特朗普上台以后，经常在社交媒体上「炮轰」美联储和鲍威尔，咄咄逼人的态势有时候甚至比对中国都强横。 为啥呢？为什么特朗普一直在刀口向内呢？核心就一个词：降息。 那今天我们不拽什么术语，就一篇文章给你讲清楚，美国利率到底意味着什么，降息对咱们国家是好是坏。 大家应该都知道，美国没有央行的概念，美联储理论上说是个私人机构。 所以美国总统有时候没办法直接干预美国利率，但特朗普有自己的办法。 骂鲍威尔是太迟先生（Mr. Too Late），称其决策"混乱且危险"，甚至威胁"越早走人越好"，这一切行为都是想通过把鲍威尔钉在历史罪人的耻辱柱上，来 逼迫美联储降息。 为啥呢？ 7月特朗普发了一个文，说美国利率至少偏高2个百分点，每个百分点每年造成3600亿美元成本。 这话到底有没有科学依据不重要，重要的是，特朗普点出了一个关键点，就是美国利率意味着经济成本。 道理很简单，利率高大家就喜欢存钱，不论是老百姓还是各种机构，都喜欢囤起来，安安稳稳的赚利息就好。 那市面上的钱就少了，对应的，融资成本也就高了（借钱的利率也就贵了嘛）。 举个例子，美国政府也借钱，也就是咱们常说的美国赤字。 那政府借钱，也是要还利息的。 2024年美国国 ...

"We're in an asset bubble, and TQI can help you navigate it profitably"I am Ahan Vashi, a seasoned investor with professional background in equity research, private equity, and software engineering. I currently serve as the Chief Financial Engineer at The Quantamental Investor, a community pursuing financial freedom through bold, active investing with proactive risk management.TQI was established in July 2022 with a singular mission to make investing simple, fun, and profitable for all investors. In alignme ...

Core Viewpoint - The market is being pushed towards a "larger bubble" characterized by increased retail participation, abundant liquidity, and heightened volatility due to the combined effects of the Trump administration's policy shift, global central bank easing, and financial deregulation [1][12][15] Group 1: Policy Shift and Debt Pressure - The Trump administration's focus has shifted from fiscal detoxification to aggressive spending, as it struggles to cut government expenditures amounting to $7.1 trillion [2] - Hartnett's analysis indicates that the federal funds rate must remain below 3% for the annual interest payments of approximately $1 trillion to stabilize, explaining the pressure on the Federal Reserve to lower rates [3] Group 2: Market Performance and Divergence - Global bank stocks have surged, with European bank stocks rising by 62%, UK and Japanese banks by 37% and 24% respectively, while U.S. bank stocks increased by 17% [4] - Despite the strong performance of the S&P 500, there is a notable divergence between Wall Street and Main Street, as Trump's approval ratings have dropped close to their April lows [6] - Technology stocks, associated with billionaire investors, have risen by 71% since the election, while small-cap stocks, sensitive to interest rates, have declined by 1% this year [8] Group 3: Market Indicators and Signals - Although market sentiment is high, several indicators are approaching warning levels, with the "bull-bear indicator" rising from 6.3 to 6.4, the highest since the November 2024 elections, yet still below the 8.0 sell signal threshold [10] - Currently, only one of Bank of America's sell rules has been triggered, indicating that cash levels among fund managers are below 4%, while other key indicators have not yet reached sell signal levels [11] Group 4: Easing and Deregulation - The current asset bubble is being fueled by global easing policies and financial deregulation, with central banks like the Fed and the Bank of England having cut rates by 100 basis points in the past year [12][14] - The Trump administration plans to allow retail investors to include private equity in their 401(k) plans and is significantly reducing margin requirements for day trading, which could further increase retail participation [14][15] - The trading volume of "zero-day options" has surged, accounting for over 60% of the total options volume on the S&P 500 in the third quarter, contributing to the formation of an unprecedented market bubble driven by retail investors [15]

Core Viewpoint - The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India stated that there are no signs of asset bubbles in the market [1] Group 1 - The central bank emphasizes the stability of the financial system and reassures investors regarding the absence of asset bubbles [1] - The statement aims to bolster confidence among market participants and mitigate concerns about potential overvaluation in various asset classes [1]

Core Viewpoint - The European Central Bank (ECB) is likely to prefer providing liquidity tools linked to loans to commercial banks rather than large-scale bond purchases (QE) in response to future economic challenges [1][4]. Group 1: ECB's Preferred Tools - Economists surveyed believe that in cases of weak inflation, economic slowdown, or financial instability, the ECB will prioritize liquidity injections through Long-Term Refinancing Operations (LTRO) [1]. - The ECB may only resort to targeted asset purchase programs if interest rate signals fail to transmit effectively within the Eurozone [1]. Group 2: Concerns Over QE - ECB decision-makers have reservations about the QE policy implemented from 2015 to 2022, especially given the historical losses faced by central banks like the Bundesbank due to rising interest rates [4]. - The Bundesbank has projected a loss of nearly €20 billion (approximately $23 billion) in 2024, marking its first annual loss since the 1970s, which raises concerns about the risks associated with large-scale bond purchases [4]. Group 3: Policy Framework Evaluation - The ECB has retained all policy tools, including QE, but has not specified the conditions under which each tool would be favored [5]. - ECB officials have differing opinions on preferred policy tools, with some favoring direct long-term bond purchases while others prefer LTROs and unutilized targeted asset purchase plans [5][6]. Group 4: Risks and Credibility - The Bundesbank emphasizes caution regarding QE due to the significant risk of losses during crises [6]. - ECB Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel warns that losses could undermine the ECB's credibility, suggesting that loan support mechanisms may be more effective for restoring credit supply and easier to exit [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rapid decline in the auction price of Labubu collectibles and the corresponding drop in the stock price of Pop Mart, highlighting a potential manipulation of market sentiment by major shareholders [3][6][7][8]. Group 1: Price Fluctuations - Labubu's auction price fell from 580,000 yuan to 230,000 yuan within two weeks, indicating a significant market correction [3][6]. - Pop Mart's stock price reached a historical high of 262 HKD per share on June 10, 2024, before dropping to a low of 230 HKD by June 23, 2024 [7][8]. Group 2: Shareholder Actions - Major shareholders of Pop Mart began to sell off their shares, totaling over 3.3 billion HKD, around the same time Labubu gained popularity [9][11]. - In May 2024, during a peak in market enthusiasm for Labubu, early shareholders sold 11.91 million shares for 2.267 billion HKD [11][13]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The article draws parallels between Labubu's rise and historical market bubbles, suggesting that the current situation reflects a cycle of speculation and subsequent market correction [24][26][28]. - The concept of "emotional value" is explored, indicating that while consumers believe in the value of these collectibles, major stakeholders are more focused on tangible value [19][21][27]. Group 4: Marketing Strategies - Pop Mart's marketing strategies, including limited releases and scarcity tactics, have contributed to the perceived value of Labubu, but these strategies may also lead to market instability [35][36]. - The article suggests that the company's actions have inadvertently fueled a secondary market for Labubu, leading to inflated prices and eventual crashes [35][36].

Core Insights - The S&P 500 index is approaching the 6000-point mark while the 10-year Treasury yield remains high, prompting warnings from Bank of America’s Chief Investment Officer Michael Hartnett about potential market movements based on three key indicators: broker stocks, bank stocks, and Bitcoin [1][11] - A bearish signal will be indicated if these three assets form a double top pattern, while a clean upward breakout would suggest a bullish outlook [1] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The recent performance of the S&P 500 index in May saw a 6% increase, marking its best monthly performance since 1990 [1] - In contrast, the dollar is struggling to gain traction, leading to speculation about a potential bear market for the dollar [2] Group 2: Economic Indicators - A weak dollar is seen as a tool to revitalize U.S. manufacturing, which currently accounts for only 8% of U.S. jobs, potentially leading to a bear market for the dollar and boosting gold, emerging markets, and international assets [3] Group 3: Investment Strategies - Investors are positioning themselves for potential market shifts, with bearish investors favoring defensive sectors like healthcare, consumer staples, and utilities, which currently represent only 18% of the S&P 500, the lowest since 2000 [5] - Bullish investors are employing a barbell strategy by going long on the "Tech Seven" and value stocks in other regions to hedge against potential bubbles in the U.S. market and risks from excessive EU fiscal spending [7] Group 4: Fund Flows - Recent fund flow data indicates a divergence in market sentiment, with cryptocurrencies seeing an inflow of $2.6 billion, the largest weekly inflow since January [9] - Other notable fund flows include $1.8 billion into gold, with an annualized inflow reaching a record $75 billion, and $2.8 billion into emerging market bonds, marking the largest inflow since January 2023 [9] Group 5: Valuation Concerns - The Tech Seven stocks have seen a resurgence, with their price-to-earnings ratio returning to 42 times, suggesting a potential 30% upside based on historical bubble patterns [10] - Historically, 12 out of the last 14 asset bubbles were accompanied by rising bond yields, with the current 30-year real yield nearing 3%, the highest since November 2008, indicating the presence of a bubble [11]

Core Viewpoint - The performance of U.S. stocks and risk assets is closely tied to three key indicators: broker stocks, bank stocks, and Bitcoin, which will serve as signals for market direction [1][10]. Group 1: Market Indicators - Broker stocks, bank stocks, and Bitcoin are identified as the best indicators for market trends, with a double top pattern signaling a bearish outlook and a clean upward breakout indicating a bullish outlook [1]. - The S&P 500 index recorded its best May performance since 1990, surging 6%, while the 30-year Treasury bond saw an increase following recommendations to invest in "humiliated" assets [1][10]. Group 2: Dollar and Economic Sentiment - In contrast to the rally in risk assets, the dollar is struggling to gain traction, leading to speculation about a potential bear market for the dollar [3]. - The weak dollar is viewed as a tool to revitalize U.S. manufacturing, which currently accounts for only 8% of U.S. jobs, potentially leading to a bear market for the dollar and a bull market for gold, emerging markets, and international assets [6]. Group 3: Investment Strategies - Bearish investors are positioning themselves defensively by allocating to healthcare, consumer staples, and utility stocks, which currently represent only 18% of the S&P 500, the lowest level since 2000 [5]. - Bullish investors are employing a barbell strategy by going long on the "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks and value stocks from other regions to hedge against potential market bubbles and risks from excessive EU fiscal spending [8]. Group 4: Fund Flows and Market Dynamics - Recent fund flow data indicates a divergence in market sentiment, with cryptocurrencies seeing a significant inflow of $2.6 billion, the largest weekly inflow since January [10]. - Despite the bullish outlook for the "Magnificent Seven," historical data suggests that market bubbles typically peak at a P/E ratio of 58x and a 244% increase, indicating that there may still be 30% upside potential [10]. Group 5: Historical Context - The current market environment is reminiscent of past asset bubbles, with 12 out of the last 14 bubbles accompanied by rising bond yields, and the 30-year real interest rate nearing its highest level since November 2008 [11].