Group 1 - The first round of ceasefire negotiations in Doha, Qatar, ended without agreement due to Israel's lack of sufficient authorization to discuss key issues such as ceasefire duration and prisoner release [2][3] - Israel's negotiating team was only authorized to discuss humanitarian aid distribution, which limited the scope of the talks [3] - The proposed ceasefire plan by Qatar required Hamas to release 10 Israeli captives and return 18 bodies within 60 days, while Israel insisted on retaining the right to resume military actions [3][5] Group 2 - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's meeting with President Trump is focused on the Gaza ceasefire, Iran issues, and normalization of relations with Arab countries, with market attention on potential concessions from Trump regarding tariffs and military aid [2][6] - The meeting is the third between Trump and Netanyahu in six months, with three main focal points: specific terms of the Gaza ceasefire, Iran nuclear issues, and tariff policies [6] - Israel has reportedly rejected Hamas's demand for a "permanent ceasefire," preferring a phased temporary ceasefire instead [6] Group 3 - The upcoming Federal Reserve meeting minutes are expected to be a key market catalyst, with a high probability of maintaining interest rates in July and a significant chance of a rate cut in September [7] - Long-term concerns about the U.S. dollar's credit risk are highlighted by the rising federal debt-to-GDP ratio and the declining share of the dollar in global reserves [9] - Geopolitical developments, including the Gaza ceasefire negotiations and the outcomes of the Trump-Netanyahu meeting, are likely to influence gold price fluctuations in the short term [9]

Core Viewpoint - The cost of credit default swaps (CDS) for Turkish debt has increased by 13 basis points, reaching 292 basis points [1] Group 1 - The rise in CDS costs indicates growing concerns about Turkey's credit risk [1]

Core Viewpoint - The rise of stablecoins is reshaping the global financial landscape in the digital age, reflecting a dual tension between market credit and state credit, and leading to a new equilibrium in monetary functions and governance [1][2][10]. Group 1: Nature of Stablecoins - Stablecoins represent a compromise between market and state credit, allowing for the issuance of "quasi-currency" under regulatory frameworks in places like the US and Hong Kong [11]. - The evolution of stablecoins has transitioned from algorithmic stability and collateralized assets to a mainstream model anchored by fiat currencies, indicating a reliance on state credit for stability [10][11]. Group 2: Impact on Global Financial System - Stablecoins may lead to a redefinition of monetary functions, pushing sovereign currencies to reassess their roles and promoting a "functional division" in the global monetary system [12]. - The distribution of financial power could shift, with the potential emergence of a multi-currency system comprising "sovereign currencies + scenario-based stablecoins," challenging the dominance of a single currency [13]. - Stablecoins signify a transformation in the relationship between state, market, and technology, suggesting that monetary power is no longer solely state-controlled but is influenced by technological intermediaries [14]. Group 3: US Interest in Stablecoins - The US's enthusiasm for stablecoins is closely tied to maintaining the dollar's dominance, as stablecoins can convert market credit into monetary power, especially in light of rising national debt [15][16]. - The use of short-term US Treasury bonds as collateral for stablecoins could alleviate liquidity pressures on US debt, reinforcing the dollar's global status [15]. - The US is positioning itself to dominate the "metaverse currency" landscape, with stablecoins potentially becoming the universal currency in digital economies, thereby extending dollar hegemony into the digital realm [18]. Group 4: China's Strategic Response - China should develop a stablecoin strategy that aligns with its economic context, focusing on supply chain advantages and ensuring that stablecoins serve the real economy [19][20]. - Collaboration between stablecoins and the digital yuan is essential, with both aiming to enhance the integration of digital and real economies [20]. - A strategy of "innovation-led + inclusive collaboration" is recommended for developing a stablecoin ecosystem that balances risk and efficiency while leveraging China's manufacturing strengths [21].

证券研究报告 固收定期报告 hyzqdatemark 2025 年 07 月 07 日 高票息信用债行情兑现 ——信用分析周报（2025/6/30-2025/7/4） 投资要点： 本周（6/30-7/4）市场概览： 证券分析师 廖志明 SAC：S1350524100002 liaozhiming@huayuanstock.com 3）负面舆情。主体负面：本周潍坊公信国有资产经营有限公司、联储证券股份有限 公司、登封市建设投资集团有限公司、聊城市安泰城乡投资开发有限责任公司列入 主体观察名单；黑龙江创达集团有限公司主体评级调低。债项负面：中燃投资有限 公司所发行的 10 只银行间债项隐含评级调低；康佳集团股份有限公司所发行的 6 只 公司债隐含评级调低；其他债项负面包括"融茂优 B"隐含评级调低，"H20 方圆 1" 展期，"23 创 01EB"债项评级调低，"23 联储一"列入债项观察名单。转债负面： 双良节能系统股份有限公司主体评级调低，其所发行的"双良转债"债项评级调低。 本周市场分析：本周公开市场共有 20275 亿元逆回购到期，本周央行累计开展 6522 亿元逆回购操作，实现全周净回笼 13753 亿 ...

"中证科创债ETF易方达等科创债ETF可以为投资者一键布局交易所高等级科创债提供便捷工具。"据李 一硕介绍，科创债ETF采取组合投资方式，可以降低投资单一债券的信用风险；同时科创债ETF在交易 所上市交易，有做市商提供流动性服务，可以降低交易成本和难度；较低的交易门槛，让资金量较少的 投资者也能参与科创债投资；此外，科创债ETF在场内实时交易可以为市场提供价格参考，增强透明 度。 今年以来，随着公司债ETF易方达（511110）等首批基准做市公司债ETF推出、信用债ETF试点开展通 用质押式回购业务等配套措施不断完善，信用债ETF扩容并迎显著增量资金。数据显示，截至7月3日， 信用债ETF年内净流入超1400亿元，最新规模已超2200亿元，在债券ETF中占比超一半。业内人士认 为，此次科创债ETF推出，将进一步丰富信用债ETF产品类型，为投资者提供更加多元的场内债券投资 工具，同时其高度聚焦的投资主题设计，将助力投资者分享科创企业发展红利。 信用债ETF再添新品。7月7日，中证科创债ETF易方达（基金全称：易方达中证AAA科技创新公司债 ETF，认购代码：551503）等首批科创债ETF启动发行。这是继公司债 ...

6月，债券二级市场整体交易活跃度回温，信用债成交金额同比与环比增幅显著。在宏观流动性环境和基本面共同作 用下，信用利差呈现震荡微幅收窄态势，月末利差水平为46.32bp。展望后市，受降息预期影响，基准利率仍有下行 空间，基本面修复节奏不确定性增加，信用债收益率大概率在宽幅波动中下行，且下行幅度也将超过基准利率，推 动信用利差继续震荡收窄。 信用利差方面，整体呈现震荡中微幅收窄的态势。与去年同期相比，上升11.68bp，而较上月末则下降1.17bp，月末 利差水平为46.32bp。 统计数据显示，债券二级市场6月总成交金额378,537.89亿元，同比、环比分别增长4.39%和12.78%。 按类型划分，利率债方面，6月成交金额229,219.09亿元，同比、环比分别增加2.19%和10.94%。信用债方面，6月成 交金额77,343.19亿元，同比、环比分别增加10.20%和18.42%。 从成交信用债的特征来看，产业债成交信用等级向AA+级及以上集中，城投债成交信用等级分布则保持均匀。在久 期方面，产业债成交久期延续向中长期延伸的趋势，城投债久期拉长趋势更为明显。具体到不同级别，产业债中AA 级别债券成交久 ...

Core Viewpoint - Tianjian Technology (002977.SZ) is expected to report a net loss attributable to shareholders of between 5.96 million yuan and 11.82 million yuan for the first half of 2025, a significant decline from a profit of 11.17 million yuan in the same period last year [1][2]. Financial Performance Summary - The net profit attributable to shareholders is projected to decline by 153.30% to 205.81% compared to the same period last year [2]. - The net profit after deducting non-recurring gains and losses is expected to be a loss of between 6.14 million yuan and 12.18 million yuan, down by 155.13% to 209.44% year-on-year [2]. - Basic earnings per share are anticipated to be a loss of between 0.0496 yuan and 0.0984 yuan, compared to a profit of 0.0930 yuan per share in the previous year [2]. Operational Challenges - The expected loss is primarily due to longer customer payment processes, leading to extended aging of accounts receivable, which resulted in the company making provisions for credit impairment losses based on accounting policies [2]. - The company's order fulfillment has been affected by related procurement plans, causing delays in project deliveries and resulting in lower-than-expected revenue recognition [2].

固定收益 | 动态跟踪 7 月挖掘机会在"小众" 信用债市场周观察 研究结论 风险提示 政策变化超预期；货币政策变化超预期；经济基本面变化超预期；信用风险暴露超预 期；数据统计可能存在遗误 | 信用债市场周观察 | | --- | | 齐晟 | qisheng@orientsec.com.cn | | --- | --- | | | 执业证书编号：S0860521120001 | | 杜林 | dulin@orientsec.com.cn | | | 执业证书编号：S0860522080004 | | 王静颖 | wangjingying@orientsec.com.cn | | | 执业证书编号：S0860523080003 | | 徐沛翔 | xupeixiang@orientsec.com.cn | ⚫ 信用债周观点：7 月挖掘机会隐藏在小众的品种、小众的期限、小众的主体当中。 回顾 6 月信用债行情，短端下沉依然是稳定的策略，高等级难有超额但低等级被持 续挖掘，保持中等久期还可获得可观资本利得。目前低等级 1Y 已经逼近乃至刷新近 一年低点，但 5Y 相比于去年 7~8 月还有 10bp 左右空间。7 ...

Core Viewpoint - The bond market in the first half of 2025 experienced high activity with a shift from a bull market to a high-volatility phase, driven by the issuance of credit bonds and interest rate bonds, which supported the real economy [2][5]. Group 1: Bond Market Expansion - The bond primary market continued to expand in the first half of 2025, with credit and interest rate bonds driving issuance, contributing to market stability and financing for key sectors [3]. - The number of credit bonds issued reached 11,077 with a total issuance scale of 10.16 trillion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 6.75% and 4.39% respectively [3]. - Special bonds and technology innovation bonds (科创债) saw rapid development, with local governments increasing support for technology enterprises, facilitating direct financing for high-end manufacturing and new energy sectors [3][4]. Group 2: Special Bonds and Infrastructure Investment - The issuance of new special bonds reached approximately 21,607 billion yuan, a growth of about 44.7% compared to the same period in 2024, playing a crucial role in driving effective investment [4]. - Special bonds were directed towards municipal infrastructure, green transformation, public services, and high-end manufacturing, significantly supporting ongoing and new projects [4]. Group 3: Market Volatility and Trends - The bond market transitioned to a high-volatility phase due to multiple factors, including monetary policy shifts and external disturbances, marking the end of a prolonged bull market [5][6]. - From March 17, 2025, the bond market experienced a notable shift, with the 10-year government bond yield rising from approximately 1.6% to 1.9%, before declining to 1.64% by July 4, 2025 [6][7]. - The market sentiment improved as liquidity remained balanced and monetary easing policies were implemented, leading to a recovery in bond prices [5][6]. Group 4: Outlook for the Second Half of 2025 - The bond market is expected to remain volatile in the second half of 2025, with the third quarter seen as a favorable window for bond allocation, while the fourth quarter may experience increased volatility due to supply pressures [8][9]. - Analysts suggest maintaining a "duration + wave" strategy, focusing on segmented market opportunities, and recommend a "barbell" approach for interest rate bonds [9].

证券研究报告 | 行业策略报告 2025 年 07 月 06 日 房地产基本面展望下的大类资产配置变化 ——房地产行业 2025 年度中期投资策略 总量研究/房地产 标的层面，房地产板块关注【招商蛇口】【华润置地】【保利发展】【中国 海外发展】【滨江集团】【绿城中国】【金地集团】【龙湖集团】等，物业 关注【华润万象生活】【保利物业】【绿城服务】【招商积余】等，交易关 注【贝壳】等，另关注产业链及生态链。 q 风险提示：贷款利率下降不及预期，新模式相关政策落地情况与市场预期有 偏差，挂牌量下降进度不及预期，新房去化周期下降不及预期，房地产行业变 化向上下游传导不及预期等。 推荐（维持） 行业规模 | | | 占比% | | --- | --- | --- | | 股票家数（只） | 256 | 5.0 | | 总市值（十亿元） | 2712.5 | 3.0 | | 流通市值（十亿元） | 2565.9 | 3.1 | 行业指数 1、《供求关系发生重大变化，"去库 存"政策或构筑局部"信用底"—— 房地产行业 2024 年中期投资策略》 2024-06-27 2、《行业均衡与主体平衡——房地产 行业 2024 年 ...