随着美国关键通胀数据相对平稳落地，市场对美联储降息的预期再度升温。 据央视新闻报道，当地时间8月12日，美国劳工部发布的消费者价格指数显示，美国7月份通胀压力维持 6月份以来的上升势头。7月份消费者价格指数同比上涨2.7%，与6月份涨幅持平。但剔除波动较大的食 品和能源价格后，7月份核心消费者价格指数同比上涨3.1%，高于6月的2.9%，远高于美国联邦储备委 员会制定的2%目标；环比涨幅为0.3%，高于6月份的0.2%。 整体而言，关税的影响在7月份的CPI数据中没有6月那么明显，通胀没有加速上行。在CPI数据公布 后，投资者押注美联储9月降息25个基点的概率超过90%，美联储或在今年剩余的三次会议上都降息。 据央视新闻报道，8月12日，美国总统特朗普在社交平台"真实社交"上发文，要求美联储主席鲍威尔立 即降息，并指责其"总是行动太迟"。特朗普称，他正考虑允许针对鲍威尔的相关诉讼继续推进。 在经济数据和白宫压力的双重驱动下，美联储9月降息50个基点的可能性也已经浮现，接下来会"暴力降 息"吗？ 通胀意外温和 迄今为止，美国大规模征收进口关税对商品价格的传导有限。 中航证券首席经济学家董忠云对21世纪经济报道记 ...

21世纪经济报道记者吴斌 上海报道 随着美国关键通胀数据相对平稳落地，市场对美联储降息的预期再度升温。 据央视新闻报道，当地时间8月12日，美国劳工部发布的消费者价格指数显示，美国7月份通胀压力维持 6月份以来的上升势头。7月份消费者价格指数同比上涨2.7%，与6月份涨幅持平。但剔除波动较大的食 品和能源价格后，7月份核心消费者价格指数同比上涨3.1%，高于6月的2.9%，远高于美国联邦储备委 员会制定的2%目标；环比涨幅为0.3%，高于6月份的0.2%。 整体而言，关税的影响在7月份的CPI数据中没有6月那么明显，通胀没有加速上行。在CPI数据公布 后，投资者押注美联储9月降息25个基点的概率超过90%，美联储或在今年剩余的三次会议上都降息。 据央视新闻报道，8月12日，美国总统特朗普在社交平台"真实社交"上发文，要求美联储主席鲍威尔立 即降息，并指责其"总是行动太迟"。特朗普称，他正考虑允许针对鲍威尔的相关诉讼继续推进。 在经济数据和白宫压力的双重驱动下，美联储9月降息50个基点的可能性也已经浮现，接下来会"暴力降 息"吗？ 通胀意外温和 迄今为止，美国大规模征收进口关税对商品价格的传导有限。 中航证券首 ...

多位政府高官和美企高管近期都收到了特朗普的下台威胁。 当地时间8月12日，美国总统特朗普在社交媒体平台发文"炮轰"高盛集团首席执行官大卫·所罗门，称其 应"找个新的经济学家"或"专注当DJ而不是经营一家大型金融机构"。所罗门曾以"DJ D-Sol"的艺名在派 对和音乐节担任DJ。 美国关税大头谁掏钱？ 高盛：先美企 再美国消费者 让特朗普把高盛CEO"贬"为DJ的导火索，是高盛近日的一份报告。 高盛首席经济学家简·哈祖斯在报告中对"美国收关税是谁掏钱"的问题估算称，截至6月，美国企业承担 了64%的关税成本，消费者承担了22%的关税，而外国出口商通过降低出口价格，承担了14%的关税。 高盛警告，继续这么加关税的话，到10月，美国消费者将承担67%，外国企业承担25%，美国公司承担 8%。 除了高盛CEO 特朗普还威胁这些人下台 8月12日，特朗普发文要求高盛CEO换掉其首席经济学家或自行退出，批评高盛关于市场反应和关税效 应的判断"完全错误"。特朗普称，关税为美国带来数万亿美元收入，并未引发通胀或对经济造成其他损 害，"主要是由企业和政府——其中很多是外国政府——在买单"。 由于唱衰美国政府加关税或未能配合其 ...

Inflation Data - The US July CPI increased by 2.7% year-on-year, below the expected 2.8% and unchanged from the previous value[1] - Core CPI rose by 3.1% year-on-year, exceeding the expected 3.0% and the previous value of 2.9%[1] - Month-on-month, the seasonally adjusted CPI increased by 0.2%, lower than the previous 0.3%[1] Component Performance - Food prices showed a month-on-month change from 0.3% to 0%, below the 12-month average of 0.2%[2] - Energy prices decreased significantly, with a month-on-month change from 0.9% to -1.1%[2] - Core services increased by 0.4% month-on-month, higher than the 12-month average of 0.3%[2] Market Reactions - Following the CPI announcement, the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones indices rose by 1.1%, 1.4%, and 1.1% respectively[3] - The 10-year US Treasury yield increased by 1 basis point to 4.29%[3] - Market expectations for a September rate cut rose from approximately 88% to around 96%[3] Future Outlook - The average tariff rate in the US increased from 16.6% to 18.6% as of August 7, the highest level since 1933[4] - Inflation is expected to rise by 1.5-1.8 percentage points due to current tariff policies[4] - Market consensus anticipates a significant rise in inflation starting Q3, with Q4 PCE inflation projected at 3.0% and core PCE at 3.2%[4]

Core Points - The Eurozone's GDP grew by 0.4% quarter-on-quarter in Q1, while the EU's GDP increased by 0.3% [1] - Year-on-year, the Eurozone's GDP rose by 1.2%, and the EU's GDP grew by 1.4% [1] - Germany, the largest economy in the EU, saw a GDP increase of 0.2%, while France, Spain, and Italy experienced growth rates of 0.1%, 0.6%, and 0.3% respectively [1] - Ireland's GDP surged by 3.2%, whereas Hungary's GDP contracted by 0.2% [1] - Analysts noted that the latest U.S. tariff policies are impacting global economic development, contributing to uncertainty in the Eurozone [1] - Economic confidence in the Eurozone declined in April, reaching a recent low [1]

Core Viewpoint - The impact of U.S. tariffs on domestic retail companies is becoming increasingly evident, with companies like Crocs predicting a decline in revenue due to cautious consumer spending and rising costs associated with tariffs [3][4]. Group 1: Company-Specific Impacts - Crocs anticipates a year-over-year revenue decline in Q3, contrary to analyst expectations of slight growth, attributing this to reduced consumer spending on non-essential items and concerns over price increases [3]. - The company estimates that the new costs from tariffs will reach $40 million in the second half of the year, totaling approximately $90 million for the entire year, equivalent to about 647 million RMB [3]. - Following the announcement, Crocs' stock plummeted nearly 30%, marking its largest single-day drop in 14 years [4]. Group 2: Broader Industry Effects - Nike has indicated that U.S. tariffs will add $1 billion in costs, while GAP expects an increase of $250 million to $300 million [6]. - Deckers, which owns brands like UGG and Hoka, reported a slowdown in U.S. sales growth from approximately 11% to 2.8% and warned of profit margin pressures due to tariff uncertainties [6]. - Deckers' stock fell nearly 20% after the news [7]. Group 3: International Brands - Puma's stock dropped 18.4% on July 25, following a disappointing earnings forecast that projected a "low double-digit percentage" decline in sales and potential operating losses due to U.S. tariffs [9]. - Puma estimates that U.S. tariffs will result in a gross profit loss of about €80 million in FY2025 [9]. - Adidas, despite reporting growth in the first half of the year, anticipates an additional cost of up to €200 million (approximately 157 million RMB) due to tariffs in the remaining part of the year [9]. Group 4: Pricing Strategies - Some companies are absorbing tariff-related costs to maintain market share, while others are considering price increases for U.S. consumers [10]. - Nike announced price hikes for U.S. products in response to tariff impacts, and Adidas also plans to raise prices due to increased costs from tariffs [11]. - Fast Retailing, the parent company of Uniqlo, indicated that it would adjust prices flexibly in light of tariffs, stating that raising prices is the only option available [11].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the U.S. tariff policy isolates the country from globalization, leading to negative consequences primarily borne by American consumers [1][2] - The U.S. has a limited share in global trade, and if other countries unite, the effectiveness of U.S. protectionist policies will diminish [1] - The immediate consequence of tariffs in the U.S. is an increase in prices, acting as a de facto tax on consumers, with a majority of Americans perceiving tariffs as harmful due to rising living costs [1][2] Group 2 - Tariffs may temporarily protect specific industries like steel and aluminum, but they increase costs across broader supply chains, negatively impacting the overall economy [2] - The Trump administration's tariff policies are unlikely to compel companies to relocate manufacturing to the U.S. due to the current poor state of American manufacturing [2] - The ultimate impact of these policies will depend on the reaction of the American public, particularly in the context of upcoming midterm elections, which will serve as a significant test for the Trump administration [2]

Group 1 - The U.S. has implemented tariffs on several trade partners, leading to a downward revision of Japan's GDP growth forecast for 2025 to 0.7%, a decrease of 0.5 percentage points from earlier estimates [1] - Japanese automotive companies, including Toyota, are facing significant profit reductions, with a projected combined operating profit decline of approximately 2.67 trillion yen (about 130.2 billion RMB) for the 2025 fiscal year [2] - Subaru anticipates a 52.7% decrease in net profit for the 2025 fiscal year, projecting a drop to 160 billion yen (approximately 7.8 billion RMB) [2] Group 2 - Japanese electronic component manufacturers reported a 24% decrease in net profit, totaling 183.9 billion yen (around 8.9 billion RMB) for the April to June 2025 period [2] - The uncertainty from U.S. tariff policies is causing Japanese companies to reduce export expectations and investment, contributing to a cautious outlook on growth [3] - The Japanese government is seeking to expand exports, including efforts to restore imports of Japanese agricultural products by South Korea [4] Group 3 - Japan's central and local government fiscal deficit for 2025 is estimated at 3.2 trillion yen (approximately 156 billion RMB), which is an improvement from the previous estimate of 4.5 trillion yen [3] - Toyota is advancing technological innovation with the upcoming launch of "Woven City," aimed at testing autonomous driving technologies and fostering collaboration with other industries [4] - The Japanese government is facing internal policy debates on how to mitigate the impacts of U.S. tariffs, control inflation, and manage interest rate adjustments [4]

Core Viewpoint - The unpredictable tariff and trade policies of the United States are disrupting global markets and impacting domestic companies, particularly those reliant on imported materials and equipment [1] Group 1: Company Impact - Emerald Packaging, a California-based company specializing in agricultural product packaging, is facing production crises due to high tariffs on imported raw materials and equipment [1] - The company has been forced to pause hiring and increase product prices as a direct result of these trade policies [1] Group 2: Industry Implications - The reliance on imports from countries such as India, Brazil, Mexico, and Germany is creating vulnerabilities for U.S. companies in the packaging industry [1] - The situation highlights the broader challenges faced by industries dependent on global supply chains amid changing trade regulations [1]

中新社北京8月8日电 题：二季度多国GDP公布 专家提醒经济增长背后挑战 作者 刘亮 李宫羽 近期，世界主要经济体二季度经济"成绩单"陆续出炉。总体看，在美国关税政策压力下，各国经济受到 的贸易冲击程度不同，经济未能实现"齐步走"。展望后期，受访专家提醒，要警惕美国关税政策后续给 世界经济增长带来的挑战。 各国经济增长未能实现"齐步走" 今年上半年，中国国内生产总值(GDP)同比增长5.3%，其中二季度同比增长5.2%、环比增长1.1%。这一 表现优于市场预期，主要得益于出口超预期、贸易结构优化及宏观政策持续显效等多方面因素共同支 撑。 美国二季度GDP环比按年率计算增长3%，扭转了一季度经济环比萎缩0.5%的局面。这主要受美国进口 大幅下降和个人消费支出增加影响，反映了在美国关税政策预期影响下，企业在一季度就提前大量进 口"囤货"以规避成本上升风险，导致二季度美国进口大幅下降。 欧元区经济二季度环比增长0.1%，创下2024年年初以来最低季度环比增幅。受美国关税措施影响，德 国、意大利等欧洲主要经济体出口在二季度受挫，拉低欧元区整体经济增速。其中，德国和意大利二季 度经济环比均萎缩0.1%。 受益于本国消费 ...