华明电力装备股份有限公司 累计投票制度实施细则 （2025 年 8 月修订） 第一章 总 则 第一条 为进一步完善公司法人治理结构，规范公司选举董事的 行为，维护中小股东利益，切实保障社会公众股东选择董事的权利， 根据《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》《深圳证券交易所上市公司自 律监管指引第 1 号——主板上市公司规范运作》《上市公司治理准则》 等法律、法规和规范性文件的规定，和《华明电力装备股份有限公司 章程》(以下简称《公司章程》)等的有关规定，特制定本细则。 第二条 本实施细则所指的累积投票制，是指股东会在选举两名 以上董事时采用的一种投票方式，即公司股东会选举董事时，股东所 持的每一股份拥有与该次股东会拟选举董事总人数相等的投票权，股 东拥有的投票权等于该股东持有股份数与应选董事总人数的乘积。股 东既可以用所有投票权集中投票选举一位候选董事，也可以分散投票 给数位候选董事。 第三条 股东会选举产生的董事人数及结构应符合《公司章程》 的规定。 第四条 本实施细则所称"董事"包括独立董事和非独立董事。 由职工担任的董事由公司职工代表大会选举产生或更换，不适用于本 实施细则的相关规定。 1 第二章 董事候选人的 ...

华明电力装备股份有限公司 董事、高级管理人员离职管理制度 （二）公开透明原则：及时、准确、完整地披露董事、高级管理 人员离职相关信息； （三）平稳过渡原则：确保董事、高级管理人员离职不影响公司 正常经营和治理结构的稳定性； （四）保护股东权益原则：维护公司及全体股东的合法权益。 第二章 离职情形与程序 （2025 年 8 月） 第一章 总 则 第一条 为规范华明电力装备股份有限公司（简称"公司"或者 "本公司"）董事、高级管理人员离职程序，确保公司治理结构的稳 定性和连续性，维护公司及股东的合法权益，根据《中华人民共和国 公司法》（以下简称"《公司法》"）、《中华人民共和国证券法》 （以下简称"《证券法》"）、《上市公司章程指引》《深圳证券交 易所上市公司自律监管指引第 1 号——主板上市公司规范运作》等法 律、行政法规、规范性文件及《华明电力装备股份有限公司章程》（以 下简称"《公司章程》"）的有关规定，结合公司实际情况，制定本 制度。 第二条 本制度适用于公司全体董事（含非独立董事、独立董事 以及职工董事）及高级管理人员因任期届满、辞职、被解除职务或其 他原因离职的情形。 第三条 公司董事、高级管理人员离 ...

Group 1 - Recent data indicates a surge in international capital reallocating towards Chinese assets, with nearly 60% of sovereign wealth funds prioritizing China as an investment market [1][2] - Korean investors have shown increasing enthusiasm for Chinese stocks, with a cumulative trading volume of $5.764 billion in 2023, making China the second-largest overseas investment destination for Korean investors [2] - UBS's survey reveals that 19% of global family offices plan to increase their allocation to Chinese assets, marking a 3 percentage point increase from 2024 [2] Group 2 - In July, five major overseas Chinese stock ETFs attracted over $2 billion in investments, with significant growth in assets under management for several ETFs [3] - Sovereign wealth funds are driven to allocate to Chinese assets due to attractive local returns, diversification benefits, and expanded market access for foreign investors [3] Group 3 - The Chinese economy's recovery has exceeded market expectations, bolstered by rapid policy responses to stabilize expectations and stimulate growth, enhancing international investor confidence [4] - China has made significant advancements in technology and innovation, leading to a re-evaluation of asset valuations by international investors [4] Group 4 - As of August 1, four A-share stocks have over 24% foreign ownership, indicating strong foreign interest in companies with global competitiveness [5] - Foreign investors are selectively investing in growth stocks, focusing on companies with sustainable performance and expanding market shares [6] Group 5 - Foreign capital is favoring high-dividend stocks and growth stocks, reflecting a dual strategy of defense and offense in investment [7] - High-dividend stocks are recognized for their stable cash flows and strong governance, while growth stocks represent long-term bets on China's economic transformation [8]

（文章来源：证券日报） 证券日报网讯 8月4日晚间，华明装备发布公告称，截至2025年7月31日，公司通过股份回购专用证券账 户以集中竞价交易方式累计回购公司股份13，820，809股，占公司目前总股本的1.5421%。 ...

华明装备（SZ 002270，收盘价：17.6元）8月4日晚间发布公告称，截至2025年7月31日，公司通过股份 回购专用证券账户以集中竞价交易方式回购公司股份约1382万股，占公司目前总股本的1.5421%，最高 成交价为17.8元/股，最低成交价为14.74元/股，成交总金额为人民币约2.21亿元。 2024年1至12月份，华明装备的营业收入构成为：装备制造占比85.53%，电力工程占比12.36%，其他占 比2.11%。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） ...

证券代码：002270 证券简称：华明装备 公告编号：〔2025〕055 号 华明电力装备股份有限公司 关于回购公司股份进展的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确和完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 华明电力装备股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2025 年 2 月 28 日召开 第六届董事会第十五次会议审议通过了《关于回购公司股份方案的议案》，公司 拟使用自有或自筹资金以集中竞价交易方式回购公司部分人民币普通股（A 股） 股份，用于实施员工持股计划或股权激励，回购价格不超过人民币 24.60 元/股， 回购的资金总额不低于 15,000 万元（含）且不超过 20,000 万元（含），具体回 购股份的数量及占总股本的比例以回购期满时实际回购数量为准，实施期限为 自公司董事会审议通过回购股份方案之日起不超过 12 个月，具体内容详见于 2025 年 3 月 1 日、2025 年 3 月 10 日在指定信息披露媒体《证券时报》《证券日 报》《上海证券报》《中国证券报》和巨潮资讯网（http://www.cninfo.com.cn） 披露的《关于回购公司股份方案的公告》（公告编号：〔 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article reveals a complex financial case involving a significant loan of 11 billion yuan that has been under litigation for eight years, highlighting potential regulatory challenges and breaches of financial rules [4][46]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The case involves a bank, a real estate company, three loan entities, and 16 guarantors, including three listed companies and two delisted companies [3]. - The loan originated from a transaction where Huaming Equipment sold its subsidiary at a drastically reduced price due to legal risks associated with a borrowing dispute [5][6]. Group 2: Details of the Loan and Legal Proceedings - The loan dispute involves a principal amount of 2 billion yuan, with the plaintiff being Lanzhou Sanwei Huicheng Real Estate Co., and multiple defendants including the loan provider and several guarantors [7][9]. - The total amount in litigation across three loan disputes initiated by the plaintiff amounts to 11 billion yuan, with loan terms of three years [9]. Group 3: Investigation Findings - Investigations revealed that the loan entities had minimal registered capital and questionable operational legitimacy, raising concerns about their ability to secure such large loans [10][13][15]. - The connections between the loan entities and the involved parties, including the bank and the guarantors, suggest a web of financial maneuvering that may have circumvented standard banking practices [18][20]. Group 4: Implications for the Bank - The bank's actions in granting loans to these entities and subsequently transferring non-performing loans at face value to a third party raise questions about its risk management practices [22][39]. - The bank's high non-performing loan ratio and significant exposure to related parties indicate potential vulnerabilities in its financial health [41][42]. Group 5: Regulatory Concerns - The case has drawn scrutiny from regulatory bodies, with concerns about the bank's compliance with lending regulations and the integrity of its financial reporting [24][46]. - The selective litigation strategy employed by the plaintiff has been criticized for potentially skewing accountability among guarantors, raising ethical questions about the pursuit of financial recovery [27][28]. Group 6: Conclusion - The entire situation underscores systemic issues within the banking sector, including inadequate risk controls, governance failures, and potential exploitation of regulatory loopholes [46][47].

Core Viewpoint - The article reveals a complex financial scandal involving a bank, a real estate company, and multiple shell companies, highlighting potential regulatory breaches and challenges to financial rules [2][42]. Group 1: Background of the Case - A lawsuit has brought to light an 11 billion yuan loan that had been dormant for eight years, raising questions about regulatory compliance and the integrity of financial practices [2][6]. - The case involves three listed companies and two delisted companies, with significant financial implications for the parties involved [6][18]. Group 2: Details of the Loan and Companies Involved - The loan originated from Lanzhou Bank, which issued 11 billion yuan to three trade companies, all of which have questionable backgrounds and connections to a larger corporate restructuring [6][17]. - The companies involved, including Hangzhou Hexiu, Hangzhou Douang, and Hangzhou Mudong, have minimal registered capital and dubious operational legitimacy, raising concerns about the bank's lending practices [7][11][13]. Group 3: The Role of Guarantors and Legal Proceedings - The loan was backed by 16 guarantors, including several companies and individuals closely linked to the restructuring of Jianxin Group, which had previously filed for bankruptcy [16][24]. - The legal proceedings have seen multiple parties being sued, with allegations of selective accountability in the pursuit of repayment [24][28]. Group 4: Implications for Lanzhou Bank - Lanzhou Bank's actions, including the original loan issuance and subsequent debt transfer to a third party, have drawn scrutiny regarding its risk management and compliance with financial regulations [38][41]. - The bank's high non-performing loan ratio and significant exposure to related parties raise concerns about its financial health and governance practices [39][41]. Group 5: Broader Industry Concerns - The case highlights systemic issues within the banking sector, including potential erosion of credit rules and oversight, as well as the need for stricter regulations to prevent similar occurrences in the future [42].

金融市场的水，有时真是深不可测，甚至可以拍成一部大片。 此次"联袂演绎"这个剧本的是1家银行、1家置业公司、3个贷款"马甲"和16个担保方，涉及3家上市公司和两家退市公司。 一轮诉讼，将尘封8年的11亿贷款，拉入公众视野，其背后是否隐藏着对规则的突破？对监管的挑战？对"三公"的践踏？ 本该是一片金融活水，却被一众"大鳄"，玩成了一股"私域流水"。 财联社记者深入这部"大片"的幕后，透过庭审材料、实地调查和多方采访，试图还原这场横跨多省、行事隐蔽的资本局中局。 一、"壳公司"暗度陈仓 一笔"血亏"的交易拉开了这部"大片"的序幕。 5月初，华明装备（002270.SZ）发布公告称，已签署股权转让协议，以100万元的价格出售全资子公司——贵州长征电气有限公司（下称 "长征电气"）100%股权。 长征电气是2018年8月，华明装备以3.98亿元从*ST天成（600112.SH）收购而来，如今却以100万元的价格转让，令人唏嘘。 华明装备在公告中解释，转让的原因是长征电气卷入了一起借款纠纷案，可能对公司财务数据产生不利影响，此举是为规避潜在法律风险。 而涉案事项发生在收购长征电气之前，原股东*ST天成未向华明装备如实披 ...

（编辑 任世碧） 证券日报网讯 7月31日晚间，华明装备发布公告称，截至本公告日，本次担保提供后，公司和下属全资 及控股子公司的担保额度203，250.00万元，公司对全资及控股子公司的实际担保金额为48，534.00万 元，占公司2024年经审计的净资产比例为15.26%；公司和下属全资及控股子公司不存在对合并报表外 单位提供担保的情况，公司对外担保的债务不存在逾期、涉及诉讼及因被判决败诉而应承担担保的情 形。 ...