Summary of the Conference Call on the Petrochemical Industry Industry Overview - The petrochemical industry in China is facing challenges such as refining capacity nearing its limit and an oversupply of ethylene, necessitating adjustments in supply through anti-involution policies for high-quality development [1][2][4] - The overall profitability of the chemical industry is weak, with only a few resource-advantaged products performing well [1][5] Key Points and Arguments - **Regulatory Changes**: The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) will implement policies to stabilize growth in response to industry demand changes, particularly focusing on refining and ethylene sectors [2][4] - **Capacity Control**: New refining projects will require equivalent replacements, and approvals for small coal-to-methanol projects will become more stringent [1][4][7] - **Old Facility Elimination**: Small, outdated refining and ethylene facilities, especially those over 20 years old, will face elimination, with approximately 60 million tons of capacity targeted for adjustment [1][12][15] - **Investment Trends**: Investment in propane dehydrogenation units is decreasing due to poor profitability, while ethylene capacity is regulated to maintain reasonable industry profitability [5][6] Market Dynamics - **Global Market Opportunities**: As European and Korean petrochemical industries face supply tightness and shutdowns, China is positioned to fill market gaps through modern, large-scale production facilities [2][14][17] - **Export Potential**: China can leverage its cost advantages to export to Europe and Southeast Asia, especially as global ethylene markets are expected to rebalance with increasing demand [2][22] Challenges and Future Outlook - **Approval Challenges**: New projects must incorporate advanced materials technology to gain approval, complicating the project initiation process for many companies [8][9] - **Environmental Standards**: The government is emphasizing energy efficiency and environmental standards, which will impact the approval of new projects and the operation of existing facilities [10][13] - **Employment Impact**: The consolidation of small, inefficient facilities may lead to job losses, but the government plans to mitigate this through retraining and support measures [26][28] Strategic Directions - **Industry Consolidation**: The government aims to increase industry concentration by encouraging the integration of smaller firms into larger, more efficient operations [29][33] - **Focus on High-Quality Development**: The anti-involution policy seeks to reduce ineffective competition and promote larger, more capable enterprises to enhance international competitiveness [33][36] Conclusion - The petrochemical industry in China is undergoing significant structural changes driven by regulatory reforms, market dynamics, and a focus on sustainability. The future will likely see a consolidation of capacity, increased export opportunities, and a shift towards high-quality, environmentally friendly production practices.

Summary of Conference Call Records Industry or Company Involved - The conference call discusses the **反内卷 (anti-involution) policy** in the context of the **Chinese economy** for the year **2025**. Core Points and Arguments 1. **Policy Focus and Tools**: The 2025 anti-involution policy emphasizes technical implementation, with ministries primarily using supply-side tools to stabilize prices, such as the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (工信部) and the National Development and Reform Commission (发改委) stabilizing PPI (Producer Price Index) and CPI (Consumer Price Index) [1][2][4] 2. **Three Main Goals**: The policy has three main objectives: - Stabilize PPI year-on-year growth to prevent worsening corporate debt risks - Maintain positive year-on-year growth in CPI - Optimize the structure of emerging industries [4][12] 3. **Constraints on Policy Implementation**: The implementation of policies is constrained by two main factors: the lack of demand-side interventions and the relatively loose macroeconomic environment in China [5][16] 4. **Impact of Electricity Prices**: An increase in electricity prices by 10% can lead to a 1.9% increase in overall PPI, indicating that electricity prices are a significant driver of PPI [8][10] 5. **Industry Selection for Price Stabilization**: When selecting industries for price stabilization, factors such as industry price elasticity and their ability to influence PPI are crucial. Six key industries (coal mining, oil and gas extraction, energy refining, chemicals, steel, and non-ferrous metals) are identified as having significant influence [9][10] 6. **Challenges in Emerging Industry Capacity Governance**: Governance of emerging industries faces challenges such as coordination difficulties and the need for comprehensive efforts across various departments [15][17] 7. **Future Expectations**: The implementation of the anti-involution policy is expected to focus on price stabilization and capacity governance, with a gradual improvement in corporate profitability anticipated as macroeconomic reforms take effect [16][17][18] Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content 1. **CPI Stability**: The stability of CPI is heavily reliant on stabilizing pork prices, with current strategies focusing on long-term price stabilization rather than immediate measures [12][14] 2. **PPI and CPI Growth Rates**: Current PPI and CPI growth rates are influenced by low base effects, with core CPI targets showing stability but some sub-items deviating from expected trends [13][14] 3. **Political Will and Policy Tools**: The effectiveness of PPI stabilization is not only dependent on technical measures but also on political will, with current policy efforts being more focused on price control rather than quantity control [11][16]

Summary of Tianshan Cement Conference Call Company Overview - Tianshan Cement is a leading national cement company in China, benefiting from the industry's anti-competition trend and supply-side reform policies, particularly the requirement to address overproduction by the end of 2025 [2][3][12]. Key Points and Arguments Industry Dynamics - The cement industry has entered a downward phase since the peak in 2020-2021, with cumulative demand expected to decline by 23% by the end of 2024 [9]. - The demand structure is shifting, with infrastructure becoming the main driver of cement demand, replacing real estate [10][11]. - The industry faces challenges such as internal competition and the need for capacity reduction, with policies in place to enforce production limits [13][14][15]. Company Performance - Tianshan Cement's clinker sales have declined in line with the industry, with a compound annual growth rate of -10.8% from 2021 to 2024 [18]. - Despite a drop in sales price from 360 RMB to approximately 250 RMB, the company maintained a competitive average price of 247 RMB per ton, second only to Huaxin Cement [18]. - In 2025, the company achieved a significant turnaround in Q2, reporting a profit of 572 million RMB, a year-on-year increase of nearly 140% [19]. Financial Health - The company has a stable financial position, with a decreasing debt-to-asset ratio and low financing costs, averaging 2.61% in 2024 [22]. - Tianshan Cement has committed to a dividend payout ratio of no less than 50% from 2025 to 2027, ensuring shareholder returns [23]. Cost Management and Efficiency - The company is implementing cost reduction measures, including increasing self-sufficiency in limestone and optimizing management, resulting in a decrease in unit costs [21]. - The average unit cost decreased by 23 RMB in 2024, while the average price per ton increased by 13 RMB in the first half of 2025 [20]. Growth Strategies - Tianshan Cement is expanding its non-clinker business, which has increased from 12% in 2020 to 37% in the first half of 2025, enhancing the overall stability of its operations [8]. - The company is also developing its overseas business, with a compound annual growth rate of nearly 21% from 2021 to 2024, and a significant increase in revenue in 2025 due to new projects [27]. Additional Important Insights - The company’s valuation is currently at a historical low, with a price-to-book (PB) ratio of 0.5, compared to the industry average of 0.74 [3][28]. - The market perception is cautious, with concerns about continued demand decline and high costs, but the company’s management believes in the potential for recovery through cost control and policy execution [29][30]. - The company’s strong shareholder structure, with nearly 90% held by the top ten shareholders, provides it with valuation flexibility [6]. Conclusion - Tianshan Cement is positioned to benefit from industry reforms and has demonstrated resilience through effective cost management and strategic expansion. The company’s financial health and commitment to shareholder returns further enhance its attractiveness as an investment opportunity.

Summary of the Chemical Industry Conference Call Industry Overview - The conference call focuses on the chemical industry and its current challenges and strategies in response to overcapacity and profitability issues [1][2][3]. Key Points and Arguments - **Profitability Improvement**: Industry associations are implementing collaborative mechanisms to bring poorly performing products back to cost levels, allowing leading companies to stabilize their profit margins [1][2]. - **Unified Market Policy**: The aim is to eliminate underperforming companies and standardize new entrants to prevent regional capacity transfer, promoting orderly industry development and enhancing product price elasticity [1][2]. - **Investment Growth**: From 2020 to 2024, the chemical industry is expected to see a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.6% in fixed asset investment, significantly higher than previous cycles. However, demand decline has led to a notable reduction in capacity utilization and profitability [1][3]. - **Export Limitations**: Relying solely on exports is insufficient to alleviate domestic overcapacity. Anti-dumping measures from various countries restrict export capabilities, making it unrealistic to rely on international markets to absorb excess supply [4]. - **Dual Strategy for Overcapacity**: The industry will adopt a dual approach of strong regulation and soft constraints to manage capacity and achieve supply-demand balance. This includes policy support and collaborative mechanisms to control production and pricing [5]. - **Complexity of the Chemical Sector**: The chemical industry is complex, with various sub-sectors and products, making supply-side reforms challenging. The need for extensive data collection contributes to the slow pace of reform [6][9]. - **Historical Context**: The current phase of supply-side reform differs from 2016 due to technological barriers, diminishing returns on new investments, and increased project approval difficulties under a unified market policy [9]. Important but Overlooked Content - **Environmental and Safety Regulations**: Historical regulatory measures, such as environmental inspections and energy consumption controls, have significantly impacted supply dynamics in the chemical sector [8]. - **Investment Selection Criteria**: When selecting investment targets, focus on industries with historical collaboration, moderate scale, high concentration, low new capacity ratio, and advantageous production pathways to enhance investment returns [10].

Group 1: Industry Insights - The price of third-generation refrigerants continues to rise, indicating a sustained high level of industry prosperity. The supply of refrigerants is constrained by quotas, coupled with increased downstream demand, significantly optimizing the supply-demand balance. Prices for R32, R134a, and R125 have increased by 44.19%, 22.35%, and 8.33% respectively as of September 19, 2025 [5][6][7] - In the basic chemical industry, the supply-side is expected to undergo structural optimization. Domestic policies frequently emphasize supply-side requirements, while rising raw material costs and capacity exits in Europe and the U.S. have created uncertainties in overseas chemical supply. China's chemical industry is poised to fill gaps in the international supply chain due to its competitive advantages [7][8] - The food additive industry is expected to expand due to new consumption trends and supportive regulations promoting health. Companies focusing on technology and product differentiation are likely to benefit, with key players identified as Bailong Chuangyuan and Jinhai Industrial [8] Group 2: Company Analysis - Juxing Technology (002444) has established a global multi-tier sales channel through mergers and acquisitions, enhancing its manufacturing capabilities. In the first half of 2025, the company achieved a revenue of 7.027 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 4.87%, and a net profit of 1.273 billion yuan, up 6.63% year-on-year. The U.S. and Europe accounted for 65.00% and 25.66% of its revenue respectively [10][11][12] - The tools industry is maturing, with stable long-term demand driven by active housing markets and industrial production expansion. The global tools market is projected to reach $67.3 billion by 2026, with a CAGR of approximately 4% from 2024 to 2026. Smart electric tools are expected to drive growth in the sector [11][12] - Juxing Technology is actively advancing its globalization strategy, having established a logistics and distribution system across China, the U.S., and Europe, along with 23 manufacturing bases worldwide. The company is investing in new facilities in Vietnam and Thailand to enhance its supply chain flexibility [12]

首先我们看一下三季度债券市场调整的主因，其实就是我们前面提到的随着权益市场上涨带来的市场风 险偏好的上行，其中会有部分资金去做大类资产配置的切换，进而从债券市场转向权益市场。在这个过 程中我们其实发现，不同于过往的几轮权益市场的牛市，在这一轮权益市场"慢牛"的行情中，居民的存 款搬家从固收类转向权益类的迹象不是特别明显。我们理解对于大部分居民而言，他其实寻找的更多的 还是稳定的、并且收益相对比较可观的资产，就导致在权益走慢牛的趋势下，其实很多资金还是更愿意 去配置在三季度调整过后相对有配置价值的债券类资产。 第二点就是在7月份中央财经委提到的反内卷政策下，三季度多种商品出现了触底反弹，包括定价国内 需求的一些黑色商品，也包括这两年相对产能比较过剩的一些光伏产业的上游资产。我们发现其实在三 季度反内卷政策推行的过程中，更多的是政策层对于供给层面的一些约束。我们看到光伏产业部分头部 的企业去注资成立公司，然后去做部分产能的收储，并且去淘汰一些落后的、过剩的产能。而在化工领 域、黑色领域部分限产也引发了上游原材料价格的上涨。 我们想强调的是，在经济转型的过程中，反内卷政策更多还是依托于供给侧去做一些产能方面的严控， ...

Group 1: Economic Phases - The report divides West Germany's fiscal history from 1945 to 1990 into three phases: 1) 1945-1965 Post-war Reconstruction; 2) 1966-1980 Global Stagflation; 3) 1981-1990 Industrial Transformation[3] - The post-war reconstruction period (1945-1965) is characterized by debt reduction and economic miracles, driven by currency reform and the Marshall Plan, which injected approximately $1.6 billion into West Germany[7][31] - The global stagflation period (1966-1980) saw West Germany facing growth bottlenecks, transitioning from fiscal surplus to deficit, with government leverage increasing from 8% in 1970 to 15% in 1980[9][10] Group 2: Key Economic Policies - The currency reform in 1948 replaced 93.5% of the old currency, stabilizing the economy and eliminating hyperinflation risks[7][28] - The Marshall Plan provided crucial support for coal, steel, and infrastructure, helping West Germany's industrial production index rise from around 20 to nearly 90 by 1949[31][37] - The introduction of supply-side reforms in 1982 under Chancellor Helmut Kohl aimed to restructure the economy, reduce social welfare, and promote re-industrialization[11][12] Group 3: Economic Challenges - The steel crisis during the stagflation period highlighted structural weaknesses in West Germany's economy, leading to high unemployment and a decline in international competitiveness[10] - The government faced challenges in managing inflation and unemployment, with the unemployment rate fluctuating significantly during the 1970s[10][30] - The transition from demand-side management to supply-side reforms marked a significant shift in economic policy, reflecting the need for structural adjustments[11][12]

策略研究 | 证券研究报告 — 总量深度 2025 年 9 月 26 日 策略深度 这是一轮混合牛 本轮牛市仍有望实现慢牛、长牛，结构上类似 2013-2014 年叠加 2016-2017 年，组成先结构牛、后全面牛的混合牛。 中银国际证券股份有限公司 具备证券投资咨询业务资格 策略研究 证券分析师：王君 (8610)66229061 jun.wang@bocichina.com 证券投资咨询业务证书编号：S1300519060003 证券分析师：徐亚 （8621）20328506 ya.xu@bocichina.com 证券投资咨询业务证书编号：S1300521070003 A 股历史牛市回顾。2001 至 2025 年，A 股历史上典型意义上的牛市共计 六轮，前五轮牛市类型各不相同，有全面牛亦有结构牛，驱动逻辑上估 值扩张是共性要素，但盈利驱动方面并不一致，第一轮和第二轮牛市的 宏观背景是经济及全 A 盈利显著提升，而第三轮牛市背后的宏观经济及 A 股盈利则处于承压状态，第四、五轮牛市更多呈现结构性景气。 从资金视角对比前五轮牛市。从增量资金的入市节奏视角，每一轮牛市 都有显著的增量资金，使得牛市的启动可 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent meeting of the Central Financial Committee emphasizes the need to "legally and reasonably govern low-price disorderly competition among enterprises" and to "promote the orderly exit of backward production capacity," indicating a clear direction for "anti-involution" policies [2][72]. Group 1: Differences in the Current "Anti-Involution" Movement - The current "anti-involution" movement is characterized by a higher stance, broader coverage, and stronger coordination, involving local governments, enterprises, and residents [3][73]. - The meeting proposed the "Five Unifications and One Opening" requirement, highlighting the importance of regional governance and the construction of a unified national market [3][73]. - The contradiction between the sharp decline in revenue growth and the rigidity of fixed costs has forced some enterprises to adopt price reduction strategies to pursue "economies of scale" [4][74]. Group 2: Negative Feedback from "Involution" - Low-price competition, a primary method of "involution," often leads to cost compression in the supply chain, with accounts payable turnover rates declining and inventory turnover rates remaining high in the "involution" industries [4][75]. - The internal cost control measures in "involution" industries have resulted in a significant decrease in sales expenses, projected at -9.7% for 2024, and a continued decline in management expenses [4][75]. - The profitability of "involution" industries remains under pressure, with a projected return on assets (ROA) of 2.9% in 2024, a significant drop from 2021 levels [5][76]. Group 3: Solutions to the "Involution" Dilemma - Addressing the "involution" dilemma requires alleviating supply-demand contradictions and promoting the orderly exit of backward production capacity while reconstructing demand expansion dynamics [6][77]. - Structural transformation can be achieved through policy guidance, industry self-discipline, and market mechanisms to promote supply innovation and upgrade [7][78]. - Accelerating the development of the service industry is crucial to address structural unemployment issues arising from the transformation process, with policies focusing on restoring supply and demand in the service sector [7][78].

Core Viewpoint - The market's focus on "anti-involution" has significantly increased, but there is considerable divergence in understanding "involution"; most viewpoints interpret it through the lens of supply-side reform, which may lead to misunderstandings [1] Misunderstanding of "Involution" and "Anti-Involution" - "Anti-involution" is not equivalent to "anti-surplus"; the causes of demand differ: "surplus" arises from declining demand and passive supply, while "involution" involves proactive supply increases in strong demand areas [2][9] - Price behaviors differ: "surplus" leads to follow-up price reductions due to demand decline, while "involution" results in chaotic price competition despite strong demand [2][9] Supply Issues - Prior to supply-side reform, there was surplus in upstream and state-owned enterprises; the current "anti-involution" is more pronounced in downstream and private enterprises [3][9] - High-energy-consuming industries have completed capacity concentration reforms, and traditional backward capacity is not as significant as before [4][9] Policy Focus - Policies may target industries with excessive supply growth, such as coal and photovoltaic sectors, but the focus is more on downstream adjustments rather than drastic supply reductions [5][9] - Avoiding excessive contraction in upstream supply is crucial to prevent "super-inflation" in prices, which could hinder the effectiveness of "anti-involution" policies [5][9] Policy Mechanisms - "Anti-involution" should not rely solely on self-discipline talks; successful strategies may include encouraging industry mergers, raising industry standards, and matching supportive policies [6][9] - The experience from Japan, the US, and Germany shows that market-driven reforms and non-price competition can effectively address overcapacity issues [7][9] Structural Adjustments - "Anti-involution" requires addressing the structural imbalance in demand rather than stimulating demand in surplus areas; developing service sector demand can help rebalance the economy [7][9] - The service sector has significant potential to absorb manufacturing job losses and alleviate "involution" challenges [7][9] Equipment and Debt Management - Addressing equipment update issues and overdue payments is essential; the current trend shows new equipment purchases without corresponding old equipment retirements, which can exacerbate "involution" [7][9] - The issue of overdue payments is more pronounced now, especially among private enterprises, necessitating stronger governance measures [7][9]