Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict between the siblings of the Wahaha founder, Zong Qinghou, and Zong Fuli over inheritance has roots dating back ten years, highlighting their shared experiences and challenges in the food safety sector [2] Group 1: Background and Context - Ten years ago, Zong Fuli and Zong Jichang united against common challenges, particularly rumors and food safety issues affecting Wahaha, leading Zong Qinghou to advocate for food safety reforms [2] - In 2015, Wahaha's revenue plummeted, with Zong Qinghou attributing a loss of 5 billion yuan to these rumors, which constituted about 10% of that year's revenue [2] Group 2: Education and Research - Zong Jichang studied food science at Cornell University, focusing on the impact of bioactive compounds on cancer cell proliferation, and authored a review on dietary supplement safety [3][4] - During his senior year, Zong Jichang collaborated with peers to develop a sports gel using maple syrup, enhancing its flavor and nutritional value, and named it "Untapped Potential" [4][6] Group 3: Industry Aspirations and Developments - Zong Fuli invested 70 million yuan in establishing the Fuli Food Research Institute at Zhejiang University to cultivate talent in food safety and nutrition [8] - Zong Fuli has launched her beverage brand "KELLYONE," targeting young consumers with personalized juice and zero-calorie tea products, while seeking skilled professionals in the food industry [9] Group 4: Family Dynamics and Legal Disputes - The inheritance dispute over an estimated 1.8 billion yuan trust fund has escalated, with Zong Jichang and his siblings filing lawsuits against Zong Fuli for their share of Wahaha's equity [14][20] - The siblings' educational paths have intertwined, with many graduates from Zong Fuli's funded programs attending prestigious institutions, including Cornell University, where Zong Jichang studied [9][20]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Xiaojin County Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection on 154 batches of products, resulting in 4 batches being deemed unqualified, highlighting ongoing concerns regarding food safety compliance in the region [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 154 batches were inspected, with 4 batches failing to meet safety standards [2]. - The unqualified products included mangoes and ginger, with specific pesticide residues exceeding permissible limits, such as 0.090 mg/kg for pyraclostrobin in mangoes, which exceeds the standard of 0.05 mg/kg [2]. - The inspection was part of a broader initiative to ensure food safety compliance in accordance with the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China [2]. Group 2: Details of Non-compliance - The non-compliant products were identified from various vendors, including Xiaojin County Xingyi Fruit Store and Xiaojin County New Dazhong Fruit Supermarket [2]. - Specific instances of non-compliance included: - Mangoes from Xiaojin County Xingyi Fruit Store with pyraclostrobin levels at 0.090 mg/kg [2]. - Ginger from a local restaurant with a detected level of 0.36 mg/kg for thiamethoxam, exceeding the limit of 0.2 mg/kg [2]. - Cucumbers from a fast-food outlet with thiamethoxam levels at 0.72 mg/kg, surpassing the permissible limit of 0.5 mg/kg [2]. Group 3: Compliance and Qualified Products - The report also included information on compliant products, indicating that a significant number of batches met safety standards [3]. - The compliant products were sourced from various local businesses, demonstrating a mix of food types including fruits, vegetables, and processed items [3][4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of food safety and the efforts made by the Yumin Market Supervision Administration to enhance public awareness and participation in food safety governance through a series of promotional activities [1][4]. Group 1: Activities and Engagement - The Yumin Market Supervision Administration, in collaboration with local authorities, organized a food safety promotional week themed "Integrity and Lawfulness, Shared Food Safety," which attracted significant public participation [1][3]. - Various methods were employed during the event, including consultation booths, informational displays, and distribution of educational materials to inform the public about food safety laws, standards, and best practices for food selection and storage [3]. Group 2: Public Education and Awareness - Staff provided detailed answers to common food safety concerns, such as identifying counterfeit products and checking expiration dates, thereby addressing public worries and enhancing understanding of food safety issues [3]. - The event featured a "Food Safety Smart Sharing" mini-program that allowed citizens to engage in fun activities like quizzes, promoting food safety knowledge in an entertaining manner while also providing real-time updates on food safety policies and regulations [3]. Group 3: Future Initiatives - The promotional week not only raised public awareness about food safety but also strengthened the integrity and social responsibility of food producers and operators [4]. - The Yumin Market Supervision Administration plans to leverage the success of this event to further enhance food safety regulation and education, aiming to create a comprehensive food safety governance system to ensure the public's health and safety [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a comprehensive special rectification action launched by the Shawan City Market Supervision Administration to enhance food safety in meat products, focusing on risk identification across the entire production and operation chain [1][2]. Group 1: Special Rectification Action - The rectification action is guided by the principle of "Four Strictest" in food safety, aiming to identify risks in meat product production and operation [1]. - Key areas of focus include urban-rural junctions, agricultural markets, meat shops, hot pot restaurants, and barbecue shops, addressing issues such as "two excesses and one non-compliance," adulteration, false labeling, and unlicensed production [1]. Group 2: Enforcement and Compliance - The enforcement approach combines strict inspections with professional training, allowing for immediate identification of issues and guidance for operators to correct them [1]. - A flexible enforcement mechanism is adopted, emphasizing "no penalty for first-time violations and exemption for minor infractions," which has led to the investigation of four illegal cases related to meat products [2]. Group 3: Future Plans - The Shawan City Market Supervision Administration plans to maintain a strong sense of responsibility and continue enhancing supervision over the meat product market to ensure the sustainability of the rectification results [2]. - The goal is to ensure that the public can enjoy safe and high-quality food, referred to as "the happiness on the tip of the tongue" [2].

Group 1 - The core issue involves Jilin Xianggete Wine Co., Ltd. being fined for labeling discrepancies on their product "Old Flavor Hawthorn Fruit Wine," which displayed two different production dates [1] - The company was fined 2,000 yuan and had illegal gains of 16 yuan confiscated, totaling 2,016 yuan in penalties [2] - The product batch in question consisted of 26 boxes, with a total value of only 16 yuan, and the company proactively recalled and destroyed the problematic products [1][2] Group 2 - Jilin Xianggete Wine Co., Ltd. was established on August 24, 2015, with a registered capital of 2 million yuan and is located in Liuhe County [5] - The company operates in the beverage manufacturing industry, specifically in the production of alcoholic beverages [5]

近日，平度市市场监督管理局公布行政处罚决定（平度市监处罚﹝2025﹞354号），青岛神秘园酒业有限公司平度分公司因生产经营标签含虚假内容的食 品，被处以罚款1万元、没收违法所得1875元的行政处罚，处罚日期 2025年7月21日。 经查，2025年3月27日，河南获嘉县市场监管局抽检发现当地商超销售的该公司2023年5月生产的"榴莲味果汁酒"存在质量问题。检验报告（编号 №:XBJ25410724932530121）明确显示，该批次产品酒精度不符合其标签明示标准，被判定为不合格产品。 | 物的金额(万元) | | | --- | --- | | 暂扣或吊销证照名称及编号 | | | 违法行为或 | 违反了《中华人民共和国食品安全法》第七十一条第一款:"食品和食品添加剂的标签、说明书,不得含有虚假内容，不得含有虚假内容，不得 | | | 疾病预防、治疗功能。生产经营者对其提供的标签、说明书的内容负责。"之规定 | | 违法事实 | 经查、2025年3月27日，获嘉县市场监督管理局依法抽检了获嘉县位庄乡胖东升购物中心销售的榴莲味果汁酒（配制酒） | | | 示生产厂家为青岛神秘园酒业有限公司平度分公司、净含量35 ...

Core Viewpoint - Qingdao Laoshijia Beer Co., Ltd. was fined and had illegal gains confiscated due to non-compliance with food labeling regulations for pre-packaged food products [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The company was penalized with a total fine of RMB 5,000 and confiscation of illegal gains amounting to RMB 1,100, resulting in a total penalty of RMB 6,100 [1] - The administrative penalty was issued by the Laixi City Market Supervision Administration on July 21, 2025, and made public [1] Group 2: Product and Safety Issues - The company produced and sold 50 boxes of "Qing Dashi Brand Sakura Brewed Beer," which contained cherry blossom extract, without the required warning label indicating it was unsuitable for certain populations [1] - The product was sold out by June 17, 2025, with a selling price of RMB 22 per box, totaling a value of RMB 1,100 [1] Group 3: Company Background - Qingdao Laoshijia Beer Co., Ltd. was established on July 25, 2016, with a registered capital of RMB 2 million [2] - The legal representative of the company is Lü Cuixiang, and it is registered in Laixi City, Shandong Province [2]

Group 1 - The National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee conducted an enforcement inspection in Henan Province regarding the implementation of the Food Safety Law from July 21 to 24 [1] - The NPC delegation, led by Vice Chairman Luosang Jiangcun, engaged with provincial leaders to discuss the effective implementation of food safety measures and the importance of public health [1][2] - The inspection included meetings with government officials, experts, and student representatives, as well as on-site checks at food production facilities and markets [1][2] Group 2 - The NPC inspection team acknowledged the significant achievements of Henan Province in implementing the Food Safety Law [2] - Luosang Jiangcun emphasized the need to adhere to President Xi Jinping's directives on food safety, focusing on risk prevention and ensuring public trust in food safety [2] - The inspection aimed to enhance government accountability, improve risk management, and strengthen the regulatory framework for food safety [2]

Overall Situation - The Xi'an Huyi District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety supervision sampling of 51 batches, with 48 batches passing and 3 batches failing [2][3] - The sampling covered 14 categories of food, including nuts, sugar, convenience foods, vegetable products, frozen drinks, pastries, bean products, grain products, edible oils, alcoholic beverages, and fruit products, all of which passed [2][3] - The main reasons for the failures were pesticide residues and non-compliance with food safety national standards regarding food additives [2][3] Non-compliant Products - The non-compliant products included: 1. Disinfected bowls from a restaurant with a result of 0.019 mg/100 cm² for anionic synthetic detergent, which should not be detected [3] 2. Ginger purchased from a supermarket with a pesticide residue of 0.62 mg/kg for dichlorvos, exceeding the standard of ≤0.02 mg/kg [3] 3. Yam purchased from the same supermarket with a result of 0.462 mg/kg for carbendazim and its manganese salt, exceeding the standard of ≤0.3 mg/kg [3] Compliant Products - All tested batches of various food categories, including nuts, sugar, convenience foods, vegetable products, frozen drinks, pastries, bean products, grain products, edible oils, alcoholic beverages, and fruit products, were compliant [2][3] - Specific compliant products included: - Canola oil from Weinan Chang'an Flower Oil Co., 5L per barrel [5] - Small liquor peanuts from Heze Suiyuan Food Co., 360g per package [5]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The Xi'an Huyi District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection as part of the provincial "You Choose, I Test" initiative, resulting in 36 out of 37 samples passing the safety standards, with one sample failing due to pesticide residue [2][3]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 37 samples were tested, with 36 passing and 1 failing [2]. - The failed sample was a carrot from a self-service store in Huyi District, which contained 0.062 mg/kg of flufenacet, exceeding the standard limit of 0.02 mg/kg [3]. Group 2: Sample Categories - The inspection covered various food categories, including edible agricultural products, dairy products, beverages, seasonings, starch and starch products, grain processing products, pastries, convenience foods, and catering foods [2]. - The inspection aimed to enhance food safety and consumer confidence in local food products [2]. Group 3: Compliance and Quality Assurance - The inspection was part of a broader initiative to ensure food safety across the province, reflecting the government's commitment to public health [2]. - The results indicate a high compliance rate among local food vendors, with only one instance of non-compliance noted [2][3].