Group 1 - The article highlights the double standards in trade practices, where Western countries advocate for free trade when exporting to China but impose trade barriers against Chinese products entering their markets [1][4] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce announced anti-dumping duties on brandy from the EU starting July 5, which has been met with claims of unfairness from the affected countries [1][4] - The U.S. has led efforts to restrict the use of Chinese 5G technology in Europe, reflecting a broader narrative of a "technology cold war" driven by geopolitical considerations [3][4] Group 2 - The EU has decided to impose anti-subsidy tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles in 2024, aiming to weaken China's competitiveness in the global renewable energy sector [4][7] - Historical cooperation between China and Europe in manufacturing has been significant, with European firms providing technology transfer that helped China develop its industrial framework [6][7] - European countries are now adopting a defensive stance in their economic relations with China, using tariffs and technical standards to limit market access for Chinese products [7][9] Group 3 - There is a contradiction in Europe's approach, as it seeks to maintain its industrial advantages while simultaneously requesting increased Chinese investment and job creation [9][11] - The article criticizes the notion that cooperation with China is a form of economic aid, arguing that China's manufacturing success is a result of its own efforts rather than external assistance [11] - It calls for a reevaluation of how countries can promote their own development while ensuring a fair competitive environment, rather than resorting to protectionism for short-term gains [11]

"大而美"法案的支持者声称，法案将通过企业回流与投资增长重塑美国经济竞争力。不过，当减税红利 被关税成本抵消，企业实际承担的合规成本与供应链中断损失，可能远超税收优惠。更关键的是，以邻 为壑的政策必然引发反制——欧盟已酝酿针对性关税，新兴市场则在加速"去美元化"布局。这种对抗性 循环一旦形成，全球经济增长的整体蛋糕将持续萎缩，最终反噬美国企业的海外利润根基。 本届美国政府就职以来推出的种种争议政策，反映出美国国内经济治理失序的困境。这种政策变动正对 世界经济带来多重冲击。 首先，多边贸易体系遭遇信任危机。当美国以国内法案为由单方面调整关税，其行为违背了世界贸易组 织（WTO）框架下的互惠原则。欧盟、日本等传统盟友被迫重新评估与美国的贸易关系，新兴经济体 则加速推进区域自贸协定以规避系统性风险。全球供应链从效率优先转向安全优先的重构进程，因美国 政策不可预测性而显著提速。 其次，美元信用基础面临持续侵蚀。法案再度提升债务上限，虽然暂时避免债务违约，却让美国国债规 模突破40万亿美元。当财政纪律让位于政治周期，各国央行对美元资产的长期信心必然受损。历史表 明，主权货币的全球地位不仅依赖市场，更需要货币发行国的财政 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the shift in the EU's stance towards the US, particularly in response to Trump's tariff threats, with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stating that a final agreement before the July 9 deadline is "impossible" [1][3][5] - Wang Yi's visit to Europe has been pivotal in changing the EU's approach, emphasizing that there are no fundamental conflicts between China and Europe, which has resonated positively with the EU amid US pressure [3][5][9] - The EU is preparing a retaliatory tariff list worth €21 billion and holds a "tariff bomb" list valued at €95 billion, indicating a strong response to US tariffs [5][9][12] Group 2 - The article discusses the growing discontent among traditional US allies, such as Japan and South Korea, towards US trade policies, suggesting a potential shift in alliances [7][9] - The EU is adopting a strategy of "waiting for change" in negotiations with the US, indicating a tactical approach to leverage its position [9][12] - The evolving dynamics between China and the EU suggest a potential for deeper cooperation in areas like digital economy and green energy, contrasting with the US's "America First" policy, which is pushing allies away [11][12]

一场牵动全球神经的税收博弈进入最后倒计时。当美国参议院以微弱优势通过30年来最大规模税改法案，全球资本市场屏息凝神——这场减税飓风， 将如何重塑世界经济版图？ 法案通过仅4票之差，折射出美国内部深刻的利益撕裂。表面是降低企业税率的"让利"，实则暗藏三重战略意图：吸引万亿美元海外资本回流，重塑美 国制造业筋骨；以"税收洼地"虹吸全球产业资本；迫使跨国企业在中美之间做出"二选一"的站队。这是一场精心设计的全球经济秩序洗牌。 国际税收战场的硝烟背后，是国运兴衰的世纪博弈。当崔天凯这样的国士再度出山，中国向世界传递的不仅是应对之策，更是一种战略定力——真正 的崛起，永远不寄希望于对手的仁慈，而在于锻造不可替代的竞争优势。 值此关键时刻，一位熟悉的身影悄然回归外交前线——72岁的资深外交家崔天凯。这位曾驻美八载、亲历中美风云变幻的老将，以中国政府中美经贸 中方牵头人身份重披战袍。其复出传递的深意远超人事变动本身，它代表着中国面对复杂博弈的终极底牌：以最顶级的战略智慧，打最硬的仗。 历史是最好的教科书。回望2018年美国上一轮税改冲击波，中国以增值税改革"组合拳"巧妙化解：制造业税率从17%降至13%，全年减税超万亿；研 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that the U.S. notion of "promoting peace through strength" is a manifestation of hegemonic thinking, aiming for military action rather than dialogue [1] - Liu Jianchao highlights that under such a mindset, the "Thucydides Trap" becomes an inevitable fate for great powers, with smaller nations often forced to choose sides and become victims of great power rivalries [1] - The article discusses the fundamental changes in the nature of warfare today, warning that an obsession with zero-sum games and absolute security, including the use of AI in warfare, could lead to catastrophic consequences for humanity [1] Group 2 - Liu Jianchao asserts that the peace and stability in Asia over the past 80 years is attributed to the region's countries having their own values and methods for problem-solving, emphasizing a preference for dialogue and negotiation over military solutions [2] - The article notes that military solutions are seen as temporary fixes, while negotiated solutions are viewed as long-term resolutions [2]

洞见 （ DJ00123987 ） —— 不一样的观点，不一样的故事， 3000 万人订阅的微信大号。点击标题下蓝字 " 洞见 " 关注，我们将为您提供有价 值、有意思的延伸阅读。 作者：洞见Moon 鱼乘于水，草木乘于时。 ♬ 点上方播放按钮可收听 洞见主播云湾朗读音频 看过一张漫画。 再厉害的人，一味埋头蛮干，累死累活也只能换来基本的温饱。 真正会赚钱的人，会把精力用在思考上，寻找一切可利用的资源。 或是在人群中借力，或是向高人借智，甚至向时代借势。 金融学家唐涯在《钱从哪里来》中说： 如果再雇一些壮士随行，这样一趟下来，就赚不了多少钱了。 后来，范蠡打听到一个叫姜子盾的人，在做布匹生意，需要把布从北方运往南方。 借力 这个姜子盾是北方巨商，经营多年，有一条安全的商路。 范蠡就去找姜子盾，表示自己可以免费帮他把布匹运到南方。 《上金谷文集》中记载了一个商圣范蠡卖马的故事。 春秋时期，北方马便宜，南方马贵。 范蠡打算去北方买马，运回吴越来卖。 但是路途遥远，马群目标太大，在路上容易遭遇盗贼。 " 财富只是结果，它的背后其实是一连串关于人和资金的正确决策。 " 懂得以外界之力加持自己，你会以最小的代价，收获丰 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Defense emphasizes that China's development does not pose a threat to any country and advocates for peaceful coexistence between China and the United States, rejecting the notion of zero-sum games in international relations [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **U.S. Military Spending and Strategy** - The U.S. plans to allocate $12 billion for the "Pacific Deterrence Initiative" to enhance military readiness in the Indo-Pacific region and strengthen Taiwan's defense capabilities [1] - **China's Position on Defense and Peace** - The Chinese military is portrayed as a steadfast force for maintaining world peace, contrasting with the U.S. approach of deterrence and coercion [1] - **Taiwan Issue** - The Taiwan issue is framed as an internal matter for China, with a strong rejection of foreign interference, particularly from the U.S. [1]

Group 1 - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized the importance of increased spending by the EU and NATO in light of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and China's military expansion [1] - NATO members' military spending is projected to account for 55% of global military expenditure in 2024, with calls for member states to raise defense spending to 5% of their GDP [1] - NATO's actions are perceived as an attempt to extend its influence into the Asia-Pacific region, raising concerns among countries in that area [1] Group 2 - China maintains a position of promoting peace and dialogue regarding the Ukraine issue, refraining from supplying weapons to conflict parties and controlling dual-use item exports [2] - China's constructive role in international affairs has been recognized globally, contrasting with NATO's alleged misinformation [2] - China urges NATO to abandon outdated Cold War mentalities and to correct its misconceptions about China, emphasizing its commitment to safeguarding its sovereignty and contributing to global peace [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's response to NATO's claims regarding military spending and perceived threats from Russia and China, emphasizing that NATO's narrative is aimed at justifying increased military expenditures and expansion into the Asia-Pacific region [1]. Group 1 - NATO officials are accused of exaggerating international tensions and undermining China's normal military development to justify increased military spending [1]. - China urges NATO to reflect deeply, listen to the international community's just voices, and abandon outdated Cold War mentalities and zero-sum game concepts [1]. - China reaffirms its commitment to safeguarding its sovereignty, security, and development interests while contributing to global peace and stability through practical actions [1].

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry must focus on both "making good cars" and "selling good cars," emphasizing the importance of marketing and brand establishment while avoiding the misconception that "traffic equals sales" [1] Group 1: Industry Competition - Some car manufacturers are engaging in "mutual criticism" to gain competitive advantages, which is damaging the industry ecosystem [1] - The "involution" competition among Chinese automotive brands leads to no winners and threatens the future of the industry [1] Group 2: Innovation and Collaboration - Chinese car manufacturers have achieved a leap in the new energy sector and must be cautious of how mutual criticism can erode their innovative momentum [1] - The industry should abandon the "zero-sum game" mentality of undermining competitors and instead embrace "open competition" in technology and services for sustainable growth [1]