瑞士央行暂停降息！ 在此前连续6次降息后，瑞士央行周四宣布将基准利率维持在0%不变，这是2024年初以来，瑞士央行首 次停止降息。 瑞士央行行长表示，已准备好在必要时将利率降至零以下，"如果中期通胀超出物价稳定范围，我们将 降息"。 瑞士央行维持利率在零水平 当地时间周四，瑞士央行将关键利率维持在零水平，结束了自去年3月份以来连续六次降息的宽松周 期。瑞士央行0%的基准利率，也是全球主要央行中最低的水平。 瑞士央行在一份声明中表示，与上一季度相比，通胀压力几乎没有变化。当前的货币政策有助于将通货 膨胀控制在与价格稳定相一致的范围内，并支持经济发展。瑞士央行将继续监测形势，必要时调整货币 政策，以确保价格稳定。 瑞士央行称，全球经济前景仍存在高度不确定性。例如，贸易壁垒可能会进一步提高，导致全球经济更 加明显放缓。然而，也不能排除全球经济将比预期更具弹性。 瑞士第二季度经济增长疲软。在第一季度强劲增长后，瑞士第二季度GDP仅增长了0.5%。瑞士央行 称，由于美国关税大幅提高，瑞士经济前景已恶化，关税很可能尤其会抑制出口和投资。 瑞士央行的官员们曾多次表示，重新引入全球唯一的负利率对金融体系造成的损害，意味着他们 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Swiss National Bank (SNB) has decided to maintain its benchmark interest rate at 0%, marking the end of a series of six consecutive rate cuts since March 2024, amidst stable inflation pressures and economic support needs [1][3][5]. Group 1: Interest Rate Decisions - The SNB's decision to hold the interest rate at 0% is the lowest among major global central banks [3]. - The central bank has indicated readiness to lower rates below zero if mid-term inflation exceeds the price stability range [2][4]. - The SNB has cumulatively cut rates by 175 basis points over the past year, with the last cut occurring on June 19, 2024 [3][4]. Group 2: Economic Outlook - The SNB expects Switzerland's GDP growth for 2025 to be between 1% and 1.5%, slightly up from previous forecasts [4][7]. - The central bank has noted that the Swiss economy is facing challenges due to U.S. tariffs and high uncertainty, which may suppress exports and investments [6][7]. - The inflation rate in Switzerland has returned to the SNB's target range of 0% to 2% after a period of decline [4]. Group 3: Currency Performance - The Swiss Franc has appreciated significantly this year, gaining over 12% against the U.S. dollar and nearly 1% against the euro, making it one of the best-performing currencies among G-10 [4][5]. - Following the announcement to pause rate cuts, the Swiss Franc's exchange rates remained stable against the euro and the dollar [4]. Group 4: Public Sentiment and Trade Relations - A recent poll indicated that a majority of Swiss citizens oppose making concessions to the U.S. regarding tariffs, with many preferring to rely more on domestic products [7]. - The imposition of high tariffs by the U.S. on Swiss goods has raised concerns about significant economic pressure on Switzerland, particularly affecting its export-driven economy [7].

新华财经北京9月25日电（王姝睿）瑞士央行（SNB）日内宣布将政策利率维持在0%不变，重申在必要 时将准备干预外汇市场。该决定符合市场预期，瑞郎兑美元基本持稳。机构分析称，由于美国高额贸易 关税对经济增长构成威胁，瑞士央行仍可能在未来几个季度再次降息。 瑞士央行行长施勒格尔表示，目前瑞士的货币政策是扩张性的，进入负利率的门槛比正常降息更高，但 如果需要，瑞士央行已准备好使用所有工具。他指出，瑞士的关税非常高，对于企业来说，这可能是一 个非常具有挑战性的因素。然而，他也提到，瑞士经济的很大一部分并未受到关税的影响，关税对整体 经济的影响是有限的。 Syz银行首席经济学家Reto Cueni指出，考虑到当前的经济和政治局势，这一稳健的货币政策是合理 的。目前瑞士经济前景的最大担忧是围绕出口部门的不确定性，这也是瑞士央行所关注的问题。 瑞银经济学家则表示，关税是短期内瑞士经济增长的最大下行风险，而即便降息至负值区间，也难以有 效抵消关税影响。 瑞士GDP增速在2025年第二季度放缓至0.5%，较高的美国关税将抑制出口和投资，尤其是在机械和钟 表制造领域，而服务业则保持韧性。瑞士央行预计，未来瑞士经济增速将保持温和， ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - The "History of Overseas Central Bank Bond Purchases" series systematically analyzes key stages of bond - purchase policies of the Bank of Japan, the Federal Reserve, and the European Central Bank. Their policies have similarities and differences in approach, implementation timing, and scale [1]. - The Bank of Japan and the Federal Reserve's bond - purchase policies evolved from traditional to innovative tools. The Bank of Japan was a pioneer in unconventional monetary policies, starting quantitative easing in 2001. The Federal Reserve launched quantitative easing in 2008. The ECB was more cautious about unconventional policies and started full - scale quantitative easing in 2015 [1]. - The bond - purchase policies of the Federal Reserve, ECB, and the Bank of Japan have been complex. The Federal Reserve ended QE in 2014, then had a slow balance - sheet reduction (QT), which was halted early in 2019. It restarted QE in 2022 due to the pandemic and then QT due to high inflation. The ECB stopped APP net purchases in 2018, restarted in 2019, and ended bond - buying in 2022 and started passive QT in 2023. The Bank of Japan ended negative interest rates and started balance - sheet reduction in March 2024. The Bank of Japan's exit was more cautious and delayed, the Federal Reserve's policy cycle was more flexible, and the ECB's policy shift was more sluggish [2]. - The bond - purchase scales of the three central banks are huge. As of August 20, 2025, the Bank of Japan's scale was 574.8 trillion yen, the Federal Reserve's was $6.5 trillion, and the ECB's was 4.2 trillion euros, accounting for 79.5%, 98.6%, and 69.2% of their total assets respectively. Relative to economic aggregates, the Bank of Japan's balance - sheet expansion was more significant [3]. - The Federal Reserve and the ECB have a wider range of bond - purchase categories. The Federal Reserve mainly buys MBS and Treasury bonds. The ECB's bond - purchase scope includes government bonds, covered bonds, asset - backed securities, and corporate bonds. The Bank of Japan, besides buying Treasury bonds, also buys a large amount of stock ETFs and J - REITs [3]. - The Bank of Japan's YCC policy directly sets an interest - rate ceiling, marking a new stage in monetary policy by shifting from controlling bond - purchase quantity to controlling bond interest rates [3]. Summary by Relevant Catalog First Stage (2009 - 2010): First Attempt during the Sub - prime Crisis - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Provide liquidity to the bond market. After the 2008 financial crisis, the euro - area banking system faced a liquidity crisis, especially in the covered - bond market [14][15]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Continuously make small - scale purchases in the primary and secondary markets. In May 2009, the ECB announced the CBPP, buying 600 billion euros of covered bonds from July 2009 to June 30, 2010, with a maximum holding of 611.4 billion euros [16]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The CBPP had a certain boosting effect on the covered - bond market, reducing the yield and spread of bank - issued covered bonds and enhancing bank financing ability. However, due to its limited scale, its impact on the overall bond market and economy was relatively mild [17]. Second Stage (2010 - 2012): Emergency Response during the European Debt Crisis - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Provide liquidity to the bond market. After the Greek debt crisis, market panic spread to peripheral countries, causing a sell - off of their sovereign bonds and a surge in yields. The ECB launched the "Securities Markets Programme" (SMP) to address market liquidity and financing difficulties [22]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Buy sovereign bonds of troubled countries in the secondary market. The SMP aimed to buy public and private - sector bonds in the secondary market without disclosing the quantity, time frame, or target level. It initially focused on Greece, Ireland, and Portugal, then expanded to Italy and Spain. The ECB also sterilized the injected liquidity. In 2011, SMP was restarted and expanded. The SMP's total reached a maximum of 2,195 billion euros by March 5, 2012. In 2011, the ECB launched CBPP2 with a planned scale of 400 billion euros but only bought 164 billion euros. In 2012, the "Outright Monetary Transactions" (OMT) plan was introduced but never activated [23][24]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The SMP had an immediate positive impact on the bond market, reducing the yields of Spanish and Italian bonds. The OMT had an "announcement effect", significantly reducing the yields of Spanish and Italian bonds. However, as the economic recovery was weak, the effectiveness of the SMP decreased [25]. Third Stage (2013 - 2018): Full - scale Quantitative Easing under Persistent Low Inflation - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Implement QE in the euro area. After the European debt crisis, the euro - area economy recovered slowly, with low inflation and high financing costs. The ECB introduced negative interest rates and launched multiple bond - purchase programs [31]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Use a combination of measures. In 2014, the ECB announced CBPP3 and the Asset - Backed Securities Purchase Program (ABSPP). CBPP3 bought covered bonds, with a holding of 2,702 billion euros by the end of 2018. ABSPP bought asset - backed securities, with a holding of 276 billion euros by the end of 2018. In 2015, the Expanded Asset Purchase Programme (APP) was launched, including the Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) and the Corporate Sector Purchase Programme (CSPP). The APP ended net purchases in December 2018, with a cumulative net purchase of about 2.65 trillion euros [32][33][35]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The ECB's large - scale bond purchases led to a significant decline in long - term government bond yields in the euro area. The yields of German 10 - year government bonds fell into negative territory in 2016, and the yields of French bonds also dropped close to zero. The spread between peripheral and core countries generally narrowed [39]. Fourth Stage (2019 - 2023): Emergency Bond - purchase Plan during the Pandemic - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Intervene promptly to maintain financial stability. In 2019, due to economic slowdown and low inflation, the ECB restarted QE. In 2020, the "Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme" (PEPP) was launched to deal with the impact of the COVID - 19 pandemic [42]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Systematically increase purchases. In September 2019, the ECB restarted QE with a monthly purchase of 200 billion euros. In March 2020, an additional 1,200 billion euros of purchases were announced. The PEPP was launched in March 2020 with an initial scale of 7,500 billion euros, which was later expanded to 1.85 trillion euros. The PEPP ended net purchases in March 2022, with a cumulative purchase of about 1.71 trillion euros [43][45]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The PEPP effectively alleviated market panic, stabilized investor confidence, and reduced excessive market volatility. During the implementation and scale - expansion of the PEPP, the 10 - year bond yields in Europe generally declined. When the purchase speed slowed down, bond yields generally rose [52]. Summary and Insights from Overseas Central Bank Bond Purchases - Similarities and differences exist among the bond - purchase policies of the Bank of Japan, the Federal Reserve, and the ECB in terms of approach, implementation timing, and scale, as detailed in the core viewpoints above [53].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the role and impact of central banks in the global economy, particularly focusing on unconventional monetary policies implemented during the 2007-2009 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting both their effectiveness and unintended negative consequences [3][4]. Summary by Sections Introduction - The introduction emphasizes the pervasive influence of central banks, likening their role to both a magician and a dictator in the economic world, and discusses the mysterious qualities of power in financial systems [8]. Chapter 1: Legacy of the Great Depression - This chapter explores the historical context of central banking, including the lessons learned from past financial crises and the evolution of crisis management strategies [8]. Chapter 2: Leverage as Poison - It identifies five driving factors behind the largest financial crisis in history, including the U.S. housing bubble and the role of securitization in spreading risk [8]. Chapter 3: The Road to Hell - The chapter details the global spread of financial turmoil, the interplay between monetary markets and major financial institutions, and the responses from the U.S. and European central banks [8]. Chapter 4: Breaking the Norms - This section discusses the unconventional measures taken during financial crises, such as zero interest rates and quantitative easing, and the challenges faced by central banks in managing these policies [9]. Chapter 5: High Costs - It outlines various syndromes that emerged from the financial crisis, illustrating the complex consequences of central bank interventions and the emergence of shadow banking [9]. Chapter 6: The Eve of Change - The final chapter reflects on the need for a paradigm shift in monetary policy, questioning the long-standing 2% inflation target and advocating for a more balanced approach to financial stability [9]. Conclusion - The conclusion calls for a new path towards stable growth in the financial system, moving beyond unconventional measures [9].

Group 1: Monetary Policy Framework - Japan's monetary policy framework has undergone several structural changes since the introduction of the zero interest rate policy in February 1999, primarily due to prolonged deflation and economic stagnation[1] - The direct goal of the monetary policy framework from 2013 to 2023 was to address the long-term economic stagnation and chronic deflation that followed the bursting of the economic bubble in the early 1990s[2] - The introduction of the quantitative and qualitative easing (QQE) policy in April 2013 aimed to double the monetary base within two years to stabilize inflation at 2%[2] Group 2: Key Policy Components - The QQE policy was complemented by the introduction of negative interest rates in January 2016 and the yield curve control (YCC) policy in September 2016[3] - The QQE policy led to a temporary increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) growth rate to 3.7% in 2014, but it fell back to around 0% due to declining global commodity prices and an increase in the consumption tax[2] - The negative interest rate policy aimed to lower nominal interest rates below the natural rate and alter overall inflation expectations, with excess reserves divided into three categories with different interest rates[3] Group 3: Economic Impact - Japan's natural rate of interest has been on a downward trend since the 1990s, contributing to weak demand and low corporate growth expectations[2] - The prolonged deflation led to a stagnation in the normal economic cycle, where price increases, corporate profits, wage growth, and demand expansion became disconnected[2] - The structural issues in Japan's economy resulted in a shift from a capital shortage to an excess savings situation among firms, leading to "balance sheet recession" and low potential GDP growth rates[2]

Group 1 - The U.S. is likely to maintain the recently imposed tariffs on multiple countries, including a 35% tariff on most Canadian goods, 50% on Brazil, 25% on India, and 39% on Switzerland, as stated by U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer [1] - The Swiss government is willing to modify its concessions in response to the high tariffs, with concerns that the 39% tariff could lead to an economic recession in Switzerland [1][2] - The Swiss economy is heavily export-oriented, and the imposition of tariffs could significantly impact its economic output, potentially reducing GDP by over 1% if long-term export disruptions occur [2] Group 2 - The Swiss government is exploring options to address the trade deficit with the U.S., which reached 38.5 billion Swiss francs (approximately 48 billion USD) last year, including increasing investments in the U.S. and purchasing U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) [2] - The Swiss stock market is expected to be impacted by the tariff news, with predictions of a potential interest rate cut by the Swiss National Bank in September due to weakened economic growth and increased deflationary pressures [3]

Group 1: Debt Levels and Economic Impact - The United States has a national debt exceeding $36 trillion, with a per capita debt of over $100,000, and annual interest payments surpassing $1 trillion, which is more than its defense spending [1][3] - Japan's government debt stands at $9 trillion, amounting to 227% of its GDP, with interest payments increasing by 35% due to rising interest rates, leading to significant corporate bankruptcies and economic stagnation [4][7] - China's total debt is $86 trillion, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of 63.8%, which is considered safer compared to the US and Japan, as the government can convert short-term high-interest debt into long-term low-interest debt [6][8] Group 2: Economic Strategies and Consumer Behavior - The US is facing challenges as countries reduce their purchases of US debt, leading to a tightening debt market [1][3] - Japan struggles with low consumer spending due to a savings rate of only 1.5%, and the government is hesitant to raise consumption taxes amid an aging population [7] - China is focusing on using debt for infrastructure projects that can generate returns, stimulating consumption and rural industries, contrasting with the US and Japan's reliance on borrowing without productive output [6][8]

Core Viewpoint - The European Central Bank (ECB) considers large-scale asset purchases as the best unconventional monetary policy tool for managing monetary policy, especially when interest rates are at zero [1][2]. Group 1: Monetary Policy Tools - Francois Villeroy de Galhau, a member of the ECB's governing council, emphasizes that quantitative easing (QE) should be the preferred option for achieving lasting changes in monetary policy [1]. - Villeroy expresses a preference for QE over negative interest rate policies, despite past criticisms regarding potential side effects such as asset bubbles and increased inequality [1]. - The ECB's evaluation report suggests a possible future reactivation of QE, although some officials indicate that its use may be more restrained [1]. Group 2: Policy Effectiveness - Isabel Schnabel, a member of the ECB's executive board, notes that the cost-benefit ratio of QE for stimulating the economy is no longer ideal, while long-term refinancing operations have shown significant effectiveness in restoring bank lending [1]. - Philip Lane, the ECB's chief economist, states that the intensity of any policy response will depend on the severity of the underlying issues [1]. Group 3: Risk Management - Villeroy asserts that the ECB's recent evaluation clarifies the principle of "moderate" use of such tools and suggests that negative impacts can be mitigated [2]. - He mentions that there are various ways to control the potential risks associated with the composition of the central bank's balance sheet due to QE [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the book "The Hand of Money," which analyzes the role and impact of central banks in the global economy, particularly focusing on unconventional monetary policies and their consequences during financial crises [3][4]. Summary by Sections Book Overview - The book provides a deep analysis of the central bank's role in the economy, particularly during the 2007-2009 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, examining unconventional monetary policies like quantitative easing and negative interest rates [3]. - It highlights the effectiveness and shortcomings of these policies in stabilizing financial markets and stimulating economic growth, while also addressing unintended negative consequences such as debt accumulation and increased wealth disparity [3]. Author Background - Johan Van Overtveldt, the author, is a former Belgian Minister of Finance and has extensive experience in economic management and central banking policy [4]. - Stijn Rocher, the co-author, serves as a policy advisor to the Flemish Minister of Finance and holds a PhD from the University of Antwerp [5]. Key Themes - The book emphasizes the importance of trust in the functioning of central banks, drawing parallels to Confucian teachings on governance and the necessity of trust for effective monetary policy [14]. - It warns of the over-reliance on central bank policies since the Great Moderation era, introducing various "syndromes" that may arise from the misuse of monetary policy, such as the "Butch Cassidy Syndrome" and the "Michael Jackson Syndrome," which reflect the dangers of excessive debt and economic dependency on central bank interventions [15][16]. Conclusion - The book aims to demystify central banking and monetary policy, encouraging a better understanding of their complexities and promoting a more responsible financial system that serves society [16].