镍&不锈钢：情绪有所好转，延续宽幅震荡 南华新能源&贵金属研究团队 夏莹莹 投资咨询证号：Z0016569 管城瀚 从业资格证号：F0313867 投资咨询业务资格:证监许可【2011】1290号 沪镍区间预测 | 价格区间预测 | 当前波动率（20日滚动） | 当前波动率历史百分位 | | --- | --- | --- | | 11.5-12.4 | 15.17% | 3.2% | 【利多解读】 成本端镍矿价格支撑仍存 刚果钴矿禁矿延续 source： 南华研究,wind 沪镍管理策略 | 行为 导向 | 情景分析 | 策略推荐 | 套保工具 | 买卖方向 | | 套保比例 策略等级（满 分5） | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 库存 | 产品销售价格下跌，库存有减 | 根据库存水平做空沪镍期货来锁定利 润，对冲现货下跌风险 | 沪镍主力合约 | 卖出 | 60% | 2 | | 管理 | 值风险 | 卖出看涨期权 | 场外/场内期权 | 卖出 | 50% | 2 | | 采购 管理 | 公司未来有生产采购需求，担 心原料价格上涨 | 根据生产 ...

Core Viewpoint - The valuation logic of technology stocks is shifting from short-term profit indicators like net profit and PE ratios to focusing on technological value, driven by policy support and market dynamics [1][3][4]. Group 1: Policy Changes and Market Dynamics - The Science and Technology Innovation Board (STAR Market) has restarted the IPO review process for unprofitable companies, with Wuhan Heyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. being the first to undergo review under the new fifth set of standards [1][2]. - The recent "1+6" policy reforms on the STAR Market have increased the inclusivity for unprofitable companies, allowing for a new growth layer that supports technology firms with significant breakthroughs and ongoing R&D investments [2][3]. - There are currently 12 unprofitable companies waiting for IPO approval, indicating a potential acceleration in the acceptance of such firms in the next two years [2]. Group 2: Valuation Methodology Shift - The evaluation of technology companies is increasingly based on their technological innovation and market potential rather than traditional profit metrics [3][5]. - A three-tier model for assessing technological value has been proposed, focusing on short-term R&D intensity, mid-term scarcity and efficiency, and long-term ecological binding [3][4]. - The "Kotevaluation" system aims to reshape the valuation framework by incorporating hard technology attributes, breaking away from the traditional profit-centric valuation [4][5]. Group 3: Market Performance and Trends - The valuation of the STAR Market has seen a significant increase, rising from approximately 117 times at the beginning of the year to 202.78 times by June 25, 2024, driven by policy support and industry growth [6]. - The valuation gap between STAR Market technology stocks and international counterparts is narrowing, particularly in sectors like artificial intelligence and biomedicine, where local firms are achieving technological breakthroughs [7][8]. - Future market performance is expected to be more differentiated, favoring companies with genuine technological barriers and commercialization capabilities, while speculative stocks may face continued adjustments [8].

Investment Rating - The report assigns an "Overweight" rating to China Reinsurance and ZhongAn Online, while it gives a "Reduce" rating to China Taiping and Sunshine Insurance [3][21]. Core Insights - The report highlights that the investment in Chinese insurance stocks is primarily driven by three key indicators: investment asset-related risks, profit growth prospects, and dividend growth visibility [6][22]. - In a normal macroeconomic scenario, the growth rate of insurance premiums is expected to align with GDP growth, which is projected at 5% for 2025, leading to significant profit potential for small and mid-cap insurers [4][22]. - The report emphasizes that small and mid-cap insurers are likely to outperform large-cap insurers due to their potential for excess growth in underwriting profits and lower earnings volatility compared to equity fluctuations [6][22]. Summary by Sections Investment Recommendations - China Reinsurance: "Overweight" with a target price of HKD 1.4, current P/E ratio of 4x for FY2025 [3][21]. - ZhongAn Online: "Overweight" with a target price of HKD 26, current P/E ratio of 27x for FY2025 [3][21]. - China Taiping: "Reduce" with a target price of HKD 8.2, current P/E ratio of 6x for FY2025 [3][21]. - Sunshine Insurance: "Reduce" with a target price of HKD 2.1, current P/E ratio of 7x for FY2025 [3][21]. Macro Environment Analysis - In a normal macro scenario, premium growth is expected to match GDP growth, leading to a projected 14% year-on-year profit growth for small and mid-cap insurers compared to 6% for large-cap insurers [4][22]. - In a pessimistic macro scenario, small and mid-cap insurers exhibit more resilient profit growth, with a potential 27% decline in earnings if the Shanghai Composite Index drops by 10%, compared to a 45% decline for large-cap insurers [29][35]. Financial Metrics - The report notes that the current valuation multiples for China Reinsurance are significantly lower than historical averages, indicating potential for valuation recovery as business conditions improve [23][24]. - The report also highlights that over 70% of equity investments are measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL), which can lead to significant earnings volatility [7][28]. Risk and Opportunity Assessment - The report suggests that the decline in bond yields is beneficial for China Reinsurance, as it may lead to increased demand for financial reinsurance contracts among smaller insurers facing capital constraints [35][36]. - The analysis indicates that the insurance sector is under pressure due to declining bond yields, which could impact the solvency ratios of life insurers, but major players have managed to maintain strong solvency through capital-raising measures [5][35].

Group 1 - The U.S. stock market is facing a reality check after a strong rebound, with mixed trading in futures on the S&P 500, Dow, and Nasdaq indices amid renewed hopes for interest rate cuts and a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel [1][4] - The S&P 500 index's forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is currently at 22 times, which is 35% higher than its long-term average, indicating that the index appears "expensive" across various valuation metrics [3][4] - Analysts suggest that the S&P 500's earnings need to grow by 30% over the next year to return to "fair value," and that potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve could help bridge the gap between fundamentals and market prices [4][5] Group 2 - BMO Capital Markets' chief investment strategist raised the S&P 500's year-end target from 6,100 to 6,700 points, citing a reduction in tariff concerns and an expected increase in corporate guidance following the second-quarter earnings season [5] - Investors are closely monitoring the progress of the ceasefire agreement in the Middle East, which has so far been maintained without new reports of attacks since President Trump's criticism of violations [6]

Core Viewpoint - FedEx's stock experienced a 6% decline in after-market trading following its Q4 FY2025 earnings report, despite surpassing consensus estimates, due to a cautious outlook for the upcoming quarter [2][6] Financial Performance - FedEx reported Q4 revenue of $22.2 billion, matching the prior-year quarter and exceeding the consensus estimate of $21.8 billion [3] - The package segment saw a 5% increase in volume, while composite package yield decreased slightly by 0.4% [3] - Freight volume declined significantly by 15%, although composite freight yield rose by 3% [3] - The adjusted operating margin improved by 600 basis points to 9.1%, with adjusted earnings per share increasing to $6.07 from $5.41 in the previous year, surpassing the consensus estimate of $5.86 [5] Guidance and Outlook - FedEx's guidance for Q1 FY2026 indicates revenue growth of flat to 2% year-over-year, slightly better than street estimates of a 0.1% decline [6] - The company forecasts adjusted earnings per share between $3.40 and $4.00, below the consensus estimate of $4.06 [6] - FedEx plans an additional $1 billion in cost-cutting measures for FY2026, building on $4 billion in savings already achieved [6] Valuation Analysis - FedEx's stock is currently trading around $215, with a trailing adjusted P/E ratio of 12x, lower than its five-year average of 16x, suggesting potential for growth [7] - The separation of the freight business is expected to unlock shareholder value and enhance focus on core parcel delivery operations [8] - The stock appears slightly undervalued, presenting a potential opportunity for long-term gains [8]

Group 1 - The U.S. stock market continues to reach new highs despite multiple pressures, with the S&P 500's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio at 22 times, significantly above the long-term average of 35% [1] - The market's ability to sustain this upward trend depends on whether corporate earnings can exceed expectations or if the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates [1][4] - The S&P 500 index is currently facing historical challenges, including a new U.S. government's efforts to adjust global order and implement large-scale tariff policies, alongside uncertainties from conflicts in the Middle East [1] Group 2 - The S&P 500's current P/E ratio of 22 times is 35% higher than its long-term average, raising concerns about overvaluation [1][3] - A Bloomberg model suggests that the fair P/E ratio for the S&P 500 should be around 17.7 times, indicating that earnings would need to grow by 30% in the next year for the P/E to return to reasonable levels [3] - Investment strategists express caution regarding the sustainability of current market levels, suggesting that earnings expectations for the second half of the year may be overly optimistic [3][5] Group 3 - The Federal Reserve has indicated that it is not in a hurry to adjust policies, although lower inflation and weak labor recruitment may lead to earlier rate cuts this year [4] - Wall Street strategists recommend viewing any potential market pullbacks as buying opportunities, particularly in technology and growth stocks [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal dispute between SoftBank and Credit Suisse regarding the bankruptcy of Greensill Capital, highlighting the financial losses incurred by both parties and the implications for the investment landscape [4][18][25]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Greensill Capital, founded in 2011, specialized in supply chain finance, providing short-term loans to small and medium-sized enterprises [8]. - SoftBank invested approximately $1.5 billion in Greensill Capital between 2019 and 2020, becoming a major shareholder [9]. - The company faced difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to its bankruptcy in 2021, which resulted in significant losses for both SoftBank and Credit Suisse [11][12]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Credit Suisse is suing SoftBank for $440 million, claiming it is owed due to Greensill Capital's lending to Katerra, a construction technology company that also went bankrupt [18][19]. - The lawsuit centers around the assertion that SoftBank's actions to protect its investments led to the loss of funds that should have been returned to Credit Suisse [21][22]. - The court proceedings have revealed conflicting narratives, with SoftBank denying responsibility and attributing the losses to Credit Suisse's mismanagement [22][23]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The article emphasizes the trend of high-profile unicorns facing bankruptcy, leading to significant financial repercussions for their investors, including SoftBank and Temasek [25][27]. - It highlights the common characteristics of these failed companies, such as high valuations and rapid financing, which ultimately resulted in unsustainable business models [28][30]. - The current investment climate is marked by increased caution among investors, reflecting a shift towards more prudent and sustainable investment strategies [30][32].

Core Insights - Moretus Research provides high-quality equity research focused on U.S. public markets, aiming to deliver clarity, conviction, and alpha for serious investors [1] - The research methodology emphasizes a structured framework to identify companies with durable business models, mispriced cash flow potential, and intelligent capital allocation [1] - Valuation practices are based on sector-relevant multiples tailored to each company's business model and capital structure, prioritizing comparability and simplicity [1] Research Focus - Moretus Research targets underappreciated companies that are undergoing structural changes or temporary dislocations, where disciplined analysis can yield asymmetric returns [1] - The research combines rigorous fundamental analysis with a judgment-driven process, avoiding noise and overly complex forecasting [1] - The firm aims to elevate the standards of independent investment research by providing actionable insights and a strong filter for relevant information in equity analysis [1]

风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者： 吕执着 来源：雪球 为什么我会提出这个概念 ， 因为2025 ， 有了一些新变化 ， 对比以往的医药行业 ， 估值的重 估 ， 开始一步步的被证实了 。 一 、 以前为啥不值钱 ？ —— 机构 " 不见兔子不撒鹰 " 只看结果 ， 不看潜力 ： 以前投资机构只认 " 快卖钱的药 " （ 比如III期临床或上市阶段 ） ， 觉得临床前或早期管线 （ I/II期 ） 风险太高 ， 10个项目可能9个失败 ， 算不过来账 。 打个比方 ： 就像种树 ， 种子刚发芽时没人出价 ， 等结果子了才有人买 。 不会算 " 未来的钱 " ： 传统估值模型 （ 比如PE市盈率 ） 只看当前利润 ， 但创新药企早期都在烧钱搞研发 ， 没利润 可看 ， 机构干脆忽略早期管线价值 。 二 、 2025年为啥突然值钱了 ？ —— 海外大佬来 " 抢货 " 大药企 " 囤货式采购 " ： 2025年起 ， 辉瑞 、 默沙东等国际巨头疯狂抢购中国创新药管线 ， 尤其是早期项目 。 比如 ： 三生制药的PD-1/VEGF双抗 （ 刚进I期临床 ） ...

Market Overview - The market experienced a significant rise, with the Shanghai Composite Index reaching 3455 points, marking a new high for the year, while the ChiNext Index surged over 3% [1] - Over 3800 stocks closed in the green, indicating a positive shift in market sentiment [5] Financial Sector - The financial sector saw a collective surge, particularly in brokerage stocks such as Guosheng Financial Holdings, Tianfeng Securities, and Xiangcai Securities, which hit the daily limit [3] - The rise is attributed to increasing expectations for policy easing and the relatively low valuations of brokerage firms, with potential catalysts from ongoing capital market reforms like the deepening of the registration system and the expansion of the Beijing Stock Exchange [3] - Caution is advised for short-term trading, while long-term investors should focus on leading firms with strong investment banking capabilities and wealth management advantages [3] Military Industry - The military sector remained active, with stocks like Guorui Technology and Beifang Changlong hitting the daily limit [3] - The sector benefits from strong performance and policy support, with many military enterprises reporting full order books, particularly in aerospace and missile equipment [3] - Long-term investments should focus on leading companies with core technologies and stable orders, avoiding short-term speculative trades [3] Software Development - The software development sector was also lively, with stocks like Guiding Compass reaching the daily limit [4] - This sector is linked to the financial industry, driven by the demand for financial IT and data security as part of digital transformation [4] - Companies that effectively combine technology with practical applications are seen as having significant future potential, but investors should prioritize firms with tangible projects and cash flow [4] Other Sectors - The oil and gas, pharmaceutical, and shipping sectors faced declines, with stocks like Zhun Oil Shares hitting the daily limit down [4] - The oil and gas sector is affected by recent volatility in international oil prices, while the pharmaceutical sector is still adjusting to the impacts of centralized procurement [4] - The shipping sector is experiencing a withdrawal of funds due to expectations around freight rates and seasonal demand [4] Investment Strategy - The market's upward movement suggests a search for undervalued and high-growth sectors, particularly in financials and military industries [5] - Long-term investors are encouraged to remain calm and avoid chasing short-term speculative stocks, focusing instead on sectors with clear policy benefits and strong mid-year performance forecasts, such as semiconductor equipment, energy storage, and high-end liquor [5]