1. Report Industry Investment Rating The provided content does not mention the report's industry investment rating. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The "10-year Treasury yield - CSI 300 dividend yield" is used as the core indicator to observe the cost - performance ratio between stocks and bonds. The current difference is near the +1 standard deviation of the one - year rolling window and at the upper limit of the past three years, indicating that the bond's allocation value is gradually increasing, but it is not yet the time for re - allocation between stocks and bonds, and the bond market still has upward pressure [3][4][5]. - The asymmetric compression of the indicator's range since 2021 is unsustainable, and the range may return to the historical normal state of [-2 standard deviations, +2 standard deviations] due to factors such as the upward revision of fundamental expectations and the increase in investors' risk appetite [4][63][64]. - In the short term, the bond market is under phased pressure due to factors such as the strengthening of M1 year - on - year data, the increase in market risk appetite, and the expectation of "anti - involution" policies. Attention should be paid to the redemption situation of bond - type funds to avoid potential negative feedback effects [7][69]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Bond Market Weekly Review: Treasury Yields Fluctuated Upward - From August 11th to 15th, Treasury yields fluctuated upward, with the stock - bond seesaw effect dominating the bond market. The 1 - year and 10 - year Treasury yields rose by 1.59bp and 5.74bp respectively, closing at 1.3665% and 1.7465% [2][12]. - On August 11th - 12th, the bond market sentiment was under pressure due to the continuous strengthening of the equity market. On August 13th, after the release of the July financial data, the 10 - year Treasury yield slightly declined under the game of multiple and short factors. On August 14th, the bond market yield fluctuated due to the rise and fall of the equity market and the central bank's reverse - repurchase operation. On August 15th, the Treasury yield reversed and rose due to the strong rebound of the equity market [12][13]. 3.2 Bond Market Data Tracking 3.2.1 Funding Situation: Funding Rates First Declined and Then Rose - From August 11th to 15th, the central bank's open - market operations had a net withdrawal of 4,149.00 million yuan. The R001 and DR001 rose, while the R007 and DR007 declined. The SHIBOR rate also showed an upward trend [25][26][37]. - The difference between R007 and DR007 narrowed, indicating a narrowing of the funding cost difference between non - bank institutions and banks. The term spread of FR007S5Y - FR007S1Y widened [26]. 3.2.2 Supply Side: Total Issuance and Net Financing Decreased - From August 11th to 15th, the total issuance of interest - rate bonds decreased, and the net financing amount also decreased. The issuance of government bonds decreased, and the net financing of Treasury bonds and local government bonds decreased [41][44][51]. - The issuance scale of inter - bank certificates of deposit decreased, and the net financing amount decreased. The issuance scale of state - owned commercial banks was the highest among different bank types, and the 1 - year term had the highest issuance scale among different term types [51]. 3.3 Next Week's Outlook and Strategy 3.3.1 Current Position of Stock - Bond Cost - Performance Ratio - The "10 - year Treasury yield - CSI 300 dividend yield" is used to measure the stock - bond cost - performance ratio. Since 2021, the fluctuation range has been asymmetrically compressed, but it is expected to return to the historical normal state [3][61][63]. - As of August 15, 2025, the 10 - year Treasury yield was about 1.74%, the CSI 300 dividend yield was 2.76%, and the stock - bond yield difference was - 1.02% [4][63]. 3.3.2 Next Week's Outlook: The Central Funding Rate May Rise Due to Tax - Period Disturbance - Next week, the supply pressure of Treasury bonds will increase. The planned issuance of Treasury bonds is 36.2 billion yuan, and that of local government bonds is 36.915 billion yuan [67]. - Due to the tax - period disturbance and the expiration of reverse - repurchases, the central funding rate may rise [68]. 3.3.3 Bond Market Strategy: The Bond Market is Under Phased Pressure, and Potential Negative Feedback Effects Should be Watched Out - The bond market is under phased pressure due to factors such as the strengthening of M1 year - on - year data, the increase in market risk appetite, and the expectation of "anti - involution" policies [7][69]. - The strengthening of the equity market is the biggest risk for the bond market. Attention should be paid to the redemption situation of bond - type funds to avoid potential bond - market stampede risks [7][69]. 3.4 Global Major Assets - US Treasury yields generally rose, and the curve steepened. The 10Y - 2Y term spread widened by 7bp to 58bp [72]. - The US dollar index declined, and the US dollar against the RMB central parity rate slightly decreased. The prices of gold, silver, and crude oil all fell [72][73].

Report Industry Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly mention the industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints - The extreme divergence between credit spreads and stock risk premiums led to the starting point of the current A-share valuation expansion. The current round of A-share market is driven by funds, and the logic has only reached the middle stage, with the upward trend unfinished [2]. - The fact that the risk premium has reached "mean - 1 standard deviation" does not mean the end of the market. Considering the intensity and duration of the current round of fund - driven, A - share valuations are expected to continue to expand, driving the risk premium to decline further, and the risk - compensation returns of stocks and bonds will eventually converge [2][5]. Summary by Directory 1. Historically, the stock market risk premium can stay below "mean - 1 standard deviation" for a long time - There were several historical periods when the stock market risk premium fell below "mean - 1 standard deviation", such as from December 2014 to August 2015, November 2017 to February 2018, and September 2020 to April 2021, with durations of 9 months, 2 months, and 8 months respectively. Except for the 2017 - 2018 period when the risk premium could not continue to decline due to rapid liquidity withdrawal, in other periods, it could fall to around "mean - 2 standard deviations" or even lower [3]. - These historical periods had similar macro - environments that did not support a bull market in stocks. The factors driving the significant expansion of A - share valuations were not fundamental but fund - driven, and there was no continuous expansion of corporate profits [3]. 2. In the current round of the market, the indexes have expanded to varying degrees, and there are no signs of an end - Since the beginning of the year, the stock market has priced in the decline of the risk - free rate. Different sectors have different repair progress. The repair of large - cap stocks is relatively large, with the ERP basically reaching "mean - 1 standard deviation", while the ERP of small - and medium - cap stocks is still above the historical mean [4]. - The current round of valuation expansion also starts from changes in the capital side. Since September 2024, the economic fundamentals and corporate profit growth have been weak, and the monetary policy has been relatively loose. The core factor determining the start and end of the market is the sustainability of fund - driving. The current round of fund - driven logic has only evolved to institutional - driven and allocation - driven (insurance funds taking the lead), and bank wealth management and public funds will take over in the second half of the year [4]. - With the expansion of A - share valuations, the risk premium of the Shanghai Composite Index has been below "mean - 1 standard deviation" since July 18, lasting for less than 1 month. "Mean - 1 standard deviation" cannot be a sign of the end of the market, especially since the risk premiums of some sectors are still above the mean [4]. 3. Valuation expansion space calculation under two scenario assumptions - Historically, the extreme situation of index valuation expansion is in the range of "mean - N standard deviations", where N is between 0.6 - 4.0, with a median of approximately 2.0. - Scenario 1 assumes that the stock market risk premium can fall to "mean - 2 standard deviations"; Scenario 2 assumes that it can fall to "mean - N standard deviations", where N corresponds to the lowest level previously reached by the index's ERP. - Based on these two assumptions, the ChiNext Index has the largest PE expansion space, followed by the Wind 300 (ex - banks), CSI 1000, and CSI 500. The PE expansion spaces of the SSE 50, Shanghai Composite Index, and Wind Dividend Index are relatively small, but there is still expansion space even in a conservative scenario [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The TIC report from the U.S. Treasury reveals that foreign holdings of U.S. Treasury securities reached $9.0134 trillion as of April, showing a year-over-year increase but a month-over-month decrease, with Japan, the UK, and China being the top holders [1][3]. Group 1: Foreign Holdings of U.S. Debt - As of April, foreign holdings of U.S. debt totaled $9.0134 trillion, an increase of $977.2 billion year-over-year but a decrease of $36.1 billion month-over-month [1]. - The top three holders of U.S. debt are Japan ($1.13 trillion), the UK ($807.7 billion), and China ($757.2 billion), with Japan and the UK increasing their holdings while China decreased its [1][3]. Group 2: Market Reactions and Trends - Since April, there has been significant market volatility attributed to a sentiment of "selling America," raising questions about whether this is a temporary shift or a long-term reallocation of global capital [5][7]. - The report indicates that 12 of the top 20 foreign holders reduced their U.S. debt holdings by a total of $125.2 billion, while 8 increased their holdings by $66.9 billion, suggesting mixed trends among foreign investors [3]. Group 3: Economic Implications - Concerns over U.S. fiscal issues have led to an increase in term premiums, as investors demand additional compensation for taking on term risk, which has affected the correlation between stocks and bonds [5][12]. - The long-term attractiveness of U.S. Treasuries may be challenged if fiscal imbalances are not addressed, potentially leading to higher yields on long-term bonds [12]. Group 4: Strategic Considerations - Japan's substantial holdings of U.S. debt are seen as a strategic asset for trade negotiations, although officials have stated they do not intend to use these holdings as leverage [10]. - The ongoing discussions about U.S. fiscal sustainability and its impact on Treasury yields highlight the delicate balance between maintaining investor confidence and addressing budget deficits [12].

Group 1 - The article discusses the impact of the U.S. tariff policy on both the U.S. and global capital markets, highlighting the uncertainty it brings [2][5][6] - The U.S. government, under President Trump, has implemented a series of tariffs on various trade partners, with rates ranging from 10% to 49% depending on the country [3][4] - The article emphasizes the historical context of globalization and its effects on economic structures, noting that globalization has significantly benefited countries like China while disadvantaging others like Japan and Europe [9][11] Group 2 - The article outlines the concept of disruptive innovation, explaining how it challenges existing market structures and creates new opportunities for growth [17][20] - It identifies the winners and losers of disruptive innovation, where disruptors gain market share and consumer benefits, while traditional companies face declining profitability and potential layoffs [20][22] - The article also discusses the macro-level changes brought about by disruptive innovation, particularly in sectors like healthcare, where traditional inefficiencies persist despite attempts at disruption [22] Group 3 - The article analyzes market drivers, particularly interest rates and stock risk premiums, and their influence on investment decisions in the context of the current economic climate [24][25] - It highlights the importance of revenue growth and operating profit margins for companies, particularly in relation to their exposure to international markets amid tariff uncertainties [26][27] - The article concludes that political and macroeconomic factors will increasingly influence company valuations, necessitating a shift in how investors assess potential returns [29]