Core Insights - The article discusses the rising attention towards "anti-involution" in the market, highlighting significant misunderstandings regarding the concept, particularly in the context of supply-side reforms and the various hidden mechanisms involved in "anti-involution" [4]. Deep Dive Topics - The "anti-involution" topic has gained traction, but there is a considerable divergence in understanding, with many interpreting it through a supply-side reform lens, which may lead to misinterpretations [4]. - The article emphasizes that beyond production adjustments and self-discipline discussions, there are numerous hidden strategies associated with "anti-involution" [4]. Hot Topics - Since June, there has been a resurgence of the "golden-haired girl" trading phenomenon overseas, with domestic sentiment also heating up. The article questions which data might exceed expectations and whether the market's main narrative will shift due to the effects of tariffs [8]. - The importance of "strategic resources" has been underscored in the context of changing global trade dynamics, prompting an exploration of which resources in China possess strategic attributes and how they should be developed in the future [10]. High-Frequency Tracking - The role of "export grabbing" is evolving, with a shift from emerging markets to the United States, indicating a change in export dynamics [13]. - Credit improvement is primarily driven by short-term loans to enterprises, reflecting a trend in financial data [17]. - The June economic data reveals five significant anomalies, suggesting new changes in the economy that may be hidden [21]. - The article notes that the third quarter will serve as a verification period for tariff-induced inflation effects, with a focus on the June Consumer Price Index (CPI) data [24]. - Domestic infrastructure construction has shown a continuous recovery, while industrial production remains relatively stable, although there is a divergence in the construction sector and a slowdown in real estate transactions [26]. - The expiration of tariff exemptions has led to declines in most developed markets, indicating a potential impact on international trade dynamics [29].

Core Insights - The article discusses the rising attention towards "anti-involution" in the market, highlighting significant misunderstandings regarding the concept, particularly in the context of supply-side reforms [4] Group 1: Deep Dive on "Anti-Involution" - The market's understanding of "anti-involution" is largely misaligned, with many interpreting it through a supply-side reform lens, which may lead to incorrect conclusions [4] - Besides production adjustments and self-discipline discussions, "anti-involution" encompasses various "hidden strategies" that are not widely recognized [4] Group 2: Economic Trends and Data Analysis - Recent economic data from June reveals five notable anomalies, indicating new changes in the economy that may not be immediately apparent [21] - The U.S. inflation data for June suggests that the third quarter will serve as a critical period for validating the effects of tariffs on inflation [24] - Domestic infrastructure projects have shown a continuous recovery, indicating a potential positive trend in construction activities [26] Group 3: Export Dynamics - The role of "export grabbing" is shifting, with emerging markets nearing the end of this phase while the U.S. begins to see a resurgence in export activities [13][14] - The importance of "strategic resources" in global trade is increasing, prompting discussions on which resources in China possess strategic attributes and how they should be developed in the future [10]

点击小程序查看报告原文 特朗普威胁解雇美联储主席 7月16日，特朗普表示将解雇美联储主席鲍威尔，但随后予以否认[1] [2] 。特朗普上任以来，多次向美联储施压，要求尽快降息。本质上，特朗普对美联 储的不满在于后者未能通过货币宽松配合前者的"大财政"计划。"大美丽法案"于7月4日最终通过，CRFB预计未来10年将增加联邦债务4.1万亿美元，如果 临时性减税条款被永久化，则增加债务5.5万亿美元，预计特朗普2.0任期内的赤字率可能维持在6.5%-7% 附近（参见《 特朗普2.0"大财政"更进一步 》）。短期，我们预计美国财政部于三季度净发行美债约1.2万亿美元，恐带来流动性紧张（参见《 特朗普2.0"大财政"更进一步 》）。高利率下美债利息 支出预计持续高速增长，化债与赤字压力使得特朗普希望货币政策持续宽松来配合财政主导，以减轻债务负担并刺激经济名义增长。在此背景下，特朗普 与美联储在降息问题上矛盾日益突出。 美国总统解雇美联储主席的规则机制 美国总统解雇美联储主席的规则机制较为模糊。 美联储主席与副主席由总统提名，需经参议院确认，任期4年，但仅是主席职位的任期，其作为理事的任 期仍为14年。美联储理事会成员有 ...

Group 1: Interest Rates and Bonds - HSBC suggests that without support from the Bank of Japan, the Japanese government bond yield curve may continue to steepen due to unfavorable factors leading to a prolonged steep curve [1] - The clarity of Japan's fiscal policy trajectory and the Bank of Japan's bond purchasing plan will be crucial for stabilizing the long-term yield curve in the coming weeks [1] Group 2: Commodity Prices - ANZ analysts report that a weaker US dollar and tight market supply are expected to drive up base metal prices, with copper rising 1.2% to $9,614 per ton [2] - Concerns about the economic backdrop are limiting the price increases of other base metals, although aluminum market supply growth is slowing, which may keep the overall market tight [2] Group 3: Trade and Travel - The Royal Bank of Canada indicates that trade tensions are reshaping Canadian travel plans, potentially boosting domestic consumption while widening the US trade deficit [3] - A notable decline in Canadians returning from the US was observed, with a 20% drop in air travel and a 26% drop in car travel in April [3] Group 4: US Fiscal Policy - CICC reports that the "one big beautiful bill" passed in the House is likely to significantly increase the US fiscal deficit over the next decade, with a debt issuance wave expected between July and September [4] - The report highlights that the US may not have the conditions to effectively reduce the deficit due to structural issues and global competition [4] Group 5: Market Trends - Zhongyuan Securities suggests focusing on sectors like power equipment, grid equipment, and cultural media, as the market is expected to steadily trend upwards [5] - CITIC Securities notes that the trade war is causing structural changes in the global stock market, with a shift in capital allocation towards financial and technology sectors [6] Group 6: Nuclear Industry - CITIC Securities indicates that the controllable nuclear fusion industry is expected to accelerate due to favorable policies, increased financing, and technological advancements [7] - Huatai Securities sees opportunities in the nuclear power equipment sector as uranium prices recover and global nuclear energy policies strengthen [8]

Core Viewpoint - The "one big beautiful bill" passed in the House on May 22, with a potential Senate vote in June, aims to significantly increase the U.S. fiscal deficit over the next decade, addressing structural issues like income inequality and re-industrialization, while also facing global geopolitical competition [1] Group 1: Legislative Impact - The bill includes tax cuts, spending reductions, an increase in the debt ceiling, and policies related to defense and immigration [1] - A combined version of the bill is expected to be completed by July 4, aligning with Trump's expectations [1] Group 2: Fiscal Implications - The legislation is likely to lead to a substantial increase in the U.S. fiscal deficit over the next ten years [1] - The U.S. may not have the objective conditions to effectively reduce the deficit in the medium to long term due to structural issues [1] Group 3: Market Reactions - Following the increase in the debt ceiling, a wave of U.S. debt issuance is anticipated between July and September [1] - This situation may compel the U.S. to accelerate monetary and financial policy adjustments, such as initiating quantitative easing (QE) and expediting SLR exemptions to provide liquidity to the U.S. debt market [1]

Core Viewpoint - The "One Big Beautiful Bill" passed in the House is expected to significantly increase the U.S. fiscal deficit over the next decade, confirming previous analyses that the U.S. is unlikely to effectively reduce its deficit due to structural issues like income inequality and re-industrialization [1][3][6]. Summary by Sections Overview of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" - The bill includes tax cuts, spending reductions, an increase in the debt ceiling, and policies on defense and immigration [1][3]. Key Components of the Bill - **Tax Cuts**: The bill aims to permanently extend and expand the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), with an estimated static reduction in fiscal revenue of approximately $4.3 trillion over the next decade [3][5]. - **Spending Cuts**: It proposes significant cuts to social welfare programs, including about $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts and $230 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) [5][6]. - **Defense and Immigration Policies**: Increased spending on defense and border security is included, supporting Trump's initiatives [6]. - **Debt Ceiling Increase**: The bill proposes raising the debt ceiling by $4 trillion [6]. Fiscal Impact - The bill is projected to increase the static fiscal deficit by approximately $2.8 trillion from FY2025 to FY2034, with dynamic adjustments raising this figure to about $3.2 trillion [6][9]. - The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) anticipates a deficit increase of $3.7 trillion over the same period [6]. Short-term and Long-term Implications - In the short term, the bill may lead to a slight decrease in the deficit for FY2025, but overall, the deficit is expected to remain high, around $1.9 trillion, with a deficit rate of 6.4% [9]. - The long-term outlook suggests that the U.S. will continue to face challenges in reducing the deficit due to ongoing structural issues and the need for fiscal stimulus to address income inequality and infrastructure deficits [11][15]. Market and Policy Responses - The anticipated increase in debt issuance may lead to liquidity pressures in the market, potentially prompting the Federal Reserve to consider measures such as restarting quantitative easing (QE) [25][26]. - The bill's passage could also accelerate financial reforms aimed at stabilizing the market and increasing liquidity in the U.S. Treasury market [26].