1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. 2. Core View of the Report In Q2 2025, the Hong Kong stock market showed a V-shaped trend of sharp decline followed by recovery. The returns of various types of Hong Kong stock funds were positive, and the scale and share of Hong Kong stock funds increased. The stock positions and Hong Kong stock positions of Hong Kong stock funds increased slightly. In terms of heavy - position sectors, there were increases in medicine, finance, and technology, and a decrease in consumption. Among heavy - position stocks, pharmaceutical stocks showed obvious increases, while some Internet platform leaders declined. The scale of some fund companies increased significantly [3]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Hong Kong Stock Fund Performance and Scale Development - **Performance**: In Q2 2025, among the main indices tracked by Hong Kong stock funds, the Hang Seng Index and Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose by 4.42% and 1.9% respectively, outperforming the CSI 300. The Hang Seng Technology Index fell by - 1.70%. The leading indices in terms of gains were the China Securities Hong Kong Stock Connect Innovative Drug Index (25.6%) and the China Securities Hong Kong Stock Connect Non - Banking Financial Index (21.8%). The average returns of various types of Hong Kong stock funds were positive, with "Hong Kong QDII - Active" leading with an average increase of 10.22% [3]. - **Scale and Share**: As of the end of Q2, the total scale of Hong Kong stock funds was 619.134 billion yuan, a quarter - on - quarter increase of 13.54 pct; the total share was 623.83 billion shares, a quarter - on - quarter increase of 7.45 pct. In Q2, the number of newly issued funds was 28, an increase from the previous quarter, but the newly issued scale was 7.517 billion yuan, lower than the previous quarter [3]. 3.2 Hong Kong Stock Fund Positioning Characteristics - **Stock and Hong Kong Stock Positions**: In Q2, the average stock position was 92%, a slight increase from the previous quarter. The stock position of index funds was higher than that of actively managed funds. The average Hong Kong stock position was 85%, an increase from the previous quarter, and the gap between index funds and actively managed funds narrowed in Q2 [3]. - **Heavy - Position Sector Allocation**: Technology (39%) and consumption (25%) ranked first and second in terms of proportion. The sectors with more increases were medicine (+2.27 pct), finance (+2.25 pct), and technology (+1.67 pct), while consumption (-5.97 pct) was significantly reduced [3]. - **Heavy - Position Stock Industry Distribution**: Media ranked first for four consecutive quarters, with a quarter - on - quarter increase of 0.66 pct in Q2; Commerce and Retail ranked second for four consecutive quarters, with a quarter - on - quarter decrease of 3.5 pct; Electronics became the third for two consecutive quarters, with a quarter - on - quarter increase of 0.88 pct. The sector with the highest quarter - on - quarter increase was Medicine and Biology, accounting for 12.42% and a quarter - on - quarter increase of 2.27 pct [3]. - **Individual Stock Level**: The "herding effect" of funds on leading stocks decreased. In terms of the number of funds holding heavy - position stocks, Xiaomi rose one place to become the third, and Sino Biopharmaceutical and Pop Mart entered the top 10 for the first time in four quarters. The concentration of heavy - position stocks decreased, and the proportion of large - cap stocks with a market value of over 80 billion yuan rose to 90% [3]. 3.3 Hong Kong Stock Fund Company Analysis - **Scale Ranking**: In Q2, the top 5 fund companies in terms of scale were Huaxia, E Fund, Fullgoal, GF, and ICBC Credit Suisse, and their total scales increased to varying degrees compared with the previous quarter. Huaxia's Hong Kong stock product scale exceeded 10 billion yuan, and ICBC Credit Suisse's scale increased by 35.45 pct quarter - on - quarter. Among the top 20, the most obvious expansion was by Huatai - PineBridge, with a quarter - on - quarter increase of 91.13 pct, rising four places to the seventh [3]. 3.4 Performance - Oriented Hong Kong Stock Fund Positioning Display and Quarterly Report Views - **Positioning Display**: Some actively managed Hong Kong stock funds in Q2 2025 held stocks that were among the top 50 in terms of gains, such as Rongchang Biologics, Sino Biopharmaceutical, and Innovent Biologics [54]. - **Quarterly Report Views**: Fund managers generally expressed optimism about the development prospects of sectors such as innovative drugs, new consumption, and technology Internet, and adjusted their investment strategies according to market conditions [57][58].

Core Viewpoint - The recent establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's growth tier and the reactivation of the fifth listing standard for unprofitable companies signal a significant shift in the capital market, allowing unprofitable "hard tech" enterprises to pursue IPOs more effectively [1][4]. Group 1: Unprofitable Companies' IPO Activities - A number of unprofitable companies are actively pursuing IPOs following the announcement of the growth tier and the fifth listing standard, which has reignited their financing needs [2]. - Wuhan Heyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. is leading the charge with its IPO approval from the CSRC on July 18, 2023, despite not having any approved drugs or profits yet [2]. - Shenzhen Beixin Life Technology Co., Ltd. also submitted its IPO registration shortly after, indicating a trend among medical device companies to capitalize on the new regulations [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Changes and Support for Technology - The fifth listing standard, initially aimed at supporting pharmaceutical companies, has been broadened to include a wider range of high-growth technology sectors such as artificial intelligence and commercial aerospace [4]. - The reactivation of the fifth standard is seen as a crucial measure to alleviate the financing bottlenecks faced by hard tech companies, which often struggle with long R&D cycles and high initial investments [4][5]. - The establishment of the growth tier is viewed as a precise upgrade to the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's system, addressing market pressures faced by companies unable to achieve short-term profitability [5]. Group 3: Investor Protection and Risk Management - The introduction of the growth tier includes measures to enhance investor protection, such as a special identifier "U" for unprofitable companies, which aims to improve risk awareness among investors [6][7]. - Regulatory bodies are implementing a three-tiered mechanism for risk management, which includes enhanced information disclosure rules and stricter delisting criteria to support rational pricing and risk mitigation for unprofitable enterprises [7].

Market Performance - The market saw an afternoon rise with sectors such as CRO, special steel, and super hydropower gaining, while banking, insurance, and pork sectors adjusted [1] - By the close, the CSI A500 index rose by 0.5%, the CSI 300 index increased by 0.4%, the ChiNext index surged by 1.9%, and the STAR Market 50 index climbed by 1.5%, while the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index fell by 0.3% [1] Index Details - The CSI 300 index, composed of 300 large and liquid stocks from the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets, had a rolling P/E ratio of 13.5 times, with a valuation percentile of 57.0% since its inception in 2005 [2] - The CSI A500 index, made up of 500 stocks with good liquidity across various industries, recorded a daily increase of 0.5% and a rolling P/E ratio of 15.7 times, with a valuation percentile of 60.2% since 2004 [2] - The ChiNext index, tracking 100 large and liquid stocks in the ChiNext market, rose by 1.9% with a rolling P/E ratio of 35.1 times, and a valuation percentile of 20.3% since its launch in 2010 [2] - The STAR Market 50 index, consisting of 50 large and liquid stocks from the STAR Market, increased by 1.5% with a rolling P/E ratio of 146.1 times, and a valuation percentile of 99.6% since its inception in 2020 [2] Hang Seng Index - The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, which includes 50 large and actively traded stocks listed in Hong Kong, saw a decline of 0.3% and has a rolling P/E ratio of 10.4 times, with a valuation percentile of 63.1% since 2002 [3]

Group 1: Market Trends - The fundraising market is in a recovery phase, with a projected decline of 20.8% in 2024, narrowing to 2.9% in Q1 2025, indicating a gradual restoration of market confidence [2] - Patient capital is becoming a significant trend, with long-term funds like banks and insurance companies accelerating their entry into the venture capital space, exemplified by the establishment of 9 financial asset investment companies (AIC) with a total scale of 150 billion yuan [2][3] - The shift in the role of state-owned guiding funds from "招商思维" (investment attraction mindset) to "产业构建思维" (industry construction mindset) is notable, focusing on matching industrial elements rather than short-term metrics [2] Group 2: Exit Strategies - Innovation in exit strategies is crucial, with a focus on balancing DPI (Distributions to Paid-In) and IRR (Internal Rate of Return) as a core challenge for venture capital institutions [3] - The adoption of diverse exit channels is showing initial success, with S funds becoming a significant part of investment strategies, providing a new exit route for general partners (GPs) [3] - The current IPO market in Hong Kong is viewed as a "first aid channel" rather than a "golden channel," with differing opinions on its long-term stability [4] Group 3: Industry Collaboration - Emphasizing long-termism and value investing is seen as essential for overcoming industry challenges, with a focus on high IRR to support overall fund DPI [5] - Full-chain collaboration is becoming a key strategy for many state-owned enterprises, leveraging mother funds to attract social capital and focusing on critical nodes in the industrial chain [5] - Suggestions for future industry development include structural problem-solving, embracing change while maintaining core principles, and deepening engagement in hard technology sectors [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the response of telecommunications companies in Beijing to severe flooding, detailing their efforts to restore communication services using advanced technologies like drones and satellite communication systems [1][4]. Group 1: Emergency Response and Recovery Efforts - As of July 28, China Telecom deployed 334 personnel, 6 satellite communication vehicles, and 30 emergency repair vehicles to restore communication in affected areas [2]. - China Unicom reported the deployment of over 320 personnel and various emergency equipment, including 10 satellite base station vehicles and 34 satellite phones, with significant restoration of base stations in multiple districts [2][3]. - Beijing Mobile utilized 5 emergency communication vehicles and 2 drones to establish communication in key areas, successfully sending emergency messages and enabling communication for local government command points [2][4]. Group 2: Impact of Severe Weather - The average rainfall in Beijing reached 165.9 mm, with the maximum recorded at 543.4 mm, leading to significant infrastructure damage, including 31 road damages and 1825 disabled base stations [1]. - Communication facilities suffered extensive damage, with 62 fiber optic cables destroyed and 136 villages experiencing power outages [1]. Group 3: Technological Innovations in Communication - The use of drone base stations has been pivotal, providing emergency communication services to several villages and sending nearly 1 million emergency messages [4][5]. - Satellite communication vehicles and portable satellite stations were deployed to ensure connectivity in remote areas, demonstrating the effectiveness of "hard technology" in disaster response [4]. Group 4: Community Support and Services - Telecommunications companies provided temporary services such as free calls and charging stations for disaster-affected individuals, with China Telecom sending out 19.65 million risk warning messages [5]. - Beijing Unicom offered 100G of free data to users in affected areas, while Beijing Mobile provided essential services like drinking water and temporary shelter at key locations [5].

Core Viewpoint - Xi'an Bank has appointed Zhang Chengzhe as the new president and vice chairman of the board, marking a significant leadership change after a year-long vacancy in the president position. The bank faces challenges in profitability and declining capital adequacy ratios, prompting a focus on bond issuance and the establishment of a specialized branch for hard technology finance to drive growth [1][3][5]. Management Changes - Zhang Chengzhe, an internal candidate with extensive experience in various key positions within Xi'an Bank, has been appointed as president. His background includes roles in branch management and core business departments, providing him with a deep understanding of the bank's operations and regional market characteristics [3][4]. - The appointment follows a series of high-level departures at Xi'an Bank, necessitating a timely reinforcement of the executive team and governance structure [5][6]. Financial Performance - Xi'an Bank's total assets reached 480.37 billion yuan by the end of 2024, reflecting an 11.14% increase year-on-year. As of the first quarter of 2025, total assets further increased to 519.72 billion yuan. However, the bank's profitability has not kept pace with this growth [8][9]. - The bank's net profit attributable to shareholders showed a decline in 2022, dropping to 2.42 billion yuan, a 13.55% decrease year-on-year. Although profits rebounded slightly in 2023 and 2024, growth rates remained below those of the bank's first year post-IPO [9][10]. Capital Adequacy - Xi'an Bank's capital adequacy ratios have been declining, with the core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio falling to 9.36% by the first quarter of 2025, down from 10.07% at the end of 2024. This trend raises concerns about the bank's financial stability [10]. - To address capital needs, the bank has issued 5 billion yuan in perpetual bonds and 2 billion yuan in subordinated bonds [10]. Strategic Focus - The bank plans to establish a specialized branch focusing on hard technology finance, aiming to enhance its service offerings in this sector. This initiative is part of a broader strategy to deepen cooperation with research institutions and technology companies [11][12]. - The new management is expected to leverage Zhang Chengzhe's local expertise to better align banking services with the needs of hard technology enterprises, which often face unique challenges [12][13].

Group 1: US-China Trade Negotiations - The third round of US-China trade negotiations in Sweden is significant, especially after the US reached preliminary agreements with multiple countries, leaving China as one of the remaining major trade partners [4][5] - The US is exerting pressure on its remaining trade partners, as evidenced by the announcement of a 25% tariff on India, indicating a strategy to leverage recent agreements with other countries [5][6] - The US aims to reduce supply chain risks in strategic industries such as rare earths, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, potentially implementing lower tariffs initially before increasing them later [6][9] - China's expansion of export capacity and improvements in the value chain are seen positively, indicating a strong manufacturing sector that poses challenges to Western economies [7][9] Group 2: Recent Policy Meeting Insights - The core message from the recent policy meeting emphasizes enhancing the attractiveness and inclusivity of the domestic capital market, acknowledging the achievements in stabilizing the market since September of the previous year [12][13] - The monetary policy focus is on maintaining low financing costs across various sectors, including government bonds and corporate loans, rather than explicitly mentioning rate cuts [13] - The meeting highlighted the need to address local government behaviors that contribute to disorderly competition, indicating a structural approach to economic challenges [14] - The real estate sector's focus is on high-quality urban renewal, reflecting a shift towards structural adjustments rather than total volume increases [14][15] Group 3: Market Trends and Observations - The Hong Kong stock market experienced significant declines, particularly in the semiconductor sector, influenced by broader market dynamics and competitive pressures in the electric vehicle market [17][18] - A notable risk in the A-share market is the suspension of trading for a stock due to abnormal fluctuations, signaling potential issues for speculative investments [24] - The bond market has seen considerable volatility recently, marking one of the highest fluctuation periods of the year [25][26]

为深入推进科技金融赋能"三项改革"，持续做好省级上市后备企业培育和服务，7月29日陕西省委金融 办会同省级有关部门、沪深北交易所驻陕基地举办2025年资本市场赋能科技金融改革暨省级上市后备企 业名单发布会。 省委金融办、上海证券交易所、陕西证监局、省发展改革委、省国资委、省工业和信息化厅、省知识产 权局、深圳证券交易所、北京证券交易所等主办方及开源证券、西部证券（002673）、长安汇通等承办 方代表出席发布会，会议还邀请先进技术成果西安转化中心参会指导。 各市（区）地方金融管理机构、中国银行陕西省分行、建设银行陕西省分行、招商银行西安分行、浦发 银行西安分行、邮储银行（601658）陕西省分行、中信银行西安分行、华夏银行西安分行、广发银行西 安分行、民生银行西安分行、渤海银行西安分行、成都银行（601838）西安分行、渣打银行西安分行、 长安银行、陕西资本市场服务中心、国家级陕西省知识产权保护中心、陕西上市公司协会、秦创原创投 公司以及上市公司、省级上市后备企业、证券公司、私募投资基金、银行机构代表及新闻媒体嘉宾参 会。 上海证券交易所在发布会上介绍了科创板开板6年来取得的成效，强调科技创新是推动社会进步的 ...

为深入推进科技金融赋能"三项改革"，持续做好省级上市后备企业培育和服务，7月29日，陕西省委金 融办会同省级有关部门、沪深北交易所驻陕基地举办2025年资本市场赋能科技金融改革暨省级上市后备 企业名单发布会。 在本次发布会上，陕西省委金融办介绍了省级上市后备企业培育、推动资本市场高质量发展有关情况。 特别是近年来，陕西省发挥科教资源富集、创新实力雄厚优势，抢抓改革机遇，全省资本市场高质量发 展成效显著。 其中，2019年试点注册制以来，陕西省新增境内外上市公司42家，其中新增A股上市公司38家，成为国 家多层次资本市场重大改革试点均有企业首批入围的5个省份之一。2024年，陕西省科技型上市后备企 业在上交所科创板受理数量居全国第一。 记者了解到，今年申请参评升级上市后备企业1591家，较去年新增加205家，企业申请更踊跃、质量更 高。各有关单位联合评选出520家优质企业进入今年省级上市后备企业名单（其中，A档80家、B档120 家、C档320家），较去年扩充20家。 520家后备企业中，呈现以下主要特点：科技属性和新质生产力特征更强，科技型企业有502家，占比 96.54%，其中，制造业单项冠军42家，国家级 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the establishment of the Sci-Tech Growth Layer on the STAR Market, which enhances the inclusivity for unprofitable tech companies to go public, prompting brokerages to adjust their project selection and valuation strategies [1][6][7] - As of now, 32 unprofitable companies have been officially included in the Sci-Tech Growth Layer, leading to comprehensive adjustments in project screening standards, valuation systems, and sponsorship strategies by various brokerages [1][2] Group 2 - Brokerages are shifting their project selection criteria to focus on "hard technology" and growth potential, prioritizing sectors like artificial intelligence, commercial aerospace, and biomedicine [2][3] - The evaluation criteria for unprofitable companies are evolving from profit-oriented to cash flow and technology valuation, emphasizing long-term profitability potential [2][3] - The new screening standards include a stronger emphasis on R&D investment, innovation capability, and the ability to convert scientific achievements into commercial success [3][4] Group 3 - Brokerages are innovating their valuation systems to balance regulatory requirements and market expectations, focusing on non-financial factors such as technological barriers and market potential [4][5] - The policy is expected to enhance overall liquidity and valuation structure on the STAR Market, with a significant increase in daily turnover rates for companies in the Sci-Tech Growth Layer compared to non-growth layer companies [6][7] - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Growth Layer is anticipated to attract long-term capital and institutional investors, thereby optimizing the investor structure and reducing short-term volatility [6][7] Group 4 - The policy encourages investment in hard technology sectors, which is expected to lead to more companies in fields like artificial intelligence and commercial aerospace going public [6][7] - Brokerages are restructuring their business logic in response to the new policies, enhancing their project selection and valuation processes to better support tech innovation [7]