Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the brokerage sector [10] Core Viewpoints - The report emphasizes three main reasons for the positive outlook on brokerages: 1) The financial sector is currently lagging, with a high safety margin in valuations; 2) Upcoming mid-year reports are expected to show continued high growth in performance; 3) The absolute value of AH premium remains high, with ongoing valuation recovery in H-shares [2][5] Summary by Relevant Sections Reason 1: Financial Sector Lagging with High Valuation Safety Margin - Since the beginning of 2025, brokerages have underperformed the market, with a cumulative increase of only 0.1% compared to a 3.0 percentage point underperformance against the CSI 300 index. Within the financial sector, brokerages lag behind insurance, diversified finance, and banks by 10.1, 11.3, and 20.0 percentage points respectively. However, since June, the sector has shown positive excess returns against the CSI 300 [6][17] - As of July 18, 2025, the price-to-book (PB) ratio for the industry is approximately 1.50, which is around the 40th percentile of the relative valuation range since 2016, indicating a high safety margin [22][23] Reason 2: Upcoming Mid-Year Reports Expected to Show Continued High Growth - The market has maintained high trading activity, with an average daily trading volume of 1,390.2 billion yuan from January to June 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 61.1%. The A-share IPO, refinancing, and bond underwriting scales for the same period are 37.4 billion yuan, 697.7 billion yuan, and 45 trillion yuan, showing year-on-year increases of 15.0%, 613.5%, and 16.6% respectively [7][30] - Among 31 brokerages that have disclosed performance forecasts, all expect a net profit growth rate of over 40%, with two companies projecting over 1000% growth [38] Reason 3: High Absolute Value of AH Premium and H-share Valuation Recovery - As of July 18, 2025, the AH premium for the brokerage sector stands at 68.1%, with the average AH premium for the entire industry at 62.0%. Notably, Citic Securities, Guolian Minsheng, and CICC maintain AH premiums above 100% [8][45] - The report highlights that the current AH premium levels for brokerages are historically high, with specific companies like Citic Securities at 133.8%, Guolian Minsheng at 118.0%, and CICC at 104.5% [48]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the electrical equipment industry [10]. Core Insights - Recent advancements in nuclear fusion technology have garnered significant attention from the capital markets, driven by breakthroughs such as China's "East Super Ring" achieving high-confinement plasma operation and substantial increases in industry capital expenditures [4][7]. - Major countries have introduced supportive policies, leading to a surge in social capital inflow, indicating that the nuclear fusion sector is approaching a pivotal point [4][30]. - The value proportion of power supply equipment is high, with significant technical barriers, particularly in magnet power supply parameters and converters being core devices [4][8]. Summary by Sections Nuclear Fusion Progress and Commercialization - The nuclear fusion sector is witnessing positive developments, with commercial viability becoming increasingly attainable. Key milestones include the successful operation of high-confinement plasma and increased capital expenditures in the industry [7][26]. - The plasma physics research institutes have reported a significant year-on-year increase in contract amounts since 2024, indicating a robust growth trajectory [29]. Importance of Power Supply in Fusion - Achieving a certain threshold in fusion triple product is crucial for effective power output, highlighting the importance of providing sufficient energy input [8]. - The power supply for tokamak devices is categorized into pulsed and steady-state loads, with pulsed loads having higher value proportions and technical requirements [8]. Competitive Landscape and Early Mover Advantage - The nuclear fusion development is still exploratory, with no unified standards for power supply parameters, creating high technical barriers [9]. - Companies that have been deeply involved in this field for years are likely to benefit from their early mover advantages as more capital flows into the nuclear fusion sector [9][30]. Investment Trends and Policy Support - The investment in nuclear fusion has seen a turning point since 2020, with the U.S. leading globally, followed closely by China. The cumulative investment in private fusion companies has surged from €1.5 billion to €9.9 billion [35]. - Various countries, including the U.S., Germany, the U.K., and China, have launched initiatives to support nuclear fusion technology development, reflecting a global commitment to advancing this field [30][31]. Focus on High-Value Equipment - The report emphasizes the need to focus on high-value equipment in the nuclear fusion sector, particularly in the context of the ITER project, where core equipment constitutes a significant portion of the investment cost structure [47][48].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: "攻守兼备红利50组合" (Balanced Dividend 50 Portfolio) - **Model Construction Idea**: This model adopts an active quantitative strategy with a "top-down" stock selection logic. It aims to identify high-potential stocks within dividend-related themes by leveraging a refined factor library and aligning with industry and thematic insights[14][15] - **Model Construction Process**: 1. The model focuses on dividend-related stocks, emphasizing a balance between "stability" and "growth" factors[15] 2. It selects stocks from a universe of high-dividend companies, incorporating both fundamental and thematic factors to refine the portfolio[14][15] 3. The portfolio is actively managed and periodically rebalanced to maintain alignment with the strategy's objectives[15] - **Model Evaluation**: The model demonstrates a strong ability to generate excess returns over the benchmark, showcasing its robustness in balancing defensive and growth-oriented attributes[22] 2. Model Name: "央国企高分红30组合" (Central SOE High Dividend 30 Portfolio) - **Model Construction Idea**: This model targets high-dividend stocks within central state-owned enterprises (SOEs), emphasizing stability and defensive characteristics[15] - **Model Construction Process**: 1. The portfolio is constructed by selecting 30 high-dividend stocks from central SOEs[15] 2. It prioritizes companies with consistent dividend payouts and strong financial health[15] 3. The portfolio is actively managed to ensure alignment with its defensive strategy[15] - **Model Evaluation**: The model is effective in capturing stable returns, making it suitable for risk-averse investors seeking consistent income[22] 3. Model Name: "电子均衡配置增强组合" (Electronics Balanced Allocation Enhanced Portfolio) - **Model Construction Idea**: This model aims to achieve balanced exposure within the electronics sector, focusing on diversification and stability[15] - **Model Construction Process**: 1. The portfolio selects stocks across various sub-sectors within the electronics industry[15] 2. It employs a balanced allocation strategy to mitigate concentration risks[15] 3. The portfolio is periodically rebalanced to maintain its diversified structure[15] - **Model Evaluation**: The model has demonstrated positive excess returns over the electronics sector index, indicating its effectiveness in achieving balanced growth[32] 4. Model Name: "电子板块优选增强组合" (Electronics Sector Preferred Enhanced Portfolio) - **Model Construction Idea**: This model focuses on identifying leading companies within mature sub-sectors of the electronics industry, emphasizing growth potential[15] - **Model Construction Process**: 1. The portfolio targets mature sub-sector leaders with strong fundamentals and growth prospects[15] 2. It employs a factor-based approach to refine stock selection within the electronics sector[15] 3. The portfolio is actively managed to capitalize on emerging opportunities within the sector[15] - **Model Evaluation**: The model has achieved significant excess returns over the electronics sector index, highlighting its ability to capture growth opportunities[32] --- Model Backtesting Results 1. "攻守兼备红利50组合" - Excess return over the CSI Dividend Total Return Index: 4.76% (YTD 2025)[22] - Weekly excess return: 0.85%[22] 2. "央国企高分红30组合" - Weekly excess return over the CSI Dividend Total Return Index: 0.11%[22] 3. "电子均衡配置增强组合" - Excess return over the electronics sector index (YTD 2025): 2.40%[32] 4. "电子板块优选增强组合" - Excess return over the electronics sector index (YTD 2025): 5.83%[32]

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is Neutral, maintained [8] Core Insights - The new round of steel growth stabilization policies focuses on direct supply-side adjustments, emphasizing the elimination of outdated production capacity to address the urgent issue of overcapacity [2][6][7] - The macroeconomic environment remains uncertain, with potential deflationary pressures on industrial products, making short-term supply-demand adjustments in the steel industry critical [2][6] - The previous growth stabilization plan aimed at stabilizing operations and expanding demand, while the current plan emphasizes structural adjustments and optimizing supply [6][7] Summary by Sections Current Market Dynamics - Recent macroeconomic positive sentiment has led to an increase in steel prices and profitability, with average daily pig iron production rising to 2.4244 million tons, a week-on-week increase of 2.63 thousand tons [4][5] - Steel consumption has slightly weakened, with apparent consumption of five major steel products down 3.92% year-on-year and 0.03% month-on-month [4] - Total steel inventory has decreased by 0.30% week-on-week, with long product inventory down 28.99% year-on-year and plate inventory down 17.96% [4] Policy Comparison - The new growth stabilization plan for 2023-2024 aims to enhance structural adjustments and optimize supply, contrasting with the previous plan's focus on stabilizing operations and expanding demand [6] - The current plan includes promoting steel structure applications and expanding consumption in key sectors such as shipbuilding, transportation, and energy [6] Future Outlook - The expectation is for continued macroeconomic positive sentiment, with steel companies showing a strong willingness to raise prices, leading to a forecast of strong fluctuations in steel prices [4] - The report highlights the importance of macroeconomic growth policies to support the implementation of capacity reduction in the steel industry [7] Investment Opportunities - The report suggests focusing on four main investment lines: 1. Companies benefiting from cost reductions due to new capacities in raw materials [30] 2. Stocks with low price-to-book ratios that may see significant performance and valuation recovery [30] 3. Mergers and acquisitions under the state-owned enterprise reform theme [31] 4. High-quality processing and resource leaders in specialized fields [31]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the defense and military industry [4] Core Insights - The report highlights the increasing demand for advanced, domestically produced military equipment, which is expected to enhance China's military trade capabilities [26][72] - The performance of major companies in the industry is showing signs of recovery, particularly in the upstream components sector, with many companies reporting positive earnings forecasts [11][22] - The report emphasizes the strategic importance of companies like AVIC Xi'an Aircraft Industry Group (中航西飞) and AVIC Chengfei (中航成飞) in the context of military exports, particularly with their advanced aircraft models [36][42] Summary by Sections Performance Forecast - As of July 20, 2025, 32 companies have released performance forecasts, with a significant number indicating positive growth in their second-quarter earnings, particularly in the upstream components sector [16][18] - The report notes that 56.25% of the companies forecasted year-on-year growth for Q2 2025, while 50% indicated quarter-on-quarter growth [18] Military Trade - The report discusses the shift towards high-end military trade, driven by the development of domestically produced aircraft such as the J-10 and J-35, which are now export-ready [28][72] - AVIC Chengfei is highlighted as a key player with its J-10 model, which has seen increased international interest, particularly from Indonesia [36][42] - AVIC Xi'an is noted for its Y-20 transport aircraft, which is positioned to become a leading model in the military transport market due to its competitive specifications [46] Company Highlights - AVIC Xi'an is recognized for its production of large military transport aircraft and is expected to benefit from the growing demand for such models [42][46] - AVIC Chengfei is acknowledged for its successful export of advanced military aircraft, with the J-10 model being a standout performer in international markets [36][42] - The report also mentions the potential for companies like Hongdu Aviation (洪都航空) and AVIC Helicopter (中直股份) to expand their export capabilities with their respective aircraft and missile systems [47][50] Market Trends - The report indicates a trend of increasing military trade demand due to global conflicts, which is expected to drive growth in the industry [72][71] - The military trade landscape is evolving, with a focus on high-quality, domestically produced equipment that meets international standards [72][71]

丨证券研究报告丨 请阅读最后评级说明和重要声明 行业研究丨专题报告丨机械 [Table_Title] 人形机器人系列（十二）：政策+资本驱动国内人 形机器人产业快速发展 报告要点 [Table_Summary] 政策在近两年在人形机器人产业发展发挥重要催化、引导作用。2024-2025 年政策一直保持推 动具身智能和人形机器人产业发展的连贯性。同时，多地政府积极参与产投基金设立，高屋建 瓴的政策+配套产业基金+具体"产学研"机构是个相对完整且成熟的模式。资本加速布局人形 机器人、具身智能赛道，今年以来多个头部厂商获得战略投资，上市企业亦在积极参与头部人 形机器人厂商的并购整合或技术合作，国内人形机器人的产业集群更加体系化，产业实力持续 夯实。 分析师及联系人 [Table_Author] 赵智勇 倪蕤 刘晓舟 SAC：S0490517110001 SAC：S0490520030003 SAC：S0490524030001 SFC：BRP550 %% %% %% %% research.95579.com 1 [Table_Title 人形机器人系列（十二）：政策 2] +资本驱动国内人 形机器人产业快速发展 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the coal industry [9]. Core Insights - The coal sector is currently characterized by low capacity utilization, high inventory levels, and poor profitability, indicating a significant oversupply situation. This suggests a higher likelihood of "anti-involution" measures being effective. Additionally, the coal sector is undervalued, with coking coal showing the highest valuation advantage, followed by thermal coal [2][7]. - Companies such as Pingmei Shenma, Panjiang, Shanmei International, Kailuan, Hengyuan Coal Power, and Gansu Energy show greater elasticity in their operations. However, when considering investment safety (debt ratios), Pingmei Shenma, Kailuan, Hengyuan Coal Power, and Jinkong Coal are more favorable [2][7]. Summary by Sections Market Performance - The coal index (Yangtze) fell by 0.69%, underperforming the CSI 300 index by 1.78 percentage points, ranking 27th out of 32 industries. The thermal coal market price as of July 18 was 642 CNY/ton, up by 10 CNY/ton week-on-week. The outlook suggests potential short-term price increases due to high temperature demand, although rising port inventories may limit sustained price growth [6][21][22]. Supply and Demand Analysis - As of July 17, the daily coal consumption across 25 provinces was 6.33 million tons, up 11.1% week-on-week. The total coal inventory was 123.41 million tons, down 0.8% from the previous week, with a usable days supply of 19.5 days, a decrease of 2.3 days [22][41]. Individual Company Analysis - The report highlights specific companies with significant operational elasticity: Pingmei Shenma, Jinkong Coal, and Shanmei International are noted as elastic stocks. For long-term stable profit leaders, China Coal Energy and China Shenhua are recommended, while for transformation and growth, Electric Power Investment and Xinji Energy are suggested [8][38]. Price Trends - The report indicates that the price of thermal coal is expected to remain supported in the short term due to tight supply conditions, while coking coal prices are also expected to maintain strength due to ongoing demand from steel production [22][49].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the industry [12] Core Insights - The report reviews the regulatory policies and effects of irrational competition in the express delivery industry in 2021, aiming to forecast the potential impacts of the current "anti-involution" measures on the industry [2][7] - In 2021, under the "common prosperity" initiative, regulations focused on "protecting the legal rights of couriers," leading to a significant recovery in industry profitability and stock prices after major express delivery companies announced a network-wide fee increase [2][7] - Looking ahead to 2025, the report anticipates a decline in single-package profits and suggests that measures such as price guidance in grain-producing areas and curbing "punitive management" could effectively transition companies from price wars to value competition [2][7] Summary by Sections Regulatory Review of 2021 - The report highlights that in 2021, the express delivery industry faced severe irrational competition, prompting regulatory actions to stabilize the market and protect couriers' rights [21][30] - Major express companies raised their fees in September 2021, which helped restore profitability and stock performance [39] Outlook for 2025 - The report indicates that the express delivery industry is experiencing renewed price competition, with average package prices dropping to around 2 yuan, and some areas seeing prices fall below 1 yuan [40][48] - The report emphasizes the need for regulatory measures to ensure fair competition and protect couriers' rights, suggesting that the industry is at a critical juncture [48] Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on companies like YTO Express, Shentong Express, Zhongtong Express, and Jitu Express, highlighting potential improvements in profitability and valuation recovery opportunities [2][7][48]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the industry [8] Core Views - The report highlights a significant decline in China's cobalt intermediate imports in June, with a month-on-month decrease of 61.6%, indicating a potential supply vacuum in the second half of the year [2][4] - Lithium prices are expected to rebound in the short term due to recent positive signals, but long-term resource clearing signals remain unclear [4] - Strategic metals such as rare earths and tungsten are undergoing a value reassessment, with strong demand recovery anticipated in the medium to long term [4] Summary by Sections Cobalt and Nickel - China's cobalt intermediate imports in June were 18,991 tons, down 61.6% month-on-month, leading to a potential second wave of price increases as domestic inventory is digested [2][4] - Nickel prices are expected to stabilize as macroeconomic expectations improve, with a long-term upward price trend anticipated [4] Lithium - Recent events, including regulatory changes in lithium mining, indicate stricter domestic mining controls, contributing to short-term price increases for lithium products [4] - The report suggests that while short-term momentum is strong, the long-term supply-demand balance remains uncertain [4] Strategic Metals - The report emphasizes the strategic importance of rare earths and tungsten, with a notable price increase for rare earth concentrates reported at 19,100 yuan/ton, up 1.5% month-on-month [4] - The demand for rare earths is expected to recover due to traditional applications and the acceleration of humanoid robot deployment [4] Market Performance - The report notes that the metal materials and mining sector outperformed the Shanghai Composite Index, with a weekly increase of 1.70% [14] - The report recommends focusing on companies with cost advantages and volume growth potential in the strategic metals sector [4]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the utility sector [9] Core Insights - The industrial economy's recovery and higher temperatures have driven electricity demand, resulting in a 1.7% year-on-year increase in power generation in June, with a 1.2 percentage point improvement from the previous month [2][19] - Hydropower generation decreased by 4.0% year-on-year in June, but the decline has narrowed significantly due to improved water inflow and prior energy storage release [7][24] - Non-hydropower clean energy sources, particularly nuclear and solar, have shown rapid growth, while wind power growth has been limited by weaker resource availability [32][41] Summary by Sections Power Generation Data - In June, the total power generation reached 796.3 billion kWh, a 1.7% increase year-on-year, with thermal power generation at 493.9 billion kWh (up 1.1%), hydropower at 139.1 billion kWh (down 4.0%), nuclear power at 39.4 billion kWh (up 10.3%), wind power at 73.8 billion kWh (up 3.2%), and solar power at 50.1 billion kWh (up 18.3%) [18][24] - For the first half of 2025, total power generation was 4537.1 billion kWh, a 0.8% increase year-on-year [18] Hydropower Insights - The average inflow to the Three Gorges Reservoir in June was 14,307 cubic meters per second, down 13.13% year-on-year, while the outflow was 12,122 cubic meters per second, down 7.51% [7][24] - The hydropower generation decline has narrowed by 10.3 percentage points month-on-month due to improved water conditions and energy storage [7][30] Clean Energy Developments - In the first five months of 2025, wind and solar power installations increased significantly, with wind power adding 46.28 million kW and solar power adding 197.85 million kW [32] - Solar power generation in June grew by 18.3% year-on-year, while wind power only increased by 3.2% due to resource limitations [32][41] Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on quality thermal power operators such as Huadian International, China Resources Power, and Huaneng Power, as well as hydropower companies like Yangtze Power and Guotou Power [12][45] - For new energy, it recommends Longyuan Power, China Nuclear Power, and Zhongmin Energy, highlighting the potential for growth in the sector [12][47]