据李雪松介绍，工银理财正逐步从"以产品为中心"向"以客户为中心"升级，从"以资产为中心"向"以策略为中心"升级。目前，转型已初见成 效。工银理财真含权固收+产品规模较年初增长超70%，获得渠道和客户广泛认可。 李雪松在演讲开篇指出："低利率环境不仅是挑战，更是推动行业从'资产驱动'向'策略驱动'跃迁的关键契机。" 他表示，当前市场正经历"低利率、高波动、资产荒"的复杂环境。债券市场从2024年的单边牛市格局切换为今年持续的宽幅震荡，A股市场呈 现出明显的结构分化特征。受关税摩擦、地缘政治、AI创新等多因素扰动，全球各类市场高波动特征突出。 "预计明年市场波动仍将延续，"李雪松强调，"同时监管部门深化推进净值化转型，明确对估值方法的整改要求。在明年估值'魔法'消失后，依 靠单一资产、单一策略将难以为继。" 面对这一市场环境，李雪松提出了明确判断，"'固收+'将成为理财行业乃至整个资管行业发展的胜负手。"他进一步阐释道，长期来看，股债 相关性不稳定，甚至阶段性呈现"高相关性、同向波动"特征，通过多资产的低相关和分散化配置、多策略的多元化和工具化组合，更能为客户 打造稳稳向上的净值曲线。 11月22日，在"第二十届 ...

Core Viewpoint - The speculation regarding the next chairperson of the Federal Reserve has intensified following President Trump's recent statements, with a potential announcement expected in early 2026 [1] Group 1: Federal Reserve Chairperson Selection - Trump indicated he plans to announce the new Federal Reserve chairperson in early 2026, which contrasts with Treasury Secretary Mnuchin's earlier suggestion of a timeline around Christmas [1] - The current chair, Jerome Powell, is set to see his term expire in May next year, and there is speculation he may remain on the board [1] - The candidate list has narrowed from 11 to 5, with potential candidates including Hassett, Fed Governor Waller, and Vice Chair Bowman [1][4] Group 2: Candidate Profile - Kevin Hassett - Kevin Hassett, 63, holds a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Pennsylvania and has previously served as a senior economist at the Federal Reserve and a professor at Columbia University [4] - Hassett has been a proponent of monetary easing to stimulate growth and aligns closely with Trump's economic views, advocating for tax cuts, fiscal expansion, deregulation, and low interest rates [4] - Analysts suggest that if Hassett is appointed, he may lower the federal funds rate from the current range of 3.75% to 4% to below 3% without significantly threatening the Fed's independence [4] Group 3: Market Expectations and Economic Indicators - Citic Securities emphasizes that the unemployment rate will be crucial for the Fed's decision on interest rates in December, with expectations of a potential rate cut of 25 basis points [5] - The probability of a 25 basis point rate cut in December is currently at 87.6%, reflecting a growing expectation among market participants [5]

Group 1 - The core discussion at the 20th Century Financial Annual Conference focused on the low interest rate environment and its implications for wealth management and financial services [1] - Industry experts emphasized the need for wealth management to transform static capital into active investment that supports the real economy, aligning with national strategies and enhancing individual wealth [1] - The future competition in the wealth management sector will hinge on a combination of investment research capabilities, service experience, and technological support [3] Group 2 - The shift of deposits into wealth management products is a significant trend, with estimates suggesting that a 5% transfer of fixed-term deposits could generate over 5 trillion yuan in new opportunities for banks by the end of 2024 [19] - The wealth inheritance market is experiencing growth despite broader economic challenges, indicating structural opportunities that require collaboration across finance, legal, and tax sectors [25] - Trust services are positioned as a key tool for addressing the complexities of wealth transfer, with a focus on enhancing professional capabilities to better serve families [74][79]

Core Insights - The asset management industry is facing three key challenges: low interest rates, aging population, and the core capabilities of asset management institutions [1][2] Group 1: Low Interest Rates - The probability of mid-term interest rates rising is very low, affecting not only bank base rates but all assets, leading to a prolonged low interest rate environment [2] Group 2: Aging Population - The aging population will lead to a significant increase in wealth transfer across generations. Data shows that since 2021, 60% of new investors in the fund industry are from the post-90s generation, characterized by being young, professional, highly educated, and willing to entrust their assets to professional investment managers [2] Group 3: Core Capabilities of Asset Management Institutions - In the context of low interest fixed income assets and high-yield, high-volatility equity assets, investors will inevitably accept "fixed income plus" products that come with some drawdown but moderate upward yield. This requires reliance on the professional investment capabilities and long-term experience of asset management institutions [2]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing power struggle between President Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Powell is significantly impacting the U.S. economy and the financial well-being of ordinary citizens [1]. Group 1: Federal Reserve's Role - The Federal Reserve is viewed as a cornerstone of the U.S. economy, with its primary tasks being to stabilize prices and promote employment [2]. - The Fed operates independently and has the authority to raise interest rates during economic overheating or lower them to stimulate recovery during downturns [2]. Group 2: Trump's Strategies - Trump employs three main strategies to pressure the Federal Reserve into lowering interest rates: 1. A media campaign attacking Powell's credibility, labeling him as lacking courage and obstructing economic growth [3]. 2. Attempting to remove dissenting members from the Fed, specifically targeting Governor Lisa Cook, which is unprecedented in the Fed's history [3][4]. 3. Appointing loyalists, such as Chief Economic Advisor Stephen Moore, to key positions within the Fed to gain control over monetary policy [5]. Group 3: Historical Context - Trump's tactics mirror those of former President Nixon, who pressured the Fed to maintain low interest rates, leading to rampant inflation and necessitating drastic measures by future Fed Chairman Paul Volcker [4][5]. Group 4: Potential Economic Outcomes - Two potential future scenarios have been outlined: 1. A gradual decline in economic vitality as the Fed, under pressure, becomes hesitant to combat inflation, leading to a slow rise in prices to around 3% [7]. 2. A complete takeover of the Fed by the White House, resulting in short-term economic euphoria but potentially leading to a severe economic downturn [9]. Group 5: Implications for Ordinary Citizens - The independence of the Federal Reserve is crucial for protecting the purchasing power of ordinary citizens, ensuring that their savings do not diminish due to political pressures [11]. - The ongoing conflict poses risks to the U.S. economy's future, with potential consequences including high inflation rates and increased mortgage rates, which could lead to a state of "stagflation" [12].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing debate regarding the future leadership of the Federal Reserve, particularly the potential replacement of current Chairman Jerome Powell by Donald Trump, highlights conflicting economic ideologies, especially concerning interest rates and the size of the Fed's balance sheet [1][22]. Group 1: Leadership Change - Trump has expressed dissatisfaction with Powell and is looking to appoint a successor who aligns with his economic views once Powell's term ends [1]. - The selection process for the new Fed chair is influenced by the ongoing discussions about whether to limit the Fed's asset size, which contradicts Trump's preference for low interest rates [3][20]. Group 2: Economic Policies - Trump's focus on low interest rates is aimed at easing government debt servicing and making loans more affordable for consumers [4]. - The Fed's balance sheet, which has exceeded $6 trillion, was expanded through quantitative easing to lower long-term interest rates during economic crises [6][8]. Group 3: Political Opinions - Republican voices have criticized the Fed for injecting too much cash into the financial system, arguing it disrupts market dynamics [10]. - Former Fed Governor Walsh advocates for reducing the Fed's size to lower short-term rates without triggering inflation, resonating with public sentiment against financial institution expansion [12]. Group 4: Future Implications - The debate over the Fed's balance sheet size reflects broader concerns about government spending and wealth inequality, with some arguing that the Fed's actions have exacerbated the wealth gap [23]. - The upcoming leadership decision will significantly impact how the Fed responds to future economic downturns, with a growing influence of the "balance sheet reduction" faction [27][29].

Core Viewpoint - Trump believes he has identified his choice for the next Federal Reserve Chair, while claiming that someone is preventing him from firing the current leader, Powell [1] Group 1: Potential Candidates - Treasury Secretary Mnuchin has narrowed down the candidates to current Fed governors Waller and Bowman, former Fed governor Warsh, NEC Director Hassett, and BlackRock executive Riedel [1] - Trump mentioned that there are some surprising names as well as some conventional ones that everyone is discussing [1] Group 2: Future Considerations - The next Federal Reserve Chair will need to maintain a careful balance between Trump's desire for low interest rates and the need to sustain investor confidence [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emerging hawkish consensus among candidates for the next Federal Reserve chair, focusing on the need to limit the central bank's balance sheet, contrasting sharply with President Trump's calls for lower interest rates [1][3][4]. Group 1: Candidates' Stance - Candidates for the next Federal Reserve chair, including Kevin Warsh and Michelle Bowman, express concerns over the current balance sheet size exceeding $6 trillion, advocating for a reduction to create space for lowering short-term interest rates without triggering inflation [4][5]. - Warsh has consistently argued for limiting the central bank's size over the past 15 years, suggesting that reducing the balance sheet could allow for lower interest rates without inflationary consequences [4][6]. Group 2: Trump's Contradictory Position - President Trump's public pressure for lower interest rates conflicts with the candidates' focus on balance sheet reduction, highlighting a tension between his desire to stimulate borrowing and the candidates' caution regarding market intervention [5][6]. - Trump's past comments, such as his 2018 tweet urging the Fed to stop reducing its balance sheet, illustrate his concern over liquidity in financing markets, raising questions about his true stance on the Fed's influence [5][6]. Group 3: Policy Logic Behind Balance Sheet Reduction - The candidates' calls for balance sheet reduction stem from Republican concerns about the long-term effects of quantitative easing (QE), which is seen as a tool that disrupts market discipline and exacerbates wealth inequality [6][7][9]. - Critics argue that QE has led to increased government spending and has artificially inflated asset prices, contributing to wealth disparity [8][9]. Group 4: Market Outlook and Future Decisions - The Federal Reserve plans to halt balance sheet reduction by December 1 to prevent liquidity issues in the financial system, a decision supported by key economic advisors [11]. - Future actions by the Fed will depend on the economic landscape, with indications that QE may still be considered if significant risks to employment and price stability arise [12][14].

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong dividend assets have shown strong performance, rivaling the technology sector, with significant increases in key dividend indices over the past year [1][4]. Performance of Dividend Indices - The Hong Kong Stock Connect High Dividend (CNY) and the Hang Seng High Dividend Low Volatility indices have reached historical highs, with annual increases of 31.65% and 33.57% respectively, outperforming the Hang Seng Technology Total Return Index, which rose by 28.02% during the same period [1][4]. Market Dynamics - The divergence between the technology and dividend sectors began in October 2025, influenced by external factors such as the escalating US-China tariff disputes and government shutdown risks, leading to a shift in investor sentiment towards more defensive dividend assets [4][5]. - The technology sector's high valuations and lack of new catalysts during a policy and earnings vacuum have prompted funds to move towards more reasonably valued dividend stocks [4]. Southbound Capital Inflows - Despite market volatility, southbound capital has consistently flowed into Hong Kong stocks, with net inflows exceeding 1.3 trillion HKD in 2025, marking a record high since the launch of the Stock Connect [6][7]. - The financial, energy, consumer discretionary, and telecommunications sectors have attracted the most southbound capital, indicating a growing interest in dividend assets [7]. Institutional Investment Trends - Insurance capital has increasingly targeted dividend assets, with 36 instances of stake acquisitions in 2025, surpassing previous highs and focusing on stable, high-dividend sectors such as banking and utilities [8][9]. - The dividend yields of the Hong Kong Stock Connect High Dividend (CNY) and the Hang Seng High Dividend Low Volatility indices stand at 5.53% and 5.69%, significantly higher than comparable A-share indices [9]. Investment Strategy - In the current low-interest-rate environment, the dividend yields from Hong Kong stocks present a compelling alternative to domestic bonds, which yield only 1.81% [9]. - The Hong Kong dividend ETFs have shown strong performance, with the Hong Kong Stock Connect High Dividend ETF achieving a 69.51% return since its inception, outperforming its benchmark [15][16].

Group 1 - The 30-year Treasury ETF (511090) has seen a recent increase of 0.21% as of November 5, 2025, with a trading volume of 9.40 billion yuan and a turnover rate of 2.9% [1] - The latest scale of the 30-year Treasury ETF reached 32.291 billion yuan, with a total of 2.69 million shares outstanding [1] - Over the past five trading days, the 30-year Treasury ETF has experienced net inflows on four occasions, totaling 1.039 billion yuan [1] Group 2 - The total scale of bond ETFs has surpassed 700 billion yuan, reaching 700.044 billion yuan, marking a significant increase since it crossed the 600 billion yuan threshold in late September [1] - The bond ETF scale has consistently crossed multiple significant thresholds throughout the year, including 400 billion, 500 billion, 300 billion, and 200 billion yuan [1] Group 3 - Low interest rates are expected to become a long-term norm in the economy, driven by a structural transformation from a labor-intensive economy to a new economy centered on high-tech industries [2] - The central bank's resumption of bond purchases is anticipated to create short-term investment opportunities in the bond market, despite ongoing economic pressures [2] - The 30-year Treasury ETF closely tracks the China Bond 30-Year Treasury Index, which consists of publicly issued 30-year treasury bonds [2]