我们不能将这仅仅视为个体问题。债务违约的背后，是对整个社会诚信体系的挑战，更是对国家信用的严峻考验。中国必须站出来告诉世界：任何逃避责 任的行为，都不会没有代价。这不仅是一场债务追讨，更是一场捍卫中国经济主权和社会公正的战斗。 债务问题从来都是经济发展的警钟，但当一个国家被拖入65000万亿债务的漩涡时，这不再只是经济问题，而是一次对社会责任和国家信誉的拷问。据统 计，这位被称为"全球最大老赖"的债务人，已经让每个中国人平摊了约4600元的负担。而更令人愤慨的是，这笔天文数字的债务不仅悬而未解，债务人更 是丝毫没有解决问题的意愿。这不仅是一种失信行为，更像是一次明目张胆的挑衅。 65000万亿是什么概念？这已经超过了许多国家一年的GDP总量，甚至几乎相当于中国一年的经济总产出。如果这笔债务属实，那它不仅是一颗压在中国 经济体系上的"定时炸弹"，更是全球经济史上前所未有的巨大黑洞。未偿贷款、企业账款、投资者的血汗钱……这一巨额债务的背后，承载了无数人的期 待与信任。它像是一张无底的"黑洞账单"，吞噬着金融秩序的稳定，也撼动着社会的公平底线。 然而，比数字更令人愤怒的，是债务人那种近乎无赖的态度。他们的行为就像一 ...

（原标题：多名国际组织代表出席科特迪瓦企业总联合会召开的科2025年私营领域经济论坛） 阿比让门户网9月29日报道，科特迪瓦2025年私营领域经济论坛于9月29日在阿比让召开，此次会议 名为"CGECI Academy"，由科企业总联合会（CGECI）负责举办，主题为"经济主权、行动时刻"。科总 理芒贝、财政部长阿达玛、贸工部长迪亚拉苏巴等科多名部长，CGECI主席西斯、摩洛哥投资事务部长 卡瑞姆、非洲开发银行新任行长塔赫、法语国家国际组织秘书长路易丝、国际金融公司非洲事务副总裁 塔法拉先生等政、经界知名人士约两千余人出席本次活动。此次活动为期两天，将围绕融资、工业化、 创新、能源、农产品加工、健康、自然资源及人力资源等众多议题开展分论坛研讨。 ...

中国商务部9月25日发布公告，决定自当天起对墨西哥相关涉华限制措施启动贸易投资壁垒调查。 根据公告，本案的被调查措施为：墨西哥政府拟对中国等非自贸伙伴的产品提高进口关税税率的相关措施。此外，墨西哥近年来采取的 其他涉及中国的贸易投资限制措施也在本次调查范围内。 商务部新闻发言人表示，中方认为，在当前美方滥施关税的背景下，各国应共同反对各种形式的单边主义和保护主义，绝不能因为他人 胁迫而牺牲第三方利益。墨方单边加税举动一旦落地，即便是在世贸框架内，也会损害包括中国在内的相关贸易伙伴的利益，还会严重 影响墨营商环境的确定性，降低企业对墨投资的信心，中方对此坚决反对。 墨西哥政府9月10日向国会提交关税提案，拟对来自中国及其他与墨方没有自由贸易协定的国家的进口商品加征最高达50%的关税，其中 既包括汽车及零部件、钢铁、纺织品等大宗商品，也包括日用品、鞋履服饰、玩具、家电等消费品。 当前，该关税提案仍处于审议阶段，需要议院批准才能生效。如果获批，相关措施预计最早于2026年12月31日前全面生效，但具体以何 种形式落地暂无定数。对中国出海企业来说，这一举措引发广泛讨论和担忧。中国商务部此前回应称，这么做将降低中国企业 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the challenges faced by South Korean President Lee Jae-myung in navigating the complex dynamics of U.S.-China relations, particularly under pressure from the U.S. following trade agreements with Japan, Vietnam, and Indonesia [1][3][4] - Lee Jae-myung's refusal to attend China's anti-Japanese war victory commemoration is seen as a response to the tense U.S.-China relationship, indicating the difficulties of maintaining a balanced foreign policy [1][4] - The recent trade agreement between Japan and the U.S., which includes a 15% tariff on U.S. cars and a $550 billion investment from Japan, raises concerns in South Korea about potential punitive measures from the U.S. against Korean automotive exports [3][4] Group 2 - The cancellation of a scheduled meeting between South Korean officials and U.S. Treasury Secretary, attributed to the latter's busy schedule, is interpreted as a strategic move by Trump to gain leverage in negotiations with South Korea [3] - In response to the pressure, Lee Jae-myung's administration imposed anti-dumping duties on hot-rolled steel from China, perceived as an attempt to curry favor with the U.S. [3] - The article underscores the precarious position of South Korea in international relations, illustrating the challenges faced by smaller nations in the geopolitical tug-of-war between larger powers [4]

Core Viewpoint - Brazilian President Lula condemned the unilateral imposition of a 50% punitive tariff by the United States, labeling it as extortionate pressure in trade negotiations and a serious affront to national sovereignty [1] Group 1: Government Response - Lula emphasized Brazil's commitment to multilateralism and international cooperation, stating that under U.S. policies, "there are no winners" [1] - Brazil plans to utilize all legal avenues, including filing a dispute with the WTO and implementing reciprocal measures under the Trade Reciprocity Act [1] - The Brazilian government will collaborate with industry, civil organizations, and unions to protect national interests and economic sovereignty [1] Group 2: Timeline of Events - Since the announcement of the 50% tariff by Trump on July 9, Lula has reiterated intentions for reciprocal retaliation on July 9 and 10 [1] - The Brazilian Foreign Ministry summoned the U.S. chargé d'affaires on July 9 and 11 to express strong dissatisfaction [1] - On July 15, Lula signed a presidential decree to formally initiate countermeasures based on the Trade Reciprocity Act, authorizing the government to draft additional tariffs and retaliatory measures [1]

Group 1 - Australia's Trade Minister Farrell emphasized the importance of China as a trading partner, stating that China is ten times more valuable than the U.S. in terms of trade, marking a significant shift from previous policies that favored the U.S. [1][3] - In the 2023-2024 fiscal year, Australia's exports to China reached AUD 210 billion, accounting for 38% of total exports, while exports to the U.S. were only AUD 37 billion, representing less than 7% [3][4] - The previous Morrison government adopted a confrontational stance towards China, which resulted in severe economic repercussions, including a 97% drop in wine exports to China due to high tariffs [3][4] Group 2 - Australia is seeking to balance its economic relations between China and the U.S., participating in trade agreements like RCEP while maintaining military alliances with the U.S. [4][6] - The shift in Australia's strategy reflects a broader trend among U.S. allies reassessing the costs and benefits of aligning with U.S. policies against China, as seen in the economic impacts on the EU and Canada [6][7] - The global trade landscape is evolving, with China emerging as a key partner for many countries, prompting Australia to view its relationship with China as essential for economic stability [6][9] Group 3 - Future developments may include Australia implementing a "dual-track strategy" to diversify its trade markets while maintaining key exports to China [9][11] - The potential fragmentation of U.S. alliances could increase if the U.S. fails to provide substantial economic incentives, leading countries like the EU and Japan to seek closer ties with China [9][11] - China may leverage its growing influence to propose reforms in global trade rules, challenging the existing U.S.-led trade framework [9][11]