Core Insights - In 2025, the private securities product registration surged, with a total of 12,645 products registered, marking a 99.54% increase from 6,337 in 2024 [2] - Equity strategies remain the preferred choice for private equity firms, with 8,328 equity strategy products registered, accounting for 65.86% of all registered products, indicating strong investor enthusiasm for equity assets [2] Group 1: Strategy Performance - Multi-asset strategies and futures/derivatives strategies ranked second and third in registration numbers, with 1,806 and 1,274 products respectively, representing 14.28% and 10.08% of the total [4] - Bond strategies and combination funds had 492 and 512 products registered, making up 3.89% and 4.05% respectively, contributing to a diversified strategy landscape [4] Group 2: Quantitative Products - Quantitative products showed remarkable growth, with 5,617 products registered in 2025, a 114.31% increase from 2,621 in 2024, and accounting for 44.42% of total registrations [4][5] - Within quantitative equity strategies, the quantitative long strategy was the most prominent, with 2,746 products registered, representing 48.89% of the total quantitative products [5] Group 3: Market Trends - The private equity product registration exhibited a clear concentration trend, with 29 private equity firms registering at least 50 products, of which 26 were billion-yuan firms, indicating their dominance in the market [7] - Quantitative investment has become a strategic focus for leading firms, with 24 out of 29 firms employing quantitative strategies, highlighting the market's increasing recognition of quantitative approaches [8] Group 4: Future Outlook - The private securities industry is expected to continue its steady growth, driven by deepening capital market reforms and ongoing advancements in strategy innovation and risk management [11] - The industry is likely to evolve towards higher quality development, offering investors a more diverse range of asset allocation options as market ecosystems improve [11]

2025年，私募证券产品掀起备案热潮。 引人注意的是，2025年量化产品备案表现尤为亮眼。 私募排排网数据显示，截至2025年12月31日，全年共计备案私募证券产品12645只（包含自主发行和担 任投顾的产品），较2024年的6337只环比增幅99.54%。 2025年量化私募备案产品共计5617只，较2024年的2621只增幅114.31%，另外2025年备案量化产品占到 总量的44.42%，较2024年的41.68%，亦有大幅提升。其中股票策略量化产品以4077只的数量占据主 导，占量化产品总数量的72.58%，彰显了量化股票策略的市场认可度。 分类型来看，股票策略依然是私募机构的首选方向。2025年备案股票策略私募产品8328只，占全部备案 产品的65.86%，占据绝对主导地位。 在量化股票策略的细分领域，量化多头策略表现最为突出，备案数量达2746只，占量化产品总数量的 48.89%，成为股票量化产品的核心发力点。股票市场中性策略备案1114只，占比19.83%，作为对冲市 场风险的重要工具，其较为稳定的收益特征受到求稳投资者的青睐；股票多空策略备案217只，占比 3.86%，虽然数量相对较少，但体现 ...

债券策略和组合基金的备案数量分别为492只和512只，占比分别为3.89%和4.05%。市场分析人士表 示，债券策略和组合基金备案数量占比虽然较小，但形成了与主流策略互补的多元化格局，满足了不同 风险偏好投资者的需求。 值得一提的是，2025年量化产品备案表现尤为亮眼。2025年量化私募备案产品共计5617只，较2024年的 2621只增幅114.31%，另外2025年备案量化产品占到总量的44.42%，较2024年的41.68%，亦有提升。其 中股票策略量化产品以4077只的数量占据主导，占量化产品总数量的72.58%，彰显了量化股票策略的 市场认可度。 期货及衍生品量化策略备案773只，占到备案产品总量的13.76%，其中量化CTA策略以726只的备案数 量成为核心细分赛道，量化产品总数量的12.93%，期权策略和其他衍生品策略则分别备案40只和7只， 占比0.71%和0.12%，反映出量化衍生品策略仍以CTA为主，其他细分领域尚处于稳步发展阶段。 2025年，私募证券产品掀起备案热潮。私募排排网数据显示，截至2025年12月31日，全年共计备案私募 证券产品12645只(包含自主发行和担任投顾的产品)， ...

ETF 规模扰动提前透支了 A500 主线行情预期，量化策略风险敞口边际进一步收紧空 间有限，2026 年 1 月微盘股复苏节奏有望比往年提前。从 IM 基差维度来看，对冲策 略有望节后重新建仓，其将是小微盘复苏的重要催化。 ❑ 如何理解微盘股 4 季度的震荡行情？ 对冲策略年末保收益，资金面形成蓄力。12 月末私募基金需要根据当年收益来 计提业绩报酬，而 2025 年量化产品在上下半年呈现两极分化的表现，上半年平 均 500 指增超额年化 22.7%，大幅领先其他权益类产品。而下半年，尤其是 8 月 上旬至 9 月中旬，量化策略普遍跑输市场，对冲类产品更是受基差影响，平均回 撤 3%-5%左右。因此，年末私募产品对风险的敏感度比往年更高，从基差变化 可以看出，期货空头力量频繁变化，IM 年化基差在 18%-5%之间大幅波动，截 至 12 月 31 日，IM 年化基差收敛至 5%附近。即使是指增多头类策略，面对 A500 带来的权重股强势行情，风险敞口亦大幅收紧。对此，我们认为转机有望 在元旦后出现，对冲产品批量建仓，量化敞口的放开，都将为小微盘带来结构性 资金流入。 ❑ 如何理解 A 股微型股长期牛市？ 微 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing objective standards to measure the value of quantitative products and their managers, rather than relying solely on short-term performance metrics [1][2]. Group 1: Value Measurement of Quantitative Managers - The value of quantitative managers can be assessed through various dimensions such as development background, management scale, research and development capabilities, and risk control abilities [3][7]. - Key dimensions for evaluating quantitative managers include their ability to generate sustainable research and development, as market conditions and trading strategies continuously evolve [7][14]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - The principle of "buy low, sell high" is highlighted, suggesting that investors should be cautious when others are overly confident and aggressive, and conversely, more active when others are fearful [9][12]. - With established value metrics, investors can engage in contrarian investing, particularly when quantitative products underperform in the short term [8][10]. Group 3: Long-term Relationships and Communication - Maintaining frequent and in-depth communication with quantitative managers is crucial for building long-term relationships, especially during periods of underperformance [10][12]. - The company values trust and long-term perspectives over short-term performance metrics, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of quantitative managers [12][14]. Group 4: Continuous Improvement and Research - The company commits to continuously improving the dimensions used to evaluate quantitative managers, emphasizing the need for ongoing learning and adaptation to new technologies [14]. - Regular high-intensity research is maintained to track both new and existing quantitative managers, ensuring a thorough understanding of the evolving landscape [14].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the extreme market conditions in the AI sector and concerns regarding the potential for newly listed stocks to underperform, contrasting this with past worries about high valuations and fundraising practices in the market [1] Group 1: Market Dynamics - Since July 2023, regulatory bodies have addressed issues such as oversupply in the A-share market, excessive fundraising, and violations related to stock reductions, aiming to restore profitability in the A-share market, which has significantly contributed to the current bull market [1] - The market has seen a significant concentration of funds in a few hot stocks, with over 80% of stocks declining while major AI concept stocks exhibit divergence [2] Group 2: Institutional Investment Trends - Institutional funds have shown a strong preference for AI stocks, with 922 public funds holding shares in Cambrian Technology, amounting to a quarterly change of approximately 33.4 billion yuan, representing 12.86% of circulating shares [3] - From October 8 to December 15, institutional inflows into Cambrian Technology reached approximately 129.7 billion yuan, with other AI stocks like SMIC and Haiguang Information also receiving substantial inflows [3][4] Group 3: Regulatory Impact on Fund Management - New regulations for public funds emphasize long-term performance and investor returns over sales metrics, potentially leading fund managers to concentrate on established stocks with strong performance certainty, thus exacerbating market polarization [4][5] Group 4: Liquidity and Market Behavior - The influx of long-term capital, particularly from insurance funds, is expected to provide around 500 billion yuan annually to the market starting in 2025, with a significant portion directed towards ETFs [6][7] - The current market liquidity is characterized by a concentration of funds in a narrow range of stocks, leading to a situation where the market appears active but is actually driven by a limited number of assets [7][8] Group 5: Global Market Influences - While institutional investors in A-shares remain optimistic about AI stocks, Wall Street has begun to reduce valuations, influenced by factors such as the Federal Reserve's policies and disappointing earnings reports from major tech companies [9][10] - The global computing power market is projected to grow significantly, with estimates indicating an increase from 1,397 EFLOPS in 2023 to 16 ZFLOPS by 2030, highlighting the ongoing competition in the AI sector [11][12] Group 6: Conclusion and Future Outlook - The narrative surrounding AI and the bull market in A-shares is compelling, but there are concerns about potential liquidity issues that could affect investors not heavily invested in AI stocks [13] - The current trend of capital flowing into a structurally volatile market raises the possibility of an impending structural bear market [13]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing importance of quantitative fund managers in the financial market, emphasizing their reliance on mathematical models, algorithms, and big data analysis to create long-term value for investors. The demand for high-educated talent in this field has intensified due to advancements in AI, leading to a talent war among quantitative institutions [2]. Summary by Sections Education and Talent - Quantitative private equity funds favor highly educated professionals, with 69.11% of fund managers holding master's or doctoral degrees compared to 56.42% in subjective private equity [2]. Performance Overview - As of the end of November, there are 1,637 quantitative products with a total scale of approximately 135.11 billion, achieving an average return of 27.29% from January to November, significantly outperforming the market. Among these, 99 managers of billion-yuan private equity quantitative funds managed 386 products with an average return of 34.42%, yielding an excess return of 14.04% [3][4]. Performance by Fund Size - **100 Billion and Above**: 386 products with a total scale of 53.81 billion, average return of 34.42%, and 14.04% excess return [3]. - **50-100 Billion**: 165 products with a total scale of 17.49 billion, average return of 25.23%, and 10.31% excess return [8]. - **20-50 Billion**: 220 products with a total scale of 22.56 billion, average return of 26.62%, and 12.21% excess return [11]. - **10-20 Billion**: 176 products with a total scale of 12.60 billion, average return of 25.37%, and 10.10% excess return [14]. - **5-10 Billion**: 224 products with a total scale of 12.15 billion, average return of 25.75%, and 10.84% excess return [17]. - **0-5 Billion**: 466 products with a total scale of 16.52 billion, average return of 23.88%, and 11.19% excess return [19]. Top Performers - **100 Billion and Above**: Notable managers include Xu Jin and Lu Zhengzhe from Ningbo Huansheng, both achieving significant returns [4][5]. - **50-100 Billion**: Top managers include Shi En from Yunqi Quantitative and Huang Bo from Dayan Capital [8][10]. - **20-50 Billion**: Mo Bo from Luxiu Investment leads the performance [11][12]. - **10-20 Billion**: Wu Yintong from Longyin Tiger Roar is a top performer [14][15]. - **5-10 Billion**: Yan Xuejie from Huacheng Private Equity leads [17][18]. - **0-5 Billion**: Xie Libo from Jingying Zhito is at the forefront [19][20].

Core Viewpoint - The asset management industry is experiencing a competitive collaboration era, with various financial institutions vying for partnerships with insurance companies to enhance investment opportunities and address asset-liability matching challenges [1][2][7]. Group 1: Industry Dynamics - Financial institutions, including brokers, funds, and banks, are increasingly seeking collaboration with insurance companies due to the stable and relatively sustainable nature of insurance liabilities [1][2]. - The low-interest-rate environment has intensified the need for insurance companies to find superior asset management partners to achieve stable and lasting investment returns [2][4]. - Regulatory changes, such as increasing the equity asset investment ratio and reducing risk factors for stock investments, have opened avenues for insurance companies to diversify their asset allocations [2][3]. Group 2: Collaboration Strategies - Various asset management firms are tailoring their offerings to meet the specific needs of insurance companies, focusing on providing stable investment solutions and customized product offerings [4][6]. - Insurance companies are looking for asset management partners that not only have strong research capabilities but also offer unique and distinctive products [5][6]. - The collaboration is characterized by a mutual understanding of the long-term investment philosophy, with asset managers encouraged to align their strategies with the investment goals and risk preferences of insurance funds [6][7]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - The competition among asset management firms to attract insurance clients is intensifying, with firms adjusting their personnel, performance assessments, and business divisions to better align with insurance needs [5][6]. - The trend of collaboration is expected to become a norm in the asset management market, reflecting a complex interdependence among various financial products and institutions [7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the ongoing competition and collaboration among asset management institutions, with a shift from traditional "fixed income" strategies to "fixed income + multi-asset multi-strategy" approaches [4][5][17] - The scale of bank wealth management products reached 32.13 trillion yuan by the end of September, marking a 4.76% increase from the second quarter [6] - The structural changes in the bank wealth management market are evident, with a significant shift towards multi-asset allocation as investors seek stable returns in a low-interest-rate environment [5][6] Group 2 - The implementation of new asset management regulations is reshaping the valuation practices of wealth management products, moving towards a more transparent net asset value system [7][9] - The demand for diversified wealth management solutions is increasing among residents, with 18.5% of individuals preferring to invest more, particularly in non-guaranteed bank wealth management products [9][10] - The collaboration between various financial institutions and insurance companies is intensifying, driven by the need for stable investment channels and the regulatory environment that encourages such partnerships [11][12][13] Group 3 - The public offering transformation of large collective products in the securities asset management industry is nearing completion, leading to a potential reshaping of the industry landscape [18][24] - The recent trend of "non-affiliated transfers" in public offering transformations indicates a shift from traditional internal transfers to collaborations with external public funds [20][21] - The competition for public fund licenses has become increasingly challenging, with many institutions withdrawing their applications, reflecting a saturated market [23][24]

Core Insights - In November, the A-share market experienced a decline in trading volume, rapid sector rotation, and pressure on heavyweight stocks, with the Shanghai Composite Index falling by 1.67%, Shenzhen Component Index by 2.95%, and ChiNext by 4.23% [2] - Despite the market conditions, 61% of the private equity products under billion-yuan private equity firms reached historical net value highs, with 389 products achieving this milestone [2] - Quantitative products dominated the performance, with 324 out of 389 products being quantitative, accounting for over 80% of the total [3] Product Strategy Overview - The majority of products were equity strategy products, totaling 312, with quantitative long positions making up 240 and subjective long positions 33 [3] - Multi-asset strategy products accounted for 39, bond strategy products for 27, futures and derivatives strategy products for 9, and combination fund products for 2 [3] Performance of Private Equity Firms - 24 billion-yuan private equity firms had all their products reach historical net value highs in November, with 18 being quantitative and 4 subjective [3] - Notable firms with over 10 products include Ri Dou Investment, Jiu Kun Investment, Tian Yan Capital, Ming Long Investment, and Ningbo Huanfang Quantitative [4] Top Performing Products - The top-performing private equity firms for the year-to-date include Ling Jun Investment, Ningbo Huanfang Quantitative, Cheng Qi Asset, Tian Yan Capital, and Jin Ge Liang Rui, all of which are billion-yuan quantitative private equity firms [4] - The highest number of products reaching historical highs was led by Ju Kuan Investment with 40 products, achieving a 93.02% success rate [12][14] Recent Trends in Quantitative Strategies - The article highlights that quantitative strategies are more adaptable to different market environments, allowing for stable alpha returns [2] - Firms like Ningbo Huanfang Quantitative and Ming Long Investment have successfully integrated AI into their investment strategies, enhancing their performance [11][19] Long-Term Performance Metrics - Over the past year, the threshold for the top 20 products was set at a return of over ***%, with 17 being quantitative long products [15] - In the last three years, the top products also featured a significant number of quantitative strategies, with notable firms like Ju Kuan Investment and A Ba Ma Investment leading the rankings [19] - For the last five years, subjective long products dominated the top rankings, with Ri Dou Investment and Jiu Kun Investment securing the top spots [22][26]