Market Overview - The market returned to a volatile range from June 9-13, with the Wind All A closing at 5142.43, down 0.27% from June 6, while the China Convertible Bond Index fell 0.02%[8] - Since the beginning of 2025, the Wind All A has increased by 2.40%, and the China Convertible Bond Index has risen by 4.65%[8] External Factors - The second round of China-US trade talks and escalating Middle East tensions were key trading cues, leading to increased market volatility[2] - The US CPI data indicated limited impact from tariffs on prices, supporting expectations for a rate cut by the Federal Reserve, while geopolitical conflicts pushed oil prices higher[2][36] Strategy Insights - Following the second round of trade talks, market adjustment pressures stem from external uncertainties, particularly from the Middle East and potential changes in US tariff policies[3] - Historical data shows that after significant geopolitical conflicts, the Wind All A typically experiences a recovery around 14 trading days later, with technology and dividend sectors showing notable excess returns[3][39] Market Dynamics - The congestion level of the China 2000 index has decreased significantly, currently at the 79.3 percentile since September 2023, indicating improved structural issues in the small-cap market[16] - Investors are favoring industries with lower congestion levels while avoiding those with higher congestion, maintaining a "rotation thinking" approach in trading strategies[19][20] Convertible Bond Valuation - Convertible bond valuations have generally declined, particularly for crowded debt-type products, with the valuation center for 80 yuan parity dropping to 46.85%[23] - The valuation for 100 yuan parity has decreased to 26.37%, reflecting a broader trend of valuation adjustments in the convertible bond market[23][29]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by the Shanghai Composite Index in breaking through the 3400-point barrier, highlighting the current high valuation levels and the lack of supportive policies or improved earnings expectations as key obstacles [4][10]. Valuation Analysis - The static PE ratio of the Wind All A (excluding financials) is currently at 31.51 times, which is at the 49th percentile since 2000, the 54th percentile over the past decade, and the 100th percentile over the last three years, indicating that the market is nearing its high tolerance for valuations [6][10]. - Compared to global equity markets, the valuation of Wind All A (excluding financials) is relatively high, with the Nasdaq at 44 times, S&P 500 (excluding financials) at approximately 30 times, and the Hang Seng Tech Index at 21 times, suggesting that A-shares lack a solid foundation to maintain levels above 3400 points [9][10]. Market Conditions - The article emphasizes that without new incremental policy support or significant improvements in earnings expectations, the market is unlikely to sustain levels above 3400 points. Current trade environment pressures limit the feasibility of large-scale policy stimulus [10]. - The Producer Price Index (PPI) has shown a continuous decline, with a year-on-year drop of 3.3% in May, indicating that A-share earnings are unlikely to improve in the near term [10]. Future Market Outlook - The market is expected to experience volatility, with a higher probability of downward movement. The focus will likely shift towards sectors with more predictable earnings, suggesting a strategy of seeking certainty and avoiding underperforming stocks [10][11]. - In the absence of significant changes in policies or PPI, a notable rise in the Shanghai Composite Index above 3400 points would be seen as a signal to reduce positions rather than increase them [11]. Structural Opportunities - The article outlines different market styles based on historical data since 2015, indicating that stable styles (e.g., utilities, consumer staples) are favored during external risks or tightening policies, while cyclical styles (e.g., materials, industrials) thrive in improving economic conditions [13][14]. - Growth styles (e.g., technology, emerging industries) depend on upward industry trends, policy support, and liquidity, while consumer styles are closely tied to economic recovery and consumer confidence [15][16]. - Currently, the market environment is characterized by weak earnings and low capital inflows, which is unfavorable for cyclical, growth, and consumer styles, but relatively beneficial for stable and financial styles [19]. Investment Recommendations - The article suggests a balanced allocation strategy, focusing on sectors with potential marginal improvements such as petrochemicals, brokerages, non-ferrous metals, military, and electric power, as well as industries aligned with policy and industry trends like AI applications, gaming, communication, and semiconductors [19].

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - This week, the market first declined and then rose, showing a sideways and narrow - fluctuating trend with an unclear main line. In the equity market, sectors such as non - ferrous metals, petrochemicals, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries led the gains, and the large - cap style was dominant. Positive feedback in the equity market may be gradually forming. From May 29th to June 12th, the bond market had a relatively high - amplitude upward trend since April 7th, with the 30 - year Treasury bond futures recording a maximum increase of 2 points. The short - term upward momentum of the bond market may be limited, and it is more likely to show a volatile trend [1][7]. - Positive feedback in the equity market may be gradually forming. Since April 7th, institutions such as Central Huijin have been bullish on the equity market and entered the market to buy, which has played a crucial role in supporting the equity market. As the resilience of the equity market gradually strengthens, the decline is limited and often accompanied by rebounds, which further enhances investors' confidence. Since May, the Shanghai Composite Index has faced relatively large profit - taking pressure when approaching the annual high, but the market adjustment has been generally controllable, indicating the gradual enhancement of investors' confidence. In terms of allocation, it is recommended to focus on the dividend style, which continues to be highly allocated, and gradually layout sub - sectors in the technology growth sector with potential for recovery [2][8]. - The convertible bond market resonates with the equity market, and structural opportunities dominate the trading rhythm. Currently, the convertible bond market maintains a pattern of high - valuation shock repair. The index is short - term limited by the height of the underlying stocks and the supply rhythm, while the medium - term structural allocation logic continues. The allocation strategy suggests focusing on three main lines: controlling positions, preferentially allocating large - cap blue - chip stocks with high ratings and good liquidity; paying attention to small and medium - cap low - parity, high - elasticity varieties; and closely monitoring the clause game rhythm and credit rating changes to adjust positions [2][9]. Group 3: Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1 Market Observation - From June 9th to June 13th, the broad - based indexes and convertible bond indexes first declined and then rose. The convertible bond financial index, AAA index, convertible bond low - price index, and large - cap index led the gains. In terms of valuation, the valuations of balanced and equity - like convertible bonds were compressed. The short - term upward momentum of the bond market may be limited, and it is more likely to show a volatile trend [7]. - Positive feedback in the equity market may be gradually forming. The market is currently in a stage of structural switching with high volatility and rotation, and the main line is in a dynamic balance among AI technology, new consumption, and dividend value. In terms of market value, large - cap dividends and mid - cap growth are favored by funds. In terms of style, the growth main line is gathering strength, and the dividend logic is stable. In terms of allocation, it is recommended to focus on the dividend style and technology growth sectors [8]. - The convertible bond market resonates with the equity market, and structural opportunities dominate the trading rhythm. The overall strategy should focus on structural optimization, risk control, and theme rotation, and the dumbbell strategy is still preferred. It is recommended to use a neutral position to deal with fluctuations, improve strategy flexibility through careful bond selection, and continuously pay attention to changes in the supply rhythm and capital structure [9]. 2 Convertible Bond Market Tracking 2.1 Convertible Bond Market Conditions - The report provides the performance data of various convertible bond indexes in different time periods, including the recent week, two weeks, since March, one month, two months, half - year, and one - year. For example, the Wind Convertible Bond Energy Index had a 0.41% increase in the recent week, 1.28% in the recent two weeks, etc. [10]. 2.2 Convertible Bond Individual Bonds - Not provided in the given content 2.3 Convertible Bond Valuations - Not provided in the given content 2.4 Convertible Bond Prices - Not provided in the given content

Core Viewpoint - Major industry ETFs in the US are mostly down, with global airline and regional banking ETFs dropping over 2%, and banking ETFs nearly down 2% [1] Group 1: Industry Performance - Global airline industry ETF is priced at $21.87, down by $0.55 (-2.45%), with a trading volume of 620,500 shares and a year-to-date decline of 13.73% [2] - Regional banking ETF is priced at $56.56, down by $1.22 (-2.11%), with a trading volume of 2,409,700 shares and a year-to-date decline of 5.66% [2] - Banking ETF is priced at $53.16, down by $1.05 (-1.94%), with a trading volume of 110,800 shares and a year-to-date decline of 3.48% [2] - Financial sector ETF is priced at $50.09, down by $0.92 (-1.79%), with a trading volume of 5,092,500 shares and a year-to-date increase of 4.01% [2] Group 2: Other Sector Performance - Semiconductor ETF is priced at $259.13, down by $4.02 (-1.53%), with a trading volume of 833,400 shares and a year-to-date increase of 7.00% [2] - Global technology stock ETF is priced at $87.17, down by $0.97 (-1.10%), with a trading volume of 7,682 shares and a year-to-date increase of 2.86% [2] - Biotechnology index ETF is priced at $127.94, down by $1.06 (-0.82%), with a trading volume of 248,700 shares and a year-to-date decline of 3.15% [2] - Consumer discretionary ETF is priced at $212.08, down by $1.63 (-0.76%), with a trading volume of 253,000 shares and a year-to-date decline of 5.21% [2] - Energy sector ETF is priced at $87.38, up by $0.79 (+0.91%), with a trading volume of 7,943,300 shares and a year-to-date increase of 2.80% [2]

Group 1 - Israel launched a large-scale attack on Iran, targeting nuclear facilities and missile factories, which may lead to a prolonged operation to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons [1] - The attack caused market turmoil, with U.S. stock index futures declining, oil prices surging, gold prices rising, and the U.S. dollar index strengthening [1] - Analysts noted that the geopolitical conflict could lead to increased inflation expectations, impacting fixed income markets and potentially pushing the Federal Reserve towards a more hawkish stance [1][2] Group 2 - The conflict has led to a rebound in the U.S. dollar, while safe-haven assets like the Swiss franc, Japanese yen, and gold have also strengthened [2] - The global stock market, which has seen a 30% increase in the MSCI global index this year, may face further declines as the conflict acts as a catalyst for price corrections [2] - Defensive sectors such as utilities, energy stocks, and defense companies are expected to perform well due to concerns over potential supply disruptions in the oil market [2] Group 3 - The scale and impact of the attack remain unclear, leading to limited market volatility despite a rush into safe-haven assets [3] - The uncertainty surrounding the geopolitical conflict adds to the fragile market sentiment, with the potential for either a quick de-escalation or an escalation that threatens oil transport routes [3]

001376 百通能源 0.08 4.69 650.33 沪指6月13日下跌0.75%，申万所属行业中，今日上涨的有3个，涨幅居前的行业为石油石化、国防军 工、公用事业，涨幅分别为2.05%、1.72%、0.48%。公用事业行业位居今日涨幅榜第三。跌幅居前的行 业为美容护理、传媒，跌幅分别为4.12%、2.53%。 资金面上看，两市主力资金全天净流出476.73亿元，今日有7个行业主力资金净流入，国防军工行业主 力资金净流入规模居首，该行业今日上涨1.72%，全天净流入资金25.70亿元，其次是石油石化行业，日 涨幅为2.05%，净流入资金为15.12亿元。 主力资金净流出的行业有24个，计算机行业主力资金净流出规模居首，全天净流出资金70.43亿元，其 次是汽车行业，净流出资金为54.28亿元，净流出资金较多的还有医药生物、电子、电力设备等行业。 公用事业行业今日上涨0.48%，全天主力资金净流入9731.62万元，该行业所属的个股共131只，今日上 涨的有50只，涨停的有3只；下跌的有69只，跌停的有1只。以资金流向数据进行统计，该行业资金净流 入的个股有48只，其中，净流入资金超5000万元的有5只，净 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Composite Index opened lower and the CSI 300 Utilities Index reported a value of 2654.37 points, reflecting a mixed performance in the utilities sector [1] Group 1: Index Performance - The CSI 300 Utilities Index has increased by 0.44% over the past month and by 7.20% over the past three months, but has decreased by 1.93% year-to-date [1] - The index is designed to reflect the overall performance of different industry companies within the CSI 300 Index, categorized into 11 primary industries, 35 secondary industries, and over 200 tertiary and quaternary industries [1] Group 2: Index Composition - The top ten weighted stocks in the CSI 300 Utilities Index are: - Changjiang Electric (48.96%) - China Nuclear Power (10.13%) - Three Gorges Energy (8.04%) - Guodian Power (5.47%) - State Power Investment (4.79%) - Huaneng International (4.21%) - Chuanwei Energy (4.2%) - China General Nuclear Power (3.76%) - Zhejiang Energy (2.85%) - Huadian International (2.61%) [1] - The market composition of the CSI 300 Utilities Index shows that the Shanghai Stock Exchange accounts for 95.91% and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange accounts for 4.09% [2] Group 3: Industry Breakdown - The industry composition of the CSI 300 Utilities Index is as follows: - Hydropower: 60.25% - Thermal Power: 15.15% - Nuclear Power: 13.90% - Wind Power: 8.37% - Gas: 2.34% [2] Group 4: Sample Adjustment - The index samples are adjusted biannually, with adjustments occurring on the next trading day after the second Friday of June and December each year [2] - Weight factors are adjusted in accordance with sample changes, and temporary adjustments occur when the CSI 300 Index samples are modified [2]

港股互联网和科技目前估值比较合理 ， 并有一定的向上增速 ， 但是由于巨头的体量比较大 ， 今年年初也有一波上涨 ， 目前弹性相对差一点 ， 但属于优秀资产 ， 适合长期投资者持有 ， 并大概率有相对不错的回报 。 三 、 创新药 风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者： 边城浪子1986 来源：雪球 一 、 低利率下的稳定回报行业 低利率的环境下 ， 一部分资金自然会寻找股息较高的行业进行投资 ， 并且这些行业的股息回报 也成为了部分银行存款和理财的替代选择 。 特别是保险类资金在大幅加仓高股息个股 ， 红利策 略也在市场上越来越受欢迎 。 我个人觉得其中的公用事业 、 电信运营商 、 电力是值得低风险 偏好的投资者持有的 。 个人疑虑比较大的是银行业 ， 因为资产的真实质量存疑 ， 但是如果未来通过通胀或者放水等手 段稀释不良资产 ， 只要这一过程持续够久 ， 银行也可以看作是安全 ， 就看时间的力量能不能 化解这一切了 。 二 、 港股互联网与科技 创新药是最近最火的板块之一 ， 而且市值除了个别巨头 ， 普遍较为适中 ， 那么弹性相对较好 。 目前创 ...

风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者： 边城浪子1986 目前创新药处于不可证伪阶段 ， 业绩不是第一位 ， 事件驱动更为重要 ， 大概率在未来一段时 间可能还有一定表现机会 ， 后期会不会出现鸡犬升天的现象 ？ 个人觉得还是存在一定概率的 ， 就是存在未来大部分创新药从合理估值到高估的过程 。 四 、 Ai应用 来源：雪球 一 、 低利率下的稳定回报行业 低利率的环境下 ， 一部分资金自然会寻找股息较高的行业进行投资 ， 并且这些行业的股息回报 也成为了部分银行存款和理财的替代选择 。 特别是保险类资金在大幅加仓高股息个股 ， 红利策 略也在市场上越来越受欢迎 。 我个人觉得其中的公用事业 、 电信运营商 、 电力是值得低风险 偏好的投资者持有的 。 个人疑虑比较大的是银行业 ， 因为资产的真实质量存疑 ， 但是如果未来通过通胀或者放水等手 段稀释不良资产 ， 只要这一过程持续够久 ， 银行也可以看作是安全 ， 就看时间的力量能不能 化解这一切了 。 二 、 港股互联网与科技 港股互联网和科技目前估值比较合理 ， 并有一定的向上增速 ， 但是由于巨头的体 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of not only beta returns but also the significant alpha capabilities that contribute to the success of a dividend-themed fund, highlighting the exceptional performance of the Zhongtai Dividend Preferred Fund [2][5]. Performance Summary - Since its establishment on March 24, 2022, the Zhongtai Dividend Preferred Fund has achieved a net value growth rate of 36.85%, significantly outperforming its benchmark growth rate of 7.02%, resulting in an excess return of 29.83% [2][4]. - The fund's performance is compared to various indices, showing a substantial advantage over the CSI Dividend Index (5.10%) and the CSI Dividend Total Return Index (23.98%) [4]. Investment Philosophy - The fund manager, Wang Tao, asserts that high short-term dividends do not guarantee long-term returns, emphasizing the need for both long-term high dividends and immediate high dividends in dividend investment [6]. - Companies that can provide long-term high dividends typically exhibit strong profitability and a willingness to distribute dividends, with preferred sectors including banks, utilities, and mature manufacturing industries [7]. Active Management Strategy - The key to constructing an actively managed alpha strategy lies in thorough research and selection of investment targets that fit the dividend investment framework, aiming to buy at "value" prices [8]. - The fund's current holdings reflect a higher allocation to bank stocks compared to the CSI Dividend Index, while coal stocks have been reduced due to declining internal rates of return [10]. Market Outlook - Wang Tao expresses caution regarding the crowded nature of dividend investment strategies, noting that rising stock prices can lead to declining internal rates of return, but adjustments are made based on these changes [12]. - The ideal dividend fund should have high internal rates of return and quality holdings with sufficient safety margins, ultimately delivering long-term benefits to investors [13].