以下文章来源于申万宏源证券上海分公司 ，作者李金玲 申万宏源证券上海分公司 . 申万宏源证券上海分公司官微，能为您提供账户开立、软件下载、研究所及投顾资讯等综合服务，为您的财富保驾护航。 目前市场主要宽基指数PE估值（TTM）均高于20%。上证50、上证指数、北证50、中证A100和科创50的PE估值（TTM）分别处于上市 85.14%、86.99%、95.00%、98.35%和99.63%的分位水平，估值分位相对较高，应注意风险。 行业方面： 当前申万一级行业指数中食品饮料和农林牧渔的PE估值（TTM）低于近十年20%分位水平，PE（TTM）估值分别处于近十年6.98%和 8.81%的分位水平，可作为重点关注。 建筑材料、传媒、钢铁、电子、商贸零售、计算机和房地产的行业PE估值（TTM）分别处于近十年历史80.20%、80.20%、82.42%、 85.30%、85.38%、98.07%和99.96%分位水平，应注意投资风险。 数据速看： 1、巴菲特指标： 当前A股巴菲特指标为83.15%%，处于相对较高区间，略高于安全区间。 2、估值历史百分位水平： 宽基指数方面： ' MET 重点关注指数估值表现 1、 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article provides an analysis of the current valuation levels of the A-share market, indicating that while some indices are at relatively high valuation percentiles, certain sectors like food and beverage, and agriculture are at lower valuation levels, presenting potential investment opportunities [7][8][9]. Valuation Indicators - The current Buffett Indicator for the A-share market is at 79.80%, which is considered to be in a relatively safe zone [7][22]. - Major broad market indices have a TTM PE valuation above 20%, with specific indices like the Shanghai 50 and the ChiNext 50 at high percentiles of 81.06% and 99.26% respectively, indicating higher valuation risks [8][9]. Sector Analysis - The food and beverage and agriculture sectors have TTM PE, PB, and PS valuations below the 20th percentile of the past decade, with PE valuations at 5.60% and 6.94% percentiles, suggesting they are undervalued and warrant attention [9]. - Conversely, sectors such as steel, retail, computing, and real estate have TTM PE valuations at 82.30%, 84.03%, 97.04%, and 98.48% percentiles respectively, indicating higher investment risks [9]. Index Valuation Performance - The current PE valuation levels for key indices show significant variations, with the ChiNext 50 at 143.37 (up 2.59%) and the North Star 50 at 66.36 (down 1.33%) [13][27]. - The PB valuation levels for these indices also reflect similar trends, with the ChiNext 50 at 4.79 (up 2.92%) and the North Star 50 at 4.95 (down 1.15%) [15][29]. Overall Market Valuation - The total market capitalization for the Shanghai market is approximately 566,557.35 billion, with an average PE ratio of 14.54 [19][26]. - The Shenzhen market has a total market capitalization of about 535,098.03 billion, with an average PE ratio of 26.93 [19][26]. Industry Valuation Levels - The agriculture sector has a PE valuation of 14.95, while the steel sector is at a low of 5.69, indicating significant valuation disparities across industries [34]. - The food and beverage sector shows a PE valuation of 16.52, which is relatively moderate compared to other sectors [34]. Conclusion - The analysis indicates that while the overall market shows high valuations in certain indices, specific sectors like food and beverage and agriculture present potential investment opportunities due to their lower valuation levels [9][34].

Core Viewpoint - The company experienced a significant decline in performance due to a one-time provision for expected credit losses of HKD 498 million, leading to a year-on-year drop in net profit by 29.9% in FY2025 [1] Group 1: Financial Performance - In FY2025, the company reported revenue of HKD 11.656 billion, a decrease of 9.4% year-on-year, and a net profit of HKD 1.075 billion, down 29.9% year-on-year [1] - The one-time provision for other receivables resulted in an expected credit loss of HKD 498 million, significantly impacting the company's year-on-year performance [1] Group 2: Business Segments - In the water supply segment, urban water supply revenue was HKD 7.498 billion, a decrease of 9.4%, while the segment profit was HKD 2.493 billion, an increase of 0.1% [2] - The operating income in the water supply segment grew by 6.5% to HKD 3.526 billion, while construction services declined by 27.9% to HKD 2.833 billion [2] - In the direct drinking water business, operating services increased by 7.2% to HKD 315 million, but construction services fell by 82.8% to HKD 220 million [2] Group 3: Cash Flow and Dividends - A turning point in free cash flow is expected in FY2025, with capital expenditures dropping to approximately HKD 3.4 billion from a historical high of HKD 5.3 billion in FY2024 [3] - The total dividend for FY2025 is maintained at HKD 457 million, consistent with FY2024, with a dividend payout ratio of 42.53% [3] - With the continuous improvement in free cash flow, there is significant potential for an increase in dividends [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for a valuation shift in the private higher education industry from PE (Price to Earnings) to EV/EBITDA (Enterprise Value to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) to better reflect the true value of companies like China Chunlai [1][3][12]. Valuation Methodology - The PE ratio is calculated as PE = Market Value / Net Profit, reflecting the price investors are willing to pay for each unit of net profit [4]. - EV/EBITDA includes two key concepts: Enterprise Value (EV), which reflects the total cost of acquiring a company, and EBITDA, which indicates the core operating cash flow of a business [6][7]. Industry Context - The private higher education sector has been rapidly developing and consolidating, with frequent mergers and acquisitions, making EV/EBITDA a more suitable valuation method to assess potential synergies and integration value [8]. Company Case Study: China Chunlai - China Chunlai has seen its total assets grow from 3.754 billion to 7.254 billion from 2020 to 2024, indicating significant investment in asset expansion to support business growth [8]. - The company is expanding its campuses and increasing enrollment through acquisitions, reflecting a heavy investment in fixed assets [8]. Valuation Comparison - China Chunlai's EV/EBITDA ratio is significantly lower than the industry average, with a current ratio of 6.2 compared to the Hong Kong education sector median of 8.2 and A-share average of 21 [11][12]. Investment Highlights - High EBITDA margins indicate strong profitability, with China Chunlai achieving an EBITDA margin exceeding 50% in FY2024 [14]. - The company has demonstrated stable cash flows, with net cash flows from operating activities ranging from 742 million to 1.074 billion from 2021 to 2024, supporting ongoing investments and financial health [15][16]. - Cost reduction and efficiency improvements are being driven by increased enrollment and optimized resource allocation, enhancing market competitiveness and revenue potential [17]. Growth Potential - The company is leveraging past acquisition experiences to enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs through resource integration [18]. - The current market environment, with increasing foreign investment in Chinese assets, presents favorable conditions for China Chunlai to unlock hidden value [19][22]. Conclusion - The shift from PE to EV/EBITDA valuation reflects a broader market recognition of the stable cash flow and asset-heavy nature of the private higher education sector, providing a new perspective for valuing companies like China Chunlai [23].

以下文章来源于申万宏源证券上海分公司 ，作者李金玲 申万宏源证券上海分公司 . 当前A股巴菲特指标为71.82%，处于相对较高区间，目前处于安全区间。 申万宏源证券上海分公司官微，能为您提供账户开立、软件下载、研究所及投顾资讯等综合服务，为您的财富保驾护航。 2、估值历史百分位水平： 数据速看： 1、巴菲特指标： 1、重点关注指数PE估值水平 重点关注指数PE估值水平 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 中证500 15.58 · - . 83.24 27.36 (↓3.97%) 科创50 29.71 · -A. 117.18 99.77 (↓0.12%) 18.94 .- 中证1000 - ● 144.82 36.37 (↓4.55%) 半导体 - ▲ . 219.12 33.21 · 112.9 (↓1.67%) 中证新能 11.21 · t . . 111.57 32.04 (↓9.86%) -- ▲. 69.26 15.36 · 北证50 63.82 (↑3.94%) 宽基指数方面： 目前市场主要宽基指数中创业板和中小100指数的PE估值（TTM）低 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report emphasizes that a single factor is insufficient for long-term success in industry comparisons, advocating for a comprehensive evaluation that incorporates multiple factors, particularly focusing on valuation metrics [3]. Valuation Analysis - Directly using valuation for industry comparisons yields poor results, as the absolute value perspective shows that valuation has an insignificant impact on stock prices. Historical data indicates that both PE and PB valuations have unstable influences on industry stock prices [4]. - Standardizing valuations improves the effectiveness of comparisons, yet the results remain inconsistent. Different industries have unique characteristics and developmental stages, making absolute valuation comparisons potentially misleading [4]. Market Sentiment Impact - The effectiveness of valuation improves significantly when combined with market sentiment. High or low valuation factors struggle to maintain consistent performance, as short-term stock performance is often influenced by marginal changes in fundamentals and market events rather than valuation alone [5]. - Market sentiment plays a crucial role in determining investor preferences for high or low valuation stocks. During periods of rising sentiment, investors favor high valuation sectors, while in declining sentiment, they gravitate towards low valuation sectors [5]. Enhanced Distinction with Market Sentiment - When market sentiment is considered, the distinction in industry performance based on absolute valuation improves significantly. Both PE and PB valuations show enhanced differentiation, with a stable upward trend in the performance of various groups [6]. - However, standardized valuation scores do not perform as well when combined with market sentiment, showing less clear differentiation and unstable performance trends [6]. Best Performing Valuation Metric - Among various valuation metrics, PE valuation combined with market sentiment yields the best scoring results. The investment strategy based on PE valuation from January 2013 to February 2025 shows annualized returns of 16.3%, 11.7%, 4.3%, 0.9%, and -4.7% for different groups, with a total annualized return of 20.9% for the long-short portfolio and a Sharpe ratio of 1.08 [7].