7月30日召开的中共中央政治局会议指出，宏观政策要持续发力、适时加力。要落实落细更加积极的财 政政策和适度宽松的货币政策，充分释放政策效应。会议指出，货币政策要保持流动性充裕，促进社会 综合融资成本下行。用好各项结构性货币政策工具，加力支持科技创新、提振消费、小微企业、稳定外 贸等。中信证券首席经济学家明明表示，货币政策"适度宽松"取向不变。相较于4月25日召开的中央政 治局会议，在总量工具方面，本次会议不再提及"适时降准降息"；在降成本目标方面，新增"促进社会 综合融资成本下行"的表述；结构性货币政策工具方面，不再提及"创设新的结构性货币政策工具，设立 新型政策性金融工具"，而是要求"用好各项结构性货币政策工具"，更多聚焦于对现有工具使用的关 注。明明预计，中国人民银行仍将维持稳中偏松的政策取向，总量工具可能仍在政策成效观察期，未来 降准降息的空间和节奏或取决于本轮经济和信用修复进度。(上证报) ...

Summary of Key Points from Conference Call Industry Overview - The conference call primarily discusses the bond market and its current dynamics, including investor sentiment, monetary policy, and fiscal measures in response to trade tensions and economic pressures [1][2][3][4]. Core Insights and Arguments - **Investor Sentiment**: Investors generally hold a bullish outlook on the bond market but are hesitant to make significant investments due to uncertainties surrounding tariff negotiations, economic downturn pressures, and the potential for monetary policy easing [1][2]. - **Policy Expectations**: There is low expectation for significant policy changes from the upcoming Politburo meeting at the end of April, with most investors anticipating a focus on maintaining economic stability and flexibility in policy implementation [1][3][5]. - **Tariff Impact**: Approximately 46% of investors believe that tariff impacts will ease in the third quarter, but overall sentiment regarding the annual outlook for tariff relief remains pessimistic [6][7]. - **Monetary Policy Outlook**: A majority of investors expect a reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cut in the next three months, with a smaller percentage anticipating interest rate cuts. The rationale for RRR cuts includes addressing liquidity gaps and supporting government bond issuance [9][10]. - **Bond Market Predictions**: Investors predict that the 10-year government bond yield will fluctuate between 1.5% and 1.8%, indicating a slight downward adjustment in market expectations [11]. Additional Important Content - **Trade Policy Response**: The policy response to trade tensions includes stabilizing the market, maintaining exchange rate stability, and expanding domestic demand, with a focus on service consumption as a key driver [12][13]. - **Service Consumption Policies**: Recent policies in the service consumption sector include direct subsidies for hospitality, dining, and transportation, with expectations for further financial support to stimulate consumption [14]. - **Real Estate Sector Focus**: Key points of interest in the real estate sector include government attitudes towards market stabilization and the potential for policy shifts regarding property development and financing [15][16]. - **Credit Bond Market Regulation**: Recent regulatory changes in the credit bond market have tightened oversight on local state-owned enterprises, impacting their financing capabilities [24]. - **Local Government Financing**: Local governments, particularly in Guangdong, are actively issuing special bonds to support land reserve projects, with a focus on expediting the issuance process compared to previous years [25][37]. This summary encapsulates the essential insights and data points discussed during the conference call, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of the bond market and related economic policies.

Report Industry Investment Rating No information is provided in the content regarding the report's industry investment rating. Core Views of the Report - Interest rate swap curve inversions are mainly caused by economic fundamentals and capital price/liquidity factors, and in most cases, they can predict central bank reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts, especially when reflecting market expectations of economic downturn and policy easing [2][67][68]. - The end of interest rate swap inversions usually means changes in the driving factors, which can be due to improved economic fundamentals, alleviated capital tightness, or implemented monetary policies. However, the monetary easing cycle may not stop immediately after the inversion ends [5][69]. - Interest rate swap inversions are not a necessary condition for monetary easing, which may be related to the central bank's control over inter - bank repo rates and the steeper yield curve after de - leveraging [6][70]. - When an interest rate swap curve inversion occurs, especially accompanied by weak economic fundamentals, it is a strong signal of future monetary policy easing. Investors and policymakers can use this signal to make decisions [7]. Summary by Directory I. Interest Rate Swap Curve Historical Inversion Situation Review - **2011 Inversion**: Occurred in August. On August 19, 5Y - 1Y/2Y - 1Y spreads turned negative. The deepest negative spreads of 5Y - 1Y and 2Y - 1Y were - 55.63bp and - 34.93bp respectively on September 6, 2011. High inflation in 2011 led to a tight monetary policy at first, but with inflation and economic growth down in Q3, long - term bond and IRS rates dropped rapidly under the expectation of monetary easing. The central bank cut the reserve requirement ratio in November [14][16]. - **2012 Inversion**: Had two rounds. The first was from the beginning of 2012 to mid - May, caused by capital rate fluctuations and easing expectations. The second was from July 11 to October 12, caused by reserve requirement ratio cut expectations due to weakening fundamentals. The end of the second inversion was related to the improvement of economic fundamentals [25][26][30]. - **2013 Inversion**: Concentrated in June. Due to tightened capital caused by factors like decreased foreign exchange inflows and the central bank's tight policy stance, it reached the extreme on June 20. The inversion ended after the central bank provided liquidity support on June 25 [36][38][39]. - **2015 Inversion**: Initially occurred at the end of 2014 and concentrated from late January to the end of March. It was caused by capital fluctuations and tightness during the New Year period and the stock market's "bull market". The inversion ended as capital prices dropped rapidly [43][44][51]. II. Whether the Interest Rate Swap Curve Can Predict Interest Rate Cuts - **2011**: The inversion predicted the central bank's reserve requirement ratio cut and interest rate cut, and foreshadowed a monetary easing cycle [54]. - **2012**: The first inversion accurately predicted reserve requirement ratio cuts, and the second predicted interest rate cuts [55]. - **2013**: The inversion did not predict reserve requirement ratio cuts or interest rate cuts due to the "cash crunch" [56]. - **2015**: The inversion predicted subsequent reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts. The end of the inversion did not mean the end of monetary easing [57][59]. III. Summary - **Reasons and Characteristics of Interest Rate Swap Curve Inversion**: Mainly caused by economic fundamentals (such as economic slowdown and inflation decline) and capital price/liquidity factors (such as capital tightness) [67]. - **Prediction Effect of Interest Rate Swap Curve on Reserve Requirement Ratio Cuts and Interest Rate Cuts**: In most cases, it can predict reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts, especially when reflecting economic downturn and policy easing expectations. It may lead the monetary easing cycle [68]. - **Meaning of the End of Interest Rate Swap Inversion**: It usually means changes in the driving factors, including improved economic fundamentals, alleviated capital tightness, or implemented monetary policies [69]. - **Interest Rate Swap Inversion Is Not a Necessary Condition for Monetary Easing**: This may be related to the central bank's control over inter - bank repo rates and the steeper yield curve after de - leveraging [70]. - **How to Use the Swap Inversion Signal**: When an inversion occurs, especially with weak economic fundamentals, it signals future monetary policy easing. Investors and policymakers can use it as a reference [71].

Core Viewpoint - The central bank will continue to implement a 400 billion MLF operation, indicating a supportive monetary policy environment despite low probabilities for rate cuts or reserve requirement ratio reductions in the short term [1] Group 1: Monetary Policy Actions - The central bank announced a 400 billion yuan MLF operation on July 25, with a one-year term, marking the fifth consecutive month of increased operations [1] - This operation results in a net injection of 1000 billion yuan, as the MLF maturity for the month is 3000 billion yuan [1] Group 2: Economic Analysis - According to Wang Qing, chief macro analyst at Dongfang Jincheng, the sustained net liquidity injection is driven by two main factors: the rapid issuance of government bonds and accelerated credit investment, necessitating coordination between monetary and fiscal policies [1] - The central bank's continued use of quantity-based tools signals a supportive monetary policy stance, aiming to stabilize market expectations and create a favorable environment for credit expansion [1] Group 3: Future Outlook - Wang Qing anticipates that the probability of rate cuts or reserve requirement ratio reductions in the short term is low, but monetary policy will remain proactive under the overarching goal of expanding domestic demand and stabilizing growth [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese economy is projected to face increasing pressure on demand due to tariffs, real estate challenges, and limited fiscal capacity, necessitating stronger counter-cyclical policies in the second half of 2025 [1][3]. Economic Growth Contributions - In the first half of the year, final consumption expenditure contributed 52% to GDP growth, capital formation contributed 16.8%, and net exports contributed 31.2% [2]. - The contribution of final consumption expenditure slightly increased to 52.3% in the second quarter, indicating that domestic demand, particularly consumption, is the main driver of GDP growth [2]. Fiscal and Monetary Policy - The focus for the second half of the year will be on reducing reserve requirements and interest rates, expanding domestic demand, and supporting a recovery in the real estate market [3][4]. - The report suggests utilizing public budget funds and considering the issuance of an additional 2.3 trillion yuan in government bonds to meet fiscal spending targets [3]. Consumer Promotion Strategies - There is an urgent need to promote consumption as the U.S. global tariffs may negatively impact Chinese exports, potentially leading to a shift from positive to negative net export contributions [5]. - Proposed measures to boost consumption include issuing long-term special bonds and increasing support for trade-in programs, with a broader scope to include general consumer goods and services [5]. Real Estate Market Recovery - To facilitate a quicker recovery in the real estate market, both demand and supply sides need to be addressed, including potential measures such as relaxing purchase restrictions and providing subsidies for low-income homebuyers [5].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the report indicates that the AI Fund Donghai Qiyuan Tianyi 6-Month Holding Mixed Initiated A (023244) reported a profit of 273,700 yuan in the second quarter of 2025, with a weighted average profit per fund share of 0.0269 yuan [3] - The fund's net value growth rate for the reporting period was 2.73%, and as of the end of the second quarter, the fund size was 10.5 million yuan [3] - As of July 21, the unit net value was 1.023 yuan, with the fund manager being Xing Ye and Qu Miao, who currently manage five funds [3] Group 2 - The fund's investment strategy focuses on timely allocation of bond assets, selective allocation and trading of convertible bonds and equity assets, aiming to create long-term stable returns for investors [4] - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the fund's top ten holdings included Shandong Expressway, Anhui Expressway, Ninghu Expressway, Guangdong Expressway A, Newao Co., Ltd., Shougang Environmental Protection, Beidahuang, Yangtze Power, Sinopec, and China Unicom [4]

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has maintained the Loan Prime Rate (LPR) unchanged at 3.00% for one year and 3.50% for five years, indicating a cautious approach to monetary policy amid stable economic conditions and external uncertainties [1][2]. Group 1: LPR and Monetary Policy - The LPR has remained stable for two consecutive months after a reduction of 10 basis points in May, reflecting a period of observation for the effects of previous monetary easing measures [1][2]. - The stability of the LPR is attributed to the unchanged 7-day reverse repurchase rate, which has become the new pricing anchor for LPR [2][4]. - The commercial banks are currently facing low net interest margins, which diminishes their motivation to lower the LPR further [2][5]. Group 2: Economic Indicators - China's GDP growth in Q2 was 5.2% year-on-year, contributing to a cumulative growth of 5.3% in the first half of the year, which supports the stability of monetary policy [2][6]. - The average interest rate for new corporate loans in the first half of the year was approximately 3.3%, down about 45 basis points year-on-year, while the average rate for new personal housing loans was around 3.1%, down about 60 basis points [6][10]. Group 3: Future Outlook - Analysts suggest that there is still potential for LPR adjustments in the second half of the year, particularly if external economic conditions remain uncertain and domestic demand needs to be stimulated [9][10]. - The likelihood of further interest rate cuts and LPR adjustments is anticipated towards the end of Q3 or Q4, as the PBOC aims to balance supporting the real economy while maintaining the health of the banking system [11][12].

短期降准降息概率下降 中信证券首席经济学家明明告诉记者，5月降息降准等宽货币工具落地后，总量政策工具进入成效观察 期，在脱离逆回购利率引导的环境下，商业银行主动压降LPR和政策利率加点的动力不足。具体来看， 7月是缴税大月，且存在一定流动性缺口，尽管央行买断式逆回购维持净投放，但7月来存单利率仍有小 幅上行，负债压力相较于6月并未出现大幅改善的迹象。结合息差压力，商业银行主动压降LPR对逆回 购利率加点的动力不足。 值得注意的是， 6月27日，央行发布2025年二季度货币政策委员会例会通稿，在货币政策思路上，提 出"根据国内外经济金融形势和金融市场运行情况，灵活把握政策实施的力度和节奏"，相比一季度例会 删去了"择机降准降息"的表述，对此，市场认为由于经济形势向好，短期降准降息的概率下降。 7月14日，央行副行长邹澜在国新办新闻发布会上表示，从经济理论和实践经验看，货币政策的传导是 需要时间的，已经实施的货币政策的效果还会进一步显现。下阶段，人民银行将继续实施好适度宽松的 货币政策，密切关注评估前期已实施政策的传导情况和实际效果，根据国内外经济金融形势和金融市场 运行情况，把握好政策实施的力度和节奏，更好地推 ...

截至7月18日，东方红智逸沪港深定开混合近三个月复权单位净值增长率为5.46%，位于同类可比基金59/630；近半年复权单位净值增长率为5.58%，位于同 类可比基金85/630；近一年复权单位净值增长率为12.43%，位于同类可比基金58/630；近三年复权单位净值增长率为5.18%，位于同类可比基金309/552。 通过所选区间该基金净值增长率分位图，可以观察该基金与同类基金业绩比较情况。图为坐标原点到区间内某时点的净值增长率在同类基金中的分位数。 AI基金东方红智逸沪港深定开混合（004278）披露2025年二季报，第二季度基金利润407.99万元，加权平均基金份额本期利润0.0057元。报告期内，基金净 值增长率为0.76%，截至二季度末，基金规模为7.67亿元。 该基金属于偏债混合型基金。截至7月18日，单位净值为1.443元。基金经理是纪文静，目前管理9只基金。其中，截至7月18日，东方红智逸沪港深定开混合 近一年复权单位净值增长率最高，达12.43%；东方红稳添利纯债A最低，为2.82%。 基金管理人在二季报中表示，展望三季度，政府债发行节奏前置或带来后期供给压力减轻，银行体系的流动性有望好转； ...

Core Viewpoint - The Loan Prime Rate (LPR) remains unchanged for both the 1-year and 5-year terms, reflecting stable macroeconomic conditions and market expectations [1][2] Group 1: LPR and Monetary Policy - The 1-year LPR is set at 3.00% and the 5-year LPR at 3.50%, both unchanged from the previous month [1] - The stability in LPR follows a 0.1 percentage point reduction in May, with the 7-day reverse repurchase rate also remaining constant [1] - Analysts suggest that the current economic environment does not necessitate a reduction in LPR, given the stable macroeconomic indicators [1][4] Group 2: Future Expectations - There is potential for LPR to be lowered in the second half of the year, particularly in response to external uncertainties and the need to stimulate domestic demand [1][4] - The next LPR adjustment is anticipated around early Q4, with a possible reduction of up to 0.2 percentage points [4] - The central bank is expected to continue using monetary policy tools such as reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate reductions to support economic growth [4] Group 3: Real Estate Market - The central bank's recent reduction of the public housing loan rate by 0.25 percentage points may facilitate further decreases in commercial mortgage rates [2] - Regulatory measures may be implemented to specifically guide the 5-year LPR downwards, aiming to significantly lower residential mortgage rates [2]