麻六记酸辣粉再陷发霉风波，代工模式暴露品控漏洞 中新网北京9月29日电(记者 赵方园 吴家驹)距离上次发霉风波不足两月，麻六记酸辣粉再次因产品质量 问题被推上风口浪尖。 近日，有消费者在社交平台曝光购买到的酸辣粉出现粉饼严重发霉并伴有酸臭异味，而该产品生产日期 标注为2025年8月6日，尚在保质期内。 与上次主动召回并公开道歉的处理方式不同，截至发稿，麻六记与其代工厂均未就此次事件作出公开回 应。 发霉事件重演 近日，一位网友在社交平台发布视频称，其在麻六记旗舰店购买的7桶酸辣粉中，拆开第一桶发现粉饼 发霉。 据媒体报道，该消费者表示，自己在9月23日收到货后立即向客服反映，却被告知需将问题产品寄回北 京检测。 "我不给他们寄过去了，因为评论区有小伙伴说寄回去的话，他们也不会进行赔偿。"该网友表示，她已 申请仅退款处理并退款成功，"但是他们出售这个发霉变质的东西给消费者，是违法的。" 这并非麻六记酸辣粉首次被曝出发霉问题。今年7月，深圳、上海、宁波等多地消费者陆续在社交平台 发帖投诉，在开市客(Costco)买到了发霉的麻六记酸辣粉。 随后，多地门店对涉事产品进行紧急下架。7月28日，代工厂商白家阿宽发布说明 ...

Group 1 - Xiaomi's marketing prowess, led by Lei Jun, has generated significant attention for both Xiaomi smartphones and cars, but this attention can also lead to backlash [1] - Recently, Xiaomi's China market manager Wang Teng was dismissed for serious violations, marking one of the company's strictest internal disciplinary actions in recent years [3][5] - Wang Teng allegedly leaked confidential information, including pricing strategies and supply chain costs, for personal gain, although he denied selling company secrets [5] Group 2 - Negative feedback has emerged regarding the Xiaomi YU7 car, with owners discovering "test car" markings on their new vehicles, raising doubts about the authenticity of their purchases [7][9] - Xiaomi's customer service explained that these markings are from static stickers used during factory evaluations, but some customers remain skeptical, fearing their cars were used for dynamic testing [9] - The controversy surrounding the YU7 follows a series of public relations challenges for Xiaomi, including a tragic accident involving the SU7 model that has led to increased scrutiny of smart driving regulations [10][11] Group 3 - The company faced criticism for marketing a non-automotive-grade chip in its vehicles while promoting a car accessory as automotive-grade, leading to public outrage [11] - Reports of prepayment demands for vehicles still in production have drawn parallels to real estate practices, further complicating Xiaomi's reputation in the automotive sector [14] - The ongoing controversies highlight the challenges Xiaomi faces as it navigates the automotive market, with increasing scrutiny on its marketing strategies and product quality [14]

Core Viewpoint - The market summarizes the mid-term performance of Three Squirrels as "increased revenue but decreased profit," with a significant drop in net profit despite record-high revenue [1][5]. Revenue Performance - In the first half of 2025, Three Squirrels achieved a revenue of 5.478 billion yuan, marking a historical high for the same period, with a year-on-year growth of 7.94% [1][5]. - The revenue for the first and second quarters of 2025 was 3.723 billion yuan and 1.754 billion yuan, reflecting year-on-year growth rates of 2.13% and 22.77%, respectively [5][6]. Profitability Issues - The net profit attributable to shareholders was 138 million yuan, representing a year-on-year decline of over 52% [1][5]. - The company's non-recurring net profit for the first half of 2025 was 50.83 million yuan, down 77.75% year-on-year [5]. - The second quarter saw a net profit loss exceeding 100 million yuan, the worst quarterly performance since 2018 [2][6]. Cost and Expense Factors - The decline in net profit is attributed to rising costs, including increased raw material prices for nuts, changes in online platform traffic structures, higher market expenses for offline distribution, and increased property depreciation and amortization [2][7][8]. - Promotion and platform service fees reached 761 million yuan in the first half of 2025, up approximately 25.35% year-on-year [2][12]. - Sales expenses grew by 25.11%, while management expenses surged by 57.89% [8]. Cash Flow Concerns - The operating cash flow net amount for the first half of 2025 was -377 million yuan, marking the first negative mid-term cash flow since 2017 [3][10]. - The negative cash flow is primarily due to increased operational procurement, with inventory reaching 768 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 42.22% [10]. Future Outlook - Three Squirrels is pursuing a listing in Hong Kong, but the current mid-term report and future performance expectations may pose challenges for its IPO [4][11]. - The company is facing new challenges, particularly with rising traffic costs, as it continues to rely heavily on e-commerce channels for revenue [12].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the animated film "Wang Wang Mountain Little Monster" highlights the impact of social media and public sentiment on film marketing and audience reception, particularly in relation to the involvement of controversial figures in promotional events [2][12][18]. Group 1: Marketing and Promotion - The collaboration between "Wang Wang Mountain Little Monster" and Xiaohongshu for a viewing event is part of a broader trend in film marketing that leverages popular creators to generate buzz and discussions [2][15]. - The backlash against the film's marketing strategy indicates a growing sensitivity among audiences regarding the integration of social issues into entertainment, leading to accusations of "topic hijacking" [13][14]. - The film's marketing team underestimated the explosive potential of the "feminism" label in today's discourse, which transformed a potentially unifying film into a battleground for polarized opinions [12][18]. Group 2: Audience Reception and Social Media Impact - The film's reception has been significantly influenced by social media, where negative sentiments can quickly overshadow discussions about the film's artistic quality [6][22]. - The public's reaction to the film reflects a broader trend where audiences are increasingly resistant to perceived ideological impositions in entertainment, leading to a backlash against the film's promotional tactics [14][22]. - The controversy surrounding "Wang Wang Mountain Little Monster" serves as a signal that the traditional metrics of evaluating a film's success based on quality may be shifting in the face of social media dynamics [7][27]. Group 3: Financial Performance - Despite the controversy, "Wang Wang Mountain Little Monster" has achieved significant box office success, surpassing 807.9 million yuan, making it the highest-grossing 2D animated film in Chinese history [28].

Core Viewpoint - Neta Auto, once a promising player in the Chinese electric vehicle market, is facing significant challenges, including a sharp decline in sales and internal management issues, leading to its current status as a "dishonest executor" in the eyes of the Guangzhou Haizhu District Court [1][2][3] Group 1: Company Background and Initial Success - Neta Auto was founded in 2017 and quickly gained traction, achieving the title of "domestic new force car company annual sales champion" in 2022, surpassing competitors like NIO and Xpeng [1][3] - The company initially focused on B-end markets, securing significant orders from ride-hailing and car rental companies, which helped it establish a foothold in the industry [4][6] Group 2: Financial Struggles and Management Changes - By 2024, Neta Auto's sales plummeted to 127,000 units, only half of its initial target for the year, leading to significant internal restructuring and management changes [1][6] - The company faced a survival crisis as it struggled to attract investment, with many potential investors showing little interest [6][7] Group 3: Strategic Missteps and Market Position - Neta Auto's shift towards high-end models, such as the Neta S and Neta GT, failed to resonate with consumers, resulting in poor sales performance [10][12] - The company’s internal conflicts and lack of cohesive strategy hindered its ability to capitalize on market opportunities, leading to missed chances for partnerships and market expansion [8][13] Group 4: Recent Developments and Future Outlook - Despite the challenges, Neta Auto is seeking to attract new investors, with 66 interested parties responding to its call for restructuring [18] - The company’s remaining value is still seen as attractive, indicating potential for recovery if managed effectively [18]

Core Viewpoint - Neta Auto, once a promising player in the Chinese electric vehicle market, is facing significant challenges, including declining sales, internal conflicts, and strategic missteps, leading to its current financial distress and potential restructuring [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][10][18]. Group 1: Company Background and Initial Success - Neta Auto was established in 2017 and quickly gained traction, becoming a significant player in the new energy vehicle sector, achieving sales of 127,000 units in 2024, which was only half of its initial target [1][3][4]. - The company initially focused on B-end markets, securing large orders from ride-hailing and car rental companies, which helped it gain early market presence [4][5]. Group 2: Financial Challenges and Strategic Missteps - Neta Auto's financial struggles intensified after its major investor withdrew support in 2018, leading to a need for new funding sources [5][6]. - The company underwent multiple rounds of financing, raising 3 billion yuan from various state-owned enterprises, but its capital structure became overly fragmented, complicating decision-making [6][7][8]. - Neta Auto's attempt to pivot to high-end markets with models like Neta S and Neta GT failed, resulting in poor sales and further financial losses [10][11][12][13]. Group 3: Internal Conflicts and Management Issues - Internal conflicts and frequent management changes hindered Neta Auto's strategic execution, leading to missed opportunities and inefficiencies [12][14][15]. - The company's marketing strategies, heavily reliant on celebrity endorsements, did not yield the expected results, and internal disagreements over product direction further complicated its recovery efforts [15][16][17]. Group 4: Current Situation and Future Prospects - As of 2024, Neta Auto is in a precarious position, with significant layoffs and management changes, including the resignation of its CEO [18]. - Despite its challenges, there is still interest from potential investors, with 66 parties expressing interest in restructuring the company, indicating that Neta Auto's brand still holds some value in the market [18].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the need for liquor brands, particularly in the white liquor sector, to evolve their marketing strategies from merely chasing short-term "traffic" to building long-term brand loyalty and emotional connections with consumers [4][5][6] Group 1: Brand Building and Marketing Strategies - The current trend of relying on "traffic" as a marketing success metric is misleading, as it often leads to fleeting consumer attention without fostering brand loyalty [5][6] - Successful brands must focus on creating lasting brand assets and establishing long-term relationships with consumers rather than just capitalizing on temporary trends [6][7] - The article highlights the importance of avoiding the "one-time visit" sales approach, which is likened to a fleeting performance that lacks sustainability [6] Group 2: Consumer Engagement and Psychological Stages - The consumer journey is described as a progression from "unawareness" to "deep reliance," requiring brands to understand and navigate consumer psychology effectively [7][8] - Brands should create "memory hooks" to capture consumer attention in the initial stages, moving beyond mere exposure to meaningful engagement [7][8] - Lowering the cost of trial and establishing initial trust is crucial for converting curious consumers into repeat buyers [9][10] - Emotional connections can be strengthened by integrating the brand into significant life events, thereby creating "emotional anchors" for consumers [13][14] Group 3: Building Loyalty and Community - As consumers progress to becoming loyal customers, brands must engage them in their lives and demonstrate genuine care to foster a sense of belonging [13][14] - In the final stage of brand loyalty, consumers become co-creators, feeling a sense of ownership and pride in the brand, which drives them to advocate for it [14][15] - The article suggests that brands should focus on long-term consumer relationships rather than short-term promotional tactics to cultivate "spiritual stakeholders" who will support the brand over time [15]

Core Viewpoint - The recent public statements by Wei Miaomiao, the wife of Huang Angen, founder of Jiangxi Runtian, have transformed family controversies into a marketing strategy, leveraging the ongoing internal conflict at Wahaha to gain visibility for Runtian [2][3]. Company Overview - Jiangxi Runtian, known for its bottled water, has faced challenges in the competitive beverage market, which is dominated by major players like Nongfu Spring, China Resources Beverage, and Wahaha [10]. - The company has recently undergone a complex process to achieve a backdoor listing, with its stock being acquired by ST United (Guolv United) [9]. Industry Context - The bottled water market in China is highly concentrated, with the top five companies controlling a significant share, making it difficult for smaller brands like Runtian to differentiate themselves and expand beyond their home base in Jiangxi [10]. - The ongoing family disputes within major beverage companies, such as Wahaha, highlight the potential instability and risks associated with family-run businesses in the industry [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the author's journey as a freelance writer in the parenting education sector, revealing the disconnection between professional writing and personal parenting experiences, highlighting the industry's reliance on trends and superficial content rather than genuine educational value [2][38][56]. Group 1: Freelance Writing Journey - The author began writing parenting articles in 2018, eventually publishing over 800 pieces and earning nearly 700,000 yuan [1][38]. - Initially motivated by personal experiences as a mother, the author found success in writing for various parenting media platforms, leading to a high frequency of submissions and publications [5][10][23]. - The author faced challenges in understanding the criteria for article acceptance, realizing that content aimed at emotional resonance often outperformed personal narratives [12][18]. Group 2: Industry Insights - The parenting content industry is characterized by a focus on trends and viral topics, often leading to a formulaic approach to writing that prioritizes engagement over substance [18][21][36]. - Many parenting influencers and content creators are often not genuine experts but are instead products of marketing strategies designed to attract views and generate revenue [29][36]. - The author highlights the prevalence of "ghostwriting" in the industry, where content is produced under the guise of personal experience but lacks authenticity [25][36]. Group 3: Personal Reflections on Parenting - Despite writing extensively on parenting, the author struggles with applying these principles in real life, often feeling disconnected from the advice given in her articles [40][56]. - The author expresses a sense of irony in her situation, where the pressure to produce content conflicts with her ability to engage meaningfully with her child's education [52][56]. - The article concludes with a critical view of the parenting advice industry, questioning the validity of widely accepted educational methods and the impact of societal pressures on parenting [56].

Core Viewpoint - The story of a girl scoring 288 in the college entrance examination (Gaokao) has sparked widespread attention and debate, highlighting the tension between educational achievement and the commercialization of failure through social media and live streaming [1][3][12]. Group 1: Background and Initial Reaction - The girl’s low score of 288, with individual subject scores significantly below average, was met with unexpected joy from her family, who celebrated it as her best performance [3][5]. - This reaction resonated positively with many online, as it challenged the traditional emphasis on academic scores, promoting a more accepting view of educational outcomes [3][5]. Group 2: Shift to Commercialization - Following the viral success of the video, the mother-daughter duo quickly transitioned to live streaming, leveraging their newfound popularity to engage with followers and share their experiences [5][7]. - The mother, already an established content creator, began producing multiple videos related to the low score, capitalizing on the situation for increased viewership and engagement [7][12]. Group 3: Public Backlash and Media Response - The rapid commercialization of their story led to public skepticism, with many questioning the authenticity of their initial joyful reaction and accusing them of exploiting the situation for financial gain [8][9]. - Official media outlets, initially supportive, later deleted their posts about the incident, indicating a shift in perception regarding the appropriateness of the narrative [7][22]. Group 4: Broader Implications for Education and Society - The incident raises concerns about the erosion of educational values, as the narrative of failure is repackaged for entertainment and profit, potentially undermining the seriousness of academic pursuits [12][23]. - The phenomenon reflects a growing trend where emotional storytelling and social media influence overshadow traditional educational metrics, prompting a reevaluation of societal values regarding success and failure [20][24].