国家网信办会同中国证监会深入整治涉资本市场网上虚假不实信息近期，国家网信办会同中国证监会深入整治涉资本市场网上不实信息，依法处置一批炮 制谣言、非法荐股的账号，并通报部分典型案例，包括："八姐无敌"等账号散布涉资本市场监管政策谣言；"财报风云"等账号集纳炒作上市公司和金融机 构不实信息；"财经周末老师"等账号利用AI编造资本市场虚假信息；"爱在深秋-郑老师"等账号炒作股市走势，随意预测涨跌，博取流量；"热点牛股 王"等账号非法推荐股票，谋取利益。 网信部门和证券监管部门提醒广大网民，树立正确投资理念，增强风险防范意识，加强金融信息辨别，不造谣、不传谣、不信谣，共同营造清朗的网络空 间。（国家网信办网站） 政法要闻 每天3分钟，速览天下事 12月20日星期六，农历十一月初一 封面新闻 应勇：17日至19日率最高检调研组在四川调研时强调，要全面提升法律监督质效，推动检察工作高质量发展。（最高检网站） 硬新闻 1、外交部：19日回应美对台军售时表示，无论向台湾出售多少先进武器，都阻挡不了中国终将统一，也必将统一的历史大势。中方将采取一切必要措 施，维护国家主权和领土完整。（外交部网站） 2、国防部：19日回应美11 ...

AI播客：换个方式听新闻 下载mp3 音频由扣子空间生成 欧盟本周将进入一个转折点，因为它正努力证明自己是一股强大的地缘政治力量。 在接下来的几天里，欧盟面临两个至关重要的最后期限：一是在没有华盛顿帮助的情况下资助乌克兰对 抗俄罗斯，二是表明其能够摆脱对日益对抗的美国的供应链依赖，实现多元化，并扩大与南美国家的贸 易。 据熟悉欧盟思路的外交官和官员称，任何一条战线的失败都会在这个危险时刻损害欧盟的声誉，并恰恰 印证美国总统特朗普关于欧洲"软弱"的说法。一位官员表示，在北约秘书长警告过去的世界大战再次成 为现实风险的一周之后，仍有太多人没有意识到当下的严峻性。 乌克兰问题和南美贸易问题都直接关系到欧盟能否在全球发挥领导作用。 随着特朗普政府切断对乌克兰的援助，后者现在只能靠欧洲来防止其被迫接受不平等的和平协议，甚至 被俄罗斯军队占领。与此同时，欧盟与南美国家之间贸易协议已成为一项备受瞩目的测试，检验欧洲能 否兑现承诺，提供除美国之外的可靠替代方案。 乌克兰的财政问题将在本周四达到紧要关头，届时欧盟领导人将齐聚布鲁塞尔，试图为一项提议的对基 辅巨额贷款寻找解决方案。而在本周五之前，欧盟必须完成贸易协议的相关工作， ...

美国最核心的收益，是锁定了非洲腹地的关键矿产命脉。刚果（金）素有"世界原料仓库"之称，其东部蕴藏的钴、锂、铜等矿产，是新能源电池与电子产 业的核心原料。协议签署当天，特朗普便直言美国将与两国签署双边协议，为获取关键矿产开辟通道。事实上，美国早有预谋：刚果（金）曾提出"用矿 产换安全"，而美国借斡旋之机，推动本国企业拿下数十亿美元矿业投资权，28座刚果（金）大型矿山已被美国资本实际控制。这些资源直接填补了美国 新能源产业链的短板，摆脱对外部供应链的依赖。 在地缘博弈中，美国成功卡位非洲大湖区，削弱了中俄影响力。近年来，中俄在非洲的合作不断深化，中国成为非洲最大贸易伙伴，俄罗斯则强化军事合 作。美国借和解协议，将刚卢两国纳入自身战略轨道，通过"洛比托走廊"计划，将刚果（金）矿产直输大西洋彼岸，构建起专属资源通道。同时，美国以 投资和安全承诺为诱饵，让两国在外交上向西方靠拢，瓦解了中俄在非洲的合作基础，稳固了其在撒哈拉以南非洲的战略支点。 2025年12月4日，刚果（金）与卢旺达总统在白宫落笔签字，结束了长达30年的纷争。这场看似造福非洲大湖区的和平协议，实则是美国精心操盘的"利益 收割局"。从关键矿产到地缘布局， ...

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the need for a coherent and focused global engagement strategy for the United States to maintain its status as the world's strongest and most influential nation [3][4][5] - It critiques past U.S. strategies post-Cold War for failing to align with core national interests and for misjudging the American public's willingness to bear global burdens [4][5] - The article highlights the importance of prioritizing core national interests in U.S. foreign policy, focusing on security, economic stability, and the protection of American values [7][10] Group 2 - The article outlines the core objectives of U.S. strategy, including the protection of national sovereignty, economic interests, and the well-being of its citizens [7][8] - It stresses the need for a resilient national infrastructure capable of withstanding various threats, including military attacks and foreign influence [8] - The article advocates for a strong military presence and advanced defense systems to safeguard U.S. interests and deter potential adversaries [8][9] Group 3 - The article discusses the importance of maintaining a robust economy as the foundation of U.S. power, emphasizing the need for a strong industrial base and innovative energy sector [8][9] - It highlights the necessity of protecting intellectual property and fostering technological advancements to sustain economic leadership [9] - The article calls for a focus on re-industrialization and energy independence to bolster economic resilience and reduce reliance on foreign sources [12][18] Group 4 - The article outlines the U.S. approach to foreign relations, advocating for a pragmatic and principle-driven diplomacy that prioritizes American interests [11][13] - It emphasizes the need for burden-sharing among allies and partners, particularly in defense spending and regional security responsibilities [14][15] - The article critiques the past U.S. approach to China, calling for a rebalancing of economic relations to ensure fairness and protect American economic independence [25][26] Group 5 - The article identifies the strategic importance of the Western Hemisphere, advocating for a return to Monroe Doctrine principles to safeguard U.S. interests in the region [16][18] - It discusses the need for a proactive stance against foreign adversaries in the Western Hemisphere, emphasizing cooperation with regional allies to combat illegal immigration and drug trafficking [19][20] - The article highlights the importance of economic partnerships and investment opportunities in the region to strengthen U.S. influence and counter external threats [22][23]

Core Viewpoint - The new U.S. National Security Strategy portrays Europe, rather than Russia, as the primary adversary, indicating a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy and potentially deepening divisions within the transatlantic alliance [1][2][6][7]. Summary by Sections U.S. National Security Strategy - The annual strategic document previously highlighted threats from Russia but now directs harsh criticism towards NATO allies in Europe, describing them as declining powers that have ceded sovereignty to the EU [2][6][10]. - The report warns that immigration could lead to the "civilizational extinction" of Europe, potentially transforming several NATO countries into nations dominated by "non-European" populations within two decades [7][10]. Critique of European Policies - The strategy criticizes the EU and other multinational organizations for undermining political freedom and sovereignty, accusing many European governments of subverting democratic processes without providing specific details [10][11]. - It emphasizes the need for Europe to correct its current trajectory and regain confidence, suggesting a paternalistic tone in its recommendations [10][11]. Shift in U.S.-Europe Relations - The document reflects a fundamental change in how the U.S. views its relationship with Europe, positioning the U.S. as an arbiter between Europe and Russia rather than a traditional ally against Russian threats [11][12]. - The strategy calls for an end to NATO's "ever-expanding alliance" and suggests a return to cooperation with Russia, which some analysts interpret as a strategy that undermines existing European structures [11][12]. European Response - European leaders are urged to reconsider their traditional transatlantic relationships in light of the new U.S. stance, with some experts suggesting that the document signals the end of the conventional alliance [7][8][12]. - The EU has rejected claims that it supports harmful immigration policies or undermines free speech, asserting that U.S. national security is closely tied to European security [12][14].

Core Points - The UK government is attempting to identify sellable assets from its £2.5 billion overseas portfolio, including embassies and luxury apartments, which may significantly weaken its global diplomatic influence [1][2] - The Foreign Office is "optimizing" the management of approximately 6,500 properties to find "monetizable assets," with hundreds of buildings in poor condition [1] - The budget highlights the need to find cost-saving measures in expensive locations like New York, potentially including the sale of a £12 million luxury apartment purchased for diplomats [1] Group 1 - The UK government is under scrutiny for a series of measures that weaken its soft power, including significant cuts to the international aid budget [2] - The UK has previously sold its embassy in Bangkok and relocated to a new site [2] - The Foreign Office plans to reduce domestic staff by 30% and reassess the scale and location of its over 250 diplomatic missions in more than 150 countries [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements by former German Chancellor Angela Merkel regarding the EU's approach to Russia have sparked significant controversy, highlighting deep divisions within Europe over foreign policy and energy dependence [1][3][5]. Background - In June 2021, Merkel and French President Macron proposed a direct dialogue between the EU and Russia to address issues related to energy, security, and borders, amidst rising tensions due to Russian military buildup near Ukraine [1][3]. - The proposal was met with strong opposition from Poland and the Baltic states, who feared it would undermine a unified EU stance against Russia and jeopardize Eastern European security [3][5]. Reactions from Eastern European Countries - Poland's government criticized Merkel for shifting blame and emphasized its support for EU unity against Russian aggression, highlighting military aid provided to Ukraine since 2022 [5][7]. - The Baltic states expressed outrage, with officials stating that Merkel's comments were misguided and that Germany's energy policies, particularly the Nord Stream pipeline, exacerbated Europe's reliance on Russian energy [7][9]. Russian Response - Interestingly, the Kremlin supported Merkel's assertions, claiming that Eastern European countries hindered peace efforts and that internal EU divisions left Russia with no choice but to act [9]. Economic Implications - Since 2022, the EU has paid over €213 billion to Russia for energy, indirectly funding military actions, while sanctions imposed on Russia have led to significant economic repercussions for Europe, including soaring inflation rates [7][9].

Core Points - China is donating police equipment worth 1 million RMB to Vanuatu, which has attracted attention from Australian media [1] - Vanuatu's Interior Minister Napote emphasized that the agreement with Australia is unrelated to Vanuatu's cooperation with China, countering claims of Chinese interference [1][3] - The relationship between China and Vanuatu has reached unprecedented levels, based on mutual trust and respect for sovereignty [1] Summary by Sections China-Vanuatu Cooperation - China has been a significant development partner for Vanuatu, particularly in the security and police sectors, providing various forms of support including police training and equipment [1] - Recent donations include patrol boats, vehicles, motorcycles, and breathalyzers [1] Australia-Vanuatu Relations - Australia is pushing for a "Nakamal" agreement with Vanuatu, aiming to invest approximately 500 million AUD over 10 years in climate, security, and economic priorities [3] - The Australian government seeks to solidify its strategic position in the Pacific and exclude China from regional security matters [3] Vanuatu's Position - Napote stated that Vanuatu is a member of the Non-Aligned Movement, maintaining friendly relations with all while not being an enemy to any [3] - Vanuatu has signed memorandums of understanding with several countries regarding police matters, with China being the only country requiring a formal agreement [3] - The Vanuatu government insists on prioritizing national interests and exercising sovereignty in international partnerships [3]

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent escalation in U.S.-China relations, particularly focusing on Trump's push for tariffs against China and his attempts to rally support from other countries for punitive measures [1][3][5] - It highlights the ongoing high-level dialogues between Chinese and U.S. officials, indicating a willingness to communicate despite existing tensions [3][5] - The article notes that Trump's actions reflect a transactional approach to diplomacy, aiming to isolate China economically while strengthening U.S.-European alliances [5][8] Group 2 - Musk's critical remarks about the U.S. government's financial situation emphasize the severity of the national debt crisis, with interest payments exceeding $1 trillion [7][8] - The article contrasts Musk's concerns about domestic fiscal issues with Trump's aggressive foreign policy, suggesting that tariffs may not effectively address the underlying economic challenges [7][8] - It points out the internal divisions within the EU regarding Trump's proposed sanctions, with significant economic implications for European businesses [5][8]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, publicly criticized the U.S. for imposing a 50% tariff on India, framing it as a geopolitical maneuver and expressing China's support for India in the face of U.S. pressure [1][3][7] Group 1: U.S. Tariff Impact - The U.S. tariff is not only an economic blow to India but also a blatant act of geopolitical suppression [3] - India has been caught between U.S. pressure and the desire to maintain relations with China, leading to a precarious diplomatic situation [4] - The recent U.S. tariffs have prompted India to reassess its foreign policy, moving towards a more balanced approach between the U.S. and China [4][6] Group 2: China-India Relations - China's support for India is seen as a significant diplomatic shift, with the ambassador's remarks providing a platform for India to stand firm against U.S. pressure [3][7] - The upcoming visit of Indian Prime Minister Modi to China for the SCO summit marks a new phase in China-India relations, indicating a thaw in previously strained ties [6] - China's commitment to supply critical resources to India, such as fertilizers and rare earths, underscores the importance of this partnership for India's economic stability [6] Group 3: Geopolitical Dynamics - The Chinese stance serves as a warning to the U.S. about the consequences of its bullying tactics, emphasizing the need for unity among nations facing similar pressures [7][9] - The support from China provides India with leverage in international negotiations, enhancing its bargaining power against the U.S. [9] - The U.S. response to China's support for India has been to escalate pressure, indicating a potential for increased tensions in the region [10]