Group 1 - The core narrative of 2025 revolves around two main lines: the fluctuation of currency values, particularly the US dollar, other fiat currencies, and gold; and the relative underperformance of US stocks compared to non-US equities and gold, with gold being the best-performing asset of the year [2][7] - The article emphasizes that almost all fiat currencies weakened throughout the year, with the US dollar declining by 4% against the yuan and 12% against the euro, while gold saw a return of 65% in USD terms, outperforming the S&P 500's 18% return by 47 percentage points [9][11] - The article outlines three key principles related to currency depreciation, wealth distribution, and the nominal versus real returns of bonds, highlighting that currency devaluation can inflate nominal returns while diluting real purchasing power [12][14] Group 2 - US stocks, while strong in USD terms, significantly lagged behind non-US markets and gold when measured in stronger currencies, with European stocks outperforming US stocks by 23% and emerging market stocks returning 34% [18][19] - The S&P 500's performance was driven by a 12% growth in corporate earnings and a 5% increase in price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios, with the "seven giants" of the index accounting for a third of its market value and achieving a 22% earnings growth [19][20] - Long-term expected returns for stocks are estimated at around 4.7%, with current bond returns at approximately 4.9%, indicating a very thin equity risk premium and suggesting limited potential for additional returns from equities [21][22] Group 3 - The political landscape, particularly under the Trump administration, has influenced market dynamics, with policies aimed at revitalizing US manufacturing and AI technology, which have contributed to the observed market changes [29][30] - The shift from multilateralism to unilateralism in global politics has increased conflict risks and military spending, while also driving demand for gold and reducing overseas demand for US debt and assets [35] - The article concludes that the evolution of key forces such as debt, currency, market dynamics, domestic politics, geopolitical factors, natural forces, and new technologies will shape the overall investment landscape moving forward [37]

Core Insights - The overall credit spread has narrowed, with the 1-year spread experiencing the most significant contraction [1][2] - Despite concerns about supply, the credit bond market has shown resilience, with short-term bonds outperforming longer-term ones [1][2] Group 1: Credit Bond Market Performance - In the first week after the New Year, credit bond ETFs experienced a significant outflow of funds, totaling 55.3 billion yuan over four days, nearly 50% of the inflow seen in December 2025 [2] - The yield on various credit bonds has shown mixed performance, with 7-year bonds performing the best, while 5-year bonds have seen an overall increase [1] - The turnover rate for public credit bonds and bank perpetual bonds has decreased this week [1] Group 2: Investment Strategies and Recommendations - The current market environment is favorable for investing in medium to short-term credit bonds, with a focus on capturing the certainty of interest rate spreads [2][3] - There is an opportunity to invest in high-grade public credit bonds with maturities of 3-5 years, particularly those rated AAA [3] - The overall leverage in the market remains low, indicating potential for increased leverage in credit bond investments [2][3] Group 3: ETF Performance Metrics - As of January 9, 2026, the company bond ETF has seen a 0.05% increase, marking three consecutive days of gains, with a current price of 106.74 yuan [5] - The latest scale of the company bond ETF reached 33.999 billion yuan, with a net inflow of 277 million yuan over the past five trading days [6] - The ETF closely tracks the China Bond - High-Grade Corporate Bond Spread Factor Index, providing a benchmark for high-grade corporate bond investments [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights a significant increase in credit bond issuance in the primary market, with a total of 332 bonds issued, amounting to 312.27 billion yuan, representing a 306.00% increase compared to the previous period [4][5] - In terms of issuance scale, industrial bonds accounted for 135.37 billion yuan, a 295.92% increase, while urban investment bonds reached 138.91 billion yuan, a 409.86% increase, together making up 43.35% and 44.48% of the total issuance respectively [4][5] - The average issuance term for credit bonds was 2.73 years, with industrial bonds averaging 1.88 years and urban investment bonds averaging 3.24 years [4] Group 2 - The average coupon rate for credit bonds was 2.22%, with industrial bonds at 2.06%, urban investment bonds at 2.32%, and financial bonds at 1.71% [5] - In the secondary market, credit spreads varied by industry, with the largest increase in AAA-rated food and beverage sector by 2.1 basis points, while the largest decrease was in the communication sector by 8.3 basis points [6] - The total trading volume of credit bonds reached 1,403.85 billion yuan, a 121.26% increase, with commercial bank bonds, corporate bonds, and medium-term notes being the top three in trading volume [7]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Since the second half of 2025, the "anti-involution" policy has catalyzed the stabilization and recovery of commodity prices, and the fundamentals of some industries have shown signs of repair. For example, the non-ferrous metals industry has seen an upward shift in the price center of major metals under the multiple positive factors of continuous increase in policy support for stable growth, rapid expansion of downstream emerging industry demand, and steady improvement in domestic resource security capabilities. The profitability, operational capacity, and solvency of issuing entities have been enhanced. In 2026, the excess returns in the credit bond market may come from the value discovery of industries with fundamental repair. For the non-ferrous metals industry with fundamental repair, it is recommended to focus on allocating AA+/AAA-level central enterprises and regional leading state-owned enterprises and appropriately extend the duration, while also paying attention to avoiding the credit risks of bonds issued by small and medium-sized smelting and processing enterprises with low resource self-sufficiency rates and single industrial chain layouts [5][7][48] - Overall, this week, the credit spreads of most industries and ratings were compressed by less than 10BP, while the AA+ credit spread of the non-bank financial sector widened significantly by 20BP. In terms of urban investment bonds, the credit spreads of urban investment bonds with different maturities were compressed by 1-4BP compared with last week. In terms of industrial bonds, the short-term (1Y) credit spreads of industrial bonds widened significantly, while those above 1Y were mostly compressed to varying degrees. In terms of bank capital bonds, the short-term (within 1Y) spreads of bank perpetual and secondary capital bonds widened slightly, the 3Y spreads were significantly compressed, and the medium- and long-term (5-10Y) spreads were slightly compressed [6][47][48] 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 This Week's Credit Hot Events - On January 9th, the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors (NAFMII) issued a business reminder on further standardizing the issuance of debt financing instruments, emphasizing five aspects: distribution information entry, withdrawal reporting, subscription record-keeping, lead underwriting syndicate mechanism, and information disclosure quality. It is expected that in the short term (Q1 2026), the issuance efficiency of inter-bank bonds may decline, and the issuance difficulty of some weakly qualified issuers may increase. In the long term, the inter-bank bond issuance market will become more standardized and transparent, which is conducive to improving market liquidity and pricing efficiency [11][12][13] - On January 9th, the Guizhou Provincial People's Government issued policies to support the integrated development of industry, county prosperity, and people's well-being. In the short term, the policies will directly support county-level "Three Guarantees" and debt risk mitigation. In the long term, they will support the continuous improvement of local debts through industrial upgrading and fiscal revenue growth. For the existing platform debts in Guizhou, the policies strengthen the financing support for high-quality projects and force county-level platforms to transform into operating entities, which may further intensify regional credit differentiation [14][15] 3.2 Primary Market 3.2.1 Net Financing Scale - This week, the net financing of credit bonds (excluding asset-backed securities) was 115.3 billion yuan, an increase of 191.6 billion yuan compared with last week. The total issuance was 285.5 billion yuan, an increase of 209.2 billion yuan, and the total repayment was 170.3 billion yuan, an increase of 17.6 billion yuan. The net financing of asset-backed securities was 14.7 billion yuan, an increase of 15 billion yuan [16] - By product type, the net financing of urban investment bonds was 30.9 billion yuan, an increase of 37.5 billion yuan; the net financing of industrial bonds was 89.7 billion yuan, an increase of 144.5 billion yuan; and the net financing of financial bonds was -5.4 billion yuan, an increase of 9.6 billion yuan [16] 3.2.2 Issuance Cost - This week, the issuance volume of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds increased significantly, and the issuance rates of AA and AA+ decreased significantly compared with last week. Specifically, the average issuance rates of AA urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were in the range of 2.6-2.8%, the average issuance rates of AA+ urban investment bonds and industrial bonds were in the range of 2.2-2.3%, and the issuance rates of AAA-level bonds of different varieties were all below 2.3% [23] 3.3 Secondary Market 3.3.1 Transaction Volume - In terms of trading volume, the trading volume of credit bonds (excluding asset-backed securities) increased by 554.6 billion yuan compared with last week. Among them, the trading volume of urban investment bonds was 246 billion yuan, an increase of 139.5 billion yuan; the trading volume of industrial bonds was 329.6 billion yuan, an increase of 172.8 billion yuan; the trading volume of financial bonds was 498.8 billion yuan, an increase of 242.3 billion yuan. The trading volume of asset-backed securities was 16.2 billion yuan, an increase of 4.8 billion yuan [24] - In terms of turnover rate, the overall turnover rate of credit bonds increased compared with last week. Specifically, the turnover rate of urban investment bonds was 1.58%, an increase of 0.89 percentage points; the turnover rate of industrial bonds was 1.7%, an increase of 0.89 percentage points; the turnover rate of financial bonds was 3.21%, an increase of 1.56 percentage points. The turnover rate of asset-backed securities was 0.44%, an increase of 0.13 percentage points [25] 3.3.2 Yield - This week, the yields of 5Y credit bonds of different ratings widened slightly, while the yields of credit bonds of other ratings and maturities fluctuated by no more than 3BP compared with last week. Taking AA+ 5Y bonds of each variety as an example, the yields of different varieties all increased to varying degrees [27][28] 3.3.3 Credit Spread - Overall, the credit spreads of most industries and ratings were compressed by less than 10BP this week, while the AA+ credit spread of the non-bank financial sector widened significantly by 20BP. Specifically, the credit spreads of AA media, mining, commercial trade, and transportation industries were compressed by 7BP, 6BP, 7BP, and 6BP respectively; the credit spreads of AA+ building materials and machinery industries were compressed by 8BP and 10BP respectively; the credit spread of the AAA computer industry was compressed by 7BP. The credit spreads of other industries and ratings fluctuated by no more than 5BP [31] - **Urban Investment Bonds**: In terms of maturity, the credit spreads of urban investment bonds of different maturities were compressed by 1-4BP compared with last week. In terms of regions, the credit spreads of urban investment bonds in different regions were compressed to varying degrees [36][37] - **Industrial Bonds**: This week, the short-term (1Y) credit spreads of industrial bonds widened significantly, while those above 1Y were mostly compressed to varying degrees [40] - **Bank Capital Bonds**: This week, the short-term (within 1Y) spreads of bank perpetual and secondary capital bonds widened slightly, the 3Y spreads were significantly compressed, and the medium- and long-term (5-10Y) spreads were slightly compressed [43] 3.4 This Week's Bond Market Sentiment - This week, the implied ratings of 41 bond issues of 8 entities were downgraded, including 16 issues of AVIC Industry Finance Holdings Co., Ltd. and 10 issues of New Hope Wuxin Industrial Group Co., Ltd. The "21 Wantong 02" issued by Guangxi Wantong Real Estate Co., Ltd. was extended; the "H20 Zhengrong 2" issued by Zhengrong Real Estate Holdings Co., Ltd. defaulted substantially; Shandong Zhangqiu Blower Co., Ltd. was placed on the watch list, and its "Zhanggu Convertible Bond" was also placed on the watch list [4][45] 3.5 Investment Recommendations - This week, a total of 1,323.6 billion yuan of reverse repurchases matured in the open market, and the central bank conducted a total of 102.2 billion yuan of reverse repurchase operations, resulting in a net withdrawal of 1,221.4 billion yuan for the whole week. As of the close on Friday, DR001 closed at 1.28% [6] - For the non-ferrous metals industry with fundamental repair, it is recommended to focus on allocating AA+/AAA-level central enterprises and regional leading state-owned enterprises and appropriately extend the duration, while also paying attention to avoiding the credit risks of bonds issued by small and medium-sized smelting and processing enterprises with low resource self-sufficiency rates and single industrial chain layouts [7][48]

Fixed Income - The report indicates that credit spreads have narrowed across the board, demonstrating resilience in credit despite rising interest rates. During the week from January 4 to January 9, government bond yields generally increased, with 1Y, 3Y, and 10Y government bonds rising by 3 basis points (BP), while the 5Y bond rose by 4 BP and the 7Y bond by 2 BP. In contrast, credit bonds outperformed government bonds, with 1Y AA+ and above credit bond yields decreasing by 2 BP, while other grades increased by 1 BP. For 3Y AAA and AA grades, yields remained stable, while other grades decreased by 1-2 BP. The 5Y AA+ and above grades saw yields rise by 1 BP, while other grades increased by 3 BP. The 7Y AAA grade yields remained stable, while other grades decreased by 2 BP. The 10Y AAA credit bonds decreased by 1 BP, with other grades remaining stable. Overall, credit spreads narrowed, with 1Y AA+ and above credit spreads decreasing by 5 BP, and other grades down by 2 BP. For 3Y, spreads decreased by 3-5 BP across grades, while for 5Y, AA+ and above spreads decreased by 3 BP, and other grades down by 1 BP. The 7Y AAA grade spreads decreased by 2 BP, with other grades down by 4 BP, and for 10Y, spreads decreased by 3-4 BP across grades [3][9][20]. City Investment Bonds - The report notes that city investment bond spreads mostly decreased by 3-4 BP. The overall credit spread for AAA-rated platforms decreased by 3 BP, while AA and AA+ platforms saw a 4 BP decrease. By administrative level, provincial platform credit spreads generally decreased by 3 BP, while city and county-level platform spreads decreased by 4 BP. Specifically, AAA-rated spreads mostly decreased by 3-4 BP, with Inner Mongolia down by 2 BP, and Yunnan, Hainan, and Gansu down by 5-6 BP. AA+ rated platforms mostly saw decreases of 3-5 BP, with Xinjiang and Guizhou down by 1-2 BP, and Ningxia and Gansu down by 6-7 BP. AA-rated platforms mostly decreased by 4-5 BP, with Shaanxi down by 3 BP and Tianjin down by 6 BP [4][13][16]. Industry Bonds - The report highlights that while most industry bond spreads decreased, real estate bond spreads continued to widen. Specifically, the spreads for central state-owned enterprise real estate bonds widened slightly by 1-3 BP, while mixed-ownership real estate bonds saw a significant increase of 702 BP. In contrast, private enterprise real estate bond spreads decreased by 30 BP. Notable changes include Longfor's spread decreasing by 6 BP, CIFI's increasing by 55 BP, Vanke's decreasing by 974 BP, Midea's decreasing by 4 BP, Huafa's increasing by 17 BP, and Poly's increasing by 5 BP. Additionally, spreads for coal bonds decreased by 2-3 BP across grades, while steel and chemical bonds saw a decrease of 3 BP [20][21]. Perpetual Bonds - The report indicates that the spreads for secondary capital bonds and perpetual bonds have significantly narrowed, with yields for 1Y secondary capital bonds decreasing by 2-3 BP and perpetual bonds down by 3-4 BP, compressing spreads by 5-6 BP. For 3Y, AA+ and above secondary bonds saw yields decrease by 1 BP, while AA secondary bonds and all grades of perpetual bonds saw yields decrease by 1-2 BP, compressing spreads by 4-5 BP. In the 5Y category, AAA- secondary capital bond yields increased by 1 BP, AA+ remained stable, and AA decreased by 1 BP, with perpetual bond yields remaining stable and spreads compressing by 3-5 BP [5][25]. Excess Spreads - The report notes that the excess spread for industry AAA-rated 3Y perpetual bonds remained stable at 14.84 BP, positioned at the 40.79% percentile since 2015. The 5Y perpetual bond excess spread slightly decreased by 0.01 BP to 13.20 BP, at the 32.21% percentile. Conversely, the excess spread for city investment AAA-rated 3Y perpetual bonds increased by 1.93 BP to 4.64 BP, at the 3.74% percentile, while the 5Y excess spread increased by 1.52 BP to 10.92 BP, at the 18.64% percentile [27][28].

Group 1 - The core narrative of 2025 revolves around two main lines: the fluctuation of currency values, particularly the US dollar against other currencies and gold, and the relative performance of US stocks compared to non-US stocks and gold, with gold being the best-performing asset of the year [3][6]. - The AI boom is perceived to be in the early stages of a bubble, and while US stocks appear strong in dollar terms, their performance is significantly weaker when compared to non-US equities and gold [4][6]. - The expected long-term return on stocks is estimated at approximately 4.7%, while existing bond returns are around 4.9%, indicating a very thin equity risk premium [28][29]. Group 2 - The US dollar depreciated against several currencies, with a 4% drop against the Chinese yuan and a 39% decline against gold, leading to a general weakening of all fiat currencies [8][10]. - Gold provided a return of 65% in dollar terms, significantly outperforming the S&P 500's 18% return, highlighting the importance of currency valuation in assessing investment returns [11][12]. - The performance of non-US equities was notably better, with European stocks outperforming US stocks by 23%, Chinese stocks by 21%, and overall emerging market stocks achieving a return of 34% [20][21]. Group 3 - The political landscape, particularly under the Trump administration, has influenced market dynamics, with policies aimed at revitalizing US manufacturing and AI technology impacting capital flows and asset allocation [36][38]. - The shift from multilateralism to unilateralism in global politics has increased conflict risks and heightened military spending, which in turn has affected investment strategies and demand for gold [47]. - The ongoing debate over wealth distribution and inflation is expected to become a central political issue, potentially influencing market conditions and investor sentiment in the coming years [40][46].

Core Viewpoint - The main narrative for 2025 revolves around two key sources of returns: the fluctuation of currency values, particularly the US dollar against other currencies and gold, and the relative performance of US stocks compared to non-US stocks and gold, with gold being the best-performing asset of the year [5][6][8]. Group 1: Currency Value Changes - The US dollar depreciated against several currencies: down 0.3% against the Japanese yen, 4% against the Chinese yuan, 12% against the euro, 13% against the Swiss franc, and 39% against gold [6][7]. - The overall narrative indicates that weaker currencies experienced sharper declines, while stronger currencies appreciated [7]. - Gold was the best-performing investment, yielding a 65% return in USD, significantly outperforming the S&P 500's 18% return by 47 percentage points [8]. Group 2: Stock Market Performance - US stocks, while strong in USD terms, showed weaker performance when measured against stronger currencies, indicating a relative underperformance compared to international markets [16]. - European stocks outperformed US stocks by 23%, Chinese stocks by 21%, UK stocks by 19%, and Japanese stocks by 10%, with emerging market stocks returning 34% [17]. - The S&P 500's total return was driven by a 12% growth in corporate earnings and a 5% increase in price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios, with the "seven giants" of the index accounting for a significant portion of this growth [18]. Group 3: Long-term Return Expectations - The long-term expected return for stocks is estimated at approximately 4.7%, while current bond returns are around 4.9%, indicating a very thin equity risk premium [19][20]. - The narrowing of credit spreads to very low levels suggests limited room for further compression, which could lead to upward pressure on spreads and negatively impact equities and credit markets [21]. Group 4: Political and Geopolitical Influences - Political changes, particularly under the Trump administration, have significantly influenced market dynamics, with policies aimed at revitalizing US manufacturing and AI technology impacting asset allocation and investor sentiment [25][26]. - The shift from multilateralism to unilateralism in global politics has increased conflict risks and heightened military spending, further influencing market behaviors and asset preferences [31]. Group 5: Other Influential Forces - The ongoing climate change and technological advancements, particularly in AI, are shaping the investment landscape, with the current AI boom being described as in the early stages of a bubble [31][34]. - The interplay of debt, currency, market dynamics, domestic politics, and geopolitical factors will continue to drive the overall investment environment [34].

证券研究报告 固收定期报告 hyzqdatemark 2026 年 01 月 05 日 证券分析师 廖志明 SAC：S1350524100002 liaozhiming@huayuanstock.com 赵孟田 SAC：S1350525070004 zhaomengtian@huayuanstock.com 联系人 长端收益率走高，利差大多小幅收窄 ——信用分析周报（2025/12/29-2026/1/4） 投资要点： 本周信用热点事件：12 月 26 日"15 天安人寿"公告实质性违约。 本周市场概览： 1）一级市场：本周传统信用债发行量、偿还量、净融资额环比上周均有所减少；资 产支持证券净融资额环比上周减少 192 亿元。本周由于元旦节前整体发行量较少， 不同评级不同券种的平均发行利率较上周变化幅度相对较大。 2）二级市场：本周信用债成交量环比上周减少 8328 亿元；换手率方面，本周信用 债换手率较上周整体下行。本周 1Y 短端信用债收益率小幅下行，其余不同评级不同 期限的信用债收益率大多有所上行。总体来看，本周不同行业不同评级的信用利差 较上周波动幅度均不超过 5BP，且大多有所压缩。具体来看，本周 ...

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided Group 2: Core Viewpoints - In 2025, the bond market showed a volatile trend. The yields of government bonds and credit bonds first rose, then fell, and then fluctuated higher. The credit spreads first narrowed and then widened. The default risk continued to decline, mainly concentrated in real - estate bonds of private enterprises. The risk of implicit rating downgrade in the ChinaBond market increased, and the recovery rate of defaulted bonds remained low [9][36][37] Group 3: Summary by Directory 1. Valuation Curve: Yields Widely Oscillated Upward - By December 31, 2025, the yields of 1 - year Treasury bonds, 10 - year Treasury bonds, and 10 - year CDB bonds changed by 25BP, 17BP, and 27BP respectively; the yields of 3 - year AAA, 3 - year AA+, 3 - year AA, and 3 - year AA - changed by 15BP, 8BP, 9BP, and - 41BP respectively. The credit spreads of 3 - year AAA, 3 - year AA+, 3 - year AA, and 3 - year AA - narrowed by 4BP, 12BP, 11BP, and 61BP respectively. Overall, yields of various maturities generally rose, and credit spreads of major maturities and ratings of credit bonds narrowed, with lower - grade and shorter - term credit spreads narrowing more. The 10 - 1 curve flattened [10][11] 2. Treasury Bond Yields Oscillated Higher - The bond market in 2025 can be divided into several stages. From January to mid - March, due to tightened money supply, short - term yields rose rapidly. After the Two Sessions in March, the 10 - year Treasury bond yield reached a high of 1.90%. From late March to April, the 10 - year Treasury bond yield dropped to the 1.63% - 1.67% range. From May to June, long - end yields fluctuated slightly. From July to September, yields oscillated upward, showing a "bear steepening" pattern. From October to December, yields showed an oscillating trend [2][12][16] 3. Credit Spreads - All Grades of Credit Spreads First Narrowed and Then Widened - In 2025, credit spreads first fluctuated and narrowed, then slightly widened. In the first half of the year, they mainly narrowed, and in the second half, they widened with the bond market correction. Short - end credit spreads had a smaller correction range [17][19] 4. The Risk of Implicit Rating Downgrade in the ChinaBond Market Increased - In 2025, the amount of credit bonds with implicit rating downgrades in the ChinaBond market was 865.5 billion, with a significant year - on - year increase. The total amount of implicit rating upgrades was 422.2 billion, significantly lower than the previous year. The proportion of urban investment bonds in the upgraded and downgraded samples decreased compared with the previous year [25] 5. Default Risk Generally Declined, and the Default Rate of Real - Estate Bonds Declined - In 2025, there were 9 new first - time defaulting issuers. According to the broad default standard, the default amount was 17.5 billion, and the default rate was 0.04%, with a significant decline year - on - year. Defaulting entities were mainly concentrated in real - estate bonds of private enterprises, and the default rate of real - estate bonds and private enterprises both declined [27][30] 6. The Recovery Rate Remained Low - In 2025, defaulted bonds recovered 24.53 billion in principal. From 2014 to the present, defaulted bonds have paid a total of 129.4 billion in principal, and the payment rate of overdue principal was 12.4% [32]

证券研究报告 | 2026年01月04日 2026年01月05日 2025 年债券行情回顾 收益率总体企稳回升，信用利差被动收窄 估值曲线：2025 年债市收益率震荡上行；信用利差方面，多数品种利差 被动收窄。收益率方面，1 年期国债、10 年期国债、10 年期国开债分别 变动了 25BP、17BP、27BP，3 年 AAA、3 年 AA+、3 年 AA 和 3 年 AA-分别 变动了 15BP、8BP、9BP 和-41BP。信用利差方面，3 年 AAA、3 年 AA+、 3 年 AA 和 3 年 AA-分别收窄了 4BP、12BP、11BP 和 61BP。 国债收益率震荡走高：年初资金面大幅收紧导致债市收益率整体上行，3 月 两会后，潘行长关于货币政策的表述推动市场修正预期，10 年期国债收益率 进一步升至 1.90%高位。二季度中美关税拉锯，叠加央行降准降息兑现，资 金面整体环比改善，10 年期国债收益率下行至 1.63%-1.67%区间震荡。三季 度"反内卷"政策推升通胀预期，权益走强压制债市，叠加基金费率新规与 债基赎回，债市收益率整体上行；但在央行呵护资金面背景下，短端收益率 较为平稳，债市呈现"熊 ...