据知情人士透露，这项"极不寻常的指令"几乎发给了美军在全球驻扎的高级指挥官。该指令于本周早些时候发布，而几个 月前，赫格塞思在五角大楼的团队宣布了对最高军事指挥部进行全面整合的计划。 据央视新闻9月25日报道，美国国防部长赫格塞思下令数百名美国军方将领下周在弗吉尼亚州的一个海军陆战队基地紧急集 结，且未说明原因。 美国国防部发言人肖恩·帕内尔25日在一份声明中确认，赫格塞思"将于下周初与高级军事领导人进行会谈"，但并没有提供 更多细节。 据参考消息援引路透社9月26日报道，两名不愿透露姓名的美国官员说，这次会议的讨论重点将是赫格塞思所说的在整个军 队中秉持"勇士精神"的必要性。其他官员则说，这次将持续约一个小时的会议可能会涉及其他领域。 还有一位官员说，考虑到将有多名高级官员在同一地点开会，会议可能会讨论一些实质性问题，比如政府的新国防战略以 及预计将裁减最高军阶人员等问题——尽管这些问题并没有被正式纳入议程。 官员们对记者说，该活动预计将在位于弗吉尼亚州匡蒂科的海军陆战队大学举行。一些最高级别的将领预计将乘飞机抵达 马里兰州的安德鲁斯联合基地。 本月早些时候，美国总统特朗普签署了一项行政命令，将国防部重新命 ...

不过，中欧关系也不是一帆风顺。欧盟对中国产品出口低价担忧，贸易逆差2024年升到3000多亿欧元，中国对欧盟聚甲醛共聚物加征74.9%反倾销关税，这 是5月18日的事。欧盟内部有声音说，中国补贴和保护主义让欧洲企业难进入市场，还有台湾海峡行为、人权问题、网络攻击这些摩擦，让关系降到低点。 特朗普还推动欧盟对中国和印度征收高关税，目的是压力俄罗斯停止乌克兰战争。9月10日报道显示，特朗普想让欧盟对部分中国商品征收100%关税，以切 断中国对俄经济支持。这让欧盟陷入两难，一方面不想完全脱钩中国，怕经济受损；另一方面，担心特朗普报复，对欧洲商品加税。 欧盟本来就面临经济增长停滞的问题，过去两年几乎没怎么增长，现在又碰上俄罗斯在乌克兰的推进，这下子压力更大了。特朗普的这些措施，延续了他第 一任期的风格，当时在2018年3月，他就对欧盟钢铝产品加征关税，引发欧盟报复，对美国威士忌和摩托车征收反制税。现在看来，他第二任期更狠，2月1 日就宣布针对中国商品加征10%关税，还把加拿大和墨西哥的商品征收25%。欧盟作为美国的传统盟友，这次被当成贸易对手对待，确实让不少欧洲国家觉 得吃亏大了。 而德国作为欧盟经济火车头，汽车产业 ...

Core Viewpoint - The new tariff measures announced by President Trump are expected to have significant impacts across various industries, continuing the "America First" policy from his first term [1][8]. Group 1: Tariff Details - The new tariffs cover four main categories: 1. Kitchen cabinets, bathroom sinks, and related building materials will face a 50% tariff [2]. 2. Imported furniture will incur a 30% tariff [2]. 3. Patent and brand-name drugs will be subject to a 100% tariff [2]. 4. Imported heavy trucks will see a 25% tariff [2]. - The most notable measure is the 100% tariff on patent drugs, which is unprecedented [2]. Group 2: Rationale Behind Tariffs - Trump justified the tariffs on furniture and cabinets by claiming that foreign countries are flooding the U.S. market with these products, which he deems unfair [5]. - National security is cited as a reason for the heavy truck tariffs, similar to the rationale used for previous steel and aluminum tariffs [6]. Group 3: Industry Impact - The tariffs are expected to lead to price increases in the U.S. market, with furniture prices already rising by 4.7% year-over-year as of August 2025 due to previous tariffs [6]. - The 100% tariff on patent drugs could effectively block many of these products from the U.S. market unless companies establish manufacturing facilities in the U.S. [11]. - Companies in the automotive, pharmaceutical, and furniture sectors will need to reassess their supply chain strategies, with some potentially absorbing costs while others may pass them on to consumers [11]. Group 4: Legal Challenges - The new tariff policies are facing legal challenges, with the U.S. Supreme Court set to review the legality of many tariffs imposed by the Trump administration [11].

Group 1 - The U.S. government's announcement of a 100% tariff on patented drugs has caused significant turmoil in global markets, leading to declines in U.S. stock futures and a drop in pharmaceutical stocks across Asia-Pacific, with Australia's CSL reaching a six-year low [1][3] - Pharmaceutical companies are faced with a dilemma: to maintain access to the U.S. market, they must invest heavily in relocating production facilities to the U.S., or risk losing profits due to the 100% tariff [3] - Indian pharmaceutical companies are particularly affected, with $8.7 billion in drug exports to the U.S. in FY2024, accounting for 31% of their total exports, and over 30% of their revenue dependent on the U.S. market [4] Group 2 - The U.S. strategy of imposing tariffs to gain economic advantage is likely to backfire, potentially leading to retaliatory measures from other countries and harming normal trade relations, which could isolate the U.S. and diminish its economic benefits [6]

特朗普再挥"关税大棒"。 当地时间9月25日，美国总统特朗普宣布，自10月1日起，美国将对多类进口产品实施新一轮高额关税，其中对 任何品牌或专利的医药产品征收100%的关税；对厨房橱柜、浴室洗手台及相关建材征收50%关税；对进口家 具征收30%关税。此外，自10月1日起将对所有进口重型卡车加征25%关税。 受此影响，日韩、澳大利亚医药股全线走低，截至北京时间26日08:40，澳大利亚CSL大跌超4%，Telix Pharma、Neuren Pharmaceuticals大跌超3%；日本住友制药大跌超4%、第一三共大跌超3%、武田药品、 Astellas Pharma跌超1%；韩国Samsung Biologics大跌超3%，SK Biopharmaceuticals、Yuhan跌超2%。 有分析人士警告称，针对医药产品的高额关税，可能会推高成本并扰乱药品供应链，从而使美国患者面临风 险。另外，在美国通胀本已高企的背景下，新的关税措施无疑将加剧物价上涨压力，并可能拖累经济增长，让 本已在适应此前关税环境的企业面临新一轮不确定性。 特朗普宣布 据央视新闻9月26日报道，当地时间9月25日，美国总统特朗普在其社交媒 ...

美韩贸易谈判已经进入了一个几乎无法调和的僵局，特朗普政府提出的苛刻条件让韩国政府在巨大压力下陷入了两难境地。 特朗普再一次显示出了他那种典型的"美国优先"姿态，而韩国总统李在明和他的政府在应对这种强势施压时也做出了果断的回应。 韩国社会的反应也给了特朗普一个明显的警告：如果你再继续这样逼迫我们，反倒是会适得其反。 最近，李在明接受《时代》杂志采访时，毫不避讳地表达了内心的焦虑。他直言不讳地表示，如果韩国政府妥协于特朗普提出的条件，可能面临国内弹劾的 巨大风险。这些话看似是总统的坦诚回应，实则反映出韩国在特朗普高压政策下所面临的困境。 曾被贴上"亲美"标签的李在明，今天为何突然转向了硬刚的姿态？其背后的原因既复杂也直接，显然，特朗普这一次又一次触碰了韩国的底线。 自从今年7月8日美韩贸易协定进入最后阶段以来，双方的谈判便开始陷入僵局。虽然韩国政府不断强调，经过了密集的磋商，但双方依然未能在所有议题上 达成共识。这些话语看似委婉，却让人明白，韩国政府正在尽力寻找一种平衡，但美方提出的要求已让局势变得愈发复杂。 特朗普在谈判中的立场无比强硬，提出了几乎令人无法接受的苛刻条件。最直接的要求是，韩国必须向美国投资350 ...

Core Viewpoint - President Trump's recent statement indicates a significant shift in his stance towards Ukraine, suggesting that Ukraine has the potential to regain its territory with the support of the EU and NATO, contrasting with his previous approach of urging negotiations and concessions from Ukraine [1][4]. Group 1: Strategic Considerations - Trump's change in perspective is not based on Ukraine's military capabilities but rather as a tactic to exert pressure on Russia [4]. - The current U.S. policy towards Russia prioritizes maintaining strategic stability and preventing the escalation of the Ukraine crisis, with a focus on short-term economic benefits for the U.S. [4][7]. - The shift may signal a change in the U.S. approach to negotiations, moving from active mediation to a more passive stance, potentially abandoning dialogue if Russia does not compromise [4][10]. Group 2: Impact on European Relations - Trump's strong rhetoric aims to alleviate European concerns regarding security threats from Russia, especially following recent incidents in Poland, Estonia, and Romania [5][6]. - The initial lukewarm response from Trump to these incidents raised doubts among NATO's European members about the reliability of U.S. commitments to collective security [6]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The ongoing conflict may provide short-term economic benefits to the U.S. through sustained pressure on Russia, aligning with Trump's shift from seeking a Nobel Peace Prize to focusing on energy and military gains [7]. - There is potential for the U.S. to expand military sales to Ukraine, supported by European funding, which could become a long-term strategy [8]. Group 4: Potential for Conflict Escalation - Trump's assertion that Ukraine could reclaim its territory may provoke a renewed wave of Western support for Ukraine, raising concerns about escalating tensions with Russia [9]. - Despite the potential for increased conflict, the likelihood of direct military engagement between NATO and Russia remains low due to Trump's cautious diplomatic approach [9]. Group 5: Future Policy Directions - The sustainability of Trump's new policy remains uncertain, as it may be more tactical than strategic, with the possibility of further adjustments based on geopolitical developments [10]. - Trump's approach reflects a desire to maximize options in negotiations, indicating that he may continue to shift his stance as circumstances evolve [10].

Core Viewpoint - The UN Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized the necessity of international cooperation in addressing global challenges, stating that no single country can tackle issues like pandemics or climate change alone [1][10]. Group 1: International Cooperation - Guterres highlighted that international cooperation is a pragmatic approach, as global issues require collective action [1]. - He pointed out that the principles of the UN are under attack, indicating a need to strengthen the UN's role in global governance [1][10]. Group 2: US Position and Criticism - Former President Trump criticized the UN, claiming it has failed to resolve global conflicts and that he has had to take on these challenges himself [4][5]. - Trump's "America First" policy contrasts sharply with the UN's mission of global decision-making, leading to significant cuts in US foreign aid and withdrawal from various international agreements [5]. Group 3: Global Challenges and Responses - The ongoing geopolitical crises, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Israel-Palestine situation, were highlighted as pressing issues during the UN General Assembly [1][7]. - The recognition of Palestine as a state was a significant topic, with 152 out of 193 UN member states already acknowledging it, which could have economic implications for Israel [8]. Group 4: UN's Current State - The UN is facing unprecedented funding shortages, exacerbated by the US's failure to pay dues since Trump's administration [9]. - Despite criticisms, the UN remains a vital platform for international cooperation, especially for developing countries seeking solutions to global issues [9].

近期，美国又一次试图通过"集团作战"的方式来加大对中国的压力，但事情的发展却出乎预料，俄罗斯则在这个关键时刻向美 国抛出了橄榄枝。这背后隐藏着怎样的战略意图和博弈？让我们一探究竟。 就在全球经济复苏乏力的当口，美国显然不打算放过任何一个施压中国的机会。在即将到来的马德里谈判之前，美国向欧盟施 加压力，要求对中国商品加征最高100%的关税，并且声称一旦欧盟妥协，美国也会紧随其后。这一举措不仅意在加深中欧之间 的裂痕，更是美国在俄乌冲突的大背景下，试图借用欧盟的力量来对抗中国。 然而，中国并未选择退缩。外交部部长王毅在访问波兰期间毫不犹豫地指出，滥用关税只会损害各方利益，而与其他国家联合 对付中国的策略，也终将适得其反。中方的强硬态度显示出，一味的经济制裁并不能解决问题，反而可能让人承受更大的损 失。 就在人们普遍预计中国会受到美欧联手夹击之际，俄罗斯却在这个节骨眼上做出了出乎意料的让步。俄罗斯副外长里亚布科夫 表示，俄方准备与美国讨论能源合作，包括重要的"萨哈林1号"项目。此举引发了广泛的关注和讨论。 许多人对这一决策感到困惑，认为这是莫斯科在俄乌战场尚未平息之际的逆转。实际上，分析其背后的原因，我们可以看到， ...

Core Points - The AUKUS partnership's future remains uncertain, with the Biden administration conducting a comprehensive review that may impose stricter conditions on technology transfer and cost-sharing [1][4][6] - Recent assurances from U.S. Secretary of State Rubio indicate that the AUKUS agreement will continue, but adjustments to the agreement's content are likely to prioritize U.S. industrial and military interests [4][5][6] - Australia is investing approximately AUD 12 billion (around USD 8 billion) to develop a defense center in Perth, which is expected to support U.S. submarine maintenance and demonstrate Australia's commitment to the AUKUS project [5][6][10] Summary by Sections AUKUS Partnership Overview - The AUKUS partnership was established during the Biden administration, with ongoing scrutiny from the U.S. government regarding its alignment with "America First" policies [4][10] - The partnership involves the U.S. and U.K. providing nuclear submarine technology to Australia, with a total estimated cost of USD 245 billion for the entire program [10][11] U.S. Review and Adjustments - The U.S. Department of Defense is reviewing the AUKUS project to ensure it aligns with national interests, which may lead to a re-negotiation of terms rather than a complete cancellation [4][6][7] - Analysts suggest that the review may focus on enhancing protections for technology transfer and cost-sharing arrangements, reflecting a shift towards U.S. priorities [4][5][6] Australia's Commitment - Australia is actively seeking to strengthen its defense capabilities and has announced significant investments in infrastructure to support the AUKUS initiative [5][6] - The development of the Henderson defense precinct is expected to facilitate the construction of naval vessels and maintenance of submarines, aligning with U.S. strategic goals in the region [6][10] Strategic Implications - The AUKUS partnership is viewed as a critical component of deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region, with bipartisan support in the U.S. Congress [4][5][7] - Concerns have been raised regarding the potential for renegotiation of agreements and the implications for regional security dynamics, particularly in relation to China [11][12]