Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government has announced a 50% tariff on imported copper semi-finished products and high-copper-content derivatives starting August 1, while copper input materials and scrap copper are exempt from these tariffs [1]. Group 1: Tariff Announcement - The U.S. President signed an announcement imposing a 50% tariff on specific copper products [1]. - Copper input materials such as copper ore, concentrates, blister copper, cathodes, and anodes are not subject to the tariffs [1]. Group 2: Industry Reaction - Maximo Pacheco, Chairman of Codelco, expressed positive feedback regarding the U.S. announcement, indicating that the exemption for cathode copper products allows Codelco to continue as a supplier [1]. - Pacheco stated that this is beneficial for Chile, Codelco, and their U.S. customers [1]. Group 3: Market Impact - The announcement led to a significant market reaction, with copper prices on the COMEX market dropping by over 19% [1].

Group 1 - The U.S. government announced a 50% tariff on imported semi-finished copper products and copper-intensive derivatives, effective from August 1 [1][2] - The new tariffs are part of a broader strategy to boost domestic industries and address trade imbalances, following previous tariffs on steel and aluminum [2] - The tariffs will not apply to copper raw materials and scrap, which are exempt from the "Section 232" provisions [1][2] Group 2 - Following the announcement, copper prices in New York plummeted over 18% within minutes [2] - The White House indicated that these copper tariffs will not be cumulative with additional tariffs on automobile imports [2] - There is a requirement for 25% of high-quality copper scrap and raw copper products to be sold domestically, although this is not expected to have immediate significant impact [2]

Group 1 - The Trump administration will announce the results of a national security investigation into semiconductor imports within two weeks, raising concerns about potential new tariffs on chips [1] - The investigation, initiated on April 13, focuses on the semiconductor industry and the entire electronic supply chain, potentially laying the groundwork for new tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 [1] - Barclays has indicated that the timeline for imposing semiconductor tariffs is becoming clearer, with implementation likely after mid-August and no later than September [1] Group 2 - President Trump stated that many companies will invest in semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. to avoid the impact of new tariffs, while the European Commission President has found a "better way" to circumvent the upcoming chip tariffs [2] - The U.S. has reached a 15% tariff agreement with the EU, which will increase investments in the U.S. by $600 billion and purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy products, while maintaining the current steel and aluminum tariffs [2] - The Trump administration is investigating the national security threat posed by reliance on foreign pharmaceuticals and semiconductor imports, alongside separate investigations into copper and lumber imports [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration has shifted its focus back to tariffs and trade following the passage of the "Great American Rescue Plan," with a series of high-intensity tariff actions initiated in early July [1] Tariff Actions - Trump announced three rounds of tariffs from July 7 to 10, targeting 14 countries with tariffs ranging from 25% to 40%, 8 countries with tariffs from 20% to 50%, and a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, along with a unified tariff of 15% or 20% for other countries [1] - The effective average tariff rate in the U.S. is expected to stabilize around 15-16% in the near future, with most newly notified countries having a negligible impact on the overall effective tax rate [1][2] Market Reaction - Following the announcement of new tariffs, major asset prices remained stable, with the U.S. stock market reaching new highs and the long-term U.S. Treasury yield rising slightly to around 4.4% [5] - Investors appear to be desensitized to Trump's tariff policies, viewing them more as negotiation tactics rather than significant threats [5] Tariff Revenue - U.S. tariff revenue surged to $26.6 billion in June, quadrupling the usual level, with total revenue for the first half of the year reaching $87.2 billion [5] - The 10% baseline tariff has generated over $17.7 billion in revenue, with specific tariffs on the automotive sector contributing more than $10.7 billion [5] Future Projections - Analysts predict that if the average effective tariff rate remains between 10-14%, it could yield annual tariff revenues of $300 billion to $400 billion, potentially offsetting the increased spending from the "Great American Rescue Plan," which is estimated to add $340 billion annually [6] - The effective tariff rate is projected to be around 2.3% by the end of 2024, with potential increases if new tariffs are fully implemented [6][10] Inflation and Monetary Policy - The impact of tariffs on inflation appears limited, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) showing a year-on-year increase of 2.7% in June, lower than earlier in the year [11] - The Federal Reserve may delay interest rate cuts due to the potential for tariffs to exert lasting inflationary pressure, with expectations for a rate hold in July and a possible cut in September [14]

Group 1: Pharmaceutical Industry - The Trump administration is threatening to impose a 200% tariff on imported pharmaceuticals, with a timeline for companies to adjust of about one to one and a half years [2][3] - The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) opposes the tariffs, stating that every dollar spent on tariffs cannot be invested in U.S. manufacturing or future treatments [3] - Analysts believe that the announcement may have a positive impact on the pharmaceutical sector, as the tariffs are not expected to be implemented immediately and their future enforcement remains uncertain [2] Group 2: Copper Industry - Trump is considering a 50% additional tax on imported copper, although no specific implementation date has been provided [3][4] - Following the tariff announcement, copper prices surged over 10%, reaching a historical high in the New York market, with futures rising 13.12%, marking the largest single-day increase since 1989 [3][4] - The U.S. relies heavily on copper imports, with nearly half of its copper supply coming from abroad, primarily from Chile [4]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, is currently engaged in negotiations regarding reciprocal tariffs and is awaiting developments related to Section 232 [1] Group 1 - The ongoing discussions focus on establishing equal tariffs between the U.S. and its trading partners [1] - The outcome of these negotiations may have significant implications for trade policies and economic relations [1] - The reference to Section 232 indicates potential adjustments in tariffs related to national security concerns [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen stated that the impact of tariffs on inflation is temporary, and a series of trade agreements are expected to be reached in the coming week [1] - There is a possibility of restoring tariffs to the levels seen on April 2 if trade partners "refuse to compromise" [1] - Ongoing negotiations are focused on reciprocal tariffs, with attention on the Section 232 provisions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Gina Raimondo, announced that an analysis under Section 232 regarding aircraft will be conducted by the end of the month [1] Group 1 - The analysis will focus on the impact of foreign aircraft on national security [1] - This move indicates a potential shift in trade policy concerning the aerospace industry [1] - The outcome of the analysis could lead to tariffs or other trade measures affecting aircraft imports [1]

Group 1: Legal and Trade Policy Implications - The U.S. International Trade Court overturned Trump's equal tariff measures, stating they exceeded the authority granted by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) [1] - The ruling questions the legality of tariffs including a 10% base tariff and equal tariffs, potentially leading to their cancellation, but does not affect tariffs based on Section 232 and Section 301 [2] - The court mandated that the administration cease the collection of related tariffs within 10 days, but did not require the refund of already collected tariffs [2] Group 2: Future Tariff Strategies - The ruling increases uncertainty in tariff policies, but the Trump administration may still impose tariffs using alternative legal frameworks such as Section 122, which allows temporary tariffs up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days [3] - Section 232 allows tariffs if imports threaten national security, but requires a cumbersome investigation process by the Department of Commerce [3] - Section 301 has not seen new tariffs this year, likely due to existing tariffs still in effect and limited room for additional tariffs under the Biden administration [3] Group 3: Market and Negotiation Impact - The court's decision limits the Trump administration's ability to impose tariffs, weakening its position in trade negotiations [4] - A potential strategy for the Trump administration could involve short-term tariffs under Section 122 to gain time for further investigations and legislation regarding specific industry tariffs [4] - Risks include uncertainty in higher court rulings and the fluctuating nature of trade negotiations [4]

Report Summary 1. Hot News - The U.S. Trade Representative's Office extended the exemption period for the Section 301 investigation against China until August 31, originally set to expire on May 31. China has repeatedly lodged solemn representations with the U.S. over Section 301 tariffs, which violate WTO rules, disrupt international trade, and burden U.S. businesses and consumers [2] - Goldman Sachs' commodities research team said the U.S. is investigating copper imports under Section 232 and has doubled steel and aluminum import tariffs to 50%, increasing the likelihood of copper import tariffs. Goldman Sachs raised its H2 2025 aluminum price forecast by $140/ton to $2280/ton, expecting it to drop to $2100/ton in early 2026 and reach $2230/ton and $2500/ton in 2026 and 2027 respectively, lower than previous forecasts [2] - The U.S. April core PCE price index rose 2.5% year-on-year, in line with expectations and slower than the previous revised 2.7%, the smallest increase in over four years. The "super core inflation indicator" also hit a four-year low. Traders still bet on a Fed rate cut in September [3] - China's May manufacturing PMI was 49.5%, up 0.5 ppts month-on-month; non-manufacturing PMI was 50.3%, down 0.1 ppt; composite PMI was 50.4%, up 0.2 ppts. New export and import order indices rose 2.8 and 3.7 ppts respectively. Some U.S.-related enterprises reported improved foreign trade [3] - OPEC+ agreed to increase oil production by 411,000 barrels per day in July, the third consecutive monthly increase. The eight OPEC+ members will meet on July 6 to decide August production policy [3] 2. Sector Performance - Key sectors to watch: urea, lithium carbonate, asphalt, soybean oil, hot-rolled coils [4] - Sector percentage changes: non-metallic building materials 2.71%, precious metals 30.65%, oilseeds and fats 11.88%, soft commodities 2.44%, non-ferrous metals 19.05%, coal, coke, steel and ore 13.59%, energy 2.60%, chemicals 12.83%, grains 1.58%, agricultural and sideline products 2.67% [4] 3. Sector Positions - Information about the recent five-day changes in commodity futures sector positions is presented, but specific numerical changes are not clearly stated [5] 4. Performance of Major Asset Classes - Equity: The Shanghai Composite Index fell 0.47% daily, with a monthly change of 0.00% and an annual change of -0.13%. Other indices like S&P 500, Hang Seng Index, etc., also had different performances [7] - Fixed income: 10-year, 5-year, and 2-year treasury bond futures had different daily, monthly, and annual changes [7] - Commodities: CRB commodity index, WTI crude oil, London spot gold, etc., showed various changes [7] - Others: The U.S. dollar index and CBOE volatility index also had corresponding changes [7]