贵金属日报 2025-04-28 钟俊轩 贵金属研究员 从业资格号：F03112694 交易咨询号：Z0022090 电话：0755-23375141 邮箱： zhongjunxuan@wkqh.cn 贵金属 沪金跌 0.77 %，报 785.34 元/克，沪银跌 0.93 %，报 8217.00 元/千克；COMEX 金跌 0.55 %， 报 3330.20 美元/盎司，COMEX 银跌 1.43 %，报 33.34 美元/盎司； 美国 10 年期国债收益率 报 4.29%，美元指数报 99.60 ； 市场展望： 美联储官员在与特朗普政府的博弈后进行鸽派表态，美国财政与货币双宽的预期后续将逐步释 放，这将驱动贵金属价格再度走强：财政政策方面，美国众议院在本月上旬通过的预算计划为 后续提高债务上限以及延期《2017 年减税和就业法案》奠定基础，减税所带来美国政府收入端 的下降将难以被关税以及支出控制所填补，美国财政赤字水平在特朗普任期内仍将持续扩大。 美国 3 月预算赤字为 1605 亿美元，2025 财年（2024 年 10 月起）累计财政赤字水平则达到 1.3 万亿美元，较去年同期的 1.06 万亿出现明 ...

文字早评 2025/04/28 星期一 宏观金融类 股指 前一交易日沪指-0.07%，创指+0.59%，科创 50+0.13%，北证 50-1.11%，上证 50-0.25%，沪深 300+0.07%， 中证 500+0.38%，中证 1000+0.32%，中证 2000+0.29%，万得微盘+0.01%。两市合计成交 11136 亿，较上 一日+45 亿。 宏观消息面： 1、政治局会议：统筹国内经济工作和国际经贸斗争，根据形势变化及时推出增量储备政策，持续稳定 和活跃资本市场。 2、3 月份，规模以上工业企业利润由 1—2 月份下降 0.3%转为增长 2.6%，企业当月利润有所改善。 3、美联储金融稳定报告：多种资产估值处高位，美债收益率高企，贸易升至头号风险。 资金面：融资额-29.16 亿；隔夜 Shibor 利率+0.40bp 至 1.6100%，流动性较为宽松；3 年期企业债 AA- 级别利率+0.39bp 至 3.1137%，十年期国债利率-0.49bp 至 1.6604%，信用利差+0.88bp 至 145bp；美国 10 年期利率-3.00bp 至 4.29%，中美利差+2.51bp 至-26 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core View of the Report - The bond market may evolve in a volatile manner but is more likely to break downward. Long - term bonds are more cost - effective, and it is recommended to maintain a duration above neutral. The bond market has been volatile in the past two weeks due to weak fundamentals constraining interest rate increases and high short - term interest rates constraining decreases. In the future, monetary easing is the general trend, and the supply pressure of government bonds in the second quarter is similar to that in the first quarter. Interest rates are unlikely to break upward significantly, and there is a possibility of a downward break driven by fundamental data [6][23]. Summary by Related Content Current Bond Market Situation - This week, the bond market continued its volatile pattern, with limited changes in interest rates across all tenors. The 10 - year and 30 - year Treasury bond rates rose slightly by 1.1bps and 2.3bps to 1.66% and 1.93% respectively. The money market continued to ease, and the certificate of deposit (CD) rate remained flat at 1.76%. The credit bond interest rate also increased slightly. The bond market has been in a narrow - range volatile stage for two consecutive weeks, with the 10 - year Treasury bond fluctuating narrowly around 1.63% - 1.67% [1][9]. Factors Constraining Interest Rate Movements Constraints on Interest Rate Increases - Fundamental pressures have constrained the upward space of interest rates. Due to trade conflicts, external demand risks have increased, and domestic demand has also shown signs of weakening. High - frequency data has weakened since April, and indicators such as EPMI and BCI have declined. However, the slowdown in high - frequency data and sentiment indices is relatively gentle, and the short - term support for interest rate decreases from the fundamentals is insufficient [2][10]. Constraints on Interest Rate Decreases - High short - term interest rates and the non - implementation of loose monetary policy have constrained the downward space of interest rates. After the intensification of external shocks, the market once expected rapid implementation of loose monetary policy, but subsequent policies were more passive and cooperative. The 2 - year Treasury bond rate first dropped rapidly and then rebounded, and the spread between 10 - year and 2 - year Treasury bonds has narrowed to the lowest level in recent years, reflecting a decline in the market's short - term expectation of monetary easing [3][11]. Breakout Directions of Interest Rates Limited Upward Breakout Possibility - Interest rate constraints mainly come from short - term interest rates. Although monetary policy is currently passive, it does not mean that it will not be loose. The Politburo meeting emphasized moderately loose monetary policy. The money market center has shifted downward, and the CD rate has remained stable. The spread between CDs and Treasury bonds has narrowed, limiting the upward space of short - term Treasury bonds and the pressure on the overall interest rate curve. From the perspective of bond supply, the pressure in the second quarter is only slightly higher than that in the first quarter, with estimated net local bond financing of 4.4 trillion yuan in the second quarter, compared with 4.1 trillion yuan in the first quarter [4][13][15]. Possibility of Downward Breakout - With changes in the fundamentals, there is a possibility of an interest rate downward breakout, with fundamental data being the core concern. In April, industrial product prices declined significantly, indicating a further decline in the PPI year - on - year. Falling prices will lead to a relatively certain decline in nominal interest rates. Although high - frequency economic indicators show a slowdown in economic volume, the extent has not significantly exceeded expectations. The overall impact amplitude needs to be determined by subsequent fundamental data. If the fundamental pressure is large enough, reserve policies, including monetary policy, will be introduced, leading to a downward breakout of interest rates [5][18]. Investment Strategy - It is recommended to maintain a duration above neutral. Since the probability of an interest rate downward breakout is higher, long - term bonds are still advantageous, and long - term interest rates are expected to reach new lows [6][23].

2025 年 4 月 24 日星期四 地址： 电话： 重庆市江北区金沙门路 32 号 23 层； 023-67070250 上一交易日，国债期货收盘全线下跌，30 年期主力合约跌 0.40%，10 年期主力合 约跌 0.17%，5 年期主力合约跌 0.13%，2 年期主力合约跌 0.04%。 上海市浦东新区向城路 288 号 1101A； 021-61101856 1 市场有风险 投资需谨慎 | 国债: | | | | --- | --- | --- | | 股指: | .. | N | | 贵金属: | .. | | | 螺纹、热卷: . | | | | 铁矿石： . | | | | 焦煤焦炭： | | | | 铁合金: | . | | | 原油: | | | | 燃料油: | | | | 合成橡胶: | | | | 天然橡胶: | .. | 1 | | PVC: | .. | 1 | | 尿素: | | 1 | | 对二甲苯 PX: | | 1 | | PTA: . | | | | 乙二醇: . | | | | 短纤: | .. | 1: | | 瓶片: | .. | 1 | | 纯碱: | . | 1: ...

核 心 观 点 近日，在对等关税政策超预期的冲击下，人民币汇率快速贬值，国内债市也涨回年初水平。那么，汇率对 于利率究竟有何影响？更进一步地，人民币汇率贬值会制约央行货币政策宽松么？ 汇率对利率有影响么？ 汇率和利率本质上并不存在直接的推导关系，历史上 人民币汇率和10年期国债利率多 数时候呈反向关系，即汇率贬值时期往往债市走牛的概率较高。 不过，汇率贬值和利率下行并不一定同时出 现， 短周期内汇率和利率呈正向关系的情况也曾出现过， 持续时间大多都在一个季度以内，汇率和利率很快 仍将回归反向变动，一般出现在汇率和利率反映的经济预期分化或中美关系变化等背景下。根本上，国内利率 水平与货币政策操作密切相关，是对国内经济基本面变化的反映，而汇率仅阶段性影响货币政策节奏，不至于 扭转市场利率的走势。 汇率是货币宽松的掣肘么？ 回顾历史上的三轮人民币贬值周期，央行货币宽松并未暂停。相较于降息直接带 来资本外流而言，降准对汇率的影响相对中性，故在历次贬值周期内，央行对于降息更为谨慎。具体来看，央 行在两轮人民币走贬时期同时采取降准和降息，而在2018年至2019年的人民币贬值周期内，央行并未调降过政 策利率， 主要的区别 ...

文 ｜ 明明 章立聪 杨宏宇 史雨洁 2 0 2 5年4月2日，特朗普政府正式实施"对等关税"政策，直接引发全球资本避险模式，风险资产持 续大幅下跌，避险资产成为最大赢家，1 0年期美债收益率骤降，中国债市同步打破持续近一个季 度的僵局，1 0年期国债收益率逼近1 . 6%的前低。从配置角度看，债市走牛逻辑已然清晰，而股市 中具备防御属性的红利资产，或将成为资金抵御"关税风暴"的核心避风港，关税风暴的超强催化器 与红利基本面的坚实逻辑共振，固收视角来看，走牛是大概率事件。 ▍ 近年来，降息周期深化与结构性"资产荒"共振推动债市趋势性走牛，短期来看，关税政策重 压或将共振推动债市重拾升势。 近年来，货币政策宽松周期叠加实体融资需求疲弱，推动1 0年期国债收益率一度趋势性下滑至 1 . 6%以下。一季度在资金面持续偏紧的压力下大幅调整，一度重回1 . 9%以上。但特朗普政府加 征1 0 4%差异化关税政策落地，料将冲击我国出口链。三驾马车同步承压格局下，货币政策宽松 预期大幅升温，债市结束一季度震荡调整，重启下行通道，1 0年期国债利率逼近1 . 6%的前低。 ▍ 纯固收产品正遭遇"收益塌陷"与"需求刚性"的双重 ...

2025 年 4 月 8 日星期二 地址： 电话： 重庆市江北区金沙门路 32 号 23 层； 023-67070250 上海市浦东新区向城路 288 号 1101A； 021-61101856 1 市场有风险 投资需谨慎 | PVC： | | 11 | | --- | --- | --- | | 尿素： | | 11 | | 对二甲苯 | PX： | 12 | | PTA： | | 12 | | 乙二醇： | | 13 | | 短纤： | | 13 | | 瓶片： | | 14 | | 纯碱： | | 14 | | 玻璃： | | 15 | | 烧碱： | | 15 | | 纸浆： | | 16 | | 碳酸锂： | | 16 | | 铜： | | 16 | | --- | --- | --- | | 锡： | | 17 | | 镍： | | 17 | | 工业硅/多晶硅： | | 18 | | 豆油、豆粕： | | 18 | | 棕榈油： | | 19 | | 菜粕、菜油： | | 19 | | 棉花： | | 20 | | 白糖： | | 21 | | 苹果： | | 22 | | 生猪： | | 23 ...

今天最主要的内容，就是关于会议解读的那一块我为了不耽误事，单独发了一篇，劳驾诸位点一下文章最上面的"猫笔刀"，可以进入到我的主页观看《暴 涨了，真暴涨了》。 …… 1、10年国债收益率创下新低，上周不是破2了嘛，今天低至1.941%，由于目前市场普遍预期明年会有更宽松的货币政策，因此降息的预期也上来了，我 前几天和一个债券分析师小伙伴聊，都觉得明年下调40-50bp是有可能的，所以债券利率走低也是情理之中。中国资本市场这四五年，综合回报率最高的 就是债券，综合下来年化4.5%左右。 很多读者搞不清楚利率和债券的关系，简单解释就是反比关系，利率下降，债券就会上涨。所以货币宽松的周期，也是债券的慢牛市。 2、11月cpi指数+0.2%，ppi指数下降2.5%，一个是消费指数，一个是出厂价格指数，都不太好，但也都在预期之内。11月份食品价格普跌，鲜菜-13.2%、 猪肉-3.4%、鲜果-3%、水产品-1.3%。 3、中国保险行业协会发布了一个统计人力资源报告，里面显示保险从业人员的教育程度提升了，本科以上学历占了72%，并且主动离职率显著降低。保 险行业一直是巨大的就业海绵，从业人员学历提升其实从侧面能反应出竞争激 ...