Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce released the "2025 Report on the United States' Compliance with WTO Rules," expressing concerns over the U.S. undermining the multilateral trade system and urging the U.S. to correct its practices and adhere to WTO rules [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Compliance with WTO Rules - Since 2023, China has continuously published annual reports on the U.S.'s compliance with WTO rules, highlighting issues such as trade bullying and manipulation of industrial policies [2]. - The 2024 report indicated that the U.S. has disregarded member expectations and escalated unilateral measures, including the implementation of discriminatory policies and "reciprocal tariffs" [2]. - The 2025 report aims to express serious concerns regarding the U.S.'s actions that violate WTO rules and harm the multilateral trade system [2]. Group 2: Multilateral Trade System - The WTO is considered the cornerstone of economic globalization and international trade, relying on member compliance with rules and mutual cooperation [2]. - The current multilateral trade system faces significant challenges, and China hopes the 2025 report will encourage the U.S. to adhere to its obligations and eliminate "reciprocal tariffs" [2]. - The goal is to promote a more significant role for the multilateral trade system in global governance and to work towards a more equitable and inclusive economic globalization [2].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has increasingly disregarded multilateral trade rules and obligations, implementing unilateral tariffs and measures that challenge the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework, which poses significant risks to global economic recovery and the interests of WTO members [1]. Group 1: U.S. Trade Practices - The U.S. has adopted a "America First" approach, leading to the implementation of unilateral tariffs and trade measures that undermine multilateral agreements [1]. - The U.S. has obstructed the selection of members for the WTO appellate body, resulting in its paralysis and affecting dispute resolution processes [1]. - The U.S. has misused trade remedy measures and export controls, as well as implemented discriminatory subsidies, which deviate from WTO principles [1]. Group 2: Impact on Global Trade - The actions taken by the U.S. have led to a politicization and weaponization of trade issues, significantly impacting global economic relations [1]. - The U.S. policies aimed at "de-risking" and "reducing dependence" have contributed to economic coercion and sanctions, further straining international trade dynamics [1]. - These practices have not only challenged the core values of the WTO but have also harmed the collective interests of its members and the welfare of people globally, hindering the recovery of the global economy [1].

Core Insights - China's foreign trade has shown resilience, achieving significant growth despite external pressures, with a focus on high-quality development and innovation during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period [2][3][4] Trade Scale and Growth - In 2024, China's goods trade volume reached $6.16 trillion, a 32.4% increase from the end of the "13th Five-Year Plan" in 2020, maintaining its position as the world's largest trader for eight consecutive years [3] - Service trade also saw a milestone, surpassing $1 trillion for the first time, positioning China as the second-largest service trader globally [3] Import and Export Dynamics - China's imports are projected to grow by 2.3% in 2024, marking a historical high and maintaining its status as the world's second-largest importer for 16 years [3] - The country has implemented zero tariffs on 100% of products for all least developed countries with which it has diplomatic relations, and has signed agreements for zero tariffs with 53 African nations [3] Trade Structure and Quality - The proportion of electromechanical products in exports rose to 59.4% in 2024, with automobile exports exceeding 6 million units for the first time [4] - Cross-border e-commerce imports and exports are expected to reach approximately 2.7 trillion yuan in 2024, a 67% increase from 2020 [4] Digital and Service Trade Innovations - China has introduced a negative list management system for cross-border service trade, with knowledge-intensive service trade growing by 38% compared to 2020 [4] - The export value of digitally deliverable services is projected to increase by nearly 40% from 2020 [4] Trade System and Global Cooperation - China is committed to maintaining a multilateral trade system and expanding its high-standard free trade zone network, actively participating in WTO reforms and promoting international economic cooperation [9][10] - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) has been signed and is now the largest free trade area globally, with China applying to join high-standard agreements like CPTPP and DEPA [10] Belt and Road Initiative - Trade with Belt and Road Initiative countries increased from $2.7 trillion in 2021 to $3.1 trillion in 2024, with an average annual growth rate of 4.7% [12]

她提到，该补贴以使用美国等特定地区产品作为补贴前提，歧视中国等世贸组织成员产品，严重违反世 贸规则，是滥用补贴政策的贸易保护主义做法。 何咏前说，中方同时注意到，美方并未终止中国诉美《通胀削减法》世贸争端案中清洁能源补贴等其他 违规措施。对此，中方将按照世贸组织规则，继续推进诉讼，坚定捍卫国内产业合法利益，坚决维护以 规则为基础的多边贸易体制。中方期待世贸组织专家组作出公正裁决。(完) （文章来源：中国新闻网） 中新社北京10月16日电(记者尹倩芸)就近期中国诉美《通胀削减法》世贸争端案最新进展，中国商务部 新闻发言人何咏前在16日举行的例行发布会上称，中方将按照世贸组织规则，继续推进诉讼。 中国诉美《通胀削减法》世贸争端案正在专家组审理中，其中新能源汽车补贴涉案措施已于9月30日终 止。何咏前称，对于美方终止该补贴项目，中方认为这是美纠正自身错误的正确一步。 ...

Core Insights - The event highlighted the challenges faced by the multilateral trading system and the importance of activating the WTO dispute resolution function to maintain a stable international trade environment for businesses [1] Group 1: Event Overview - The WTO dispute resolution mechanism training program took place on October 16, 2025, with participation from senior diplomats and officials from trade and foreign affairs departments of 11 countries [1] - The event was organized by the International Commercial Dispute Prevention and Settlement Organization (ICDPASO), which was established on October 15, 2020, with support from the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade [1] Group 2: Discussion Focus - Participants engaged in in-depth discussions on how WTO member countries can activate dispute resolution mechanisms to safeguard the multilateral trading system [1] - The discussions aimed to create a predictable and stable international trade environment for enterprises across nations [1]

Core Points - The 24th meeting of the China-Denmark Economic and Trade Joint Committee was held in Wuhan, marking the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and Denmark [1] - Bilateral trade between China and Denmark has been steadily growing, with significant cooperation in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, logistics, and green low-carbon initiatives [1] - Denmark, as the rotating presidency of the EU, is encouraged to play a constructive role in promoting dialogue and resolving trade frictions between the EU and China [1] Group 1 - The meeting was co-hosted by China's Vice Minister of Commerce and Denmark's Permanent Secretary of State, highlighting the importance of bilateral relations [1] - China welcomes Danish enterprises to invest in its market and encourages Chinese companies to invest in Denmark, seeking a fair and open business environment [1] - Denmark views China as a key economic partner, with many Danish companies considering China a strategic market [1] Group 2 - Both parties expressed a commitment to free trade and maintaining a multilateral trade system [1] - There is a mutual interest in deepening cooperation in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, agriculture, logistics, and green initiatives [1] - Denmark is willing to facilitate practical cooperation between the EU and China through dialogue to address trade issues [1]

10月初，世界贸易组织(WTO)与国际货币基金组织(IMF)等国际机构接连发声，指出全球贸易体系 正承受着单边主义和贸易政策不确定性的冲击。当前，一些国家短期的人为政策干扰，正在深刻威胁着 中长期全球贸易的增长根基和全球经济稳定。 10月7日，WTO发布全球贸易展望报告称，受全球经济复苏乏力和美国关税政策等因素影响，将 2026年全球货物贸易增长预期大幅下调至0.5%，这较8月份1.8%的预测值明显降低。报告还预计，2025 年全球服务出口增速将从2024年的6.8%降至4.6%，2026年进一步降至4.4%，"单边关税措施和贸易政策 不确定性带来强劲逆风"。8日，IMF总裁格奥尔基耶娃对外表示，关税政策全部影响"尚未显现"，"全 球经济韧性尚未受到全面考验，而且有令人担忧的迹象表明真正的考验可能即将到来"。 面对严峻挑战，维护以规则为基础的多边贸易体制是应对危机的根本出路。10月6日至7日，世界贸 易组织在瑞士日内瓦召开总理事会2025年度第四次会议。中方主动设置议题，提出加强透明度、集体重 申对多边体制的承诺以及推动WTO取得务实成果等建议。欧盟、巴西、澳大利亚、瑞士、巴基斯坦等 多方也发言呼吁维护世贸组 ...

Group 1 - The global trade system is under significant pressure from unilateralism and trade policy uncertainty, threatening long-term growth and economic stability [1][2] - The WTO has drastically lowered its global goods trade growth forecast for 2026 to 0.5%, down from 1.8% predicted in August, indicating potential stagnation in global trade [1][2] - The IMF warns that the full impact of tariff policies has yet to be felt, suggesting that the global economy's resilience is about to be tested [1][2] Group 2 - Unilateral tariff barriers set by the U.S. are directly damaging the global trade order, with potential long-term consequences for economic growth and trade rules [2] - Developing countries may face severe repercussions from U.S. tariff policies, risking marginalization in global value chains due to high transportation costs and tariffs [2] - Structural changes in the global trade system are underway, with warnings that further tariff increases could lead to decreased global output and rising inflation [2] Group 3 - The maintenance of a rules-based multilateral trade system is essential for addressing the current crisis, with various countries advocating for WTO reform and commitment to its principles [3] - Many countries are opting for enhanced international cooperation to counteract uncertainty, with businesses adjusting supply chain strategies to focus on regional markets [3] - Emerging areas such as digital trade and green transformation present new opportunities for sustainable global trade development, with China playing a stabilizing role [3]

Core Insights - China's total goods trade value in the first three quarters reached 33.61 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 4%, with exports growing by 7.1% and imports declining by 0.2% [1][2] - In September, the monthly trade value was 4.04 trillion yuan, marking an 8% year-on-year increase, the highest monthly growth rate of the year [1][2] Group 1: Trade Growth Characteristics - The growth rate of imports and exports has accelerated quarter by quarter, with Q1 at 1.3%, Q2 at 4.5%, and Q3 at 6% [2] - Trade with countries involved in the Belt and Road Initiative reached 17.37 trillion yuan, a 6.2% increase, accounting for 51.7% of total trade [2] - Exports of mechanical and electrical products reached 12.07 trillion yuan, a 9.6% increase, making up 60.5% of total exports [2] Group 2: Import Trends - Imports showed signs of recovery, with a 0.3% increase in Q2 and a further acceleration to 4.7% in Q3 [2] - In Q3, the import volumes of crude oil and metal ores increased by 4.9% and 10.1% respectively [2] Group 3: Trade Entity Activity - The number of foreign trade enterprises with import and export performance reached 700,000, an increase of 5.2% year-on-year [2] Group 4: Global Trade Position - As of September, China's exports and imports have shown a four-month consecutive year-on-year increase, maintaining its position as the world's largest goods trader with an 11.8% share of global trade [3] Group 5: Future Outlook - The fourth quarter is expected to see continued support for foreign trade policies, including measures to assist enterprises in exporting and stabilizing markets outside the U.S. [4]

Group 1 - The article highlights the disruption of the multilateral trade system due to the unilateral trade policies of the Trump administration, particularly the imposition of reciprocal tariffs, which have exacerbated the existing challenges faced by the World Trade Organization and the multilateral trade framework [1][5][10] - The post-World War II international trade order was established under the Bretton Woods system, with the U.S. at its core, leading to significant trade liberalization among developed countries, while developing countries gradually participated in the multilateral trade system [2][3] - The 1980s marked a significant shift towards liberalization, with Western countries abandoning Keynesianism in favor of free-market policies, leading to a new trade arrangement where developing countries began exporting manufactured goods to developed nations [3][4] Group 2 - The Trump administration's tariff policies have violated key principles of the multilateral trade system, including the commitment to agreed tariff rates, non-discrimination among members, and transparency in trade measures [6][7] - The imposition of tariffs by the U.S. has led to two significant effects: a reduction in export opportunities for U.S. companies and a shift of products originally destined for the U.S. market to other countries, which in turn pressures those countries to increase their own tariffs [6][7] - The potential outcomes of these effects could range from the collapse of the multilateral trade system to the emergence of a managed multilateral drift, where regional trade agreements proliferate while still adhering to WTO rules [7][8] Group 3 - The current international trade landscape is characterized by a shift towards a "two superpowers and many strong" structure, with the U.S. and China as primary competitors, influencing the evolution of global trade dynamics [9][10] - China is positioned as a key player in resisting U.S. unilateralism, with its response to U.S. tariffs potentially leading to a more assertive role in shaping a non-U.S. international trade order [10][11] - The future international trade system is likely to be divided into three parts: the U.S. operating outside the multilateral framework, China promoting trade liberalization within the multilateral system, and other countries maintaining their own trade networks [11][12] Group 4 - The article suggests that China could play a dual role in the international system: either as a target of U.S. pressure or as a leader in uniting other countries against U.S. unilateral actions [13][14] - The potential for trade group formation among non-U.S. countries hinges on whether China can resolve its differences with the EU and Japan, which would influence the future of the multilateral trade system [12][14] - The article emphasizes the need for China to actively engage with other nations to promote a stable multilateral trade system and counteract U.S. unilateralism [16][18]