Future Outlook - The WTO has significantly lowered the global goods trade growth forecast for 2026 to 0.5%, suggesting challenges ahead for China's foreign trade landscape [4] - Despite challenges from US tariff policies and global trade uncertainties, the diversification of trade partners and stable economic relations with the EU are expected to support export resilience [4] - The ongoing transformation towards high-end, intelligent, and green manufacturing is enhancing the global competitiveness of certain industrial chains [4]
15连板大牛股,明起复牌
财联社· 2025-10-15 10:56
Core Viewpoint - The company Tianpu Co., Ltd. (605255.SH) announced that its stock will resume trading on October 16, 2025, after a suspension period due to significant price fluctuations [1][2]. Group 1: Stock Performance - The company's stock price experienced a significant increase of 317.72% over 15 consecutive trading days from August 22, 2025, to September 23, 2025, with the stock hitting the daily limit up [5]. - The stock price has deviated significantly from the Shanghai Composite Index and the automotive parts industry index, indicating a risk of a sharp decline [3]. Group 2: Business Operations - The company's main business has not undergone significant changes, but there are risks associated with declining operating performance that need to be monitored [4]. - The external circulation of shares is relatively small, which may lead to irrational speculation risks [4]. - Current production and operational activities are normal, and there have been no major changes in the internal and external operating environment [4].
兼评8月企业利润数据:低基数与反内卷共振修复利润
KAIYUAN SECURITIES· 2025-09-27 10:08
Group 1: Profit and Revenue Trends - From January to August 2025, the cumulative profit of national industrial enterprises increased by 0.9% year-on-year, compared to a previous decline of 1.7%[2] - In August 2025, industrial enterprises' revenue improved slightly with a year-on-year increase of 2.3%, maintaining the same growth rate as the previous month[3] - August 2025 saw a significant profit growth of 20.4% year-on-year, marking a recovery of 21.9 percentage points compared to the previous month[3] Group 2: Cost and Profitability Analysis - In August 2025, the cost per 100 yuan of revenue was 85.7 yuan, a decrease of 0.2 yuan compared to the same month in 2024, marking the first decline since July 2024[4] - Profit margins improved, with the profit rate turning positive after previously contributing negatively, indicating a recovery in profitability[4] - The contribution of profit factors in August 2025 was +5.6 from industrial added value, -3.2 from PPI, and +17.7 from profit margin year-on-year[3] Group 3: Sector Performance - Public utility profits increased, with their share of total profits rising to 11.4%, while upstream mining and midstream equipment sectors showed varied performance[5] - The cumulative profit of upstream sectors improved by 3.8 percentage points to -9.1% year-on-year, with significant recovery in black metallurgy and chemical fiber sectors[5] - In August 2025, the profit of "anti-involution" industries improved by 3.8 percentage points to -4.3%, while non-anti-involution industries improved by 2.8 percentage points to 0.9%[6] Group 4: Inventory and Economic Outlook - In August 2025, nominal inventory decreased by 0.1 percentage points to 2.3%, while actual inventory fell by 0.8 percentage points to 5.2% year-on-year[7] - The report anticipates increased downward pressure on economic growth in Q4 2025, which may affect the upward slope of equity markets, but timely policy support is expected to mitigate this impact[7]
【广发宏观王丹】8月利润反弹的背后原因分析
郭磊宏观茶座· 2025-09-27 08:19
Core Viewpoint - The industrial enterprises above designated size in August showed signs of recovery in revenue and profit, with revenue growth of 1.9% year-on-year and a significant profit increase of 20.4% compared to the previous year, indicating a potential stabilization in the industrial sector [1][7][8]. Revenue and Profit Trends - In August, the revenue of industrial enterprises increased by 1.9% year-on-year, marking a 1.0 percentage point acceleration from the previous month. Cumulatively, the revenue growth for the first eight months remained at 2.3%, consistent with prior values, ending a four-month slowdown [1][6][7]. - The profit total for August saw a substantial year-on-year increase of 20.4%, a recovery from a decline of 1.5% in the previous month. The cumulative profit growth for the first eight months turned positive at 0.9% [1][8][25]. Price and Volume Dynamics - The improvement in revenue in August was primarily driven by price increases, with a structure characterized by "volume contraction and price increase." The Producer Price Index (PPI) improved from -3.6% to -2.9% year-on-year, supporting profit margins [2][10][11]. - The revenue profit margin for January to August was 5.24%, showing a slight year-on-year decline of 0.06 percentage points, but significantly better than the declines observed in June and July [2][10][11]. Industry Performance Disparities - Profit growth varied significantly across industries, with notable increases in sectors such as non-ferrous metals, utilities, essential consumer goods, electrical machinery, and transportation equipment. Conversely, industries like coal, black metal mining, petrochemicals, and light manufacturing experienced the largest profit declines [3][15][16]. - In August, profit growth improvements were concentrated in upstream industries, with coal, steel, and non-metallic minerals showing low-level recoveries. The beverage and tea industry saw a significant rebound in profits due to seasonal demand [3][18]. Inventory and Debt Levels - As of the end of August, nominal inventory for industrial enterprises grew by 2.3% year-on-year, while actual inventory saw a decline of 0.8 percentage points, reflecting a continuous reduction trend [4][19][20]. - The asset-liability ratio for industrial enterprises remained stable at 58%, with a slight increase of 0.1 percentage points month-on-month. Capital expenditure showed a small rebound in August, indicating potential growth in investment despite low capacity utilization [4][22]. Future Outlook - The profit growth for industrial enterprises is expected to remain supported in the coming months due to low profit bases from the previous year. If sustained, this could mark the first return to positive profit growth since 2022 [5][25]. - However, the current operational conditions of enterprises are not yet solid, with ongoing uncertainties in price trends and profit structures, necessitating continued policy support to enhance cash flow and profit recovery [5][26].