随着8月1日最后期限的临近，美国政府推动与多国关税谈判的步伐，变得愈发匆忙。 当地时间7月22日的6个小时内，美国总统特朗普在社交媒体上，高调宣布了三条贸易协议的相关消息。 乍一看，美国的关税谈判似乎进展神速，但对比白宫官员4月曾放言的"90天内达成90项协议"，迄今为 止，白宫仅与少数国家敲定了贸易协议框架。 美媒直言，美国关税政策给许多企业带来了混乱和财务上的痛苦，却依然没有让美国一些大的贸易伙伴 坐到谈判桌前。 尽管日本首相石破茂也表示双方已达成贸易协议，不过外媒指出，两人均未透露协议的关键细节。 特朗普7月22日在社交媒体上宣布，美国与菲律宾、日本达成贸易协议，并透露了日前与印度尼西亚所 达成贸易协议的更多细节。 威胁将实施所谓"对等关税"以后，特朗普称已与英国、越南、印尼达成了贸易协议，不过分析指出，这 些协议缺乏关键细节。 美日达成"最大规模贸易协议" 特朗普写道，美国与日本达成贸易协议，原定25%的对等关税税率将下调至15%，日本将向美国投资 5500亿美元并放开大米等农产品市场。 特朗普称，美日达成的是有史以来最大规模贸易协议。 "对菲律宾征19%关税" 特朗普同日宣布与菲律宾达成贸易协议。特 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the rising attention towards "anti-involution" in the market, highlighting significant misunderstandings regarding the concept, particularly in the context of supply-side reforms and the various hidden mechanisms involved in "anti-involution" [4]. Deep Dive Topics - The "anti-involution" topic has gained traction, but there is a considerable divergence in understanding, with many interpreting it through a supply-side reform lens, which may lead to misinterpretations [4]. - The article emphasizes that beyond production adjustments and self-discipline discussions, there are numerous hidden strategies associated with "anti-involution" [4]. Hot Topics - Since June, there has been a resurgence of the "golden-haired girl" trading phenomenon overseas, with domestic sentiment also heating up. The article questions which data might exceed expectations and whether the market's main narrative will shift due to the effects of tariffs [8]. - The importance of "strategic resources" has been underscored in the context of changing global trade dynamics, prompting an exploration of which resources in China possess strategic attributes and how they should be developed in the future [10]. High-Frequency Tracking - The role of "export grabbing" is evolving, with a shift from emerging markets to the United States, indicating a change in export dynamics [13]. - Credit improvement is primarily driven by short-term loans to enterprises, reflecting a trend in financial data [17]. - The June economic data reveals five significant anomalies, suggesting new changes in the economy that may be hidden [21]. - The article notes that the third quarter will serve as a verification period for tariff-induced inflation effects, with a focus on the June Consumer Price Index (CPI) data [24]. - Domestic infrastructure construction has shown a continuous recovery, while industrial production remains relatively stable, although there is a divergence in the construction sector and a slowdown in real estate transactions [26]. - The expiration of tariff exemptions has led to declines in most developed markets, indicating a potential impact on international trade dynamics [29].

Core Insights - The article discusses the rising attention towards "anti-involution" in the market, highlighting significant misunderstandings regarding the concept, particularly in the context of supply-side reforms [4] Group 1: Deep Dive on "Anti-Involution" - The market's understanding of "anti-involution" is largely misaligned, with many interpreting it through a supply-side reform lens, which may lead to incorrect conclusions [4] - Besides production adjustments and self-discipline discussions, "anti-involution" encompasses various "hidden strategies" that are not widely recognized [4] Group 2: Economic Trends and Data Analysis - Recent economic data from June reveals five notable anomalies, indicating new changes in the economy that may not be immediately apparent [21] - The U.S. inflation data for June suggests that the third quarter will serve as a critical period for validating the effects of tariffs on inflation [24] - Domestic infrastructure projects have shown a continuous recovery, indicating a potential positive trend in construction activities [26] Group 3: Export Dynamics - The role of "export grabbing" is shifting, with emerging markets nearing the end of this phase while the U.S. begins to see a resurgence in export activities [13][14] - The importance of "strategic resources" in global trade is increasing, prompting discussions on which resources in China possess strategic attributes and how they should be developed in the future [10]

期 货 研 究 2025 年 07 月 17 日 铝：向上承压 氧化铝：关注矿端影响 铸造铝合金：区间震荡 王蓉 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0002529 wangrong2@gtht.com 王宗源（联系人） 期货从业资格号：F03142619 wangzongyuan@gtht.com 所 铝、氧化铝、铸造铝合金基本面数据更新 | T | T-1 | T-5 | T-22 | T-66 | 沪铝主力合约收盘价 | 20475 | -245 | 45 | -40 | 450 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 沪铝主力合约夜盘收盘价 | 20425 | ー | - | - | l | LME铝3M收盘价 | 2576 | -8 | -27 | ര്‍3 | -30 | | | 沪铝主力合约成交量 | 73249 | -30346 | -29320 | -59980 | -80307 | 沪铝主力合约持仓量 | 194458 | -10736 | -55641 | 12786 ...

2025年07月17日 国泰君安期货商品研究晨报-贵金属及基本金属 观点与策略 | 黄金：震荡上行 | 2 | | --- | --- | | 白银：突破上行 | 2 | | 铜：市场谨慎，价格震荡 | 4 | | 锌：承压运行 | 6 | | 铅：下方或有限 | 7 | | 锡：价格走弱 | 8 | | 铝：向上承压 | 10 | | 氧化铝：关注矿端影响 | 10 | | 铸造铝合金：区间震荡 | 10 | | 镍：消息面扰动情绪，基本面承压运行 | 12 | | 不锈钢：现实与宏观博弈，钢价震荡运行 | 12 | 国 泰 君 安 期 货 研 究 所 请务必阅读正文之后的免责条款部分 1 期货研究 商 品 研 究 商 品 研 究 2025 年 7 月 17 日 业 服 务 研 究 所 | 王蓉 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0002529 | wangrong013179@gtjas.com | | --- | --- | --- | | 刘雨萱 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0020476 | liuyuxuan023982@gtjas.com | 【基本面跟踪】 贵金属基本面数据 | 贵金属基本面数据 | | ...

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of high-level opening up as articulated by Xi Jinping in the publication of "Qiushi" magazine [7] - Xi Jinping expressed condolences to Nigerian President Tinubu over the passing of former Nigerian President Buhari, highlighting diplomatic relations [8] - The Central Urban Work Conference has sparked significant reactions, with various sectors calling for the implementation of its spirit to achieve a new path for urban modernization with Chinese characteristics [9] Group 2 - The State Council, led by Premier Li Qiang, is focusing on policies to strengthen domestic circulation and has reviewed the preliminary rectification of issues found in the 2024 central budget execution [11] - Li Qiang attended the 8th China-Australia CEO Roundtable, indicating ongoing business engagement between the two nations [12] - Wang Huning participated in discussions aimed at expanding domestic demand, reflecting a strategic focus on economic growth [13] Group 3 - China's consumer market showed increased vitality in the first half of the year, becoming a major driver of economic growth, supported by various policies to boost demand [14] - The third China International Supply Chain Promotion Expo opened in Beijing, featuring over 170 foreign delegations, indicating a growing interest in international trade and collaboration [15] Group 4 - A large-scale vocational skills enhancement training initiative is being launched, aiming to provide subsidized training for over 30 million people by the end of 2027, focusing on high-demand industries [19] - ExxonMobil's Huizhou ethylene project phase one has officially commenced production, featuring advanced technology that significantly reduces emissions [19]

以下文章来源于财联社 ，作者潇湘 财联社 . 财联社是上海报业集团主管主办，定位资本市场报道财经通讯社，以"准确、快速、权威、专业"为准 则，提供7x24小时金融信息服务。 来源|财联社 如果美国通胀数据迟迟不上升，那么"最尴尬的人"，或许就是正在等待关税下通胀复燃信号的鲍威 尔，以及那些长期以来一直警告关税将推高美国通胀的经济学家…… 而 今晚，即将公布的美国6月CPI报告，可能就将成为一场关键的"正名之战"…… 目前，在连续四个月高估CPI读数后，不少华尔街机构再度在今晚关键的CPI押注中选择了"押大" ——预计美国6月CPI数据将出现较高的增速。一些业内人士表示，若美国6月份CPI最终出现明显上 涨，将是美国关税上调正在推高通胀的第一个真正迹象。 事实上，前几个月不温不火的美国通胀数据表现，其实已经让美联储处于了一个较为尴尬的境地 ——美联储官员们一直在为年内迄今按兵不动的利率政策进行辩护，他们给出的最常见理由就是预 期关税将推高通胀，但这一效应至今仍始终未见踪影。 而如果今晚的通胀数据表现依然温和——涨幅低于预期，那么几乎可以肯定会引发美国特朗普再次 表达强烈不满。他近来已多次呼吁美联储降息，并屡屡把 ...

Group 1 - Developed markets experienced a decline, with the S&P 500 down 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average down 1.0% [2][4] - The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose by 8 basis points to 4.4%, while the dollar index increased by 0.9% to 97.87 [2][4] - Emerging markets showed mixed performance, with indices like the Ho Chi Minh Index and the Korea Composite Index rising by 5.1% and 4.0% respectively, while the Brazilian IBOVESPA and Indian SENSEX30 fell by 3.6% and 1.1% [4][9] Group 2 - The U.S. announced an increase in tariffs on 14 countries, effective August 1, with rates as high as 50% on copper products [2][65] - The June FOMC meeting minutes revealed a division among Federal Reserve officials regarding the impact of tariffs on inflation, with some believing it would have a temporary effect while others anticipated a more lasting impact [2][81] - Eurozone retail sales fell by 0.7% month-on-month in May, indicating a slowdown in consumer confidence [2][84] Group 3 - The U.S. fiscal deficit for 2025 reached $804.4 billion, up from $772.5 billion in the same period last year, with total expenditures at $4.4 trillion [69][70] - The demand for U.S. Treasury auctions remained robust, with a bid-to-cover ratio of 3.08 for 4-week bills and 2.61 for 10-year notes, indicating strong interest from investors [67][68] - Commodity prices generally increased, with WTI crude oil rising by 2.9% to $68.5 per barrel and COMEX gold up by 0.8% to $3,359.8 per ounce [48][54]

Group 1 - The article discusses the resurgence of the "Goldilocks" trade in overseas markets, driven by the successful implementation of the "Beautiful Act" and lower-than-expected inflation data, which has alleviated market concerns about economic slowdown and interest rate hikes [2][6] - The article highlights that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has caused temporary market disturbances, but the overall market reaction to tariff adjustments has been relatively muted, with the S&P 500 experiencing only a slight decline [21][2] - The article notes that the domestic market is witnessing a mild economic recovery, with consumer policies effectively stimulating demand, as evidenced by a significant increase in retail sales growth in May [3][29] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that the focus for July will be on potential inflation risks in overseas markets and the "anti-involution" policies in the domestic market, with evidence suggesting that inflation in the U.S. may begin to rise due to various factors [55][62] - It mentions that the domestic economy is seeing a shift towards service sector recovery, with increased investment and consumption in services, while export pressures may be building [62][39] - The article outlines the government's focus on addressing "involution" through supply-demand adjustments and structural upgrades, indicating a broader scope for policy implementation [69][49]

Group 1: Macroeconomic Overview - Developed markets experienced a decline, with the S&P 500 down 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average down 1.0% [2][4] - The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose by 8 basis points to 4.4%, while the dollar index increased by 0.9% to 97.87 [2][4] - The expiration of tariff exemptions led to increased tariffs on 14 countries, effective August 1, including Japan and South Korea at 25% [2][4][66] Group 2: Sector Performance - In the U.S., most sectors within the S&P 500 saw declines, particularly financials (-1.9%), consumer staples (-1.8%), and communication services (-1.2%) [9] - Conversely, energy, utilities, and industrial sectors showed gains of 2.5%, 0.7%, and 0.6% respectively [9] - In the Eurozone, non-essential consumer goods, industrials, and energy sectors rose by 2.5%, 2.4%, and 2.3% respectively, while communication services and utilities fell [9] Group 3: Commodity Prices - Commodity prices generally increased, with WTI crude oil rising by 2.9% to $68.5 per barrel and Brent crude oil up by 3.0% to $70.4 per barrel [48] - COMEX gold increased by 0.8% to $3359.8 per ounce, while COMEX silver surged by 5.9% to $38.9 per ounce [48][54] - LME copper fell by 2.4% to $9640 per ton, while LME aluminum saw a slight increase of 0.1% [54] Group 4: Currency Movements - The dollar index rose by 0.9%, with most currencies depreciating against the dollar, including the Japanese yen (-2.0%) and the British pound (-1.1%) [31][42] - The offshore RMB depreciated to 7.1736 against the dollar, with the onshore rate at 7.1710 [42][31] Group 5: Fiscal and Monetary Policy - The U.S. fiscal deficit for 2025 reached $804.4 billion, up from $772.5 billion the previous year, with total expenditures at $4.4 trillion [69][70] - The June FOMC meeting minutes revealed a division among officials regarding the impact of tariffs on inflation, with some believing it would have a temporary effect while others anticipated a more lasting impact [81][82]