特朗普"极限施压"美联储降息的真实目的曝光。 7月6日消息，《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip发表文章称，特朗普近期密集要求美联储主席鲍威尔降 息，他希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先目标，为美国国会刚通过的减税法案提供更便利的融资支 持。 Greg Ip表示，特朗普正试图打破预算赤字与利率之间的传统联系。传统经济学理论认为，大规模借贷会推高 利率，从而抵消减税带来的好处。但特朗普的策略是通过向美联储施压，强制降低利率来配合其财政政策目 标。 文章警告称，这种"财政主导"模式在历史上通常与阿根廷等新兴市场的弱央行相关联，往往会导致通胀、危机 和经济停滞的组合。然而，在短期内，这种模式可能会成为强有力的经济刺激手段，这也解释了美股市场在此 预期下不断创出历史新高。 《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip在最新发布的文章中表示，美国总统特朗普要求美联储降息的目的是， 希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先策略。文章警告称，这种"财政主导"模式往往导致通胀、危机和经 济停滞的"危险组合"。 7月7日，美国财长贝森特表示，市场可能在将特朗普的降息观点计入价格。贝森特认为，今年剩下的时间将会 降息两次。关键 ...

Core Viewpoint - Moody's maintains Israel's long-term local and foreign currency rating at Baa1, warning that direct military conflict with Iran will further increase fiscal pressure [1] Group 1: Rating and Fiscal Pressure - Moody's indicates that geopolitical risks have led to a weakening of Israel's fiscal situation since October 2023 [1] - The agency expects Israel's debt-to-GDP ratio to peak at around 75% in the medium term due to increased defense spending and slowing economic growth [1] - Prior to the onset of military conflict with Iran, Moody's had projected this ratio to peak at 70% [1]

Group 1 - The South Korean National Assembly recently passed a supplementary budget of approximately 31.8 trillion KRW (about 31.8 trillion KRW equals 100 billion RMB) to stimulate economic recovery amid challenges such as weak consumption and rising trade risks due to the US's so-called "reciprocal tariffs" [1] - The supplementary budget is expected to increase South Korea's GDP growth rate by 0.14 to 0.32 percentage points, with institutions like Goldman Sachs and Barclays raising their GDP growth forecasts to around 1% [2] - The budget includes 12.17 trillion KRW for consumer vouchers and 10.3 trillion KRW to cover tax revenue shortfalls, along with debt relief measures for small and micro enterprises [1] Group 2 - Concerns are rising regarding the increasing fiscal burden, as the total fiscal expenditure in 2025 is projected to reach 703.3 trillion KRW, with government debt as a percentage of GDP rising from 48.4% to 49.1% [2] - The supplementary budget was passed just before the deadline for US tariff negotiations, with South Korean officials engaging in discussions with US counterparts regarding tariff exemptions [2]

Group 1 - Germany is planning to provide billions of euros in subsidies to energy-intensive industries as part of Chancellor Merz's commitment to enhance the competitiveness of German heavy industry, with an estimated investment of around €4 billion [1] - The number of German companies eligible for electricity price subsidies is set to increase from 350 to 2,200, aimed at reducing electricity costs for industrial enterprises [1][2] - The German government emphasizes that supporting industrial enterprises is crucial for maintaining employment amid weak economic growth [1][2] Group 2 - The subsidy plan will cover up to 50% of electricity costs for companies over the next three years, particularly benefiting the chemical, glass, and plastics industries [2] - The plan aligns with the new EU state aid framework, which allows member states to subsidize industrial electricity costs to aid decarbonization efforts [2] - There is ongoing debate regarding the electricity subsidy, with some factions arguing for broader relief measures that include households and smaller businesses [2][4] Group 3 - The expansion of the subsidy reflects Germany's increased support for its industrial sector, particularly in light of significant job losses in the past year [3] - The chemical industry, seen as a barometer for the economy, has shown improved business sentiment, with the business climate index rising significantly [3] - However, there are concerns that the subsidy may undermine incentives for long-term renewable energy contracts and could negatively impact small businesses [4] Group 4 - Germany has one of the highest electricity prices globally, with an average price of €0.38 per kWh in the first quarter of this year [5][6] - The current electricity tax structure places a heavier burden on households compared to industrial users, raising concerns about the government's commitment to reducing energy costs for the public [6] - The new spending plans may conflict with EU fiscal rules, as Germany's federal deficit is projected to increase significantly over the coming years [6]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The discussion primarily revolves around the U.S. labor market, economic policies under the Trump administration, and the implications of the "Great Beautiful Act" on the economy. Core Insights and Arguments - **Labor Market Risks**: The decline in labor participation rates, particularly among youth and older populations, indicates potential risks in the labor market despite a decrease in unemployment rates. The unemployment rate may rise in the future, with projections suggesting it could reach 4.4%-4.5% by the end of the year, exceeding the natural unemployment rate level [1][6][10]. - **Non-Farm Payroll Adjustments**: Significant downward revisions are expected for the non-farm employment data for Q1 2025, with monthly adjustments potentially reaching 70,000 to 80,000 jobs. This aligns with a slowdown in private non-farm income due to reduced working hours and declining wages [3][4]. - **Impact of Government Policies**: The Trump administration's immigration restrictions have temporarily lowered unemployment rates but may hinder long-term demand and GDP growth. The tax cuts have stimulated short-term demand, but the overall impact on employment growth remains uncertain [9][11]. - **Federal Reserve's Interest Rate Decisions**: There is a high probability that the Federal Reserve will initiate interest rate cuts in September, with expectations of two cuts within the year, influenced by the current labor market conditions and fiscal policies [10][20]. - **Economic Implications of the "Great Beautiful Act"**: The act, signed on Independence Day, is expected to have short-term economic effects, but its long-term impact requires further analysis, particularly on various sectors such as services and manufacturing [7][8]. Other Important but Potentially Overlooked Content - **Debt and Deficit Projections**: The new fiscal legislation is projected to expand the deficit to approximately $4.1 trillion over the next decade, with a potential debt-to-GDP ratio reaching 130% by 2033, raising concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability [11][13][15]. - **Sector Performance in A-Share Market**: The A-share market shows strong sentiment, particularly in sectors like non-bank financials, insurance, and consumer goods, which are expected to perform well due to supportive earnings and favorable valuations [21][22]. - **Macroeconomic Policy Directions in China**: Future macroeconomic policies in China will focus on stabilizing the real estate market, expanding domestic demand, and promoting technological innovation, which are crucial for overall economic stability [23][24]. - **Investment Opportunities**: Long-term investment potential is identified in sectors such as energy, basic chemicals, and consumer electronics, with a focus on areas that exhibit strong earnings support and favorable valuations [24][25][26].

Group 1 - International gold prices experienced a significant increase, rising by $62.76 or 1.92% for the week ending July 4, marking the best performance in three weeks [1] - The rise in gold prices was driven by uncertainties in trade negotiations and concerns over fiscal risks associated with the "Big and Beautiful" plan, alongside expectations of a Federal Reserve rate cut and a weakening dollar [1][3] - The U.S. non-farm payroll data released showed an increase of 147,000 jobs in June, with the unemployment rate unexpectedly dropping to 4.1%, which overshadowed some of the positive momentum in the gold market [2] Group 2 - The uncertainty surrounding the so-called "reciprocal tariffs" remains, with President Trump announcing plans to impose tariffs of up to 70% on certain goods, which has attracted safe-haven buying in gold [3] - The "Big and Beautiful" tax and spending bill is projected to increase the existing $36.2 trillion national debt by $3.4 trillion, raising concerns about the sustainability of U.S. fiscal policy and the stability of the debt market [4] - Speculative long positions in gold are increasing, with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange reporting an increase of 7,918 contracts to a total of 443,920 contracts as of July 4 [6]

美国财长贝森特：（关于财政部和美联储的职位）：我将按照总统的意愿行事。 ...

Core Points - The "Big and Beautiful" tax and spending bill signed by President Trump on July 4 marks a significant legislative move, reflecting Republican priorities and diminishing Democratic political capital [1][2] - The bill extends many provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, increasing tax exemptions and military spending while cutting social welfare programs [1][3] - Critics argue that the bill disproportionately benefits high-income earners and exacerbates income inequality, with potential negative impacts on low-income households [2][6] Tax and Spending Provisions - The bill raises tax exemption thresholds, including a $25,000 exemption for tip income and a $12,500 exemption for overtime income, while also increasing military spending by $157 billion [1][3] - It eliminates subsidies for clean energy and imposes stricter work requirements for Medicaid, affecting over 7 million people by 2034 [3][4] - Food stamp benefits will be reduced for approximately 40 million people, impacting vulnerable populations including children and the elderly [3][4] Economic Implications - The effectiveness of the tax cuts in stimulating economic growth is questioned, with historical data suggesting limited impact on growth and increasing federal debt [7][8] - The new tariffs are expected to have a negative effect on the economy, with rising consumer costs and potential inflationary pressures [8][9] - Employment levels may not improve significantly, as the bill's measures to increase work requirements could overlook the contributions of undocumented workers [9] Political Context - The passage of the bill reflects a partisan divide, with Republicans leveraging their slim majority to push through legislation that may disadvantage Democrats ahead of the midterm elections [2][6][10] - The upcoming midterm elections will serve as a referendum on the bill, influencing the political landscape for both parties [10]

Group 1 - COMEX gold inventory recorded at 1144.16 tons on July 3, a decrease of 8.17 tons from the previous trading day [1][2] - COMEX gold price closed at 3346.50 USD/ounce on July 4, up 0.31%, with an intraday high of 3355.00 USD/ounce and a low of 3332.80 USD/ounce [1][2] Group 2 - The recent fiscal legislation proposed by Trump aims to make the 2017 tax cuts permanent and introduces new tax deductions, including exemptions for tips and overtime pay [2] - The legislation includes significant cuts to Medicaid, making it harder for low-income Americans to qualify, and tightens food stamp regulations [2] - The bill allocates over 46 billion USD for border security and immigration enforcement, while raising the debt ceiling by 5 trillion USD [2] - The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the new fiscal legislation will increase the U.S. deficit by 3.4 trillion USD over the next decade [2] - The national debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to rise from 97.8% to over 125%, significantly higher than the CBO's earlier forecast of 117.1% [2]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - The central government's fiscal policy remains actively oriented, with increased investment in people's livelihood, consumption, and long - term development. In 2024, special bonds supported over 40,000 projects and contributed over 350 billion yuan as project capital. From January to May 2025, new local bonds worth 1.98 trillion yuan were issued, a 36.6% increase [5]. - Local government debt management continues to be strengthened. In 2024, the number of local financing platforms decreased by more than 7,000. As of June 29, 2025, the issuance of refinancing bonds for replacing existing implicit debt reached 1.8 trillion yuan, completing 89.8% of the quota [5]. - The issuance scale and net financing of local government bonds and urban investment bonds have changed. The issuance and net financing of local government bonds increased significantly this week, while the issuance scale of urban investment bonds rose, and the net financing turned positive [5]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1. News Review - **2024 Central Final Account Draft and Review Report**: In 2024, fiscal reform and development achieved new progress. The central final account was generally favorable. In 2025, more active fiscal policies were implemented, and local government debt management was strengthened. The number of financing platforms decreased by over 7,000. Future work will focus on optimizing fiscal policies and debt management [5]. - **Inner Mongolia Optimizes Special Bond Management Mechanism and Sichuan Supports Cultural and Tourism Industry Financing**: Inner Mongolia issued an implementation opinion to optimize special bond management from six aspects. Sichuan introduced a decision to support the cultural and tourism industry, which is beneficial for the financing and transformation of cultural and tourism - related urban investment enterprises [5]. - **26 Urban Investment Enterprises Pre - paid Bond Principal and Interest**: This week, 26 urban investment enterprises pre - paid bond principal and interest, involving 27 bonds with a total scale of 6.146 billion yuan, an increase of 2.06 billion yuan from the previous value [5]. - **Two Urban Investment Bonds Cancelled Issuance**: "25 Guangzhou Metro MTN002" and "25 Huai'an Huai'an PPN002" cancelled issuance, with a planned total issuance scale of 2.1 billion yuan. As of June 29, 60 urban investment bonds had been postponed or cancelled this year, with a total scale of 37.448 billion yuan [5]. 3.2. Issuance of Local Government Bonds and Urban Investment Enterprise Bonds - **Local Government Bonds**: This week, 161 local government bonds were issued, with a scale of 641.64 billion yuan, a 145.13% increase from the previous value. The net financing increased by 350.68% to 560.352 billion yuan. The weighted average issuance rate rose by 9.97BP to 1.82%, and the weighted average issuance spread widened by 1.17BP to 11.36BP [5]. - **Urban Investment Bonds**: 213 urban investment bonds were issued, with a scale of 136.601 billion yuan, a 5.99% increase from the previous value. The net financing increased by 449.77 billion yuan to 12.344 billion yuan. The average issuance rate was 2.27%, a 2.49BP increase from the previous value, and the issuance spread widened by 2.82BP to 80.71BP [5]. 3.3. Trading of Local Government Bonds and Urban Investment Bonds - **Urban Investment Rating Adjustment**: On June 24, Zhongchengxin International upgraded the ratings of Hunan Liuyang Urban and Rural Development Group Co., Ltd. and its related bonds from AA+ to AAA. On June 25, Lianhe Credit Rating upgraded the rating of Hunan Yongzhou Xiaoxiangyuan Urban Development Group Co., Ltd. from AA+ to AAA [5]. - **Urban Investment Credit Events and Regulatory Penalties**: No urban investment credit risk events occurred this week [5]. - **Local Government Bonds**: The spot trading volume of local government bonds was 546.611 billion yuan, a 0.40% increase from the previous value. The maturity yields generally increased, with an average increase of 2.29BP [5]. - **Urban Investment Bonds**: The trading volume of urban investment bonds was 377.672 billion yuan, a 0.33% decrease from the previous value. The maturity yields generally increased, with an average increase of 1.78BP. The spreads of 1 - year, 3 - year, and 5 - year AA+ urban investment bonds widened [5]. - **Abnormal Trading of Urban Investment Bonds**: Under the broad - based definition, 22 urban investment entities' 23 bonds had 27 abnormal trades, with a decrease in the number of entities, bonds, and abnormal trading times [5]. 3.4. Important Announcements of Urban Investment Enterprises This week, 33 urban investment enterprises issued announcements regarding changes in senior management, legal representatives, directors, supervisors, etc., as well as changes in controlling shareholders, actual controllers, equity/asset transfers, suspected disciplinary violations, and business scope changes [5].