时代长安动力电池有限公司成立于2023年6月，法定代表人为朱云峰，经营范围包括电池制造、电池销 售、新兴能源技术研发、新材料技术研发等。股东信息显示，该公司由宁德时代（300750）、深蓝汽车 科技有限公司、长安汽车（000625）共同持股。 天眼查App显示，近日，时代长安动力电池有限公司发生工商变更，注册资本由15亿人民币增至40亿人 民币，增幅约167%。 来源：中国能源网 ...

2026年以来，钠电池产业迎来突破，头部企业动作频频。 近年来，钠电池凭借低温性能好、安全性高、成本潜力大等优势，在储能、两轮车、启停电源等场景持 续渗透。业内预测，钠电池将在多个领域对铅酸电池和部分锂电池形成替代或补充，2026年有望成为其 商业化落地的关键节点。 "如果说过去几年钠电池行业仍处于技术开发、市场探索等发展初期，那么从现在开始，钠电池已具备 商业推广的条件。"中科海钠总经理李树军在2025高工钠电年会上表示。而江海证券最新研报提到， 2025年钠电芯均价约为0.52元/瓦时，预计2030年将降至0.25元/瓦时。研究机构起点研究院（SPIR）预 计，到2030年，全球储能钠电池市场规模将达580吉瓦时，同期汽车用钠电池市场规模或将突破410吉瓦 时。 总体而言，场景破局是钠电池打开市场空间的关键所在。无论是储能电站的集装箱、城市街头的两轮车 换电柜，还是商用车启停电源等细分领域，钠电池的应用场景都在持续拓宽。业内人士表示，由于钠离 子半径较大、电解液凝固点低、电极材料结构稳定等特性，在低温环境下，钠电池仍能有效维持电池容 量和性能，这让钠电池成为极寒地区乘用车、轻商车辆等场景的理想选择之一。此 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In Q4 2025, after nearly a year of upward trend, the A - share market started to move sideways and fluctuate, with wide - based indices showing mixed performance. Large and mid - cap value indices significantly outperformed growth indices, and the active equity fund scale and share decreased while the issuance quantity and scale slightly increased [3][8]. - The average stock position of equity funds slightly shrank, and the Hong Kong stock position also declined. Institutions increased the allocation in cyclical and financial sectors and adjusted the allocation in technology, medicine, and consumption sectors [3]. - The performance of theme funds in various industries was differentiated. Cyclical theme funds performed the best, while pharmaceutical theme funds performed the worst [3]. - Among the top 20 fund companies in terms of active equity fund scale, the scale changes compared to Q3 were mixed, with some companies' rankings changing [3]. - In Q4, the active equity fund most heavily held by FOF in terms of holding ratio and quantity was "Fuguo Steady Growth" [3]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 Fund Market Overview - **Performance Review**: In Q4 2025, the A - share market moved sideways and fluctuated after a year - long upward trend. Only the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 2.22% among wide - based indices, while others like the Shenzhen Component Index and the ChiNext Index declined. In terms of style, large and mid - cap value indices outperformed growth indices. The Hang Seng Index and related Hong Kong stock indices also declined [8]. - **Industry Index Performance**: Except for 9 industries such as medicine and beauty care, the remaining 22 industries in the Shenwan 31 - industry index achieved positive returns in Q4. Resources and military industries performed well, while the pharmaceutical industry was weak overall. The top 5 industries in terms of increase were non - ferrous metals (16.25%), petroleum and petrochemicals (15.31%), communication (13.61%), national defense and military industry (13.1%), and light industry manufacturing (7.53%) [11]. - **Equity Fund Performance**: In Q4 2025, ordinary stock - type funds, partial - stock hybrid funds, and flexible allocation funds declined by 1.94%, 1.60%, and 0.04% respectively, while balanced hybrid funds rose by 0.87%. In terms of risk, balanced hybrid funds with lower stock positions had the best drawdown performance, and flexible allocation funds showed better risk - return performance in the long - term [31]. - **Scale and Share**: By the end of Q4 2025, the total scale of active equity funds was 3.81 trillion yuan, a slight decrease of 4.53pct compared to the previous quarter, and the total share was 2.56 trillion shares, a decrease of 2.91pct. Among them, partial - stock hybrid funds had the largest scale, and balanced hybrid funds had the smallest scale [34]. - **Newly Issued Fund Situation**: In Q4, the number and scale of newly issued active equity funds slightly increased. A total of 100 funds were newly issued, with a total scale of 441.67 billion yuan, an increase of 4.72 billion yuan compared to the previous quarter. Partial - stock hybrid funds had the largest newly issued scale [36]. 3.2 Fund Holding Characteristics - **Stock/Hong Kong Stock Position**: In Q4 2025, the equity fund position slightly shrank, with the average stock position at 88.05%, a decrease of 0.88 percentage points compared to the end of the previous quarter. The Hong Kong stock position also decreased, with the average investment market value of Hong Kong stocks accounting for 11.62% of the net value, a decrease of 1.85 percentage points compared to the previous quarter [43]. - **Heavy - Holding Stock Sector Allocation**: In Q4, technology was the most heavily held sector by active equity funds. Except for cyclical, manufacturing, and financial sectors, the proportion of other sectors decreased. Institutions increased the allocation in cyclical and financial sectors and adjusted the allocation in technology, medicine, and consumption sectors [48]. - **Heavy - Holding Stock Industry Allocation**: The electronics industry was still the largest heavily - held industry by equity funds, but the allocation ratio decreased, and non - ferrous metals were significantly increased. The concentration of the top five industries slightly decreased from 58.58% in Q3 to 58.40% [50]. - **Individual Stock Level**: The top 10 individual stocks in terms of heavy - holding market value accounted for by equity funds were Zhongji Innolight, Xinyisheng, CATL, Tencent Holdings, Zijin Mining, Alibaba - W, Cambricon - U, Luxshare Precision, SMIC, and Kweichow Moutai. The market value proportion of Zhongji Innolight, Xinyisheng, and Ping An of China increased significantly, while that of Industrial Fuxing, Alibaba - W, and EVE Energy decreased relatively more [52]. - **Heavy - Holding Stock Market Value and Concentration**: The market value style of equity fund holdings continued to strengthen towards mid - and large - cap stocks. The concentration of the top 50, 100, and 200 heavy - holding stocks slightly decreased, but basically continued the previous trend [61]. 3.3 Fund Company Analysis - **Scale Ranking**: In Q4 2025, the scale changes of the top 20 fund companies in terms of active equity fund scale compared to Q3 were mixed. The top 5 institutions were E Fund, China Europe Asset Management, GF Fund, Fuguo Fund, and Huatai - PineBridge Fund. Among the companies ranked 6 - 20, the equity scale of Yongying Fund further increased, and its ranking rose by 2 places [64]. - **TOP20 Fund Company Heavy - Holding Industries**: The first - largest heavily - held industries of the top 20 fund companies were mainly electronics and medicine and biology. Dacheng Fund's first - largest heavily - held industry was non - ferrous metals, showing certain differences [65]. - **TOP20 Fund Company Heavy - Holding Stocks**: In Q4, the average concentration of the top three heavy - holding stocks of the top 20 fund companies in terms of active equity fund scale was 14.27%, and the concentration of the top five heavy - holding stocks was 21.04%, slightly increasing compared to the previous quarter. Xingquan Fund had the highest concentration of the top three heavy - holding stocks [67]. 3.4 Theme Fund Analysis - **Fund Performance**: In Q4, the performance of theme funds in various industries was differentiated. Cyclical theme funds performed the best, with a quarterly increase of 10.10%, followed by financial and manufacturing theme funds. Pharmaceutical theme funds had the worst performance, with a quarterly decline of 13.15% [71]. - **Pharmaceutical and Consumption Themes**: In pharmaceutical theme funds, the sub - sectors with a relatively high market value proportion in heavy - holding stocks were chemical preparations and other biological products. The sub - sectors with a relatively large increase in heavy - holding proportion were medical R & D outsourcing and traditional Chinese medicine. In consumption theme funds, the sub - sectors with a relatively high market value proportion were liquor and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery. The sub - sectors with a relatively large increase in heavy - holding proportion were food processing and social services [75]. - **Technology and New Energy Themes**: In technology theme funds, the sub - sectors with a relatively high market value proportion in heavy - holding stocks were artificial intelligence and consumer electronics industries. The sub - sectors with a relatively large increase in heavy - holding proportion were optical modules and IDC. In new energy theme funds, the sub - sectors with a relatively high market value proportion were energy storage and solid - state batteries. The sub - sectors with a relatively large increase in heavy - holding proportion were resource stocks and solid - state batteries [79]. 3.5 FOF Holding Analysis - **High - Holding - Ratio Funds**: In Q4 2025, the active equity fund with the highest holding ratio among FOF heavy - holding funds was "Fuguo Steady Growth", with a fund manager of Fan Yan. The fund's holding market value accounted for 2.53% of the total market value of all heavy - holding funds, an increase of 0.13% compared to the previous quarter [81]. - **High - Holding - Quantity Funds**: In Q4 2025, the active equity fund most heavily held by FOF in terms of quantity was still "Fuguo Steady Growth", followed by "Bodaojiu Hang" and "China Europe Dividend Premium Selection" [83]. - **Ratio/Quantity Changes**: In Q4 2025, the active equity funds with the largest increase in holding ratio and quantity among FOF heavy - holding funds were "Huatai - PineBridge Extended Growth Theme" and "China Europe Dividend Premium Selection" respectively [85]. - **New - Generation Fund Managers**: Among the active equity funds managed by new - generation fund managers with less than 3 years of management experience, the fund with the highest holding ratio among FOF heavy - holding funds in Q4 was "Rongtong Industrial Trend Selection", with a fund manager of Li Jin. The fund's holding market value accounted for 0.70% of the total market value of all heavy - holding funds, a quarter - on - quarter increase of 0.37% [87]. - **Holding Own Funds**: Different FOF institutions such as E Fund, China Europe Asset Management, Invesco Great Wall, Fuguo Fund, Huatai - PineBridge Fund, and Xingzheng Global Fund had different situations in holding their own equity funds, with different scales and top - held funds [89][91][94][96][98].

Summary of Conference Call Records Industry: Energy Storage and Lithium Battery Key Points 1. **Energy Storage Policy**: The national capacity compensation electricity price policy has been introduced, with provinces expected to follow up with detailed regulations and lists. There is a strong demand for large-scale energy storage, with an expected growth of over 60% in 2026. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act has led to unexpected installations in 2025, and data center energy storage is anticipated to explode starting Q4 2025, with 2026 expected to exceed forecasts. Emerging markets in Europe and the Middle East are also projected to see significant growth in energy storage demand, contributing to a global installation growth of over 60% in 2026 and a compound annual growth rate of 30-50% over the next three years. The focus remains on large-scale energy storage integration and leading energy storage battery companies [1][1][1] 2. **Lithium Battery Market**: The China Passenger Car Association anticipates a recovery in electric vehicle sales in late January, with retail sales expected to reach 800,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 8%, which is better than pessimistic forecasts. Domestic sales in 2026 are expected to grow by 5-10%, with battery capacity increasing by 10%. The national energy storage capacity price policy is expected to be followed by multiple provinces, and the recent decline in lithium carbonate prices may lead to the suspension or restart of some projects. Production is expected to decrease by over 10% in February due to the Spring Festival, but recovery is anticipated post-holiday. Battery prices have been adjusted to 0.38 yuan/wh, with price increases for small and medium customers already implemented, and larger customers expected to see gradual price adjustments after March. The battery sector is strongly recommended, with top picks including CATL and EVE Energy, along with other quality material leaders [2][2][2] 3. **Industrial Control and Wind Power**: The industrial control sector is experiencing a weak recovery in demand, with positive trends in lithium battery demand, wind power, and machine tools. The domestic offshore wind power capacity is projected to exceed 8GW in 2025, with a three-year action plan to enhance domestic offshore wind potential. The European offshore wind sector is entering a sustained boom cycle, and the domestic onshore wind power capacity is expected to exceed 100GW, a 25% year-on-year increase. Wind turbine prices are expected to rise by 3-5%, with profit margins gradually recovering. Recommendations include companies involved in offshore cables, foundations, and complete machines [3][3][3] 4. **Solar Power and Grid Investment**: Demand in the solar power sector is currently weak, with rising silver prices pushing battery prices up significantly. The component sector is facing pressure, and demand is expected to decline for the first time in 2026. However, space solar power presents significant growth potential, with gallium arsenide, P-type HJT, and space perovskite expected to benefit first. The grid investment is projected to grow in 2025, with opportunities in overseas transformer markets. Key recommendations include leading companies in various segments of the energy sector [3][3][3] 5. **Company Recommendations**: - CATL: Global leader in power and energy storage batteries, with confirmed growth and low valuation - Sungrow: Global leader in inverters, with strong overseas energy storage integration capabilities - Sifang Electric: Domestic leader in power equipment with strong overseas orders and profitability - EVE Energy: Strong growth in power and energy storage lithium batteries, with a stable consumer battery segment - Other notable companies include Ganfeng Lithium, BYD, and LONGi Green Energy, which are expected to perform well in their respective sectors [3][3][3] Additional Insights - The energy storage market is expected to see a significant increase in demand driven by new policies and technological advancements - The lithium battery sector is poised for growth, with a focus on production recovery and price adjustments - The industrial control and renewable energy sectors are experiencing a gradual recovery, with specific companies positioned to benefit from these trends - The solar power market faces challenges but also opportunities in emerging technologies like space solar power [1][2][3][4][5]

2月2日，宁德时代跌0.29%，成交额137.66亿元。两融数据显示，当日宁德时代获融资买入额10.47亿 元，融资偿还12.95亿元，融资净买入-2.48亿元。截至2月2日，宁德时代融资融券余额合计234.68亿 元。 责任编辑：小浪快报 资料显示，宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司位于福建省宁德市蕉城区漳湾镇新港路2号,香港中环云咸 街29号LKF2913楼，成立日期2011年12月16日，上市日期2018年6月11日，公司主营业务涉及宁德时代 新能源科技股份有限公司是一家主要从事主要从事动力电池、储能电池的研发、生产、销售的中国公 司。该公司的产品应用于乘用车、商用车、表前储能、表后储能等领域，以及工程机械、船舶、航空器 等应用场景。动力电池产品主要包括电芯、模组或电箱及电池包。储能电池产品主要包括电芯、电池 柜、储能集装箱以及交流侧系统等。该公司还从事电池材料和回收以及其他业务。该公司在国内和国外 市场经营其业务。主营业务收入构成为：动力电池系统73.55%，储能电池系统15.88%，电池材料及回 收4.41%，其他(补充)4.28%，电池矿产资源1.88%。 截至9月30日，宁德时代股东户数22.75万 ...

智通财经APP获悉，东吴证券发布研报称，国家层面首次明确电网独立新型储能容量电价机制，实行清 单制管理、加速储能项目建设进度。该行预计后续多省将出台相关补贴，25年新型储能并网183GWh， 该行预计26年仍可实现50%增长至275GWh。全国性储能容量电价出台+碳酸锂价格回调，储能需求恢 复，并看好中游材料，推荐隔膜、电解液、负极、正极、铝箔、铜箔等相关产业标的。 东吴证券主要观点如下： 国家层面首次明确电网独立新型储能容量电价机制、战略意义大 1)容量电价计算规则：以当地煤电容量电价标准为基础(165-330元/kw*年)，根据顶峰能力按一定比例折 算(折算比例为满功率连续放电时长除以全年最长净负荷高峰持续时长，最高不超过1)，并考虑电力市 场建设进展、电力系统需求等因素确定。 实行清单制管理、加速储能项目建设进度 项目具体清单由省级能源主管部门会同价格主管部门制定，管理要求由国家能源局另行明确。该行预计 对储能电站的申报、考核、建设周期等明显要求，一定程度上推动一部分暂停项目的建设进度。 明确容量电价承担方、电费结算与市场参与 1)明确新型储能容量补偿费用，纳入当地系统运行费用，成为电价构成部分，由终端 ...

作为深耕中国市场数十年的老牌车企，福特与宁德时代和比亚迪开展电池技术合作是非常明智的选择。 近年来，LFP电池因其安全性和低成本优势，在储能电池领域占据超过90%的市场份额；在电动汽车领 域也日益成为主流技术方案，2025年全球市场占有率已超50%。宁德时代是LFP电池技术的引领者，在 全球装机量中占比达到48%，稳居第一。而在混合动力汽车电池领域，比亚迪则居于全球领先地位， 2025年3季度市场占比接近30%。 与中国企业的合作，对于福特的新能源转型至关重要。2025年6月，福特电动汽车系统副总裁丽莎·德雷 克曾在接受媒体采访时如此解释引进宁德时代技术的意义："如果你从未亲眼见过某样东西，就很难进 行创新。这就是为什么我们需要把它引进到这里"。 日前，美国众议院中国事务特别委员会主席约翰·穆勒纳尔致信美国福特汽车公司首席执行官吉姆·法 利，就福特与宁德时代等中国电池企业的合作情况进行质询。信中污蔑中国严重威胁美国供应链独立性 和经济安全，并表达了对中国"利用"美国关键产业和将基于中国技术所产电池部署在美国关键基础设施 中的风险等问题的担忧。 很明显，穆勒纳尔此次质询的目的就是对福特施压，阻挠其与中国电池企业 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the establishment of a low-altitude economy standard system in China, aiming for a basic framework by 2027 and over 300 standards by 2030 to support the healthy development of the low-altitude economy [1][2] - The low-altitude economy is transitioning from concept validation to practical application, with a rapid increase in the number of related enterprises and continuous market growth [1][2] - By 2025, the low-altitude economy market in China is projected to reach 1.5 trillion yuan, with expectations of 3.5 trillion yuan by 2035, highlighting its potential as a new trillion-level industry [2][3] Group 2 - Local governments are actively promoting low-altitude economic development, with Shanghai targeting an industry scale of over 80 billion yuan by 2028 and Chongqing implementing policies to encourage innovation and testing [2][3] - The low-altitude economy is recognized as a national strategic priority, with policies becoming increasingly detailed, indicating a maturing industry [3][4] - The consumer-grade drone market is expected to reach 48.9 billion yuan in 2024, growing by 20%, while the industrial-grade market reached 113.4 billion yuan in 2023, showing greater growth potential [4] Group 3 - Companies are making strategic investments in the low-altitude economy, with Deep City Transportation planning to raise up to 1.8 billion yuan for projects related to intelligent transportation and low-altitude applications [2][3] - ZTE Corporation is advancing its low-altitude sensing technology through pilot projects, while XPeng Motors is exploring flying cars with plans for stable progress between 2026 and 2028 [6][7] - Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. has introduced a low-altitude economic solution combining zero-carbon water airports and eVTOL aircraft, marking a significant step towards large-scale development [7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights that compared to automakers, power battery suppliers are potentially more profitable, as evidenced by the financial forecasts of companies like Ruipu Lanjun and Guoxuan High-Tech [2][3]. - Ruipu Lanjun expects a net profit of approximately 630 million to 730 million yuan in 2025, a significant turnaround from a net loss of 1.353 billion yuan in 2024, driven by increased product shipments and improved capacity utilization [2]. - Guoxuan High-Tech anticipates a net profit of 2.5 billion to 3 billion yuan in 2025, representing a year-on-year growth of 107.16% to 148.59% [3]. Group 2 - The profitability of leading power battery companies like CATL is highlighted, with projected net profits of 44.121 billion yuan, 50.745 billion yuan, and 49 billion yuan for 2023, 2024, and the first three quarters of 2025, respectively [3]. - In contrast, leading electric vehicle manufacturer BYD's net profits for the same periods are significantly lower, at 30.041 billion yuan, 40.254 billion yuan, and 23.333 billion yuan [3]. - The automotive industry's sales profit margin is projected to be only 4.1% in 2025, down from 4.3% at the end of 2024, indicating ongoing profitability challenges due to factors like price wars and rising raw material costs [4].

胡定坤 日前，美国众议院中国事务特别委员会主席约翰·穆勒纳尔致信美国福特汽车公司首席执行官吉姆·法 利，就福特与宁德时代等中国电池企业的合作情况进行质询。信中污蔑中国严重威胁美国供应链独立性 和经济安全，并表达了对中国"利用"美国关键产业和将基于中国技术所产电池部署在美国关键基础设施 中的风险等问题的担忧。 很明显，穆勒纳尔此次质询的目的就是对福特施压，阻挠其与中国电池企业的技术合作。2025年12月， 福特宣布将利用宁德时代的技术授权生产磷酸铁锂（LFP）电池，用于电力储能系统。今年1月15日， 美国《华尔街日报》披露福特还在与比亚迪洽谈混合动力汽车电池交易。当日，穆勒纳尔就发表声明 说，"这是一个严重的安全隐患"，福特应该与美国的盟友而不是对手合作。 讽刺的是，美国议员却无视本国企业利益，频繁发声、质询予以阻挠。殊不知福特将是合作推进的主要 受益者，也将是合作受阻的主要受害者。没有与福特的合作，宁德时代、比亚迪仍然是全球电池产业的 领军者。而与中企的合作拖延一天，福特就离拥有高性能LFP电池、离进军储能电池市场远了一天，美 国相关产业也必然因此受损。 美国议员做出如此不智之举的背后是"泛化国家安全"思维上 ...